Skip to player
Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Comments
Bookmark
Share
Add to Playlist
Report
Maj Gen Jagatbir Singh (Retd.), Distinguished Fellow, United Service Institute of India and Editor, Salute speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on implications of US initiating peace talks with Russia | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
Follow
2/27/2025
Maj Gen Jagatbir Singh (Retd.), Distinguished Fellow, United Service Institute of India and Editor, Salute speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on implications of US initiating peace talks with Russia | SAM Conversation
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Welcome to SAM Conversation, a program of South Asia Monitor.
00:14
Today our topic is U.S. Initiating Peace Talks with Russia.
00:21
It is our pleasure to welcome Major General Jagatbir Singh, retired Distinguished Fellow
00:28
United Service Institution of India and Editor, The Salute Magazine.
00:35
Yesterday, 24th February 2025, marked three years of the Russo-Ukraine War, which began
00:51
exactly on 24th February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine as part of an escalation of
01:04
its earlier war, which began in 2014, considered as the largest and deadliest of conflicts
01:17
in Europe since World War II.
01:21
It has caused hundreds of thousands of military casualties, tens of thousands of Ukrainian
01:29
civilian casualties and over the three years of this conflict, Ukraine has lost about 20%
01:40
of its territory to the Russians.
01:44
From a population of about 41 million, about 8 million are reported to be displaced and
01:56
more than 8.2 million of Ukrainians have fled, resulting in the largest of refugee crisis
02:03
since World War II.
02:08
Russia always avoided any public condemnation of Russia for this conflict at a time when
02:16
no nation helped India with urgently required weaponry.
02:23
It was the USSR, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, also known as Soviet Union, which
02:34
supplied up to 80% of our requirements for the army, navy and air force at political
02:43
prices under the Treaty of Peace and Friendship and Cooperation, framed in 1971.
02:56
Just as the Russo-Ukraine war was about to complete three years, the second time US President
03:07
Donald Trump literally played his trump card by splitting with his European allies and
03:18
not just refusing to blame Russia for its invasion but also shaking hands with Vladimir
03:26
Putin with a view to stopping this war as a part of his attempt to get this war to stop
03:43
and there seems to be some light at the end of the tunnel.
03:50
General Jagatpeer, you are someone who has been following this for the last three years.
04:04
From some brief comments about how and why it began and thereafter, whatever we can have
04:11
from you, please.
04:12
Good evening, sir.
04:13
And firstly, I thank you very much for calling me to be part of this podcast by Sam.
04:22
And it's indeed wonderful for me to be here present with you all and all your viewers.
04:27
And I consider it a rare honor and privilege to be called to this platform to give my views
04:33
on the Russia-Ukraine war.
04:35
I call it, I say today that a turning point is visible.
04:40
Now, as you rightly said, as we were approaching the third anniversary, the conflict today
04:46
is at a turning point and a sign of that was the latest issue of The Economist magazine
04:53
that shows a picture representative of the President of the US, Trump, with his back
05:00
turned.
05:01
So literally, as you said, he's turned his back on his European allies.
05:06
Everyone thought at the beginning of the war that, you know, the problem was NATO expanding
05:11
into towards Russia.
05:14
And then people said in between that NATO's expanded by taking Norway and Sweden and other
05:19
countries into their fold.
05:21
And today, what you've seen is a complete reversal of US policy, that the first signs
05:27
were visible on 12th February.
05:30
And those signs were visible earlier when the election campaign was going on.
05:36
At that time, President, I mean, that time he was not President, he was candidate of
05:39
the Republican Party, former President Trump, he termed it as a ridiculous war.
05:46
So no one could have imagined this sudden reversal, sudden turnabout.
05:51
And today, literally, I say that NATO is facing its biggest existential crisis that it's faced
06:01
because bulk of the funding for NATO was done by the United States.
06:08
And constant refrain was that the European powers need to, you know, step up on their
06:13
defense spending.
06:16
Bulk of the things, people and resources were given by the United States throughout when
06:21
they were confronting Soviet Union.
06:24
But after the Cold War collapsed in 1991.
06:29
And that's when the seeds of this whole thing started.
06:32
You see, there are three ways of looking at it.
06:35
Everybody the world over says this war started in 2024, Feb 2024.
06:40
A Ukrainian will say it started in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea.
06:46
But if you look back, as far as Russian imperialist designs, I won't even say Soviet Union, you
06:52
know, get back to the Soviet Empire, I'll say Russian imperialist designs were that
06:58
after 1991, they felt weakened because at that time, President Reagan at that time and
07:06
a security advisor very famously made a statement that NATO will not expand that inch eastward.
07:12
And then you've seen this steady expansion of NATO.
07:15
And you've seen these agreements, which are all thrown to the winds, literally the Minks
07:19
Agreement and all, where, you know, the nuclear weapons, which were Russian nuclear weapon
07:25
station in Ukraine, they were removed.
07:28
So I mean, Russia was looking at this, they've considered the Ukrainians as a Slavic people
07:36
more aligned to them than to Western Europe.
07:39
And they felt that the minute it was a red line for them, NATO getting into Ukraine.
07:45
And they had one set of rules for Belorussia.
07:48
And they wanted to apply the same set of rules as far as Ukraine goes.
07:54
Maybe the war, since you asked me to talk a bit on this, initially, everyone thought
07:58
when the war took place that, you know, it was perceived that it would be an overwhelming
08:03
result in Ukraine's, in Russian's favor, they'll just go over, but go through, you know, Ukraine
08:10
like a knife, hot knife through butter, that never happened.
08:16
Thereafter, analysts felt that Russia would collapse because the sanctions imposed, the
08:22
combined West, arming of Ukraine, and the support of the population, the losses you
08:29
talked about, Russia apparently has lost 1,75,000 combatants, now that's a lot, that's about,
08:37
you can imagine over three years, every month, how many they, it adds up to.
08:42
So that's a lot, which losses which have taken place, but no one is sure of the exact figures,
08:47
but there are large amounts of people who've been displaced, like you said.
08:51
And apart from this, there are a large amount of fatalities, to the extent that Russia even
08:56
had to get in, when the key, the inclusion into Kursk took place, they had to get in
09:02
troops from North Korea.
09:05
And I'm told that there are a large amount of troops who have been, suffered casualties
09:10
there also, about one third of the North Koreans have suffered casualties.
09:13
So that is the, today the West is divided, the first sign of that was, you know, as I
09:19
said, during the election campaign.
09:21
And after that, you had the comments of the Defense Secretary Peter Hesget on the 12th
09:28
of February, when he spoke at a conference, a NATO conference, thereafter, you had the
09:34
Vice President, literally showing a mirror to Europeans at the Munich Security Conference.
09:42
And the latest thing is, I mean, that the West was even divided on the language of the
09:49
statement to be brought out on to mark the third year, which was yesterday by the G7.
09:55
And the resolution, which was to be passed in the UN General Assembly, and I'm not talking
10:01
about the Security Council, in the General Assembly, against condemning this invasion
10:07
of Ukraine, Russia, US, North Korea, and Iran, were the three countries, I mean, were
10:19
amongst the 18 countries, four of them, which voted against it.
10:23
Now just see, which are the countries, how things have changed so fast.
10:27
India of course, has been consistent in its stance and it abstained.
10:31
So you had countries like France and UK and all, you know, Germany, they voted for it.
10:38
93 voted for it, 18 against and 65 abstained, including India, China, and Brazil.
10:44
So all the BRIC countries, except for Russia, abstained.
10:49
So look at the changes that have taken place in world geopolitics.
10:54
It's something that nobody could have imagined.
10:57
No analyst imagined it, none of the analysts imagined it.
11:00
I've listened to numerous analysts from, you know, various think tanks of the US, nobody
11:06
even, in fact, even today, the language is that, you know, the opposite, that it's basically
11:12
pro-Ukrainian thing, the narrative which is coming out.
11:17
So I mean, this nobody could imagine.
11:19
So as I said, and there have been attritional conflicts, marginal gains have taken place.
11:27
And as you rightly brought out, sir, economies of both countries are suffering.
11:32
Ukraine has been damaged to a large degree, there are immense amount of casualties and
11:40
President Trump promised to end the war.
11:43
And he's, after being sidelined throughout by President Joe Biden, he, I mean, nobody
11:49
will talk to Putin and all that.
11:52
Today what happened?
11:53
Zelensky has been called a dictator.
11:58
And President Trump has spoken on a 90-minute conference call with President Putin to try
12:05
to resolve the thing.
12:07
And following that conversation, see how fast things move.
12:11
Within three to four days, there have been negotiations which took place, not in a European
12:16
country, because there's no European country which is neutral, except for Switzerland.
12:21
So where did the negotiations take place in Riyadh?
12:25
And who was there at the negotiations?
12:27
The people present at the negotiations were the Americans, represented by the Secretary
12:32
of State, by the NSA, by Stephen Wilcox, who's the person in charge of Middle East, his envoy.
12:40
And Lavrov was there.
12:42
So that's the level.
12:44
So the talks are, look at the number of different talks taking place.
12:49
There are talks in Riyadh to end the war.
12:51
European leaders have met separately.
12:53
And at the General Assembly, you have a vote talking to end the war.
12:56
So there are three parallel things going on.
13:02
It's really a bunch of surprises, you know.
13:06
But going back three years ago, you know, it was, one clearly remembers that there were
13:14
enough of warnings that were issued by Vladimir Putin that look, don't, don't get into this
13:23
NATO, you know, don't get, get into them.
13:29
But Vladimir Zelensky was, was, was bent, was evil.
13:36
He had, he was seeing his own, you know, what he thought was a very bright side.
13:43
And this carried on the way, the way this man has, you know, allowed his country to
13:51
get, you know, so badly bashed up.
13:55
Just because there's a host of NATO countries, which are supplying him with weaponry.
14:04
Entire NATO was supplying him with weaponry.
14:09
You know, when you look back at, one is not, one is not trying to, I don't want to sound
14:15
like a moralist, but now when you look back at Biden's tenure, look at what he's achieved,
14:22
what he, what he's done for the, for the Americans.
14:25
Yes, you're absolutely right, as far as your comments are concerned, sir, there's no doubt
14:34
of what has happened.
14:35
The red lines were visible and, but no one thought that Russia would, you know, cross
14:39
because slowly America, the West has been crossing multiple red lines and taking many
14:46
other countries under the umbrella of NATO.
14:50
And today I'd say there's even a divide between Eastern Europe and Western Europe, because
14:57
Western Europe has the money, they have the resources, but they're spending less on defence
15:02
because they feel less threatened, whereas Eastern Europe, it is totally the opposite.
15:09
As far as Eastern Europe is concerned, they're spending more on defence and they are worried
15:13
about their borders with Russia, which, you know, so Poland is one country, but at the
15:20
contrary, when you look at it, how many of them are actually willing to put boots on
15:24
the ground?
15:26
That was something that was missing.
15:28
So rightly saying, and if we go back into history, we're all aware of all the revolution
15:34
that took place there, the removal of presidents and how Zelensky came into power and what
15:39
happened.
15:40
I think let's not go there.
15:41
So let's talk about the future.
15:42
What about the negotiations?
15:43
What's going to happen?
15:44
How's that going to take place?
15:45
What do you know?
15:46
How can you resolve issues which are incompatible collisions of reality?
15:55
Everybody has their own take on this.
15:58
So where will you come to a common meeting ground, sir?
16:01
According to some reports, there seems to be, Zelensky is sort of actually feeling the
16:13
pinch now because there are statements being attributed to him, you know, should I step
16:20
down or, you know, may even accept a part of his country being, never know what comes
16:34
out in the next few days, literally.
16:37
But all we can be very thankful about is that I think there is a, I think we can say the
16:46
beginning of the end is approaching, you know, and as far as India is concerned, it's a kind
16:54
of a vindication that we remained neutral as a military man and we are both from the
17:07
armoured corps. We both used the T-series of Russian tanks, T-54s, T-55s, which we needed
17:21
very badly in 1971.
17:24
And then later, those of us who used their equipment, which we got very timely, there's no
17:36
denying a soft corner, well, that's, I won't go to more than that, you know, into personal
17:46
opinions. But the fact remains that as a country, we remained, you know, quite consistently
17:53
neutral. And I think it was very significant when Mr. Narendra Modi said, I'm on the side of
18:05
peace. He put that, that one, you know, statement of his stands out.
18:16
Jagatvir?
18:17
You cover a lot of ground, sir, so I'll go over each issue separately and little slowly, sir.
18:25
The first issue is the ceasefire talks which have started and preceding the talks, very
18:32
important statement was given out by the Secretary of Defence for the US, when he
18:37
categorically said that it is very difficult and he said it's unrealistic for Ukraine to get
18:45
back the territory that has been captured or lost.
18:49
The second issue, which he said, which I feel was more important than the first issue, was
18:54
the first issue everybody in their minds had felt and yes, that is there.
18:59
Second issue is when he said that there's no question of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO.
19:09
Now, that's a huge, huge step.
19:11
And the third issue, he said that even if anybody positions their troops in NATO for
19:16
anything, Article 5 will not apply.
19:19
So you've seen in one stroke, in one day on 12th of February, how the matrix changed
19:26
completely. So that's one thing.
19:28
And now when the talks took place, I've been reading about that.
19:33
Three other things have been said.
19:35
I mean, everybody is going to focus on, you know, rebuilding how this ceasefire will take
19:40
place. What are the security guarantees?
19:42
And when I think when President Putin said that, you know, he's a dictator, he never won
19:47
election. He, President Zelensky, in two steps, threw the last card he had.
19:53
He said, in that case, I'm willing to resign, but give me NATO membership.
19:57
Now, surely NATO membership doesn't hinge on his being president or not being president.
20:03
Irrespective of who is president of Ukraine, President Putin will, I mean, Russia will
20:10
not see X or Y or Z as the president of Ukraine and membership for NATO.
20:16
I mean, so I mean, that's, I call it like almost like a red herring being thrown there.
20:22
So that's one thing.
20:23
So this alternative of NATO membership were discussed earlier, but with the American
20:31
statement brought out and the way they talked in the summit in Munich and, you know,
20:38
Munich, of course, they never touched it, but the earlier summit and after that, I think
20:42
they're totally ruled out.
20:43
And in fact, now what I've been given to understand is that we focused, one of the
20:49
issues discussed in the talks was, you know, restoring the embassy staff between US and
20:54
Russia back to the earlier levels, creating a high level team for negotiation and
20:59
exploring ways to, you know, strengthen economic cooperation.
21:03
So what they're hinting at is Russia wants, naturally, they want the sanctions lifted.
21:08
So if the sanctions are lifted, that's swift, which was that, you know, financial
21:13
currency, stopping the financial currencies from being transferred to each other.
21:19
That will go. There'll be part and parcel of the, you know, globalized world order
21:25
again, as far as trade goes.
21:27
So, I mean, these are huge things.
21:29
And he, President Putin is going to get his, demand his pound of flesh.
21:38
Now, a lot of people have talked of how do you ensure security guarantees?
21:42
One of the things people said is the best security guarantee, apart from peacekeeping
21:47
troops, is to say that Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
21:52
And if they violate it, then Ukraine can be taken as a member of NATO.
21:56
Now, US has negated that.
21:59
Next, without US support, how long can Ukraine last?
22:04
What are the percentage of weapons?
22:06
What is the percentage of money being pumped in by US?
22:11
All these long range missiles, the air defense systems, a lot of them are from US.
22:17
Today, he'll, earlier President Biden had denied certain targets by him and all to be
22:23
used. Today, he'll stop supplying those systems.
22:27
Then what happens? How much ammunition do they have?
22:30
We all know how ammunition is calculated, how they come in.
22:33
Say if your chain goes for that, I think maximum couple of three to six months is what
22:39
the reserves they'll have.
22:41
And how do you encounter that?
22:43
How do you overcome that?
22:45
So this is something which I've talked about.
22:47
The next thing is, how do you enforce the peace?
22:51
Who's going to, who will do that?
22:53
Who's going to ensure?
22:55
The biggest problem for Ukraine is security guarantees.
22:59
So what sort of security guarantees can be done?
23:06
Now, Prime Minister of Britain, the UK Prime Minister, he said we'll be willing to
23:12
provide peacekeepers.
23:14
We'll be willing to do this.
23:15
Earlier, France had offered.
23:17
Now, France is not that keen and Poland has ruled it out.
23:21
So, I mean, somebody has to come in.
23:23
And today, President Putin has categorically said or the Russians have categorically said
23:29
that any peace, any forces from a NATO country will be seen as an infringement of the
23:39
NATO, you know, on our soil.
23:41
So, I mean, on Ukraine's soil.
23:43
So, I mean, that's an issue that people have to think of.
23:47
So the next issue you raise, sir, is the most important one, and that is India's stance
23:55
during the war and how the implication of this will affect India.
23:59
So you very correctly said that India, our Prime Minister said this is not a era for
24:08
war. So I've said that India has been consistent in its stand throughout.
24:14
And we've always focused on dialogue and diplomacy.
24:18
We've held a balanced position.
24:20
And our Prime Minister has visited both Kiev and Moscow.
24:23
He's engaged with both the leaders.
24:25
We also, like you talked of, you know, tanks coming from Russia.
24:31
Yes. But part of our equipment came from Soviet Union and the Soviet Union defense
24:37
industrial complex is scattered.
24:39
And a large part of that was in Ukraine, some portion of that.
24:44
Yes. So we've got our aircraft from there, our AN series of aircraft came from there,
24:49
the AN-32.
24:50
But that's one thing.
24:52
The overall of the AN-32 has also been delayed because of this.
24:56
But apart from that, we also get all the gas turbine engines for our ships from there.
25:01
So we get a lot of engines from there.
25:03
And two of those facilities were hit by Russian missiles.
25:07
So we've had disruptions in our supply chain.
25:09
So then you have disruptions as far as your spares go.
25:13
For almost 10 years, for almost 10 years after the breakup of USSR, we had, you know,
25:22
this thing, a crisis of spares.
25:26
Absolutely. Which has again taken place now.
25:29
But, you know, so that was something that is known, everybody knows, because will they
25:34
give other countries spares or will they focus on their own thing?
25:37
So and when a facility gets damaged, that trade, it takes time to rebuild it.
25:43
So that's one thing. Other thing is that look at the economic downside of the whole
25:47
thing. We've been accused by the West of getting oil from Russia at cheaper prices.
25:54
That's there.
25:55
But the cost of fuel, because of the tension, the cost of fuel has gone up, fertilizer has
26:01
gone up, food has gone up.
26:02
So as a result, inflation has gone up.
26:04
As a result, currencies have fallen.
26:07
And you've seen the result of the Indian currency weakening on the stock market.
26:13
So, I mean, it's all a cascading effect.
26:15
So as far as I'm concerned, I feel the best news is to stop this war.
26:21
No military person wants war.
26:23
But the problem is how you can resolve the differences which are so deep rooted.
26:28
And I personally feel that, though I've always maintained that the two countries who can
26:34
stop this war are US and Russia.
26:36
There's no third country.
26:38
But for them, but for this, I always maintain that Ukraine should be part of that
26:44
negotiation. So you may like to sideline European powers, but you cannot afford to not
26:50
have Ukraine as part of the negotiation.
26:53
So that's why I think.
26:55
But what stands out, sir, because of all this is the way today the US has changed track
27:03
from one side to the other or reversed its position.
27:07
And suddenly you said, surprised.
27:10
I'll admit that the Europeans were shocked.
27:14
They were shocked. It was almost a sense of disbelief in most European capital.
27:19
And that disbelief is carrying on in the analysts, you see.
27:23
So what does it show you?
27:24
That today you have to have your own capability to stand on your own feet.
27:28
You must have developed your own hard part because anybody can, if you're too dependent on
27:34
somebody, they can, what if they choose a point and a time to discard you when you're most
27:40
vulnerable? So I mean, that's something that needs to be seen and something that we must
27:45
look at, sir. So for India, as I said, our multi-alignment policy.
27:49
I must say, sir, that this is something that has been extremely successful and we must, you
27:56
know, compliment the way we have carried out, walked the tightrope, as somebody said.
28:02
We again abstained from the vote today.
28:05
So we never took any side again.
28:07
And dialogue, I said, and also another issue that nobody talks of much is that, you know,
28:14
we couldn't afford to take any other stance because if we had taken a very pro-Western and US
28:20
stance, Russia would have gone closer to China.
28:23
And for us, a close alliance between China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, that has got far more
28:32
damaging consequences for India.
28:35
We have to have Russia on our side.
28:37
As you said, we've got old friendship, deep friendship.
28:41
They've supported us in 1971 war and they've been constantly by our side.
28:47
We also had a problem back to this defence exports.
28:52
You know, the problem with the S-400.
28:55
So the Americans were going to put CAATSA against us.
28:57
We got out of that. But now that fear is not there, sir.
29:01
So, you know, I think we need to end this Russian alienation, sir, and that removal of the
29:10
sanctions. And that's extremely important.
29:12
So, I mean, this is a very tricky time the world is in.
29:19
But as you said, there's some ray of hope that is there, sir.
29:22
I hope things work out and I hope things work out well as far as the conflict is concerned,
29:30
sir.
29:36
Put it across very relevantly and very clearly.
29:41
Whatever it is, I think there is no denying that Donald Trump needs to be thanked for
29:54
all it whatever is literally his trump card.
29:58
But something which he had, he showed that he had the guts to do.
30:04
There's so much this man was, you know, facing.
30:08
He's headstrong and he's, you know, whatever it is, all we can do is hope and pray that
30:17
this war is, you know, effectively ended.
30:23
Period.
30:25
Absolutely right, sir.
30:26
You know, all wars end sometimes, all wars end sometimes, but the manner in which they
30:32
end is important because the ending determines the peace that is to follow.
30:38
Both World War II and Cold War charted a new course as far as the security architecture
30:44
of Europe and the world is concerned.
30:46
So let's see.
30:48
I think there's a new security architecture being unveiled now and we'll see it as it
30:52
comes at the end of these talks.
30:55
And hopefully, you know, the complexities of this conflict preclude a very quick solution.
31:01
But regardless of the outcome of the negotiation, you know, the war in Ukraine has
31:06
already changed the character of conflicts to a great degree.
31:10
So but that's entirely a different issue.
31:12
So we won't get into that part.
31:15
Countries have to adapt to the new realities and the main credibility of the global
31:21
leaders and the policymakers today will be on how soon this conflict ends.
31:28
And unfortunately, no conflict has a fit all settlement.
31:32
That means everybody is there.
31:34
But the lessons of a fruitless war, you know, and like you brought up the damage and all,
31:41
can ensure that, you know, we have more of a lasting peace.
31:45
But what is the acceptable end is, you know, leaves a lot of scope for the correct
31:54
definitions as far as, you know, acceptable end for one may be something, acceptable end
31:59
for Europe may be something, for Russia may be something, for U.S.
32:04
may be something. But for bulk of the countries around the world, the acceptable end, the
32:08
start point is the war must end.
32:10
So this conflict must end and peace must come back.
32:15
So that's what I have to say, sir.
32:17
And once again, I thank you very much for calling me here to present my views.
32:23
No, it was very, very nice hearing all that you put across.
32:27
Thank you. All the best.
32:31
Thank you, sir.
Recommended
29:11
|
Up next
Maj Gen Sudhir Vombatkere (Retd.), strategic affairs commentator, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on applying India's ancient military wisdom to address its security challenges | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/13/2025
34:11
Dr. Harinder Sekhon, Distinguished Fellow, CUTS International and former Intelligence Analyst, National Security Council Secretariat, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on the need to review India-US relations | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
6/22/2025
27:43
Lt Gen Kamal Davar (Retd.) former DG, Defence Intelligence Agency & President, Delhi Forum for Strategic Studies speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on Israel-Iran war’s impact on India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
6/27/2025
30:26
Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan (Retd.) former ADG, Military Operations & Visiting Fellow, Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on India’s Op Sindoor and what it achieved | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/19/2025
30:23
Dr. Udai Bhanu Singh, former Senior Research Associate, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on changes in Myanmar affecting India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
1/21/2025
26:00
General MM Naravane (Retd.), former Indian Army Chief, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on his new book ‘The Cantonment Conspiracy’ | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
7/1/2025
21:18
Lt Gen A.K. Bhatt (retd), DG, Indian Space Association speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on new space-age opportunities for India's armed forces | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
11/22/2024
34:38
Maj Gen Rajan Kochhar (retd.) speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on India's defence budget | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/4/2025
30:28
Maj Gen Mrinal Suman (retd.), military analyst, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the current situation in Jammu & Kashmir | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/13/2024
13:26
Lt Gen Kamal Davar (Retd.) speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on how the world media viewed India’s Op Sindoor | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/20/2025
29:43
Lt Gen Kamal Davar (Retd.), former founder Director General of Defence Intelligence Agency and President of Delhi Forum for Strategic Studies, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on future of India-Bangladesh relations | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
3/1/2025
32:05
Maj Gen Prabir Chakravarty (Retd.) Additional Director General, Artillery and Advisor, BrahMos Aerospace speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on the drone war in the recent Indo-Pak conflict | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/25/2025
26:43
Lt Gen Rajan Bakshi (retd.), former GOC-in-C Central Command, Indian Army speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the continuing border standoff with China | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
9/22/2024
20:34
Dr Sreeradha Datta, Professor, Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India and Non resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, NUS, Singapore speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the crisis in Bangladesh and implications for India | SAM Convers
South Asia Monitor
8/10/2024
29:43
Lt. Gen. Kamal Davar (Retd), former Founder DG, Defence Intelligence Agency and President, Delhi Forum for Strategic Studies speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on political turmoil in Pakistan, Af-Pak hostilities and impact on India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/10/2025
36:13
Tenzin Lekshay, Spokesperson & Additional Secretary (International Relations), Central Tibetan Administration, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on the Dalai Lama's assertion on reincarnation and its implications| SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
7/9/2025
34:38
Former Indian Ambassador Dilip Sinha speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on his recent book “Imperial Games in Tibet: The Struggle for Statehood and Sovereignty”| SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
10/24/2024
28:38
Col Rajinder Singh Kushwaha (retd.), formerly of Bihar Regiment that lost 20 soldiers at Galwan in 2020, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on why China cannot be trusted | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
10/16/2024
30:51
Ashok Sajjanhar, former Indian ambassador speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on Quad and its future | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
9/24/2024
23:54
Dr. Smruti Pattanaik, Research Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the Bangladesh transition and its implications for South Asia | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
11/11/2024
31:03
Dr Aman Hingorani, Senior Advocate, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on his book Unravelling the Kashmir knot: Past, Present and Future | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
7/22/2024
11:45
Neil Makhija, Executive Director, IMPACT, the US-based South Asian civic organization, in conversation with Akshat Singh | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
1/8/2022
30:08
Aparna Rawal, security researcher and analyst, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on changing Af-Psk dynamics as Afghan Taliban warms up to India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
1/27/2025
36:50
Indian Ambassador Abhay Kumar speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on How Nalanda changed the world | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
4/12/2025
24:16
Ambassador Dilip Sinha (retd.) speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the turmoil in Bangladesh and its impact on India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
12/15/2024