Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
Judge says divorce or separation is ‘neither a lottery windfall nor a revenue-generating exercise’.

Read More:
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2025/07/29/spousal-maintenance-does-not-include-career-related-losses-court-rules

Laporan Lanjut:
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2025/07/29/kerugian-berkait-kerjaya-tak-termasuk-nafkah-pasangan-putus-mahkamah

Free Malaysia Today is an independent, bi-lingual news portal with a focus on Malaysian current affairs.

Subscribe to our channel - http://bit.ly/2Qo08ry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check us out at https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com
Follow FMT on Facebook: https://bit.ly/49JJoo5
Follow FMT on Dailymotion: https://bit.ly/2WGITHM
Follow FMT on X: https://bit.ly/48zARSW
Follow FMT on Instagram: https://bit.ly/48Cq76h
Follow FMT on TikTok : https://bit.ly/3uKuQFp
Follow FMT Berita on TikTok: https://bit.ly/48vpnQG
Follow FMT Telegram - https://bit.ly/42VyzMX
Follow FMT LinkedIn - https://Ábit.ly/42YytEb
Follow FMT Lifestyle on Instagram: https://bit.ly/42WrsUj
Follow FMT on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/49GMbxW
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download FMT News App:
Google Play – http://bit.ly/2YSuV46
App Store – https://apple.co/2HNH7gZ
Huawei AppGallery - https://bit.ly/2D2OpNP

#FMTNews #Divorce #Separation #HighCourt

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The High Court dismissed a wife's application for interim spousal maintenance, finding her
00:06claim was based on compensation for career setbacks rather than legitimate financial
00:11need under family law. Justice Everill Marriott Peters described the wife's attempt as disingenuous
00:17and said divorce is neither a lottery windfall nor a revenue generating exercise. The couple,
00:24married since 1987 with three adult children, co-founded a highly successful company where the
00:29wife played an active management role until 2018. The wife's original claim for maintenance was
00:35rejected in 2023 and she renewed it after the husband filed for divorce. Peters ruled the wife
00:41did not meet the means and needs threshold citing her steady income, earning capacity,
00:46and financial independence. The court noted that her claim focused on lost salary bonuses and EPF
00:52contributions, framing it as compensation for career-related losses rather than traditional
00:58spousal support. Peters stressed that the law does not preserve a luxurious lifestyle post-divorce
01:04but only prevents unjust hardship and the wife's claim lacked documentation of actual expenses
01:09or proof of financial dependency.

Recommended