" Maryam Nawaz Ne Jo Aaj Judges Ko Target Kya Is Par Tauheen e Adalat Karwai Hosakti Hai, "

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00In Pakistan, in my personal opinion, there is not a single percent chance that an emergency will be imposed in the country.

00:11This is not a joke.

00:13Your economy is on its last breath. You are saying that you want to drive away the investors.

00:19Who will invest in your country for which you are raising slogans?

00:23When you say that there is an emergency in the country, there is not.

00:26But you are trying to drive away the investors.

00:29I understand the constitutional breakdown.

00:32Today, the Election Commission of Pakistan has expressed its unanimous approval for the implementation of this decision.

00:38Although, they have clarified their role in this matter.

00:41Now, we have to wait for a detailed judgment.

00:43But, we did not see the attitude of the government that they will let it be implemented so easily.

00:47They will go to the Parliament, to the Speaker.

00:49They will try to do whatever they can.

00:51So, do you see a constitutional breakdown in the future?

00:58Maria, first of all, what the Election Commission has tried to clarify is that they have tried to argue their case once again.

01:05Although, the Supreme Court has already made a decision.

01:07So, in my opinion, the way they are presenting their arguments on the Supreme Court's arguments is contemptuous.

01:14We will see, we will think about what we can do and what we cannot do.

01:18They do not have this opportunity now.

01:20It is a decree of the Supreme Court.

01:22They have been commanded to do something.

01:24Within 15 days, it is necessary to give those seats to the Muftis.

01:27After that, if they are doing this, then they have this with them.

01:36And, they are a victim of a fundamental misunderstanding.

01:38Which the courts had already hung for them.

01:40So, do not think that your independence is because you are equal to the Supreme Court or a court that gives justice.

01:49Your independence is because you have to file and get the elections done fairly.

01:53If you do not succeed in that work and you fail, then there will definitely be a judicial intervention to punish you.

02:01But, we are seeing this position again.

02:03Constitutional breakdown happens when Sindh wants something in terms of water and Punjab wants something else.

02:08And, the constitution says something else.

02:10Constitutional breakdown happens when the wellheads are of gas and the first right of gas belongs to one province.

02:18And, the people of that province are not getting it.

02:20And, despite that, the constitution says something else.

02:23And, in this, the provinces are interacting with each other and are not listening to the constitution.

02:28Or, the disobedience of the constitution is happening at a state level.

02:31This is not a constitutional breakdown that you did not like a decision.

02:35And, you are threatening the judges that we did not like it and now we are going to tear the constitution.

02:42This is not a constitutional breakdown.

02:44This is a threat of treason.

02:46Article 6 addresses this.

02:48This is not a breakdown within the scope of the constitution.

02:51This is just bad sportsmanship.

02:54A decision has come against you.

02:56A decision has come against you.

02:58That decision is being presented as if it was a judicial gymnastics.

03:02After that, before the decision is implemented, they are leaving the idea that everything will be destroyed.

03:08Yes, it will be destroyed.

03:10But, what you are understanding will not be destroyed.

03:12For the rest of the people, the country may face more difficulties.

03:16This is nonsense.

03:18I think this is a random saber rattling.

03:21And, this is not called a constitutional breakdown.

03:23This is called contempt.

03:25This is what the government is trying to do.

03:27And, the election commission is also pointing out.

03:30So, the election commission is also talking about contempt.

03:33Because, it is very clear that all the judges agree that the election commission of Pakistan's interpretation was wrong.

03:39If the government delays in this matter, then that will also be contempt of court.

03:43Although, they have the right to review.

03:45What can be the legal repercussions if this judgment is not implemented?

03:48Maria, first of all, the way the truth has been used today.

03:54You can post-mortem the judgment of the judges.

03:58You can destroy it.

04:00But, you cannot question the personality of the judges.

04:04You cannot talk about their personality.

04:06You cannot talk about the institution.

04:08You cannot scandalize the institution.

04:12The word contempt is used.

04:15There is also a contempt of court ordinance on it.

04:18And, there can be a proceeding of contempt under Article 204 of the Constitution.

04:23And, I think the judgment given by the Supreme Court is exactly in accordance with the law.

04:30The two orders were of the election commission and one was of the Peshawar High Court.

04:35Both of them were satisfied by the Supreme Court.

04:37On this, there is a judgment of the Hyderabad High Court.

04:40And, there is a judgment of the Supreme Court by Mr. Tashadduk Jilani.

04:43And, there is a judgment of the early Supreme Court.

04:45In which, if a foundation of a building is illegal,

04:50and superstructure which is made over that building, that would also be considered illegal.

04:54If there is an illegal order and a lot of buildings are built on it,

04:58if the fundamental order itself is declared illegal,

05:01then all other set-ups will be illegal.

05:04So, when the two basic decisions are set aside,

05:07then this PTI will go to anti-status, to the previous position.

05:13This is not a rewriting.

05:15In Article 187, it is provided that complete justice will be done,

05:21substantial justice will be done.

05:23For example, in the case of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto,

05:25under Article 186 of the Constitution,

05:30Article 10 was not given to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.

05:34However, that was decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

05:38That was the judgment.

05:40Under Article 186, only the President can send a reference,

05:43on which the question of law is ambiguous.

05:47So, guidance can be taken on that.

05:49Now, when the Supreme Court is listening under Article 187,

05:52or under Article 186, then the Supreme Court is not bound by any restrictions.

05:57When substantial justice is to be done,

05:59then there is no restriction of any kind.

06:01The mistakes that were there, the orders that were illegal,

06:04they have set them aside.

06:06No storm has broken out in that.

06:08Now, see, it is written in this,

06:10that when an election boy comes to the Parliament,

06:14comes to the National Assembly,

06:16then within three days he has to join a party,

06:19Azad Mohid Warne.

06:20In this, what is being said for 15 days,

06:22you see, if the Supreme Court had given three days,

06:24then the situation that could have been implemented today,

06:27these are pro-consequences,

06:29after that election,

06:31if it would have been before joining,

06:34then it could have been said that this is wrong.

06:37But now, because they have done complete justice,

06:39it is a landmark judgment,

06:41and there is no such illegality in it.

06:43Let's see about its implementation.

06:45Now, we see that the government,

06:47it seems that they are not in the mood,

06:49but they will resist further,

06:51and politically also.

06:53We will hear different opinions on this.

Category

Transcript

Recommended