"Game Palat Jaygi Agar Imran Khan...", Sahibzada Hamid Raza Breaks Big News

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00Sir, this committee is a very big committee.

00:04Such negotiations are also sensitive.

00:08There are three parties.

00:10It is very important to agree on at least two parties for such negotiations.

00:13It is a special establishment.

00:15You know that mastermind is Imran Khan.

00:21Today, two more people have joined.

00:23Mr. Jadhul Haq and Mr. Magsi have joined.

00:25This is a whole gang.

00:27Will such negotiations be possible?

00:29Is this serious enough for talks?

00:31Such negotiations are behind the curtains.

00:34When something comes out, it should come out.

00:37We three people were there today.

00:39One was Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf.

00:41Mr. Kaisar was there.

00:42Mr. Nasir Abbas was from MWM.

00:44And I was from SIC.

00:46We are three united parties.

00:48Now, the government also has a problem.

00:50The sensitivity of this committee and its effectiveness

00:55or its media hype, the government's political parties want to become a member of this committee.

01:01That's what I feel.

01:02This is my personal point of view.

01:03Maybe I am wrong.

01:04Do they want to become a problem to solve?

01:08No, some of them are serious.

01:10They are talking about solving the problem.

01:12For example, Mr. Magsi said this earlier.

01:15When the special committee meeting was held after the abduction of MNS from the Parliament House,

01:20he played a big role in it.

01:22Similarly, Mr. Ijaz-ul-Aqsa spoke very positively at that time.

01:25Mr. Ijaz-ul-Aqsa was very close to Mr. Tariq-e-Insaf.

01:28Yes, absolutely.

01:29If a positive person feeds into it and brings things closer,

01:32I think it will be easier.

01:33The rest is the government's prerogative.

01:35Mr. Kaisar, they didn't make two sides.

01:36They didn't make ten sides.

01:37That's not true.

01:38I say this because we see that such a thing is successful when it has a small mandate.

01:45The government claimed that it has the power.

01:48It has the power.

01:49It has the decision-making.

01:52Sir, we threw the ball in their court.

01:54You have been saying for eight months that you are the decision-maker,

01:57you are in power, you are in power.

02:00We would have given you the ball.

02:02What do you want?

02:03What did you talk about today?

02:05Today, we talked about the judicial commission on 9th May and 26th November.

02:10We talked about the release of the imprisoned workers.

02:14Including Imran Khan?

02:15Including Imran Khan.

02:16We talked about the martyrs.

02:21We talked about the torture of our workers.

02:24We talked about the torture of our parliamentarians.

02:29And most importantly, we talked about the negotiations.

02:33Some people came out, not from the committee, but from the ruling party,

02:37they came out and said that they would not be in the direction of Adayala,

02:40they would be without Khan.

02:42We made it clear that the negotiations would be in the direction of Imran Khan.

02:45They would be with his consent.

02:47They would be with his consultation.

02:49So, you give us access to Imran Khan.

02:51A lot of complaints were made about Khwaja Asif.

02:53What do I say about Khwaja Asif?

02:58My opinion about him is always very strict.

03:00At this age, a person develops a sense of justice.

03:04And a person tries not to hurt anyone with his attitude.

03:07Khwaja Asif is a personality, I think, of the Pakistani parliament,

03:10on whom he should be rewarded.

03:12He has no respect for anyone other than his own people.

03:16I am older than him.

03:21I feel ashamed to answer in his language.

03:24But the problem is that this is also a matter of our politics.

03:28When we discussed that day, he said that your language is also the most strict.

03:33Now, if you talk to me for a debate,

03:37Mr. Nawaz Sharif, you should not play the role of a law-abiding establishment.

03:42You should deal with the establishment first.

03:47The problem is that he is his spokesperson.

03:50You heard Mr. Nawaz Sharif today.

03:53When you talk to him, you talk about ending the party.

03:56You talk about ending Imran Khan.

03:58You talk about ending the party.

04:00This is his anger.

04:02You have kept people in jail for two years.

04:04The party has not ended.

04:06The party has started.

04:08The party has not ended.

04:10When Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged,

04:12it was assumed that in another 5-7 years,

04:14the people who were there at that time said that it would end.

04:17You have not been able to end the Bhutto phenomenon yet.

04:20Although it has shrunk to the extent of a morning.

04:22If the policies of Bhutto and Bebe Naseer had remained the same,

04:25then perhaps the old era of the People's Party of Pakistan would have happened.

04:30It has shrunk, but Bhutto is still present.

04:33What does the government say?

04:35When you said that you have hawks,

04:37they give such statements.

04:39I heard that there was a lot of talk.

04:41Who is going to talk harshly?

04:43You were mentioned.

04:45What did the government say to you later?

04:47They said that there are hawks on your side too.

04:49So let's forget about the hawks.

04:51What kind of hawks are you?

04:53Who are your hawks?

04:54God knows.

04:55Maybe it was a sign for me because of the past few days.

04:57Or it was a sign for someone else.

04:59Mr. Kashyap, you know that I have never spoken below the belt.

05:02I speak harshly.

05:04I do.

05:05A lot of people don't like me.

05:07Maybe that's why I also scold a lot of people.

05:09But I have never crossed that moral line and gone down.

05:13I stand firm and criticize Maryam Bebe.

05:15But I am sitting in your program and calling her Maryam Bebe.

05:18But it is my right to criticize her.

05:20Sir, that is political.

05:21I do that.

05:22And she should be in a circle.

05:24She has not nominated anyone from our side.

05:26God knows which hawk she thinks she is.

05:28But she must also be saying that your demands are not acceptable.

05:32She has said two demands.

05:34She has not said that.

05:36I was thinking today, what will happen if you are a king?

05:39I was thinking what will happen if you are a king.

05:42I said that you will keep your demands which you already have.

05:45Remove Imran Khan.

05:46She did not say no.

05:48She did not even say yes.

05:49If Imran Khan comes out, the game will be turned upside down.

05:53The government will not be able to run.

05:55Sir, if Imran Khan comes out, the game will be turned upside down.

05:58Let's wait and see.

06:00You want us to audit the 8th election.

06:04Sir, listen to me.

06:05Do you know why?

06:06Sir, listen to me.

06:07This is the third party.

06:08Do you know this?

06:09Yes.

06:10This is the third party.

06:11Let's leave the first one.

06:12This is the third party.

06:13You want us to go to Madhya Pradesh.

06:15You want us to revisit the 26th amendment.

06:17You want us to end it.

06:18The court was freed.

06:19What will happen?

06:20It will be over.

06:21You want us to follow the law.

06:23You want us to follow the law.

06:25This is a joke.

06:26This cannot happen.

06:27Sir, this is a joke for them.

06:29All your demands are not feasible for them.

06:32Sir, the first two demands are feasible.

06:34Which ones?

06:35Can there be a judicial commission or not?

06:37No.

06:38If they don't want a judicial commission, why don't they do it?

06:41Look, there are two views.

06:42One is that we did not do it on 9th.

06:44The other is that the bullets were fired and the murders took place.

06:47This is your claim.

06:49Yes.

06:50So, the issue is that the government has to go either this way or that way.

06:53The judicial commission will be formed.

06:55So, the results will be controlled.

06:57If you say it will be free, then the results cannot be controlled.

07:00There will be a lot of questions.

07:02How did you reach there?

07:04How did this happen?

07:05How did that happen?

07:06Sir, if they don't agree on a judicial commission, then our claims will be proven to be true.

07:10Then there is something really fishy-fishy.

07:12Because of this, you are not taking us to a judicial commission.

07:14Tell me one thing after the break.

07:15Let's go.

07:16One of them says that we agree to two of your claims.

07:19He says this on the basis of a presumption.

07:21I am going on a break.

07:22Come back and tell me.

07:23He will say, okay, you agree to two of our claims.

07:25You run this government.

07:27You will not tease it for 2-3 years.

07:30Then what will happen?

07:31I will answer this question after the break.

07:33Let's take a break, viewers.

07:34Obviously, when there is a discussion, it is based on some people and some people.

07:37We are agreeing, sir.

07:38Yes, this is right.

Category

Transcript

Recommended