Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • today
During a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Troy Balderson (R-OH) spoke about the neurological assessment of organ donors prior to removal surgery.
Transcript
00:00Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and congratulations.
00:05Dr. Lynch, thank you for being here today.
00:07HRSA's report details many instances where the neurological condition of patients were not thoroughly assessed.
00:14Can you provide a few examples of where you found that to be the case?
00:20The initial one was what we are calling the index case.
00:23That individual was showing increased signs of consciousness over the day preceding the organ recovery attempt
00:31and then throughout that day of the organ recovery attempt.
00:34Despite the OPO noting this in its own electronic medical record,
00:39they continued without deviation from the plan and went to the operating room with the intent of recovering his organs.
00:46What changes to policy or procedures would you or have you recommended to ensure that patients are thoroughly evaluated
00:53prior to moving forward with procurement through DCD?
00:58So for DCD to be done in a safe way, for any organ, potential organ donor to be evaluated in a safe way,
01:05we need to understand what is wrong with them and to what degree there is chemical manipulation of their neurologic status.
01:12By which I mean, is this what we're seeing on a neurologic exam brain function,
01:17or is it brain function and being sedated or paralyzed in order to, you know, accomplish other medical tasks?
01:26Dr. Lynch, could you briefly describe what leads to variations in process and procedures related to DCD in hospitals and OPOs?
01:37So, again, the hospital providers have a role in this, but they are dependent on the OPO as their subject matter expert.
01:43OPOs have been, have had established areas of care for many years.
01:48They have a responsibility to provide procurement care in every hospital in their area,
01:52and so they all have hospital development divisions that are supposed to go out and provide education.
01:58That education can be in the abstract.
02:00A provider may not see somebody who could be an organ donor for many months.
02:04When a potential donor is identified by the OPO, they need to provide updated information
02:10and what we would term just-in-time training to make sure that there's a good expectation of the respective roles
02:15and the ability to reassess if this is a potential organ donor if the neurologic status changes.
02:23And I'll follow up with that.
02:24You've been interested in that.
02:25And how might this lead to different standards in patient care
02:28and occasionally patient outcomes in CDC cases?
02:31So this is meant to provide consistent care to make sure that the imaginary lines
02:38or the invisible lines over which a patient may move within a state or across states
02:44don't affect the quality of neurologic care that they will receive in a hospital
02:48and that they are able to have equal access to being an organ donor if that is the path for them
02:54or to not being subject to that procurement process if it's not appropriate.
02:59Dr. Lynch, has HRSA ever recommended that an OPO be decertified?
03:05So the decision to decertify an OPO actually rests with CMS, not with HRSA?
03:13Has an OPO ever been decertified?
03:15No.
03:17Mr. Chairman, I yield back my remaining time.
03:20The gentleman yields.
03:22The chair recognizes the gentlelady from Colorado.

Recommended