Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/20/2025
During a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing last week, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) questioned Adam Telle, nominee to be Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, about coastal flooding issues.
Transcript
00:00Senator Whitehouse.
00:02Thanks, Chairman.
00:04Mr. McMaster, the Chair and I both intend to deliver to you a robust bipartisan surface transportation reauthorization.
00:14As we discussed in my office, in order for that to happen,
00:18we need assurances that whatever bipartisan legislation we write and get enacted into law
00:24will be implemented by the Executive Branch in a faithful and unbiased way.
00:29And in particular, we need to clear the illegal funding freezes that have jammed up so many already appropriated projects.
00:38Will you commit to implementing any and all authorized programs in a faithful and unbiased manner?
00:44Senator, I appreciate your comment and your question.
00:49It's an important one.
00:50I give you my full commitment, if I'm confirmed, to implement the law with the intent of Congress.
00:59You understand how it would be hard for the minority to agree to a bipartisan bill
01:07if the upshot of that agreement was that only the majority's parts of the bill were actually implemented
01:13and everything that we wanted got binned by the Executive Branch?
01:17Senator, I appreciate your comments.
01:19I think, as the Secretary pointed out, infrastructure is not partisan.
01:25And you have my full commitment to implement the law in accordance with the intent of Congress.
01:33Mr. Tell, I have referred to the Army Corps of Engineers as the bureaucratic tributary of the Mississippi River.
01:39That's a rhetorical point that I make to highlight the extent to which the Army Corps appears to favor inland
01:49over coastal flooding projects.
01:53We've looked back at the inland and coastal flooding account at the Army Corps,
01:59and its best year was $20 for inland for every $1 for flooding, for flooding, coastal, right?
02:07That was our best year as coastal states.
02:09Worst year was $100 for inland flooding for every $1 for coastal flooding.
02:16Rhode Island's sea level is up about 11 inches.
02:21That's not a debatable proposition.
02:23You measure that the same way you measure the height of your kid on the doorway.
02:29It's really simple.
02:30It's inches and rulers.
02:33And so we have real coastal flooding issues.
02:37And I would like your assurance that you will take these inland versus coastal concerns seriously
02:47as coastal flooding becomes more and more of a danger for coastal communities.
02:54Senator Whitehouse, thank you for raising this issue.
02:58And I look forward to and am eager to, if confirmed, make sure we have our hands around this data and understand it.
03:05I think historically the riverine flooding has been easier to predict, perhaps, than the locations of coastal flooding.
03:13But that doesn't mean we shouldn't invest a greater amount in coastal flooding.
03:17This is obviously an issue that's been near and dear to my heart, working on hurricane recovery my entire career,
03:23as well as inland flooding, riverine flooding.
03:26But I would just say I think you're right.
03:29As we work to justify and prioritize, as Chairman Capito mentioned,
03:33the projects that are of the greatest benefit to the public,
03:35we have to be able to consider things that have in the past been unpredictable
03:39and try to predict them more accurately.
03:41Thank you, Senator.
03:42Yeah, I'd also add that FEMA's mapping has been such a flagrant disaster
03:48that states like mine have had to do their own flood mapping
03:55because FEMA's mapping simply wasn't worthy of belief.
04:00You don't have to look much beyond FEMA's flood mapping of the Houston area
04:06versus the actual flooding, repeated flooding, in the Houston area,
04:11which is a really big area in the last decade, to see how bad FEMA's mapping has been.
04:18So part of the problem is to fix the mapping as well as to fix the priorities.
04:25So I look forward to working with you on that.
04:27Senator, if I may really quickly, this is an issue I've worked on in the past,
04:31and I would say there is a great deal of frustration in the public around FEMA's mapping programs.
04:37It's not something that I will be in charge of if confirmed,
04:39but certainly something I will work on.
04:42But to the extent that you rely on them, you need to go in eyes wide open that they're a failure.
04:46One of the frustrations that the public has had about FEMA's maps
04:48is it doesn't adequately consider flash flooding, rain storms.
04:53It only considers storm surges in many cases,
04:56and it doesn't adequately consider flood control infrastructures.
05:00So these are issues that have to be addressed
05:02in order to give the public confidence in the government's product.
05:04I'd also like to work with you and the chairman on a priorities list.
05:09We're committee members who feel that a project has gotten lost in the Army Corps' bureaucracy
05:15can get a regular scheduled briefing from the Army Corps
05:19where we put our projects on that list,
05:22and you know that those projects are on that list,
05:26and you're going to have to come in and report to us on them on a regular basis
05:29so that projects that are important to members of this committee
05:33get the attention that they deserve.
05:35Senator, when Congress passes a law and the president signs it,
05:40there's some expectation that it be followed,
05:42and I look forward to working with you on that.
05:43Good.
05:43Well, this is an issue where the chair and I are going to need to work together and agree,
05:47but we would certainly urge that senior Army Corps folks
05:50turn up for those briefings on those projects
05:53once we've sorted out what that looks like.
05:55And I would add just...
05:58And I would add just...
05:58And I would add just...

Recommended