Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) spoke about the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon.
Transcript
00:00And I want to thank everybody for their time here today.
00:03I think from the...
00:05Mr. Chairman.
00:06Oh, I'm sorry, because I didn't see you come in.
00:08Snuck in on you.
00:08I'm sorry about that.
00:12Thank you, Senator.
00:13Congratulations to all of you.
00:14And I really just want to pick up, actually, where Senator Ricketts left off,
00:18and I know Senator Murphy and others with respect to Lebanon, Mr. Issa.
00:23And I want to second the comments that have been made about the need to strengthen the Lebanese armed forces.
00:29In my view, they're an indispensable entity to ensure the central government has sovereign control over the entire territory.
00:38And I take it you agree.
00:40I agree, definitely.
00:41I mean, this is the only hope for them.
00:43Yeah.
00:43I do believe that right now that the UNIFIL forces are an important, play an important role.
00:51Their mandate is set to expire next month.
00:54Do you believe that the administration should support the renewal of that mandate?
00:59Thank you, Senator, for the question.
01:01The UNIFIL has been in Lebanon since the 70s, I believe.
01:06And their role in Lebanon was monitoring the borders between Lebanon and Israel.
01:12At that time, it was a very important role because they were watching what can happen.
01:19Lately, with the war between Israel and Hezbollah, and then the fact that Hezbollah has been removed from the south
01:28and hopefully removed from most of the territory in Lebanon.
01:34The UNIFIL role now is changing because the LAF, Lebanese Air Force, is taking over the south.
01:41And their role is going to be exactly maybe as legitimate now army between the country on the border.
01:52It will be the damper that would create some kind of, let's say, security for northern Israel.
01:59So the role of the UNIFIL is kind of changing now.
02:04If I may, and I'm sorry to cut you off, but I want to get to some of the questions.
02:07Please, go ahead.
02:08Look, obviously, things are in transition.
02:12But we're talking about a mandate that will expire next month.
02:15And I would hope that until we succeed in fully replacing Hezbollah with the LAF in the south
02:24and disarming Hezbollah, my view is they continue to play an important role.
02:27And I hope the administration will recognize that.
02:31If I could turn to you, Mr. Buchan.
02:35And with respect to Morocco, I second the comments of my colleagues.
02:40We are glad to see them join the Abraham Accords.
02:44And the question is the price that was paid in order to achieve that.
02:51And I just want to read a statement from former Senator Inhofe.
02:58Members of the Senate will remember him as a very conservative chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee
03:05who said, I think that all countries should recognize Israel.
03:10I think he was right.
03:11He goes on to say, referring to the announcement by the White House,
03:16essentially asserting Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara.
03:21He said this.
03:23Today's White House announcement alleging Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara is shocking and deeply disappointing.
03:30I am saddened that the rights of the Western Saharan people have been traded away.
03:35And he goes on to detail the long period of colonization and UN resolutions calling for self-determination.
03:45Former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker said, and I quote, of this decision, quote,
03:53an astounding retreat from the principles of international law and diplomacy, jeopardizing our standing across Africa and the world.
04:03My question to you, because I heard that one of your goals is to advance the Moroccan autonomy plan.
04:10My question to you is, do you see the UN having an important role to play in that process?
04:17Senator, thank you for that question.
04:22As you can appreciate, I'm still a private citizen, so I haven't been read into all the details.
04:28What I'll say is this.
04:30I trust President Trump.
04:32I trust Secretary Marco Rubio.
04:35And I, as you know, if confirmed as an ambassador, I execute policy on behalf of the administration.
04:45I don't set policy.
04:47So...
04:47Are you familiar with this whole dispute and Senator Inhofe's views and the statements of Secretary Baker and the concerns expressed?
04:55Are you familiar with that?
04:56I am not familiar with that, sir.
04:58And, but I'm very happy to research that and give back to you and the committee, if appropriate.
05:06Yeah.
05:07Okay.
05:09Senator, if I may, you have a very quick question for the nominee for Thailand, Ms. O'Neill.
05:14We're glad to see the fragile Thai-Cambodian ceasefire holding.
05:19Mr. O'Neill, I apologize.
05:22Thailand also plays a very important role with respect to the Myanmar conflict.
05:27It hosts approximately 150,000 Burmese refugees.
05:33It manages one of the longest and most volatile borders with Myanmar.
05:38And increasingly, it's become a channel for Myanmar's arms procurement through Thai banks,
05:45as the UN Special Rapporteur Tom Andrews spotlighted in a report last year.
05:51So, what role do you think Thailand can play in lessening the conflict in Burma,
05:58which has been ongoing for a long time, at great cost to the people of Burma?
06:05And should there be any diplomatic or other consequences if the Thai government fails to prevent companies
06:13from using Thai financial infrastructure to enable atrocities in Myanmar?
06:19Thank you, Senator, for that question.
06:21I served in Burma years ago in 2007 and 2009 under the last military regime.
06:27And so I saw firsthand – my wife and I were there.
06:29We saw firsthand the horrors they inflicted on their population.
06:32I think it's, frankly, worse this time, probably, because of the violence that's spread throughout the country.
06:40This is a significant problem for Thailand, and it's one, I think, that affects their national interests
06:47and those of their citizens.
06:48You raise a good question of what role they can play.
06:51I think the first role they can play is to not recognize this regime,
06:57not to lend legitimacy to this Burmese regime and its military leadership.
07:04Similarly, I know that it's the Department's position to not encourage them to hold these sham elections
07:11that they're looking to hold in the fall.
07:13And we are encouraging ASEAN nations, I think, and in particular Thailand,
07:18and if confirmed, I would encourage Thailand not to recognize an election
07:22that does not include the participation of over 50 percent of the country
07:25while most of the opposition leaders are in prison.
07:29With respect to your question on the financial networks, sir, if confirmed,
07:34I think that would certainly be something that we would have to look at very –
07:38I would look at very closely.
07:40I would certainly make clear to Thailand that it would not be in their interests
07:46or anyone else's for their financial networks to be used
07:49to fund ongoing instability inside Burma.
07:52Thank you, sir.
07:53I appreciate that.
07:53Thank you, Senator.
07:54Thank you, Senator Van Hollen.

Recommended