Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • today
During debate on the House floor, Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA) ripped into a Republican-backed rules package.
Transcript
00:00I rise in strong opposition to the rule. Although Bitcoin's been around for over
00:0515 years, cryptocurrencies and related decentralized financial products have
00:10exploded in the past few years. Many Americans now own cryptocurrencies and
00:14the industry has seen significant growth. At the same time, our laws have not kept
00:19up with these novel crypto products and there's a wide agreement that Congress
00:24must update our laws to appropriately account for crypto assets. However,
00:28today's bills are not the answer to that problem. The Clarity and Genius Acts are
00:34bad legislation. They're industry written bills that give the crypto industry
00:39everything it wants at the expense of retail investors, consumers and the
00:44overall health of our financial system. These bills are products of the DC
00:48swamp that so many of our colleagues usually condemn. Mr. Speaker, every time
00:53our Republican colleagues write a finance bill, it leaves us less safe and more
00:58prone to financial crisis. We saw the very real consequences of this when Silicon
01:03Valley Bank failed in 2023. That failure was the direct result of Republican
01:09legislation that exempted Silicon Valley Bank from Dodd-Frank Act regulations. GOP
01:15proponents of that bill had argued without evidence that Dodd-Frank was too
01:19onerous and that big banks needed regulatory relief. But it only took a couple of
01:24years for their disastrous deregulatory agenda to lead exactly where we all knew
01:29it would, with billions of dollars of customer deposits evaporating overnight and with the
01:34federal government bailing out the bank's uninsured depositors. This time,
01:40Republicans are at it again with two bills that will create a weak and ineffective
01:44regulatory regime for cryptocurrencies and stable coins, allowing exchanges and insurers
01:50to continue risky, fraudulent and illegal practices with limited oversight by the SEC or Commodity Futures
01:58Trading Commission. These bills give the crypto industry exactly what it wants. They get the illusion
02:03of a real regulatory regime and the legitimacy that would bestow. They get weak rules that can be
02:10exploited and manipulated for financial gain. And they get enforcement mechanisms that are so meager
02:16and underfunded that they won't deter bad actors. We've seen what deregulation gets us. It got us the
02:222008 financial crisis. It gets us bankruptcies and bailouts. And it ultimately leaves hard-working
02:28Americans holding the bag while CEOs get golden parachutes. And it's not like we're talking about
02:34deregulating some benign financial product. Crypto stands out as a uniquely risky asset. From the
02:42invention of Bitcoin until now, the primary demonstrated uses for cryptocurrencies have been
02:47speculation, fraud, and money laundering. You can't really use crypto to buy anything. The coins
02:54themselves aren't backed by any profits, assets, or other tangible property. And while we've been
02:59hearing about all the wonders of the blockchain for over a decade, shockingly few companies actually
03:04use it in a way that's essential to their business. In practice, the main real-life use case for crypto
03:11is money laundering. Crypto is used by Mexican cartels to launder their proceeds from drugs
03:17trafficked into the United States. Terrorist organizations fund their operations with crypto.
03:24And countries like North Korea use cryptocurrencies to avoid U.S. sanctions and fund their nuclear weapons
03:30programs. In fact, Bitcoin and Tether are the payment methods of choice for the fentanyl manufacturers
03:37in China that supply the Mexican cartels as well as other fentanyl traffickers inside the United States.
03:44These criminal organizations rely on crypto and the legislation under consideration today will not
03:51disrupt that illegal commerce. The Clarity and Genius Acts will not do anything to prevent crypto from
03:57being used to break our laws or fund fentanyl deaths and senior fraud. These bills do not provide any
04:04meaningful regulations to ensure that issuers and exchanges fully comply with anti-money laundering
04:10laws. Add to this that cryptocurrencies are used to facilitate billions of dollars worth of fraud
04:17against Americans each year. This fraud comes in the form of scams, especially those targeting seniors,
04:23where fraudsters trick people into purchasing fake crypto products and then run off with the money,
04:29leaving the seniors with no recourse. Then there's the institutional fraud, the fraud that comes from
04:34the crypto companies themselves. Here we also have a long list of examples, the most notable being the
04:40fall in bankruptcy of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which incorporated itself in the Bahamas to avoid
04:47American regulatory scrutiny, gambled with customer funds and ultimately left its customers penniless
04:54because of fraudulent business practices. There's no other way around it. The Clarity and Genius Acts will
05:00not stop these types of fraud from happening and they will leave regular investors on the hook if they're
05:06victims of fraud. The other glaring omission in these bills is they do nothing to stop the abuse of
05:11cryptocurrencies and stable coins as tools for bribery and influence peddling. As President Trump and his
05:19allies have demonstrated on a daily basis, any politician can issue a crypto asset, own the majority
05:25of tokens, and then anyone who wants to buy that politician's assistant attention or votes can just
05:32invest in the asset. There's no oversight or disclosure requirement. There's deniability on both sides of
05:38the transaction. Any person, any foreign country can bribe and buy politicians through cryptocurrency like this.
05:47And those who've purchased such coins have been open about their motivations for doing so.
05:53Right before his inauguration, President Trump issued his own coin, the Trump coin, for which he is the
05:58majority owner. Millions of dollars of questionable funds, including funds from foreigners and foreign
06:03governments, have flowed into this coin, as well as his company's Trump Media and World Liberty Financial.
06:10All in all, it's estimated that President Trump has netted one billion dollars from those crypto
06:15schemes, which take advantage of the office of the president to enrich him and his family. During the
06:242024 election, crypto companies donated millions of dollars to elect the president, and after he was
06:30elected, they donated millions more to his inaugural committee. And it's notable that in his first six
06:36months in office, Trump has dismantled all the regulators that oversee the financial and crypto
06:42industries, dropped criminal charges and investigations against various crypto companies, pardoned a crypto
06:48exchange that pleaded guilty to abetting money laundering, and pardoned the former owner of the Silk Road,
06:55who was responsible for selling hundreds of millions of dollars worth of drugs on the deep web.
07:01Apparently, anyone who seeks to buy influence in this White House simply has to find one of the
07:06president's companies or meme coins and make a sizable investment. Emiratis and Saudis are investing in
07:13Trump's crypto assets to curry favor. People looking for pardons, dismissals or preferential regulatory
07:20treatment are taking advantage of the Trump crypto scheme. Lawyers and lobbyists are advertising to
07:26clients that they can buy a pardon for the right price. It's easily the biggest potential corruption scandal
07:33in our nation's presidential history. If there's any crypto regulation we need right now, it's a bright
07:39line prohibition on any elected official profiting off a crypto asset. Mr. Speaker, this year marks the
07:4615th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, which paved the way for corporations
07:52and billionaires to spend unlimited money in our elections. Because of this ruling, anyone for the right
07:59price can buy their preferred outcomes in our elections and in Congress. And one need look no
08:05further than Elon Musk and the crypto bills that we are considering today to see the impact of the
08:12Citizens United decision. We all know about the millions that Musk poured into the Trump campaign
08:18and the White House access he was granted before their abrupt split recently. But the crypto industry also
08:25spent a lot of money, and it spent money to make these bills happen. Over the past few years, the
08:30crypto industry has emerged as one of the biggest and most aggressive political spenders in American
08:36politics. In the 2024 election, crypto emerged as the biggest corporate spender accounting for nearly
08:42half of all the corporate money spent. Crypto outspent every other business lobby by tens of millions of
08:50dollars. And while the crypto industry's political spending is enormous, what really sets it apart
08:55is the brazenness with which the industry buys influence in Washington. Usually it's hard to
09:01exactly pinpoint a direct relationship between political spending and outcomes, but crypto spending
09:06is so in your face that we can actually put a price on these bills. All in all, the Clarity and Genius
09:13Acts cost the crypto industry about $245 million. And that's a conservative figure. That's just the money
09:19spent on 2024 campaigns. If you count money spent to hire expensive lobbyists, to come to Congress,
09:26and apply representatives with industry talking points, the number's even higher. Crypto's $245
09:32million was spent supporting candidates who backed the industry and defeating candidates who did not.
09:38And crypto got a good return on its investment. In the overwhelming majority of races that crypto
09:44principles invested in, they got their preferred candidate. And now crypto companies have been
09:49able to write their own regulations to ensure they won't face serious scrutiny or oversight,
09:54meaning that fraud and money laundering will continue unabated, and investors will be on the
09:59hook when the next crypto crisis happens. Fifteen years after the Citizens United decision, these bills
10:05are the direct result. Crypto is a textbook example of the consequences of that decision. The question
10:12before us today is, how should cryptocurrencies be regulated? And the answer we're getting is with
10:18regulations provided by the crypto industry itself. Fifteen years later, Citizens United has been an
10:24unmitigated disaster for our country. Unlimited spending in politics has corroded our democracy.
10:31It has bred cynicism and nihilism in the political process. It's made Americans feel disenfranchised and
10:36powerless. It says to every American, your voice doesn't count unless you can
10:42pay to play. We have a political system where any company or any rich person can pay for
10:47advertisements, pay for lobbyists, donate to campaigns and PACs and super PACs, all to buy
10:52influence and get their desired income outcomes from Congress or the White House. And time and time again,
10:59in every sector of our economy, corporations and the rich have won in Congress, in the courts,
11:04and in the rulemaking process, even in decision making by enforcement agencies.
11:08We see the consequences of Citizens United everywhere we turn. It's the reason corporations
11:15can screw over workers and consumers with no penalty. It's why every part of the economy is
11:20monopolized by two or three companies that sell you poor products and give you bad service. It's why
11:26we're diving headfirst into a global climate crisis and doing nothing about it. It's why every time
11:32someone runs for office on a platform of putting people over profits, they have to endure attacks
11:37from super PACs supported by billionaires or business interests. Our democracy will remain
11:43in peril so long as the mega rich can buy influence, votes and elections. If anyone was unsure of the
11:51consequences posed by Citizens United in 2010, it is now clear, but beyond any doubt, that the decision was an
11:58abject failure for the country. We have to overturn Citizens United, get dark money out of politics,
12:04and make sure that our government is accountable to voters, not donors. But to my colleagues here
12:10in the House, we don't need to end campaign spending for members of Congress to do the right thing.
12:16Integrity doesn't require authorizing legislation. We cannot allow big money donors to buy or bully
12:23Congress. We need to do the right thing. Mr. Speaker, today's rule also provides for consideration of
12:29the fiscal year 2026 defense appropriations bill. Since taking the majority in the House, Republicans
12:35have abandoned, unfortunately, any pretense of bipartisan compromise to promote our national security by
12:42loading every defense bill with radical right-wing policy riders. These riders have turned what was
12:48once a rare area of bipartisan consensus into yet another partisan divide. This time around, Republicans
12:56have loaded the national defense bill with provisions to prevent female service members from accessing
13:02reproductive health care. They've given a green light to discrimination against LGBTQ service members,
13:09and this bill does nothing to address the gross mismanagement of the Pentagon by Pete Hegseth,
13:15a man who has leaked classified intelligence, who spends more time in front of his Pentagon makeup
13:21mirror and doing press stunts than effectively managing the armed forces, and who has prioritized
13:27support for bigotry and weird culture war obsessions like changing the pictures on the Pentagon's website
13:33and renaming military bases after Confederate icons. When you combine this bill with the money spent by
13:40Republicans in the big beautiful bill, the United States is on track to spend over a trillion dollars on defense.
13:48Every year we spend more and more on defense, and it's not clear that taxpayers are getting a good deal.
13:55After years of consolidation and lax antitrust enforcement, the defense industry has ossified
14:01around five major prime contractors, each with a degree of specialization.
14:06That means only two or three companies ever compete for a major contract. The consequences of this
14:12consolidation can be found across the defense industrial base. We don't make enough of the weapons
14:18and platforms that we need. Production for major platforms is often beset by delays and cost overruns.
14:25We spend billions on studies and research programs that don't lead anywhere. Production timelines are always
14:32being extended, delivery times delay, per-unit costs increase, and in the face of these glaring business
14:39inefficiencies, Congress and the Pentagon always give the contractors what they ask for, and ask for
14:45very little in return. We need to replenish our weapons stockpiles. We need to quickly field next
14:51generation military assets like the Columbia submarine and the B-21 radar. We need to bolster supply chains
14:58that support this production, and we need to ensure that the nation has the industrial capacity to
15:03respond to a sustained major conflict anywhere in the world. But in order for us to achieve these goals,
15:10meet our national security needs, and support our service members, Congress needs to perform real
15:16oversight over the Pentagon and defense contractors. In my time in Congress, I have supported multiple
15:22efforts to require the Pentagon to perform a clean audit with tangible enforcement mechanisms to ensure
15:28compliance. But in each case, these efforts haven't garnered the votes for passage, because at the
15:34end of the day, this body has not been willing to hold the Pentagon and defense industry's feet to the fire.
15:41The Pentagon has failed to complete seven audits in a row. Seven! And until the Pentagon faces real
15:48consequences for being unable to account for the billions of taxpayer dollars it spends every year
15:54and failing to comply with congressional oversight, we will never have accountability. And at a time when
16:00our Republican colleagues' quest to root out fraud, waste, and abuse has led them to slash funding for
16:07Americans' health care and hunger relief, it's astonishing that they're willing to write yet another
16:13blank check to the Department of Defense, no questions asked, despite growing evidence of cost
16:18overruns, mismanagement, and more. At the end of the day, I want our service members to have every
16:25single advantage over our adversaries. I want them to have all the tools, platforms, resources, and weapon
16:31systems we can provide. But I don't want taxpayers to get a bad deal. I don't want to waste money on
16:38overpriced defense contracts that over-promise and under-deliver. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
16:45the gentlelady reserves and
16:46the gentlelady reserves —

Recommended