Skip to player
Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Comments
Bookmark
Share
Add to Playlist
Report
Aparna Rawal, researcher-analyst on the AfPak region, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on Pakistan's recent alliances with terror networks and their implications for regional and global security | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
Follow
6/9/2025
Aparna Rawal, researcher-analyst on the AfPak region, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on Pakistan's recent alliances with terror networks and their implications for regional and global security | SAM Conversation
Category
🗞
News
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
Welcome to SAM Conversation, a program of South Asia Monitor.
00:15
We are today going to look at what all connections,
00:22
new connections that Pakistan has made with more terrorist groups.
00:30
To discuss this, we have Ms. Aparna Rawal, Editor, The Strategic Perspective.
00:44
Thank you for having me, sir.
00:48
Before we get into the recent connections that Pakistan has made with the different terrorist groups or outfits,
00:58
it's important to also remember most of these links that Pakistan is remaking with the terrorist groups
01:08
are already existing from a long time ago.
01:11
Pakistan, since the conception of India and Pakistan,
01:16
has always resorted to a form of warfare, which has been to exhaust India.
01:25
If you let me put it this way, that right from the time Pakistan was born in 1947,
01:33
their very first war which they launched, was launched with this outsourcing,
01:41
outsourcing to 25,000 tribals.
01:45
But, of course, with the Pakistan army being there very much.
01:51
And that has continued.
01:53
You know, that in 1965 also they made use of tribals.
01:57
So did they in 1971.
02:00
And then, of course, once Ziaul Haq,
02:05
the third dictator president,
02:07
once he decided that, you know,
02:09
we should go for the option of bleeding India by a thousand cuts.
02:15
Then this outsourcing became institutionalized
02:18
with, you know,
02:20
jihadi groups which are supported
02:24
and sponsored, supported
02:26
and trained by Pakistan army
02:30
and the inter-services intelligence.
02:32
So what we understand
02:36
from the way Pakistan approaches
02:39
towards India,
02:41
it's more in the form of like an attrition warfare.
02:44
What they are doing is
02:46
they're trying to exhaust India
02:47
by deploying terrorist outfits
02:50
which are homegrown
02:51
or even foreign fighters.
02:53
When we say foreign fighters,
02:55
we are looking at Al-Qaeda.
02:57
We know that ISI has a very strong connection
02:59
with Al-Qaeda
03:00
because most of its foreign fighters,
03:04
the operatives,
03:05
still thrive on the Pakistani soil.
03:07
And this is also being backed
03:09
by major networks
03:10
like the Jaish-e-Mohammed,
03:12
Lakshari Taiba.
03:14
Yes.
03:15
And most of these
03:16
come together to support one another.
03:19
Now, because of this attrition warfare
03:22
that we are seeing,
03:23
this is also one of the reasons
03:24
why Pakistan is not succeeding.
03:26
Because if it was a restricted area
03:29
that it was trying to target
03:30
or if it was trying to target
03:32
a country with limited resources,
03:34
maybe it would have been advantages
03:36
to Pakistan.
03:38
Unfortunately, that has not worked.
03:40
However, Pakistan continues
03:42
to pump out
03:43
most of its terror outfits
03:45
while trying to maintain
03:48
some kind of a deniability.
03:50
The deniability is that
03:52
the state doesn't do this.
03:54
We are doing counterterrorism.
03:55
However, this is turning out
03:57
to be very contradictory
03:58
given that Pakistan
04:01
has not even complied
04:02
with anti-terrorism law,
04:05
which was one of the main conditions
04:07
that FATF had given Pakistan
04:10
to be removed from the gray list
04:11
in 2022.
04:14
Hence, India is going to push a dossier
04:16
which will ask FATF
04:19
to re-enlist Pakistan
04:21
back on the gray list.
04:23
So, when we are looking...
04:25
Yes.
04:28
You know,
04:29
after this recent launch
04:31
of Operation Sindhuur,
04:33
which is now...
04:34
It's been a month now,
04:36
you know,
04:36
since it was launched.
04:39
And it's had some
04:41
very, very, you know,
04:43
major effect of
04:44
the targeting
04:45
that has been achieved
04:47
by Indian Army, Navy,
04:49
and particularly Air Force.
04:50
Indian Army and Air Force
04:51
have been very, very debilitating
04:54
on Pakistan's armed forces.
04:57
However,
04:58
I do not see the...
05:01
And though India may have destroyed
05:03
nine terrorist camps,
05:07
there are still
05:08
a number of thousands
05:09
of terrorists
05:10
up and about.
05:12
And I don't expect
05:13
Pakistan Army
05:14
or the ISI
05:16
or, for that matter,
05:17
the state,
05:18
the Pakistani state
05:20
to sever their
05:21
connections
05:22
with these
05:23
jihadi groups.
05:24
Yes.
05:25
That is
05:26
the likelihood
05:27
of how things
05:29
will be
05:29
because as long
05:30
as Pakistan exists,
05:31
its modus operandi
05:32
has...
05:33
now you...
05:34
I am
05:35
looking forward
05:37
for you
05:37
to bring out
05:39
whether there
05:40
are going to be
05:41
or whether there
05:42
already are
05:42
some new connections.
05:44
There are
05:45
some new connections,
05:46
but
05:47
Pakistan
05:48
is trying
05:49
to rekindle
05:50
old reconnections
05:51
too
05:52
because initially
05:53
the problem
05:54
with Pakistan
05:55
has been
05:55
it thrives
05:57
on pushing
05:58
out proxy wars
06:00
through
06:00
these outfits.
06:01
it works
06:02
with a certain
06:03
element
06:03
for some time.
06:05
As long as
06:06
the ideologies
06:07
coincide,
06:09
it will
06:09
utilize it.
06:10
But at some
06:10
point,
06:11
these terror
06:11
outfits
06:12
also move
06:13
away
06:13
from the
06:14
ISI connection,
06:15
which we could
06:15
see also
06:16
in the case
06:16
of Taliban.
06:18
Taliban
06:18
was a creation
06:19
of Pakistan.
06:20
U.S.
06:21
Actually,
06:22
it's important
06:22
to mention
06:24
this.
06:26
Until
06:27
1993,
06:28
Pakistan
06:29
was always
06:29
on the
06:30
designated
06:30
terror list.
06:31
by the
06:32
U.S.
06:33
But the
06:33
moment
06:33
Pakistan
06:34
joined
06:35
the war
06:35
on terror,
06:36
now the
06:36
duplicit
06:37
nature
06:37
of Pakistan
06:38
is this,
06:39
that it
06:39
takes the
06:40
funds from
06:41
a certain
06:41
country,
06:42
pretending
06:43
that it's
06:43
doing
06:44
counter-terrorism,
06:45
while it's
06:45
siphoning the
06:46
rest of it
06:46
towards producing
06:48
these outfits,
06:48
who are also
06:49
doing two
06:50
things at
06:51
one time.
06:52
So we
06:52
saw the
06:53
creation of
06:54
Taliban
06:54
during this
06:55
time,
06:56
during the
06:57
Soviet-Afghan
06:58
war.
06:59
Taliban
06:59
moved forward
07:00
into
07:01
Afghanistan,
07:02
they went
07:03
ahead,
07:03
fought.
07:05
Then
07:05
afterwards,
07:06
when the
07:07
Russians
07:07
withdrew,
07:08
these people
07:09
returned back
07:10
to Pakistan.
07:12
Since,
07:13
and during
07:13
this time,
07:14
now this is
07:15
important that
07:16
I'm mentioning
07:16
some of these
07:17
old ties,
07:18
because these
07:18
old ties are
07:19
again getting
07:19
renewed.
07:20
food, so
07:21
it's important
07:21
to mention
07:22
these also.
07:23
There was
07:23
a group
07:24
called
07:24
Sipaha
07:25
Sabah,
07:27
that is
07:28
SSP.
07:29
Sipahi
07:29
Sabah,
07:30
yes.
07:32
The SSP
07:33
is notable
07:34
for having
07:35
madrasas,
07:36
which had
07:36
also trained
07:37
the Mujahideens
07:38
who went
07:39
to fight
07:40
the Afghan
07:40
war.
07:41
And
07:41
interesting
07:42
enough,
07:43
when the
07:43
war was
07:44
done,
07:45
when these
07:45
outfits,
07:46
Taliban
07:48
Mujahideens,
07:49
when they
07:50
returned back
07:50
to Pakistan,
07:51
they were
07:51
rerouted and
07:53
made to
07:53
focus on
07:54
India's
07:55
Kashmir.
07:56
And this
07:57
is how it
07:58
has continued
07:58
ever since.
08:00
Now,
08:00
what we are
08:01
seeing recently
08:02
is that
08:03
there is a
08:04
re-emergence
08:05
of ISKP,
08:06
Islamic
08:06
Khurasan
08:07
in,
08:09
ISIS
08:10
Khurasan
08:10
in Pakistan.
08:12
And there
08:13
have been
08:13
reports of
08:14
the ISI
08:15
having some
08:17
kind of
08:18
an agreement
08:18
with ISKP.
08:21
They have
08:22
been given
08:22
some kind
08:24
of a safe
08:24
haven in
08:25
Balochistan
08:25
area,
08:26
mostly in
08:28
Mastung,
08:28
as we
08:29
have been
08:29
told.
08:31
ISKP
08:32
is a rival
08:33
group of
08:33
Taliban.
08:34
Taliban
08:34
and Pakistan
08:36
are no
08:36
longer getting
08:37
on good
08:38
terms because
08:39
of Afghan
08:40
refoulement,
08:41
the whole
08:42
border
08:42
smudges.
08:43
They are
08:43
on very
08:44
deadly
08:44
terms now.
08:44
Yes.
08:46
And not
08:47
only that,
08:48
China also
08:48
had asked
08:49
Taliban to
08:50
ban its
08:51
relations with
08:52
TTP.
08:53
There were
08:53
reports of
08:54
even Turkey
08:54
not being
08:55
happy,
08:56
I mean,
08:56
Tariqi,
08:57
Taliban,
08:57
Pakistan,
08:58
which has a
08:59
close affiliation
08:59
with Taliban,
09:00
Afghanistan.
09:02
So because
09:03
TTP has
09:04
decided to
09:05
wage war in
09:06
Pakistan,
09:06
Chinese assets
09:07
are coming
09:08
under threat.
09:09
China had
09:10
requested
09:10
Taliban to
09:12
separate itself
09:13
from TTP,
09:13
so had
09:14
Pakistan,
09:14
but Pakistan
09:16
hasn't got
09:16
any strategic
09:17
depth into
09:18
Afghanistan,
09:19
and hence
09:19
what has
09:19
happened is
09:20
it has
09:21
started giving
09:22
safe havens
09:23
to the
09:24
ISIS
09:24
Khurasan,
09:25
who is a
09:26
rival group
09:27
of Taliban.
09:29
ISIS always
09:30
wanted to
09:30
have Afghanistan
09:31
as a launching
09:32
pad for
09:33
Jihad and
09:34
control the
09:34
monopoly in
09:35
that region.
09:36
So ever
09:37
since Taliban
09:38
exited the
09:39
war theater,
09:40
we see
09:41
ISKP
09:41
trying to
09:43
start things
09:44
to discredit
09:45
Taliban,
09:46
because it
09:47
wants the
09:47
monopoly on
09:48
Jihad now.
09:50
Especially
09:50
around the
09:51
Durand line,
09:51
we see like
09:52
in areas of
09:53
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
09:54
and all,
09:54
you will see
09:55
like safe havens
09:56
which are being
09:56
provided to
09:57
also the
09:58
TTP fighters,
09:59
to a lot of
10:00
other groups,
10:01
which Pakistan
10:02
has created,
10:03
might not have
10:04
best relations
10:05
with anymore,
10:06
such as the
10:07
Hafiz Gul Bahadur
10:08
group,
10:08
so on.
10:10
So we see
10:10
that Pakistan
10:11
in order to
10:12
maintain its
10:14
space in front
10:15
of the rest
10:16
of the
10:16
Jihadist groups
10:17
has made
10:18
some kind
10:19
of agreement
10:19
with the
10:20
ISIS group,
10:22
the ISIS
10:22
in Khurasan,
10:23
not the
10:24
parent ISIS,
10:25
we are talking
10:25
about the
10:26
offshoot,
10:27
ISIS Khurasan.
10:29
And now
10:31
we are seeing
10:31
this in
10:32
Balochistan
10:32
area.
10:34
With these
10:34
people being
10:35
in Balochistan,
10:36
the Baloch
10:37
insurgents
10:38
are having
10:39
difficulty
10:40
because ISIS
10:40
has done
10:41
some kind
10:42
of an
10:42
agreement
10:42
that it
10:44
gives Pakistan
10:45
what it
10:46
wants while
10:46
it forgets
10:47
the safe
10:47
haven because
10:48
Taliban is
10:49
already out
10:50
witch hunting
10:51
or killing
10:52
off the
10:52
ISIS groups.
10:54
So last
10:55
month,
10:56
some of the
10:57
Baloch fighters,
10:58
the BLA,
10:59
have also
11:00
claimed
11:00
attacks,
11:01
responsibility
11:02
of the
11:03
attacks on
11:04
the ISK
11:04
basis,
11:06
especially in
11:06
Mastung.
11:07
They have
11:07
claimed openly
11:08
that these
11:09
safe havens
11:10
do exist.
11:11
Now,
11:12
while this
11:12
is going
11:12
on during
11:14
Operation
11:14
Sindhu,
11:15
the Baloch
11:15
also went
11:16
ahead and
11:17
claimed
11:18
freedom from
11:20
Pakistan.
11:21
And with
11:22
this happening,
11:23
we can
11:24
safely assume
11:24
that ISKP
11:26
will do the
11:27
bidding for
11:28
Pakistan and
11:29
attack the
11:30
Baloch in
11:31
names of
11:31
like turf
11:32
core that
11:33
you attract
11:34
us, hence
11:35
we attack
11:35
you.
11:37
Any idea
11:37
of the
11:40
strength of
11:42
this ISKP
11:44
Khorasan?
11:47
Because
11:48
that's a
11:48
problem.
11:50
At the
11:51
moment, it's
11:52
very hard to
11:52
predict or
11:53
get the exact
11:54
strength in
11:55
the area
11:55
because for
11:56
one, people
11:57
have been
11:58
making claims
11:58
that ISKP
11:59
has been
12:00
wiped out.
12:00
Some people
12:01
are saying
12:01
the strength
12:02
has been
12:02
reduced, hence
12:03
they have
12:03
moved to
12:04
the Mastung
12:05
area.
12:06
Plus, what
12:07
has happened
12:07
is most
12:09
of the
12:09
terror outfits
12:10
normally do
12:11
not have
12:12
the same
12:12
cadre or
12:13
the individuals
12:14
from that
12:15
outfits.
12:15
There are
12:16
a lot of
12:17
foreign
12:18
fighters that
12:19
come join
12:20
the outfit
12:20
temporarily
12:21
under the
12:22
banner.
12:23
They will
12:23
carry out
12:24
the operations
12:24
under the
12:25
banner, but
12:26
that doesn't
12:26
mean that
12:27
they are ISKP.
12:28
So it's
12:28
very hard to
12:29
determine exactly
12:30
how many
12:31
are a
12:32
part of
12:33
that at
12:33
this point.
12:34
But we
12:35
do know
12:35
that in
12:37
order to
12:37
counter
12:39
Taliban or
12:40
to counter
12:41
TTP,
12:42
Baloch
12:42
militants or
12:44
the SRA,
12:46
we know
12:46
that Baloch
12:47
have come
12:47
up with
12:48
the BRAS,
12:49
which is
12:50
the umbrella
12:50
network of
12:51
all the
12:51
militants
12:53
and insurgents.
12:54
it has
12:55
now transformed
12:55
into Baloch
12:56
National
12:57
Army, which
12:58
is going
12:58
to be a
12:59
bigger threat
12:59
for Pakistan.
13:01
And
13:01
sometimes
13:02
over the
13:03
time period
13:03
what has
13:04
happened is
13:05
the human
13:06
intelligence
13:08
and even
13:09
the networks
13:10
of the
13:10
Baloch
13:10
have increased
13:12
drastically.
13:12
Even the
13:13
tactical warfare
13:14
has improved
13:15
quite a bit.
13:16
And other
13:18
groups such
13:18
as the
13:19
Sindhu
13:19
Revolutionary
13:20
Army,
13:20
even TTPs,
13:22
sometimes they
13:23
join forces
13:24
to fight
13:24
the same
13:25
common enemy
13:26
which is
13:26
the Pakistani
13:27
administration
13:28
and the
13:28
military.
13:29
So with
13:30
this going
13:30
down,
13:31
we are
13:32
going to
13:32
now see
13:33
ISKP
13:34
probably
13:34
coming into
13:34
the forefront
13:35
because they
13:37
have already
13:37
issued a
13:39
warning to
13:40
the Baloch
13:40
saying that
13:41
it will
13:42
spare no
13:43
one.
13:43
This could
13:44
also affect
13:45
the Baloch
13:45
freedom
13:46
movement.
13:47
And we
13:48
can expect
13:48
that because
13:49
ISIS,
13:50
Khorasan,
13:50
is known
13:51
to attack
13:52
even the
13:53
civilians.
13:54
While the
13:54
Baloch
13:55
insurgents,
13:56
they try
13:57
to not
13:57
attack the
13:58
civilians.
13:59
They target
13:59
very specific
14:00
groups like
14:01
the military
14:02
establishments,
14:03
the government
14:03
establishments,
14:04
so on.
14:05
This is not
14:06
the case with
14:07
ISKP.
14:08
And we
14:08
know that
14:09
Pakistan will
14:10
employ them
14:11
to carry
14:12
up further
14:13
attacks.
14:14
Also because
14:15
the Chinese
14:15
threats are,
14:17
I mean,
14:17
the Chinese
14:18
are threatened
14:18
by the attacks
14:19
from the
14:19
Baloch
14:20
and so
14:20
on.
14:22
So with
14:23
this happening,
14:24
now we
14:24
can safely
14:25
assume that
14:26
ISKP will
14:27
also have
14:28
some kind
14:28
of attack
14:30
mode on
14:30
India as
14:31
well.
14:32
Not too
14:32
long ago,
14:33
some of the
14:34
commanders from
14:35
ISKP have
14:36
released a
14:36
statement that
14:37
India will
14:38
fight a
14:38
two-front
14:38
war.
14:39
One is
14:40
going to be
14:40
from the
14:41
Jammu-Kashmir
14:41
side, the
14:42
other one
14:42
will be
14:43
from the
14:43
northeast.
14:43
They had
14:44
released
14:45
pamphlets
14:46
asking the
14:47
Muslims of
14:48
India to
14:49
wage jihad in
14:50
these areas
14:51
of northeast
14:52
and we're
14:53
seeing Jammu
14:54
and Kashmir.
14:55
So we
14:55
know that
14:56
ISIS is
14:58
definitely going
14:59
to be backed
14:59
by ISI.
15:01
And the
15:01
agreement under
15:02
which they
15:03
had done
15:03
this transaction
15:05
was called
15:05
the Dabori
15:06
Agreement.
15:07
The leaders
15:08
of ISKP
15:09
were provided
15:10
safe havens
15:11
by the
15:11
Pakistani
15:12
government.
15:12
And the
15:14
word Dabori
15:15
comes from
15:15
the village
15:16
where the
15:17
leadership of
15:17
the ISKP
15:18
hails from.
15:20
So hence
15:21
the Dabori
15:21
Agreement that
15:22
came into
15:23
the picture.
15:24
Not only
15:25
that, the
15:27
former
15:28
core commander
15:29
of
15:29
Pakistan,
15:31
also known
15:33
as
15:33
he has
15:35
already made
15:37
a claim
15:37
a year ago
15:38
that since
15:39
the Dabori
15:40
Agreement that
15:41
has come
15:41
into the
15:41
picture,
15:42
Pakistan
15:43
will now
15:44
also use
15:45
the ISKP
15:45
cadre against
15:46
Afghanistan
15:47
and carry
15:48
out Kashmir
15:49
style
15:50
infiltration
15:51
in Afghanistan.
15:52
This is
15:52
him claiming
15:53
that this
15:55
is exactly
15:55
what happened
15:56
in Kashmir
15:57
and Pakistan
15:58
as usual
15:59
under the
16:00
military fire
16:01
tries to
16:02
push its
16:03
terror outfits
16:04
into the
16:05
other side.
16:07
So this
16:07
is something
16:07
that has
16:08
been confirmed
16:09
also by the
16:10
core commander
16:11
from TTP.
16:12
now while
16:14
this is
16:15
happening,
16:15
we are
16:15
also looking
16:16
at earlier
16:18
this year
16:18
on Jan
16:19
1st, the
16:20
ISI chief
16:21
Asim Malik,
16:23
he had
16:24
visited
16:26
Tajikistan
16:28
to convince
16:29
the president
16:30
of Tajikistan
16:31
to fight
16:32
the Taliban
16:33
because a
16:34
certain outfit
16:35
that exists
16:35
and operates
16:37
from the
16:37
Afghan soil
16:38
wants to
16:39
overthrow the
16:40
Tajikistan
16:41
government.
16:43
So in
16:44
such a case,
16:45
we can see
16:46
a lot of
16:47
new alliances
16:48
building up
16:49
with even
16:50
like the
16:51
Tajikistan
16:52
to counter
16:52
Taliban.
16:54
But at the
16:55
moment,
16:55
we can also
16:56
state that
16:56
a lot of
16:57
if we have
16:59
to predict
16:59
something,
17:01
we can say
17:01
that a lot
17:02
of these
17:03
groups,
17:04
even the
17:05
Chinese fighters
17:05
that come
17:06
from China,
17:07
the ones
17:07
from the
17:08
Gansui group,
17:09
the ones
17:09
from the
17:09
Hui group,
17:11
even the
17:11
Uyghur fighters,
17:13
these individuals
17:15
were given
17:15
safe haven
17:16
by the
17:17
ISKP
17:18
in the past
17:19
also.
17:20
Now we have
17:21
safe havens
17:22
given to the
17:22
ISKP in the
17:23
Mastung-Balochistan
17:25
area.
17:25
So we might
17:26
see even the
17:26
Chinese fighters
17:27
coming here.
17:28
These Chinese
17:29
fighters,
17:30
according to
17:31
reports,
17:32
they were used
17:33
to get trained
17:34
in Afghanistan
17:34
by ISKP
17:35
individuals,
17:37
and then
17:38
they were
17:39
migrated to
17:40
Turkey for
17:41
further training,
17:43
then exported
17:44
back to
17:46
whichever area
17:47
of target.
17:47
you know,
17:49
there is
17:49
something which
17:51
I feel we
17:53
should be
17:53
prepared for,
17:56
that after
17:56
the kind of
17:57
warlocking that
17:57
Pakistan army
17:58
and force
18:00
have taken,
18:02
they are bound
18:03
to retaliate,
18:05
and for
18:06
retaliation,
18:07
they are
18:08
probably looking
18:09
for any
18:10
and every
18:10
kind of
18:11
reinforcement
18:14
that is
18:15
possible for
18:16
them.
18:16
that is
18:20
for certain
18:20
because while
18:21
Operation
18:22
Sindhur was
18:23
also going
18:23
on,
18:24
Pakistan has
18:26
been trying
18:26
to work on
18:27
its alliances
18:27
with Azerbaijan,
18:29
with Turkey,
18:30
the whole
18:30
trifecta that
18:32
has been
18:32
working together
18:33
because you
18:34
see that
18:34
all the
18:36
three countries
18:37
have an
18:38
similar way
18:41
of talking,
18:41
especially when
18:42
it comes to
18:42
UN.
18:43
The narratives
18:44
are similar.
18:45
Not only
18:45
that,
18:46
even a
18:47
couple of
18:48
years ago,
18:49
a Greek
18:50
publication
18:50
also mentioned
18:51
how Erdogan's
18:54
private army,
18:56
the Sadat,
18:57
we call it
18:58
the private
18:58
army because
18:59
it does the
18:59
bidding for
19:00
the Turkish
19:01
president.
19:05
So with this,
19:06
we know
19:06
Sadat had a
19:07
meeting of
19:08
all the
19:09
jihadists at
19:10
one point,
19:10
and it
19:11
talked about
19:12
sending
19:13
fighters from
19:14
Syria,
19:14
its own
19:15
personal
19:15
fighters,
19:16
which were
19:16
trained during
19:17
the Syrian
19:17
war also,
19:19
to move
19:20
them from
19:20
those areas
19:22
to Pakistan
19:22
area.
19:23
Turkish
19:24
intelligence has
19:25
been deployed
19:25
across the
19:26
border to
19:27
keep tabs on
19:28
what's happening
19:28
in the Kashmir
19:29
area.
19:30
There's
19:30
indoctrination
19:31
going on
19:31
constantly.
19:33
And we
19:34
know Turkey
19:35
has been
19:35
helping out
19:36
Pakistan with
19:37
heavy funding
19:37
as well.
19:38
Azair Raejan
19:39
has also
19:40
been an
19:41
equal partner
19:42
when it
19:43
comes to
19:43
supporting
19:43
Pakistan.
19:45
So a lot
19:45
of foreign
19:46
fighters
19:46
expected to
19:48
be recycled
19:49
and sent
19:50
back to
19:51
Pakistan so
19:52
they can
19:53
achieve their
19:53
certain
19:53
targeted
19:54
areas.
19:56
And Pakistan
19:56
does have a
19:57
history of
19:59
blurring the
20:00
difference between
20:00
what it
20:01
considers
20:01
us to
20:02
be a
20:03
fighter,
20:03
a terrorist
20:04
and a
20:05
military
20:05
personnel.
20:06
Even in
20:07
the 1971
20:08
war, we
20:09
had the
20:10
SSP.
20:11
They had
20:11
trained these
20:12
fighters called
20:13
the Rajakar
20:14
fighters, which
20:16
were utilized
20:16
in Bangladesh,
20:17
which were
20:18
responsible for
20:20
the genocide
20:20
of the
20:21
Bangladeshis.
20:22
And these
20:24
personnel were
20:25
considered to
20:26
be a part of
20:26
the Pakistani
20:27
army.
20:28
So now the
20:29
differentiation
20:29
between who
20:30
is a terrorist
20:30
and who is
20:31
a military
20:31
personnel, that
20:33
line has
20:34
long been
20:35
forgotten.
20:38
And with
20:39
this also
20:40
going down,
20:41
now why is
20:42
it important
20:42
that India
20:43
took out
20:44
these bases,
20:45
the terror
20:45
camps, the
20:46
bases in
20:47
Operation
20:47
Sindhu?
20:48
People think
20:49
it's just
20:49
hosting
20:49
terrorists, but
20:50
nobody is
20:50
actually considering
20:51
the fact, the
20:52
amount of
20:53
training and
20:54
the vast,
20:55
vast compounds
20:57
that these
20:58
camps have.
20:58
these are not
20:59
just madrasas
21:00
which are
21:01
indoctrinating
21:02
people.
21:02
These are
21:03
areas which
21:04
are training
21:05
fighters.
21:07
According to
21:07
Amir Rana, a
21:08
Pakistani
21:09
analyst, he
21:10
also mentioned
21:11
that it takes
21:12
about 18
21:12
months for
21:14
these
21:14
mujahideen to
21:15
be created.
21:16
The first
21:17
month is spent
21:17
indoctrinating
21:19
these mujahideen.
21:19
the next
21:20
three months
21:20
is again
21:21
further
21:21
brainwashing
21:22
indoctrination
21:24
followed by
21:25
some amount
21:26
of military
21:28
training, which
21:30
will be for
21:30
six months.
21:31
This happens
21:33
in six
21:33
stages to
21:34
the point
21:35
where they
21:36
even train
21:36
their fighters
21:37
how to use
21:38
a tank.
21:39
This is a
21:41
rare situation
21:42
because they
21:43
don't have the
21:44
resources to
21:45
do it, but
21:46
we know that
21:47
most of the
21:48
fighters are
21:48
trained in
21:49
different
21:50
weaponry.
21:52
Handheld,
21:53
shoulder,
21:54
firing weapons,
21:55
things like
21:55
that.
21:57
Yes, so it
21:58
takes about
21:58
18 months to
21:59
do this and
22:00
for them to
22:00
do this in
22:02
such a vast
22:02
amount.
22:04
Imran Khan in
22:04
2020 stated
22:06
that when he
22:07
went to the
22:08
US, he
22:09
openly stated
22:10
that there
22:10
were 30,000
22:11
to 40,000
22:12
terrorists
22:14
still flying
22:14
inside Pakistan
22:16
and it is
22:17
impossible for
22:18
any intelligence
22:19
of any
22:19
nation to
22:20
not have
22:21
an idea
22:21
of so
22:22
much
22:22
development
22:23
within their
22:24
own country.
22:26
Osama bin
22:27
Laden was
22:27
also captured
22:28
from an
22:29
area which
22:30
was very
22:30
close to
22:31
the Pakistani
22:32
military
22:33
academy.
22:35
He thrived
22:35
over there.
22:36
He's been
22:37
funding LED,
22:38
JEM, so on.
22:40
It's impossible
22:41
for all these
22:42
developments to
22:42
happen without
22:43
the knowledge
22:44
of ISI.
22:45
And we
22:46
know that
22:46
JEM,
22:47
Lashkar,
22:48
they're all
22:49
the products
22:49
of ISI at
22:50
the end of
22:51
the day.
22:52
In fact,
22:52
a lot of
22:53
ISI
22:53
commanders have
22:56
been training
22:56
these groups.
22:57
I don't
23:00
see any
23:00
possibility of
23:01
any activity
23:04
without the
23:06
knowledge or
23:07
the active
23:08
involvement of
23:09
the ISI.
23:11
Yes.
23:12
The entire
23:13
doctrine has
23:14
been based
23:14
on, you
23:15
know,
23:16
deniability
23:17
by using
23:18
proxy wars.
23:18
We all
23:19
know it's a
23:19
failing state
23:20
without the
23:20
money required.
23:22
So,
23:23
employing some
23:23
fedains to
23:24
carry out
23:25
a tax is a
23:25
lot more
23:26
cheaper than
23:26
carrying out
23:27
a full
23:27
frontal war
23:28
and being
23:28
held responsible
23:29
when your
23:30
economy is
23:30
falling.
23:31
And not
23:33
to mention,
23:34
Pakistan is
23:35
known to
23:36
allocate 18%
23:37
of its
23:38
general budget
23:39
to its
23:40
defense
23:41
development,
23:42
which is a
23:42
lot more
23:43
than any
23:44
affected
23:45
countries due
23:47
to conflict.
23:48
The normal
23:49
average range
23:50
would be
23:50
like 12%
23:51
to 14%
23:53
of allocation
23:54
to the
23:54
defense budget.
23:56
But what
23:56
Pakistan does
23:57
is it
23:58
siphons the
23:59
money that
23:59
comes in for
24:00
the development
24:01
program of
24:01
the country
24:02
to the
24:02
defense budget,
24:03
which is
24:04
being indirectly
24:05
used to
24:06
sponsor fund
24:07
terrorists and
24:08
to provide an
24:09
attack on
24:10
India.
24:10
It's not
24:11
anything to
24:12
do with the
24:13
development of
24:14
the nation.
24:14
And it is a
24:15
sinking ship.
24:16
It's not going
24:17
to stop.
24:18
It will align,
24:19
realign, and
24:20
reposition itself
24:21
with the terror
24:22
outfits to
24:22
carry out a
24:23
war, thinking
24:24
that it will
24:25
exhaust India
24:26
because this is
24:28
one way of
24:29
attrition.
24:32
India better
24:33
not get
24:34
exhausted.
24:35
Simple.
24:36
India better
24:36
not get
24:37
exhausted because
24:38
we have to
24:39
ensure that
24:41
we have our
24:43
powders.
24:44
There is
24:44
enough dry
24:45
powder with
24:46
us to deal
24:47
with Pakistan
24:49
on the
24:50
terrorist level
24:53
and on the
24:54
borders.
24:56
You can't
24:57
rule out the
24:58
possibility.
25:00
And in any
25:01
case, as far
25:02
as China is
25:03
concerned, China
25:04
is enemy number
25:04
one.
25:05
But it
25:06
conveniently
25:07
uses Pakistan
25:10
as and when
25:12
possible, you
25:14
know, it
25:15
has been doing
25:16
so constantly,
25:18
right, you
25:18
know, continuously.
25:21
Even now, now
25:23
it will probably
25:23
look for more
25:24
opportunities to
25:25
do so.
25:26
Yes, and it's
25:27
interesting also
25:28
because China is
25:29
also one of the
25:30
countries that
25:31
blocked the
25:32
banning of the
25:33
resistance front
25:34
at the UN.
25:36
Yes.
25:37
When the fact
25:38
is the resistance
25:39
front had
25:39
openly made a
25:40
clean, literally
25:41
after the
25:43
attack, that
25:44
it was
25:45
orchestrated by
25:46
them.
25:46
However, the
25:47
handlers in
25:47
Pakistan might
25:48
not have been
25:48
too happy and
25:49
hence, they
25:51
retracted their
25:51
statement.
25:52
But the
25:53
statement was
25:54
out for
25:54
everyone to
25:55
see and we
25:56
know it
25:56
was an
25:57
offshoot of
25:58
L.E.T.
26:00
Plus, which
26:01
country gives
26:02
military honors
26:03
to terrorists
26:05
and especially
26:07
during their
26:08
funerals are
26:09
seen, you
26:09
know, with
26:10
the terrorists
26:10
because at
26:11
the end of
26:11
the day,
26:12
these same
26:12
terrorists are
26:13
nothing but
26:13
assets of
26:14
Pakistan, which
26:16
have been
26:16
prescribed by
26:17
us.
26:18
They are
26:18
force
26:19
multipliers for
26:21
Pakistan,
26:23
the Pakistan
26:23
army.
26:24
They are
26:25
doing the
26:27
Pakistan army's
26:28
job, they
26:28
are force
26:29
multipliers,
26:29
they are
26:30
outsourced,
26:31
you know,
26:31
elements,
26:32
whatever, and
26:33
their coffins
26:35
will be covered
26:36
with the
26:37
Pakistani
26:37
flag.
26:38
And their
26:40
funerals will
26:41
be attended
26:44
by all the
26:47
senior brass of
26:48
Pakistan army.
26:50
Yeah, very
26:50
true.
26:51
That's true.
26:52
only thing that
26:53
remains is they
26:54
have not been
26:55
given ranks.
26:56
You might as
26:56
well give them
26:57
ranks also now.
26:59
Who knows, they
26:59
may probably have
27:00
ranks that we
27:01
are not aware
27:01
of.
27:02
They may even
27:04
be having
27:04
ranks.
27:04
Anyway, thank
27:10
you, Aparna, for
27:12
a lot of
27:13
inputs that
27:14
have come from
27:16
you.
27:17
And we
27:18
will need to
27:19
keep a watch on
27:20
this particular
27:21
aspect very
27:24
sharply, because
27:26
it's also time
27:28
for Pakistan
27:29
to be a
27:31
little more
27:31
Pakistan army
27:33
and the
27:34
armed forces.
27:34
to be a
27:35
little more
27:35
desperate.
27:38
So, they
27:40
are looking for
27:41
more force
27:44
multipliers, more
27:46
outsourced
27:46
elements.
27:48
That you
27:49
cannot at all
27:50
rule out the
27:51
possibility.
27:52
That's a
27:52
certainty, in
27:52
fact.
27:56
Enjoy.
27:56
Thank you very
27:57
much.
27:57
Enjoy.
Recommended
30:08
|
Up next
Aparna Rawal, security researcher and analyst, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on changing Af-Psk dynamics as Afghan Taliban warms up to India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
1/27/2025
23:54
Dr. Smruti Pattanaik, Research Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses speaks with Col Anil Bhat (retd.) on the Bangladesh transition and its implications for South Asia | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
11/11/2024
35:35
Desh Kapoor, Atlanta, US-based geopolitical observer and analyst, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on India wrought devastation on Pakistani military infrastructure during Op Sindoor | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
6/10/2025
13:26
Lt Gen Kamal Davar (Retd.) speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on how the world media viewed India’s Op Sindoor | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/20/2025
29:43
Lt. Gen. Kamal Davar (Retd), former Founder DG, Defence Intelligence Agency and President, Delhi Forum for Strategic Studies speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on political turmoil in Pakistan, Af-Pak hostilities and impact on India | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/10/2025
32:33
Maj Gen Jagatbir Singh (Retd.), Distinguished Fellow, United Service Institute of India and Editor, Salute speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on implications of US initiating peace talks with Russia | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/27/2025
24:53
Jappandeep Kour a doctoral candidate at the Centre for West Asian Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University speaks with C Uday Bhaskar on Israeli strikes on Iran | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
6/14/2025
19:12
Jappandeep Kour a doctoral candidate at the Centre for West Asian Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University speaks with C Uday Bhaskar on Israeli strikes on Iran | SAM Conversation (Hindi)
South Asia Monitor
6/14/2025
23:10
Indian peace activist O P Shah speaks with Tarun Basu and C Uday Bhaskar on peace prospects in subcontinent | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
6/2/2025
32:05
Maj Gen Prabir Chakravarty (Retd.) Additional Director General, Artillery and Advisor, BrahMos Aerospace speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on the drone war in the recent Indo-Pak conflict | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/25/2025
19:53
Cmde C Uday Bhaskar (Retd.) speaks with Mugdha on Pakistan Army chief, Gen Asim Munir’s elevation to Field Marshal rank and its implications | SAM Conversation (Hindi)
South Asia Monitor
5/21/2025
24:13
Cmde C Uday Bhaskar (Retd.) speaks with Mayank Chhaya on Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir’s elevation as field marshal | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/21/2025
3:20
Mayank Chhaya pays tribute to Indian astrophysicist Jayant Narlikar who passed away at the age of 86 in Pune | SAM Vignette
South Asia Monitor
5/21/2025
30:26
Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan (Retd.) former ADG, Military Operations & Visiting Fellow, Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on India’s Op Sindoor and what it achieved | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/19/2025
4:57
IAEA says no radiation leak at Pakistani n-site | SAM Vignette
South Asia Monitor
5/15/2025
34:48
Cmde C Uday Bhaskar (Retd.) speaks with Tarun Basu on the latest bout of India-Pakistan conflict and the dramatic ceasefire: What now? | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/12/2025
3:55
India Pak ceasefire: What happens now | SAM Vignettes by Mayank Chhaya
South Asia Monitor
5/11/2025
32:06
Mallika Sarabhai speaks with Mayank Chhaya on 75 years of an iconic performing arts academy | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/6/2025
45:41
Investigative journalist Chitra Subramaniam speaks with Mayank Chhaya on her new book Boforsgate, the scandal that brought down the Rajiv Gandhi government in 1989 | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
5/3/2025
27:00
Srinagar-based journalist and writer Zafar Choudhary speaks with Mayank Chhaya on the Pahalgam terror attack and its implications | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
4/24/2025
36:50
Indian Ambassador Abhay Kumar speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on How Nalanda changed the world | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
4/12/2025
45:22
Michael Sternfeld, Ramayana scholar, speaks to Mayank Chhaya | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
3/17/2025
29:43
Lt Gen Kamal Davar (Retd.), former founder Director General of Defence Intelligence Agency and President of Delhi Forum for Strategic Studies, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on future of India-Bangladesh relations | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
3/1/2025
19:52
Air Marshal Sumit Mukerji (Retd.), former AOC-in-C, Southern Air Command, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on the critical shortage of combat aircaft in the Indian Air Force and its implications | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/17/2025
29:11
Maj Gen Sudhir Vombatkere (Retd.), strategic affairs commentator, speaks with Col Anil Bhat (Retd.) on applying India's ancient military wisdom to address its security challenges | SAM Conversation
South Asia Monitor
2/13/2025