Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
During a Senate Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) spoke about critical mineral deals with African countries.
Transcript
00:00Fully agree.
00:02We will do one final round of questions and then we will wrap up.
00:06Mr. Woodard, I want to discuss prioritization of efforts.
00:10The Department of Interior has a list of 50 critical minerals.
00:14The Department of Energy has a list of 18.
00:17The Defense Logistics Agency has a list of 62.
00:21When you combine the three lists, there are 13 minerals that all three consider critical.
00:28The existence of different lists makes prioritization for U.S. investment increasingly important.
00:34There should be a clear message to the private sector on where the focus should be to establish
00:40a unified approach to investing in the critical mineral supply chain.
00:45In your judgment, what critical minerals should the United States be targeting in Africa specifically,
00:51and how should we prioritize given today's supply chain vulnerabilities?
00:55Yeah, that's a very helpful question, Senator.
01:02When we consider critical minerals, as you mentioned, there are so many that you could
01:06look at.
01:07Figuring out how to categorize them is a challenge.
01:11One way that I like to do it is I divide them sometimes into four kind of buckets.
01:17There's the battery metals like copper, lithium, cobalt, the rare earths that we've talked about,
01:24especially things like dysprosium and terbium for permanent magnets.
01:30You can create a category of kind of defense industrial needs minerals like antimony, and you can look
01:37at something like the low volume processing byproducts, gallium, germanium, scandium, which are a very interesting
01:45category because these are not mined directly, but they're acquired as kind of waste byproducts of smelting processes.
01:56And in China, for example, by legislation, many smelters have to capture gallium and germanium.
02:07It's expensive.
02:08It requires an investment to do that.
02:11In the West, outside of China, there's no such legal requirement, and so to do that requires
02:17some kind of incentive because these are, again, low volume but very important kinds of things.
02:24And so each of these categories that I've kind of depicted here all require sort of slightly
02:30different approaches to solve the problem behind them, but all of them are challenges, right?
02:38When we get back to the battery metals, you know, copper, it's a scale problem in a sense, right?
02:46So the copper mines that we have in the United States, the grades are far lower than in a place
02:53like the DRC.
02:54So just for an example, in the United States, a copper mine might have a grade of like 0.3% of copper.
03:03Mines in the DRC have a copper grade more like 2.5%, so like eight times higher.
03:09So you can imagine how the economics of that is dramatically different, and so each of those
03:17requires very different kind of approaches, if you will.
03:21So I guess the bottom line message for all this is that it's important to keep in mind,
03:28as we're talking about strategies for these minerals, that there's not just one strategy out there.
03:34Each of these minerals is unique in their own way, and it will require kind of a different
03:39kind of approach, and we'll have to kind of sort them in different ways that make sense,
03:46like the way that I've outlined here below, but there are also other ways you could do it.
03:49But that is kind of one way to kind of think about how you would create the approach you would need
03:54by categorizing these things effectively.
03:58I think that was a very helpful answer, and I hope that U.S. investors and companies
04:03listen to that answer that you just gave. I think that's helpful for prioritizing, and I hope also
04:09the administration gives weight to the answer you just gave, because if we don't prioritize,
04:14it means we're prioritizing nothing, and that's not a path to success.
04:19The final set of questions, Ambassador Pratt, I'm going to direct to you.
04:23The Trump administration has taken unprecedented steps to end more than 30 years of conflict in
04:28the eastern DRC. In the next month, the leaders of the DRC in Rwanda are expected to come to
04:33Washington and formally sign a peace agreement that includes the regional economic integration
04:38framework. This is not just a political deal. It's a chance for African nations to build real
04:44prosperity and keep their resources out of Beijing's grip. Critical minerals will play a major role in the
04:51final agreement. The DRC holds the largest concentration of cobalt in the world, plus large amounts of
04:58copper, lithium, tantalum, and more. If this peace deal holds, it's a real opportunity to bring stability
05:07to the region, to boost our African partners, and to safeguard U.S. interests – all while countering
05:13the Chinese Communist Party. Two questions. What tangible commitments has the United States received
05:25from President Shizakedi's administration for the U.S. DRC cooperation in critical minerals?
05:32Number one. And number two, how can this agreement be used as the blueprint for future deals across the
05:38continent? Thank you. Thank you, Senator. We were blessed that at the beginning of this year when the
05:49conflict broke out, my colleague mentioned the assault on an area close to a tin mine where a U.S.
05:58company was operating. We got involved. I was with Senior Advisor Boulos when we brought the parties
06:04together. They were in Washington. We said, we need to stop this immediately. And that needs to be the
06:09first step. And that was where we began this peace process four months ago, five months ago now.
06:17The economic piece of this will deliver for U.S. companies, especially in lithium and cobalt that you
06:26mentioned, in central and southern Congo. It will also – because those offers have been made and they're
06:34in live negotiations with the government of the DRC right now. And so that's been successful and those
06:43commitments are there. We also are hoping to formalize the coltan sector in eastern Congo so that
06:51we can have more involvement of U.S. companies, major U.S. companies that rely on coltan and their
06:57products, which right now aren't sourcing from coltan from eastern Congo because they know that it's
07:03coming from areas that have completely unacceptable labor standards and that this is a totally informal
07:11sector approach. And so we hope that through this agreement the countries will live up to their
07:16commitments. They have told us that they will. And part of the strategy of getting them to the White
07:24House once they have – they're well on the road to implementing this agreement is that they live up
07:29to those commitments that they've made to us, including on formalization of the coltan sector in eastern
07:35Congo. Thank you. That's helpful. Ranking Member Booker.

Recommended