Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
During a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) spoke about restoring confidence in the organ procurement and transplant network.
Transcript
00:00The chair recognizes the ranking member of the entire committee, Mr. Pallone, for his five minutes of questioning.
00:10Unlike our hearing last September, we have the benefit of HRSA in attendance as a witness,
00:15and we have solid evidence-based examinations conducted by HRSA that's also directed the OPTN
00:21to make a monitoring plan for the Kentucky organization that is the focus of its investigation
00:26and a system-wide policy and protocols to pause the organ procurement process
00:31when there are concerns about the patient's status.
00:34And these actions, I think, will better protect patients across the country during the pre-donor phase
00:39and increase confidence for would-be donors that their safety and interest will be addressed in the process.
00:44But, Dr. Lynch, does the corrective action plan, which is now public,
00:48send a message to all OPOs and relevant OPTN members involved in patient care
00:53that OPTN oversight is becoming stronger?
00:56And what do you hope the impact of that shift will be on the culture at OPOs and the OPTN?
01:02I have four questions, though, so please be brief.
01:08Oh, your mic is not on. Mine wasn't either.
01:11I'd like to emphasize the vast majority of providers are doing this in good faith,
01:15and every day they show up trying to do a good job.
01:17This shows that HRSA is doing the same and that we are committed to maintaining a safe environment,
01:22and so if they see something that is wrong, that they can plan for a future where we are doing that better.
01:28All right.
01:28And then what was it that you saw in your investigation that made you believe more safeguards were needed
01:33specifically for potential donations after circulatory death?
01:37The primary problem in Kentucky related to them failing to reevaluate their initial neurologic exam
01:46and failing to see that instead of somebody slowly getting worse
01:49or staying at a very low level of brain function, that they were in many cases recovering.
01:54I see.
01:55Now, Hearst's report concludes that the Kentucky OPO disregarded or dismissed any indication
02:00that a patient who was identified as a potential donor would ultimately not be eligible for donation.
02:06And from the report, the OPA appears to have been determined to proceed with the donation protocol
02:11until it was forced to stop by a physician's refusal to do the procurement operation.
02:17And various hospital staff do not appear to have stepped in to stop the process either until the very end.
02:22And despite this, some organizations argue that discussing concerning cases like this
02:27openly leads to fewer donations and harm to the donation and transplant system.
02:31So, Dr. Lynch, I can't believe I'm asking you this because it seems absurd,
02:36but what is Hearst's response to criticism that identifying and discussing lapses in patient safety
02:42in the OPTN is harmful to the system?
02:46I mean, I don't agree with that, but go ahead.
02:48I'll keep it brief for your other questions.
02:50It's twofold.
02:51The first is that trust is earned.
02:53It's not to be expected.
02:55It's earned every day.
02:55And the second is that no system ever improved in the dark.
03:00We need to have good data.
03:01We need to show that we are paying attention.
03:04And look, the bottom line is transparency is everything.
03:07You know, I mean, I've been here a long time.
03:09And if you don't have transparency, ultimately, you know, things don't work.
03:15So I totally agree with you.
03:18Last question, though you can take time on this.
03:20What are specific ways that improved oversight of the system will help restore confidence that the OPTN is safe and effective
03:28and that people should be organ donors?
03:31You have almost two minutes to answer that one.
03:34So, again, the adequate collection of data.
03:37The OPOs already collect these data on the patients with whom they interact,
03:42making sure that that's relayed to the government and that, in turn, is able to be used for analysis and for public use.
03:49The OPTN already is a leading example of making all data that we have available to researchers and policy advocates,
03:56adding in all the data on either end.
03:58The individuals with whom OPOs interact before they are organ donors and the individuals with whom transplant centers interact
04:06before they are on the wait list will help us to really understand the system
04:10and make sure that we're providing consistent, good care.
04:14All right.
04:15I mean, if the goal is trust in the system, there has to be consistent standards for all OPOs
04:21to avoid disparate treatment for patients based on where they live and receive care.
04:27And HRSA's corrective action plan, I think, is a step in that direction.
04:31And the OPTN and OPOs should welcome a constructive response from HRSA
04:35to prevent egregious incidents that put patients at risk.
04:38It's very important.
04:40So, with that, Mr. Chairman, thank you.
04:42I yield back.
04:43The gentleman yields.
04:44The chair now recognizes the vice chairman of the committee, Mr. Balderson, for his five minutes of questioning.

Recommended