Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
LIVE NEWS 🔴 | FOX 24/7 LIVE STREAM | Breaking News Live Now

Stay informed with FOX News 24/7 LIVE coverage! 🔴
Catch breaking news, top headlines, political updates, weather alerts, global events, and live press conferences — streaming non-stop, right here.
Watch Now for the latest updates from around the world, brought to you by FOX News Live.
Subscribe and turn on the notification bell 🔔 to never miss a moment.

Your Query

#LiveNews #BreakingNews #FOXNewsLive #24x7News #NewsLiveStream

#FoxLiveStream #WorldNews #USNews #WatchLive #LiveNow

#LiveBreakingNews #FoxHeadlines #PoliticsLive #FoxStream



Live news today,

FOX News live stream,

24/7 breaking news,

Live US news,

FOX News now,

World news live,

Real-time headlines,

Political updates live,

FOX live channel,

Watch news online free,







Facebook :_

Next Video:- https://rumble.com/v6rpuiv-live-news-live-now-fox-247-live-stream-live-news.html

https://latestnewupdatelive.blogspot.com/

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HmjiWUnvxfU2

#LiveNews, #trendingnews, #livestreaming #NewsUpdate #fb
LIVE NEWS Live NOW FOX 24/7 LIVE STREAM live news

LIVE NEWS, Live NOW , FOX 24/7 , LIVE STREAM, live news,

#LIVENEWS
#livenow
#FOX24/7
#livestreaming
#LivenewsToday



Transcript
00:00and Assad being subbed with Shara.
00:04So to say that the Israelis are just acting out whimsically,
00:09I think that'd be a bit too much.
00:11And our diplomacy is capitalizing on whatever the Israelis did.
00:15Now, granted, some days they might make some calls
00:19that we wouldn't like and vice versa,
00:21but I wouldn't say that this suggests
00:24that there's a big gap between the policy.
00:28I think that we agree on the policy,
00:31whether in Lebanon and Syria or in other places,
00:33but there might be a hit there or a hit here
00:36that not everyone agrees on.
00:38But do you worry or are you concerned,
00:41are people who follow this, are they concerned
00:43that over time this could deteriorate the relationship
00:47between the Trump White House and the Netanyahu government,
00:51that if this sentiment is prevailing there
00:54that Netanyahu is kind of some cowboy in the Wild West
00:58who bombs everything, who shoots from the hip
01:00and asks questions later,
01:02do you worry that the relationship could break down?
01:07Well, I think sometimes the chemistry between leaders plays a role,
01:10but I would like to think of our relationship with Israel
01:14as a strategic alliance.
01:16And these kinds of relationships usually go through multiple layers.
01:20We have our security establishment, intel establishment
01:24that counsels the president on how to or when to run things.
01:31And I think the Israelis have the same thing.
01:32I wouldn't say that any prime minister in Israel
01:35would do whatever he wants to do
01:37without, of course, consulting first with the professionals,
01:40the military, the intelligence,
01:42you know, everybody else around the table.
01:44So from time to time, there might be tension.
01:47From time to time, the chemistry is not right
01:48between two leaders of any two countries.
01:52But to say that this affects the strong alliance
01:54between the two countries,
01:56I think that would be a step too far.
01:58All right.
01:59Hussain Abdul, Hussain, thanks for bearing with us here.
02:01Always good to see you.
02:02We'll talk soon.
02:04Thank you very much.
02:05Okay.
02:06In the meantime here,
02:06we're not going to go to a quick commercial break.
02:08We do want to stay, though, in the Middle East today
02:11on the Fox News program special report
02:13hosted by anchor Brett Baer.
02:16He had an exclusive interview
02:17with the Iranian foreign minister
02:19talking about their now heavily damaged
02:23nuclear enrichment program
02:24because of those U.S. and Israeli strikes
02:27and whether or not they could rebound
02:31or bounce back from that.
02:33So this was a huge, huge get by Brett Baer
02:35and his team there.
02:36What we want to do right now
02:38is play out for you.
02:39That entire interview, it aired tonight.
02:41It's about 15 minutes.
02:42Let's watch.
02:46Are you open to direct talks
02:49with the Trump administration
02:51to try to find a solution
02:52that could de-escalate heightened regional tension
02:56after all that's happened?
03:00We are open to talks.
03:03Not direct for the time being.
03:05If they are coming for a win-win solution,
03:10I am ready to engage with them.
03:13I mean that we are ready
03:15to do any confidence-building measure
03:20needed to prove that Iran's nuclear program
03:24is peaceful and would remain peaceful forever
03:27and Iran would never go for nuclear weapons.
03:32And in return, we expect them to lift their sanctions.
03:38This is a win-win game
03:40and we are ready to engage in that.
03:44We cannot start these negotiations in a direct way.
03:50We still prefer indirect negotiations.
03:54Were you truly empowered to make a deal
03:57if it came to that?
03:58There are people obviously who wonder
04:00whether you are empowered by the Ayatollah
04:02to make such a deal.
04:04Are you?
04:05Well, of course I was empowered to make a deal.
04:08If you ask me about the negotiations
04:12I had with Mr. Whitcoff,
04:14I think there was a possibility to make a deal.
04:20I told Mr. Whitcoff very clearly several times
04:25that if the purpose of these talks
04:27is to achieve a deal
04:30in which Iran commits itself permanently
04:35not to go for nuclear weapons,
04:38that deal is achievable.
04:40But if you want to deprive us
04:43from our legitimate rights,
04:45including, you know, enrichment,
04:47that is not going to happen.
04:49But why not import enriched uranium
04:51as other countries do,
04:53as part of the deal?
04:54Why not do it that way?
04:56Well, because this is an achievement,
04:59a scientific achievement,
05:00that we have been achieved by ourselves.
05:02Why we should import something
05:03that we can produce by ourselves?
05:05Because you take it past the percentage.
05:08You take it to 90% or 60%
05:11instead of 35%.
05:13No, no, no.
05:14We never go to 90%.
05:16We remain committed to below 5%
05:20for, you know,
05:23to produce fuel for nuclear power plants.
05:27And we also enriched up to 20%
05:29because we have a research reactor in Tehran,
05:33which is called Tehran Research Reactor, TRR.
05:37So we are enriching uranium
05:39for our own needs.
05:42And we once went up to 60%
05:45and that was after the sabotage in our nuclear facilities.
05:50And then we, you know, go up to 60%.
05:56But I was a negotiator at that time.
06:00I told our interlocutors that we immediately go down
06:05if a nuclear deal is achieved.
06:09Mr. Foreign Minister,
06:10what is the extent of the damage
06:12to the nuclear enrichment program
06:14after these attacks?
06:16Well, our facilities have been damaged,
06:19seriously damaged,
06:20the extent of which is now under evaluation
06:24by our Atomic Energy Organization.
06:27But as far as I know,
06:28they are seriously damaged.
06:30Did the already enriched material survive?
06:33Is it accessible?
06:34Well, I have no detailed information.
06:39As I said,
06:39our Atomic Energy Organization
06:44is now responsible for that.
06:47They are now trying to, you know,
06:50evaluate what has exactly happened
06:54to our nuclear material,
06:59to our enriched material.
07:01And we will soon inform, you know,
07:05the agency, IAEA,
07:08about the exact, you know,
07:11that what has exactly happened
07:12to our enriched uranium.
07:14We have not stopped our cooperation
07:15with the agency.
07:17We continue working with them.
07:19We need a new modality
07:20because the facilities have been destroyed.
07:24So you're saying that you may allow
07:26UN inspectors back into your country,
07:29all the sites,
07:30the IAEA,
07:31to see all the sites?
07:33Well, based on the modality
07:36that we come to with the agency,
07:39that would be possible.
07:40Case by case,
07:41so any request by the agency
07:43to visit any place
07:44or to send inspectors or whatever
07:47should be carefully considered
07:50by our Supreme National Security Council
07:54because of the safety
07:56and security concerns.
07:58Understanding those concerns,
08:00does Iran plan to reconstitute
08:02its enrichment program?
08:04Is it continuing now
08:05or has the damage been so severe
08:08that it is all stopped?
08:10It is now stopped
08:11because, yes,
08:12damages are serious and severe.
08:14but, obviously,
08:17we cannot give up our enrichment
08:20because it is an achievement
08:25of our own scientists.
08:27And now, more than that,
08:29it is a question of national pride.
08:31Our enrichment is so dear to us.
08:36We are ready to engage into negotiation
08:38to make sure that our enrichment
08:40is only for peaceful purposes.
08:42We prefer a negotiated solution.
08:46We are not ready to give up something
08:48which is now a question of,
08:50a matter of dignity
08:51for the Iranian people,
08:52a matter of national pride.
08:54So, rest assured
08:56that we want to continue our enrichment,
08:58but, of course,
08:59we prefer a negotiated,
09:00you know, solution for that.
09:03Mr. Minister,
09:04with all due respect,
09:05obviously,
09:05it's not just the U.S. and Israel,
09:07but other world leaders
09:08who have concerns
09:09about the enrichment program.
09:11Why would you need to put it
09:13a half mile under a mountain facility
09:15to protect it
09:16if it was a completely peaceful program?
09:19That's just some of the thoughts about it.
09:21Secondly,
09:22President Trump has said
09:23he would not hesitate
09:25to launch more strikes
09:26if Iran tries to rebuild
09:27its enrichment program.
09:29So, what's your response
09:30to President Trump?
09:31Because of the, you know,
09:33constant threats
09:35by Israelis,
09:36by, you know,
09:37the United States in the past,
09:39we had no way
09:40but to protect our facilities
09:42and to protect our material
09:43and protect our scientists.
09:47So, my message
09:49to the United States
09:53is that let's go
09:55for a negotiated solution
09:57for Iran's nuclear program.
10:00And we did that
10:01in the past,
10:02in 2015,
10:04after two and a half years
10:05of negotiation,
10:06in which I was a negotiator myself.
10:09We came to that solution.
10:12That was called JCPOA
10:14or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
10:16Maybe the current administration
10:17doesn't like that,
10:20but we can come to a similar deal,
10:23a better deal than that.
10:24I think that was proved
10:25that there is no military option
10:28to destroy our nuclear program.
10:30Yes, facilities have been destroyed.
10:33They are severely destroyed.
10:35But the technology is there.
10:38Our nuclear program,
10:39our enrichment program
10:40is not something imported
10:41from outside
10:42that can be destroyed
10:43by bombings.
10:44It is developed by ourselves.
10:46It is an achievement by ourselves.
10:48The technology is there.
10:50The scientists are there.
10:51You know,
10:51the people who have run
10:52these facilities are there.
10:54Buildings can be rebuilt.
10:56You know,
10:56facilities can be rebuilt.
10:57Machines can be,
10:59you know,
10:59replaced
11:00because the technology is there.
11:02I think the recent attack
11:03proved
11:04that there is no military option
11:06for our nuclear program.
11:08But I can,
11:09I tell you,
11:10there is a negotiated solution
11:11for our nuclear program.
11:13We have done it
11:14once in the past.
11:15We are ready to do it
11:16once again.
11:17Mr. Minister,
11:17if you'll stand by, please.
11:19More with the foreign minister
11:20from Iran
11:21after this.
11:23How would you describe
11:24the state of Iran's
11:25missile program?
11:27You know,
11:27hundreds were used
11:28during the war
11:28with Israel,
11:29many destroyed.
11:30How would you describe
11:31the state of that?
11:33Well,
11:34I think we are
11:35in a good shape
11:36right now.
11:37The capability
11:38is still there.
11:40You know,
11:40our missiles
11:41are
11:41our
11:43most reliable
11:46means of defense.
11:47So we continue
11:49our missile program.
11:52Right now,
11:53they are,
11:55it's still
11:56in a very good shape.
11:57We still,
11:58we have a good
11:58number of missiles
12:00to defend ourselves.
12:02Is the Ayatollah
12:03in good health?
12:04We haven't heard
12:05from him in a long time.
12:06I met him today.
12:08He is in a very good shape
12:09and in a very good health.
12:11And I think,
12:14you know,
12:15the whole system
12:16in Iran
12:17is quite
12:17stable
12:19and
12:20strong.
12:23Mr. Minister,
12:24is Iran
12:25currently
12:26trying to
12:27assassinate
12:28President Trump,
12:29former Secretary of State
12:30Mike Pompeo,
12:32former Ambassador
12:33John Bolton
12:34and other
12:35Trump administration
12:36officials
12:37in the wake
12:38of the death
12:38of Qasem Soleimani?
12:40No,
12:41we have never said that.
12:43Maybe some individuals
12:44here or there
12:45have said things like that,
12:47but that has never been
12:48Iran's official position.
12:50Mr. Minister,
12:51the Ayatollah
12:52has said
12:53death to America
12:54and that means
12:55death to Trump.
12:56That is from
12:56the Supreme Leader.
12:57The New York Post
12:58had the Iranian
12:59fatwa crowdfunding effort
13:00claims to have raised
13:02$40 million
13:02for bounty
13:03on President Trump's head.
13:05The campaign
13:05organized by a group
13:06known as
13:06the Blood Covenant
13:07comes after
13:08multiple Iranian
13:09clerics issued
13:10fatwas
13:10or death warrants
13:11against Trump.
13:12So you can see
13:13why the administration
13:14is looking at
13:14some of these signals
13:15saying that
13:16you are doing that.

Recommended