PTI Should Resign if They Don’t Want to Join Parliament: Rana Sanaullah

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00The second last paragraph of your announcement is very interesting.

00:06I would like to ask you because it is very interesting.

00:09It says that the committee has agreed that no institution or individual or group working with the enemy forces

00:16will be allowed to damage the security and stability of Pakistan.

00:20The committee has expressed regret over the absence of some members of the opposition party

00:25and has promised that the process of consultation will continue.

00:28First of all, you say that the opposition has boycotted institutions or groups working with the enemy forces.

00:38Are you implying that the people who did not come today are terrorists?

00:44Are you implying that the PTI or other opposition parties did not come?

00:49Because this sentence could have been different.

00:51You have added this sentence to the announcement.

00:54Is this an innocent way?

00:56No, this sentence is added to the announcement.

01:04The reason for this is that after the Jaffar Express incident,

01:12if this is just a coincidence, then let's move ahead and see what happens next.

01:20The statements that were made by the Indian media,

01:28and the way they were showing that God knows what will happen in Pakistan,

01:35the social media wing of the political party was also saying the same thing.

01:45I was not able to understand whether the Indian media was endorsing them or they were endorsing them.

01:51So, Mr. Rana, tell us one thing.

01:53The situation of the PTI, the way it is,

02:01there is a need for further consideration.

02:05So, I should understand correctly that you have included the PTI and other opposition parties in this account.

02:15So, I should understand correctly that you have included them in this account.

02:18No, we do not include them in this account, but if they themselves fall into this account,

02:23then what solution do we have?

02:25You tell me, should they not have come today?

02:27They should have come today.

02:29Either they should have resigned from the Parliament,

02:35or they should have come to the Parliament to get facilities, funds,

02:43they would have reached everywhere to get their salaries, but why didn't they come today?

02:48So, you are saying that the big leader who is a member of the National Assembly,

02:57who did not come today, the PTI did not come, they are not concerned about the country.

03:06They are not concerned about the country at all, they are only concerned about themselves or their leader.

03:13So, Mr. Rana, I want to ask you a question.

03:15If there is Pakistan, then there is Pakistan. If there is no Khan, then there is no Pakistan.

03:19You may have missed my question.

03:22The PTI did not come, so if that was the case, then why did Nawaz Sharif not come?

03:27He was the Prime Minister three times, he is also the MNA.

03:30Then why did he not come to today's meeting?

03:34Look, for example, if the PTI or the opposition party had come,

03:41then it was not necessary that out of the 92 members,

03:46we would have said that 92 out of 92 should come.

03:49The ratio of all the parties…

03:52So, the Speaker did not call Mr. Nawaz Sharif?

03:55He is called a party committee.

03:56He did not call Mr. Nawaz Sharif?

03:57Three times Prime Minister, party leader, MNA, he did not call him?

04:01He did not invite Mr. Nawaz Sharif?

04:03The thing is that the number of party leadership that was formed,

04:09that so many people, that is, the number was decided,

04:13according to the number of people in the parliament,

04:18that 14 people will come, 20 people will come,

04:21Mr. Rana, Mr. Rana, one second, Mr. Rana, one second.

04:24Your entire party, your party's name is Nawaz League.

04:29He is your three-time Prime Minister.

04:31He is the head of your party.

04:33Was there anyone more important than him?

04:35Especially when this person is the Prime Minister himself,

04:38and during his time, he did all the operations, military operations,

04:42and you take credit that we did it.

04:44Shouldn't he have been in this meeting, which was on terrorism?

04:48Was there anyone more important than him in your party?

04:50No, listen, listen to me.

04:54The thing is that you say that Mr. Imran Khan should have been on behalf of PTA,

05:00someone else should have been on behalf of someone else.

05:02The thing is that when the PMLN government's representative is present there,

05:07then there is no point in this matter.

05:12Okay, tell me personally, in your opinion,

05:15personally, in your opinion, should he have been there?

05:21He should have contributed.

05:22No, look, there is no such thing in this that he should have been there.

05:30If he wanted to be there or if he was there, then it was okay,

05:35but if he is not there, then his party had a full representation.

05:40Chief Minister Punjab was present there.

05:42The Prime Minister was present there.

05:45The President of Punjab was present there.

05:48The other senior leaders of his party were present there.

05:51Okay, tell me one thing, you are criticizing,

05:54when you know, every time you say that the PTA people are looking for excuses to leave the meetings,

06:00they have already ended the negotiations,

06:02they told you to introduce us to the leaders,

06:05after that we will also join.

06:08If they had introduced us yesterday, then what mountain would have fallen?

06:11You are also stubborn, they should have introduced us.

06:13No, no, Mr. Malik, the matter is that when they were first told that,

06:20you should participate and according to the ratio set by the Speaker,

06:27you should give the names of 14 people.

06:29They gave the names of 14 people, they said that we are coming, there is no such thing.

06:34After that, I think it was around 11.30 or 12,

06:40they said that these three people should include our names.

06:45When the Speaker said that according to the ratio, this issue will be raised,

06:50others will be objected,

06:52so they put a lot of effort to include the names of three more people.

06:57So we were not even in doubt, they went somewhere.

07:00I think that when they took a walk,

07:02after that they thought that we did not want to go.

07:05So this was their very late decision,

07:07according to that nothing could have happened in the morning.

07:10This is the opinion of the PTA.

07:13No, Mr. Malik, you tell me,

07:15if they had come there and first objected to this,

07:20after that whatever their point of view was,

07:23whatever they wanted to do, they would have done it there,

07:26they would have kept their position there,

07:28so wasn't that better?

07:30No, I have repeatedly said this to Salman and Raja,

07:32I have said that you have wasted the opportunity,

07:34you have given an open field to the government to do whatever they want,

07:39this is what I argued with them,

07:41I said that you should have come,

07:43and you should not have left this.

07:46But Mr. Raja, the real thing is that everything has happened now,

07:50in the coming days,

07:52the Army Chief has also said that Pakistan should have a hard state,

07:57we will continue to sacrifice innocent lives for a soft state.

08:02Now in a hard state,

08:04military and economic powers,

08:07these two powers are considered a symbol of a hard state,

08:11and they think that a soft state is better than a hard state.

08:14So in that, democracy and democracy become secondary.

08:18Does Pakistan afford to become a hard state?

08:21What is the normal meaning of that?

08:24No, look, these terrorists,

08:30the kind of their activities,

08:35these soft targets,

08:38look, there is one thing,

08:40they attack military targets,

08:43now the training that they have done,

08:46the two or three things that have happened,

08:48Mr. Raja, thank you very much,

08:50time is up,

08:51I am sorry your answer could not be complete,

08:53thank you very much,

08:54let's take a break.

Category

Transcript

Recommended