Ross Coulthart Reveals Shocking Ufo Truth

Vetted

Patrick discusses another bombshell revelation from Ross Coulthart about the 2004 Tic-Tac incident.  Catch up and watch this video first: https://youtu.be/eTWMlfQYi9I?si=ZW1Sw0N_BHS3tZqI  SUPPORT VETTED:  + JOIN YOUTUBE MEMBERSHIP: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1VfNwcNXSvCy8bNnFzqkpA/join  + JOIN PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/VettedUAP  + BUY MERCH: https://vettedshow.myspreadshop.com  + SUBSCRIBE TO CLIPS CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/@VettedClips  SOCIAL MEDIA:  + DISCORD: https://discord.gg/pcZ3k3dm4D  + TWITTER: https://twitter.com/VettedPodcast  PLAYLISTS:  + DAILY VIDEOS: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSA-phE0E4jIc3cZY5TA7VPBQz19PuybW  + INTERVIEWS: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSA-phE0E4jINxtsMy3MPO6oqvK4D9NKj  SOURCE LINKS:  https://youtu.be/eTWMlfQYi9I?si=ZW1Sw0N_BHS3tZqI  https://youtu.be/96Gv52tenUk?si=pJ2iAwSc8SGinchc  https://x.com/The_Astral_/status/1944410631697813742  ___________  VETTED Hosted By Patrick Scott Armstrong  + WEBSITE: http://www.vetted.show  #aliens #uap #ufonews #ufos #ufo #disclosure #alien #uapnews #orbs #nhi  #news24 #news

Transcript

00:00What's up, Vetters? Patrick here with Vetted. I am back, y'all. I took a nice little trip,

00:07vacay, holiday, as you might say, to España, Spain, where I will be moving in a couple

00:13months. So I went to do a little work and also take a little time with Miss Vetted on

00:19the beach. And I also shot some stuff for my upcoming Psyonix documentary, which is

00:25a perfect segue into today's video. So let's get to it, y'all. And thank y'all so much for

00:32supporting the channel. It was a good break. I needed it, but I'm happy to be back. So let's

00:36get to it. So please hit that like button, Vetters. That really helps out the videos. And of course,

00:40if you're not already subscribed, hit that subscribe button. I put out new videos every

00:44week about the UFO phenomena, unless I'm on vacation, and I'm trying to get to 100,000 subscribers

00:50before the end of the year. If you remember the video that I made right before I left,

00:55which got quite a few views, as you can see here, almost 170,000 views. Clearly people

01:01were interested. And it's because Ross Coulthart said this.

01:06I'm going to leave you with one thought today, Bryce. I now know categorically that the TicTac

01:12is Lockheed Martin technology.

01:15Okay.

01:15The TicTac is Lockheed Martin technology. Why are we being lied to?

01:25Now, I'll put a link in the description to the full video so you can see everything that

01:28I put together leading up to that, which is a great video to check out. Now, this is sort

01:33of a follow-up to this because Ross has since made additional comments about this TicTac being

01:40Lockheed Martin technology during the 2004 Nimitz encounter. But more importantly, it's what he

01:48said about the craft and how it's operated because this clip started to go viral as well. Shout out

01:55to Astral. Let's take a look. Ross Coulthart says he's reasonably sure that TicTac was controlled using

02:02psionics. What I was told, and I'm reasonably sure that this is the case, is that the TicTac

02:10was being operated by Lockheed Martin. And it's conceivable that that was being operated

02:17neuro-meditatively, psionically, by a human psionic, which is what I understand is the way that these

02:25retrieved non-human craft are being operated.

02:29All right. So I don't know about you, but I'm a little confused by this, which is why I'm about

02:34to show you guys the original clip with a lot more to it to add a little more context to what he's

02:41saying. Because when you just hear this short clip, it's confusing. I mean, it sounds like he's saying

02:46he's reasonably sure now that the TicTac was Lockheed Martin technology, but before he was

02:53categorically 100% sure. So I don't know what's changed there, but maybe, you know, he's

02:59sure that it was Lockheed Martin, but not sure if it was psionic. So he's reasonably sure it was

03:04used, you know, a psionic asset, basically controlling with the mind this TicTac, right?

03:11And he's saying it was retrieved NHI technology. Well, which is it? Is it Lockheed Martin technology

03:17technology or, you know, retrieved NHI technology, right? Because if it's retrieved NHI technology,

03:24it's not Lockheed Martin's, right? Even if they have it in their possession, it doesn't make it

03:29theirs. Uh, even though in America possession is nine tenths of the law, you know, I'm not even sure

03:35if that's true, actually, but that's the saying here. But regardless, I'm just confused now. So

03:41this was a, um, you know, an advanced aerospace company, Lockheed Martin, um, it's their TicTac,

03:50but it's also, you know, retrieved NHI, non-human intelligence technology that they were controlling

03:57it using, um, psionic asset in 2004 to see if they could, you know, go up against this testing group

04:09out, um, uh, in the Pacific ocean, right? Um, because the 2004 Nimitz cases, one of the most

04:16fascinating cases there is, um, in my opinion, right? So I don't know either way, I'm totally

04:23confused. And if I'm confused, I'm sure a lot of you are as well. So look to help, you know, diffuse

04:30some of this confusion, let's hear from Ross Coltart himself. Okay. I've got kind of a longer clip

04:36that I'm going to break down a little bits here and let's just go through it to allow Ross to give

04:40a little more clarification and add context to exactly what he's saying and respond to all of

04:47the crazy responses he got from coming out and saying that the TicTac was Lockheed Martin technology

04:54because a lot of people were confused by that. Exactly. So let's dive in and answer some of these

05:00questions that you have, such as, is this NHI technology? Are all TicTacs Lockheed Martin or

05:07some NHI? Is the TicTac from the 2004, you know, retrieved NHI technology, uh, but it's also Lockheed

05:16Martin, uh, they're using psionic assets to control the TicTacs. Can the TicTacs control themselves? Like,

05:24let's just get into all of this. It's been a very interesting week with the public response to the

05:29comments that I've made on the show that I do with my friend and colleague Bryce Zabel. Need to know

05:35where we discussed what I've been told by my sources, multiple sources, by the way, that Lockheed Martin

05:44was indeed behind the TicTac encounter of 2004 with the USS Nimitz battle carrier group. I guess

05:56that's one of the questions people want to ask us about, Megan. You recently mentioned the TicTac was

06:01produced slash manufactured by Lockheed Martin, but you never mentioned if it was under autonomous

06:06flight or piloted. P.S. Love your reporting. Thank you, Charles. That's a good question. And I'll be

06:12honest with you, I don't know for sure. Um, I have been told previously that when TicTacs, um, you see,

06:21one of the other things I want to clarify here as well is there are NHI TicTacs. A lot of people

06:27seem to be thinking that I'm suggesting that all TicTacs are Lockheed Martin. That's not the case at

06:33all. Uh, what I was told, and I'm reasonably sure that this is the case, is that the TicTac was being

06:41operated by Lockheed Martin. And it's conceivable that that was being operated neuro-meditatively,

06:49psionically, by a human psionic, which is what I understand is the way that these retrieved

06:56non-human craft are being operated. It's not clear to me, though, whether this is a craft that was built

07:03by Lockheed Martin, or whether it is Lockheed Martin testing the use of neuro-meditative signaling,

07:11as our friends at Skywatcher call it, to operate one of these craft. I just can't answer that question

07:17specifically. All I can do is tell you what I've been told by my multiple sources, which is that the,

07:24um, uh, operation of the TicTac was being controlled on the day by Lockheed Martin. Now,

07:33I want to say here, let's be really clear about this. There is always the possibility that sources

07:39that talk to a journalist like me may be malign. They may indeed be running some kind of PSYOP.

07:46And of course, I've taken that into consideration in asking the question. The, um, the difficulty is I

07:54can't go into the detail for very obvious reasons about, about who these sources are and why I think

08:01so strongly that those sources are telling me the truth.

08:04So, okay. So he's kind of saying that, um, you know, from his sources, right? So he's saying

08:10multiple sources. I've told him that the TicTac was Lockheed Martin technology, but he's not sure if

08:16it's NHI, but it is Lockheed's. But again, I would argue if it's NHI's technology and Lockheed Martin

08:23has, it doesn't necessarily make it theirs because that statement sounds like it's something

08:27that Lockheed Martin created, right? That they came up with, they invented, right? It's like saying

08:33who's the writer of a particular song. And if someone covers that song, it's not their song.

08:38They just covered it. Right? So it's like Lockheed Martin's like a cover band, right? Essentially,

08:45right? Like, or what is it? Are they the original writers of the song, right? That's what people

08:49really want to know. And it sounds like even Ross is admitting that his sources could be wrong,

08:55right? And I actually have a feeling I know who at least one of his sources is. I don't really want

09:02to say in case I'm wrong. And plus, I'm not really trying to out his sources. Um, you know,

09:09to be honest with you, I, I take that very seriously. People having sources, even though

09:13that's not something I do have anonymous sources because you then have to protect them. And I'm just

09:17not up for that because I take it so seriously. I understand the task of, of that and journalists

09:23need to have sources. I totally get that, but I'm not journalist, right? So I just don't want to step

09:28into that puddle. But for Ross's sake, I don't really want to even guess who his sources are and

09:34maybe put them in some particular, you know, situation. Clearly people watch, uh, vetted videos. Um,

09:41you know, and I know these videos get around and I just don't want to cause any issues, but I think

09:46I do have a feeling who one of his sources is and it makes me think, you know, it makes sense that he's

09:54saying what he's saying, to be honest with you, because of that. Um, now with that said, again,

10:01we're still a little confused on what exactly this tic-tac is. Is it again,

10:10Lockheed Martin technology that they created, or is it recovered alien technology, right? That they

10:18then used, um, for a minute again, like a cover band. And I can tell you, there are a lot of people,

10:26uh, who are assuring me that I'm flat wrong and that's fine, but let's have a discussion about this.

10:33Hi, Megan, a simple question for Ross to shed light on his statement about the tic-tac.

10:37To be clear, even if Ross seems confident that tic-tac is U.S. tech, does he think it's a reverse

10:42engineering tech from NHI or a tech 100% created by humans? Okay. And again, Chris, thanks for your

10:50question. Um, as I've mentioned earlier, uh, we're not saying all tic-tacs are Lockheed Martin.

10:57And it's quite clear that, uh, some tic-tacs are indeed non-human intelligence or suspected to be

11:05non-human intelligence. But what we're talking about are objects that are showing the five

11:11observables performing, doing maneuvers and, um, operating in ways that don't conform to terrestrial

11:18craft. Um, I can't answer the question definitively whether they are constructed by Lockheed Martin or

11:28whether it's Lockheed Martin operating a recovered retrieved craft, because what I've been told and

11:34what Jake Barber told me in the interview that you've all watched, hopefully on News Nation, is that there

11:39have been retrievals of craft, including tic-tacs. So why is it a surprise to people that a contractor

11:49that I'm alleging is directly involved in the legacy program is involved in operating these craft?

11:57And moreover, why would we necessarily expect that people, even those flying in the carrier battle

12:03group would actually know about this or be briefed into this? It would have been a really good idea if

12:09they were going to test this technology against the carrier battle group to have let the people know.

12:15And I think people need to be reminded that my good friend, Kevin Day, who I know disputes the

12:21possibility that the tic-tac is Lockheed Martin. In my book, Kevin Day told me, and he said this in

12:30many, many interviews, that when I think it was the admiral in charge of the carrier battle group was

12:37told about the tic-tac, he didn't seem very alarmed. Why not? Why aren't people asking these questions?

12:49Why was the commander of a carrier battle fleet that was suffering incursions by anomalous objects

12:56doing the five observables during a hugely important and sensitive naval exercise, why wasn't

13:03he concerned about those craft? You see, this is why we watch the full clips to get better context

13:10about what is going on. So Ross can, you know, have a little bit of runway here to sort of explain

13:16what exactly he's saying, because at first his comments are shocking, but once you break it down,

13:22you know, I see what he's saying. You know, it's, it's, it's honestly, a lot of it's kind of up in the air.

13:28All the comments are up in the air, even things he's so sure about. He's still, to be honest,

13:34fairly saying that he could be still wrong about that, right? But he's trying to clarify his

13:39comments here. So I do appreciate that from Ross. So let me know what you think of the comments. Now,

13:45let's move on to what commander David Fravor said about this. Now, if you remember, commander David

13:51Fravor was the one who testified in July, 2023 with David Grush and Ryan Graves before Congress,

13:58right at a UFO hearing about this 2004 Nimitz encounter, right? And then it was this anomalous

14:06object that he chased with his team, right? As being one of these, you know, quote, Top Gun pilots,

14:11right? One of the best pilots in the Navy at, you know, in his, in his prime, right? And what David

14:19Fravor thought about Ross Coltart's comments that the tic-tac that he chased was Lockheed Martin

14:25technology. Okay, Russ, you kind of touched on this, but people really want me to ask you

14:29directly about David Fravor's comments. James on X said, what is Ross's opinion on retired

14:36commander David Fravor's categorically stating the tic-tac is not Lockheed Martin? There's a part

14:41two to this, but I'll let you start there. Okay, no worries. Let me first say I have nothing but

14:47admiration for David Fravor. He's given service to his country. He's a patriot and he deserves respect

14:53respect and recognition for that. I'm not getting involved in a stage with a person who's done so

14:59much honorably for his country. It's not though outside the realm of possibilities. In fact, I think

15:06it would be extremely unlikely that if there is, as I know there is, a compartmented secret program

15:13where Lockheed Martin is one of the primary contractors operating retrieved non-human technology

15:19and attempting to reverse engineer that technology, there is absolutely no way that David would be

15:25briefed into that unless it was absolutely necessary for the part of it for the doing of his job. As we

15:32all know, when the government wants to protect a secret, it compartmentalizes it. Even if you have a

15:39top secret classification, which I'm sure David probably had, it's also compartmentalized. And that's

15:45how the US keeps its secrets. And I've spoken to people literally in institutions in the United

15:52States, one of whom knows about the program and the other of whom is in an adjoining office and has

15:58absolutely no idea. I've had a situation where I've spoken to the head of a government agency that ought

16:06properly to have known about the legacy program. That head of a government agency was not informed about

16:14the fact that we are recovering non-human craft and attempting to reverse engineer that technology.

16:21A person two rungs down was the person that the legacy program was using to gatekeep inside that

16:28institution. It's really interesting how they compartmentalize all of this. And so absolutely no

16:34disrespect to David Fravor or my good friend, Kevin Day, but they're good men. The simple fact is

16:41compartmentalization works. Now I agree with Ross's point here that compartmentalization

16:47does work, but I guess an obvious question, maybe it's not so obvious, but it's obvious to me,

16:54the question would then be to ask, how does Ross Coltart get access to quote the truth in the real

17:00information and commander David Fravor doesn't? Right? Does that make sense? Right? Right? How is Ross Coltart,

17:09who's never been in the military have access to the real secrets and all of the compartmentalization?

17:15He gets it, but someone like commander David Fravor, who served in the Navy, who was a part of this

17:21encounter with the Nimitz, right? And had top secret security clearance. How does he not get this

17:29information from quote sources? Right? How does Ross Coltart get access to the information

17:37and that be the truth? Right? So it's almost like Ross's, I know he's not implying it, but I'm just

17:43saying it's, it's sort of implied by default by just by what he's saying, not necessarily his own words, but

17:49he's sort of implying that, you know, he's outside of compartmentalization, right? He's outside of the

17:57stove piping and he's able to get all of the information. That just doesn't make any sense to

18:03me. I'm not saying it's not what it is. I'm just saying that seems odd and a red flag and weird,

18:10right? I'm just saying. So, but either way, it was great to have Ross, you know, give his answers,

18:15give a lot more context to what's going on. I'm still as confused as ever, to be honest with you.

18:21Although I have more information, it just makes me have more questions. So will we ever know the

18:26actual truth? Are Ross's sources correct? His anonymous sources, who we don't know who they

18:32are, who are telling him, right? And then Ross Coltart felt the need to say that publicly and come

18:38out. Why? What is the point of saying that and coming out with that information and putting that

18:43out there, right? And that he's reasonably sure that not only was the Tic Tac Lockheed Martins, but

18:49that they were psionically controlling it. You know, who, where was this psionic asset located,

18:56right? Was he one of the people on the boat on the Nimitz? Was he part of it? Like,

19:02was he hidden in plain sight? Was he in some other location doing this? I don't know. Very

19:10interesting. And if you remember the Tic Tac wasn't alone. There were many of them flying around,

19:15right? So, and what was that object underneath the water that Commander David Fravor first saw?

19:21They gave this big whitewash, right? Like a, like a big commercial airliner underneath,

19:27right? The ocean. And they just disappeared, right? Are we saying that that was like a submarine that

19:34came up and let these Tic Tac out and they flew around? I mean, I don't know. Anyway, let me know what

19:39you think in the comments. I'm sure this discussion is not over, but Ross has definitely opened a can of

19:46worms and, you know, continues to sort of add on to it again, right? So now we're wondering if this

19:52thing was controlled psionically. Is it still NHI? Um, but it's Lockheed Martin's, right? Like,

20:00what is going on? So let me know what you think in the comments. We'll see you guys in the next video.

20:03Again, great to be back, y'all. I've got more videos coming your way, so stay tuned. Hit that

20:08subscribe button. All right, y'all. We'll see you in the next one. Remember, every day is a gift, y'all.

20:14Peace!

20:16Peace!

20:17Peace!

20:18Peace!

20:19Peace!

20:20Peace!

20:21Peace!

20:22Peace!

20:23Peace!

20:24Peace!

20:25Peace!

20:26Peace!

20:27Peace!

20:28Peace!

20:29Peace!

20:30Peace!

20:31Peace!

20:32Peace!

20:33Peace!

20:34Peace!

20:35Peace!

20:36Peace!

20:37Peace!

20:38Peace!

20:39Peace!

20:40Peace!

20:41Peace!

20:42Peace!

20:43Peace!

Category

Transcript

Recommended