What should the offering of the poor to God be like? VC6-E20-I
- há 5 anos
Actions that occur in the sky are didactically represented in rituals determined as the shadow of celestial facts, these shadows need physical objects for man to observe, and sometimes they cannot be acquired because of people's poverty. Thus God has used alterations by limiting the poor, not because the right is changed, but because love can understand the difficulty of every person in the world in which he lives.
Thus we have "if their possessions are not enough for small cattle" 1, ie the limit is not in God is in man, if man cannot have small cattle then God delimits a necessary factor for man. This can be seen in other facts, for example, David ate of the holy loaves "they ate the loaves of the proposition, which was not lawful for him to eat, nor to his fellows, but only to the priests," and even the priests worked on the sabbath. law that on Saturdays the priests in the temple violate the Sabbath, and are without blame, "all these factors are linked to needs.
One of the basic rules of everything is that a need is not a rule. So when you are hungry and at risk of death, you can eat the holy bread, but this is not to eat, it is a case of necessity. So if the priest does not light the fire in the sanctuary on Saturdays, or does he put out who would light the fire for the sacrifice? In other words, the limiting can never determine the whole.
For example, the rituals of Yom Kippur were performed by the shrine, and throughout the year the shrine prepared for the day of atonement, the shrine unlike a poor person, was made up of many people's gift possessions, so the ritual system could not be made different from the established rule. Whether it was goats, fire, or any material in the rite, there was no shortage, and in fact it cannot compare with a starving person, or one who has no money for sheep, or small cattle.
In fact a person who tries to idealize that except for an individual's poverty, is brought to the wealthy priests, has a rational problem, idealizing that when giving alms to a poor man, he should automatically set aside such money for a rich man, which really tends to be a deviation of reason.
Thus we have "if their possessions are not enough for small cattle" 1, ie the limit is not in God is in man, if man cannot have small cattle then God delimits a necessary factor for man. This can be seen in other facts, for example, David ate of the holy loaves "they ate the loaves of the proposition, which was not lawful for him to eat, nor to his fellows, but only to the priests," and even the priests worked on the sabbath. law that on Saturdays the priests in the temple violate the Sabbath, and are without blame, "all these factors are linked to needs.
One of the basic rules of everything is that a need is not a rule. So when you are hungry and at risk of death, you can eat the holy bread, but this is not to eat, it is a case of necessity. So if the priest does not light the fire in the sanctuary on Saturdays, or does he put out who would light the fire for the sacrifice? In other words, the limiting can never determine the whole.
For example, the rituals of Yom Kippur were performed by the shrine, and throughout the year the shrine prepared for the day of atonement, the shrine unlike a poor person, was made up of many people's gift possessions, so the ritual system could not be made different from the established rule. Whether it was goats, fire, or any material in the rite, there was no shortage, and in fact it cannot compare with a starving person, or one who has no money for sheep, or small cattle.
In fact a person who tries to idealize that except for an individual's poverty, is brought to the wealthy priests, has a rational problem, idealizing that when giving alms to a poor man, he should automatically set aside such money for a rich man, which really tends to be a deviation of reason.