Disha Salian Case: “Enough proof for death…” Lawyer levels explosive charge on Aaditya Thackeray

ANI

Mumbai, July 03, 2025 (ANI): Speaking on Disha Salian murder case Satish Salian’s Advocate, Nilesh Ojha indicated to have firm video proof to prove the culprit guilty in court of law in upcoming hearing in Disha Salian Murder case.

Transcript

00:00In this case, there was an accidental death report that we checked the first closure report.

00:10We didn't find anything like this.

00:13In this case, there was a complaint in March 25th.

00:20Who did it?

00:22Sati Salian Ji.

00:24In this case, there was an investigation that we recorded the statement in the last year.

00:34We said that this is a law, but they have given it.

00:38So, there were costs on them.

00:40Let them prosecute them.

00:42Send them to the court.

00:45We demanded all the content.

00:47Now, what are they saying?

00:50What are they saying?

00:52What are they saying?

00:54This is a court.

00:55In this case, there was a gun and a gang arrest.

00:57And of ROP, Aditya Thakira and others, it is a key thing to prove.

01:02This is a material.

01:04The court had a very strong report in this case.

01:07The court was told to him.

01:09He told him that the court was wrong, it was wrong, it was wrong, it was wrong.

01:12The police have given its report to the police.

01:19What is the report?

01:24First, the report is not passed yesterday.

01:27The report was submitted in High Court in 17 June.

01:33The report means an affidavit.

01:38The report is wrong and wrong.

01:44That's why the police and the government have given it to the prosecution.

01:52They also had the hearing.

01:55So, the report is not passed.

02:00Now, I will explain both of you.

02:04I will explain what happened yesterday.

02:08When the report came, the government said that he gave the affidavit.

02:14I told the court that you have seen the order on the 30 April.

02:18There was the direction of the chief secretary.

02:22The chief secretary replied.

02:24He called the court check in.

02:25He said, the court checked number one and one is chief secretary.

02:28Then the court checked himself.

02:30I asked him that the

02:33And he asked, all the respondents in the report in Sheldr.

02:36He doesn't have a senior PML who had responded.

02:38But they also gave him a affidavit.

02:40No answer, no answer.

02:42He said, the final one is not passed.

02:44You did not comply with the order of High Court?

02:46There is no answer to the Chief Secretary?

02:48No answer.

02:49The third crucial question was asked.

02:52You tell this,

02:54Chief Secretary has authorized

02:56the Senior P.I. Malwani to Selendra Nagar,

02:59that we have to do the affiduit.

03:01He said that there is no authorization.

03:03He said then,

03:05the court was a little angry.

03:07The court said, let's leave everything.

03:10Are you prepared for the argument?

03:12I will decide the final of the year.

03:16I said, no, I will give you three weeks.

03:20I give you two weeks of time.

03:22What is the first instruction required for you?

03:25That is the final year.

03:28It is kept on July 16.

03:30Now, what is the affiduit?

03:33Selendra Nagar wrote in his affiduit.

03:38The first report, the accidental death report.

03:42We have checked it.

03:44Besides, we did not get anything like this.

03:47The biggest joke.

03:49In this case,

03:52In this case,

03:54there was a complaint from March 25.

03:59Who did?

04:00Satish Salayan Ji.

04:05The complaint of investigation is that,

04:09we recorded the statement last year.

04:11We made a closer report on that.

04:13We made a closer report.

04:15Now, this happened.

04:16This is the complaint.

04:17This is the complaint.

04:18It is not the statement of Nitesh Rani Ji.

04:20We have given the list of witnesses.

04:22It is not the statement of the witness.

04:23It is not the statement.

04:24We have asked.

04:25Let's leave.

04:27The Supreme Court has told the Supreme Court

04:34about this police and Mumbai police.

04:36In this case,

04:37There is a complaint on them.

04:38The Supreme Court has said that,

04:40your post-mortem report is also said.

04:42Your ADR report is also said.

04:46that there is no matter of murder.

04:53There is no value of this report.

04:59That means,

05:00I put it in the liquor.

05:01There is no value.

05:03The Supreme Court has said that,

05:06When there is complaint that there is a murder,

05:10it is a complaint of the serious

05:13report or post-mortem or post-mortem, you have to be mandatory.

05:20So, the case law is binding to Maharashtra police, but it is binding to India's police.

05:27In May 2015, the Supreme Court has also given the right judgment.

05:31In Akshay Sindhye case, the Supreme Court has also given the right judgment.

05:36That's why they have aggravated contempt.

05:41The Supreme Court is saying that you can't rely on that report.

05:44So, who is relying on that report?

05:46This is P.I. Nagar.

05:47And this is the government.

05:50This is the report.

05:52And some of the police officers.

05:55So, this is the contempt.

05:57And the law of the police, the law of the police,

06:01to save ROP.

06:04This is an offense in IPC 409.

06:09So, the police officers, the police officers,

06:12and the police officers,

06:13we have had a request for both of them.

06:15And yesterday, the hearing was also made.

06:18The court has added to it for 16 years.

06:21In one line, the senior officers of Malwani police station, who started this incident,

06:29when the incident happened, the previous report was published in the court.

06:36Yes, he wrote that we were right from that.

06:38We are right from that report.

06:42That was it, in short.

06:44And did they accept this affidavit from the court?

06:47No, no, the court has said that this is one of them.

06:51And I am telling you, that if they keep in mind and keep in mind,

06:56then yesterday, the police station came to the intervention application.

07:00They needed to come.

07:02So, they also put the intervention application.

07:05And the police station came to this report four steps.

07:09They wrote yesterday,

07:11that the CBI gave me clean-chit in the murder of Dishya Saliyan case.

07:18Now, the CBI has written on their website,

07:22that the case of Dishya Saliyan has never been investigated.

07:25And they are saying that the CBI has given them clean-chit.

07:29This is a small news that the CBI has given.

07:32So, their affidavit has gone.

07:33One.

07:34The other one, they wrote another one.

07:36They said that in Dishya Saliyan case,

07:39the Supreme Court has taken the Cognizance and closed the case.

07:43So, the High Court has not taken the Cognizance.

07:45So, we have said that they have taken custody.

07:49Aditya Thakre and their employees.

07:52Both of them have taken the prosecution.

07:54So, we have said, please tell us.

07:56In the Supreme Court of India, there is nothing like that.

07:58So, the case number is ordered.

08:02And if you have ordered another one of the other,

08:04the Supreme Court of Pakistan or the Supreme Court,

08:07they are not allowed to go to India.

08:08So, the third one said,

08:10after this, there is a third one.

08:13They said that I am not MLA.

08:17In their affidavit, they wrote that I am a businessman and a social worker.

08:22And why did the fact of the MLA was hidden?

08:24The Supreme Court's guideline is,

08:26the case number of MLA and YMP,

08:28they will be heard in the fast track and in the special court.

08:32So, they have hidden the information from him from the affidavit.

08:36The third one, the age of 28,

08:41because they are only with the previous affidavit.

08:45So, the charges that came in the news,

08:49that Ramdas Kadam Ji,

08:51that this is the arrest of the criminal court case,

08:54that they have called Aghori Baba Tantrik from Hyderabad.

08:58So, what happened after that?

09:00Five days, seven days, the charges came in the news.

09:02So, in the media, there is a charge that,

09:04in the media, there has been a charge that,

09:07in the affidavit,

09:08AIC should have written a total of 10.

09:12So, for that, they have written this complaint.

09:14So, this is all the complaint.

09:17Now, in one line, I have to tell you something else.

09:20I have to tell you the court.

09:21I have to tell you the intervention,

09:22but I have to prepare for the argument.

09:24because the Supreme Court is the judgment and you will remember.

09:27In the case of Mamata Banerjee,

09:29in the case of Mamata Banerjee,

09:31the court said,

09:35how will the ROP say it?

09:36That you will investigate the CVI and you will not speak to them.

09:39You will not register it.

09:41The court is under the cabinet.

09:43If you come to this case,

09:45it was the cost of $50,000,000,

09:47which the Supreme Court has appealed.

09:49We have said that this is the law,

09:52and they have given the rights to them.

09:54So, they have also given the cost of them.

09:56They have prosecuted them.

09:57They have to send the court to the court.

09:59They have to send the court to the court.

10:00So, the contempt of the court,

10:01we have to demand all the content.

10:03In this case,

10:04specifically,

10:05where has been going?

10:08What has happened?

10:09What has happened to the court?

10:13Who has given the court?

10:14Where has been legal counsel?

10:15Yes, this is the common man.

10:18Now, this stage has come very good and crucial.

10:26Now, what are you saying?

10:29What are you saying?

10:30You have come to the stage of the court finally decide.

10:34Second, where have you come from?

10:39We have given some considerable evidence court.

10:44We are going to show some video in the court.

10:48I will not tell you what they are showing,

10:51but we are going to show some video in the court.

10:55Our plan is complete.

10:58What is the witness, what is the witness, what is the witness.

11:00They will show 10% of the witness.

11:03There is a lot of evidence.

11:05They say that if they will disclose their name,

11:07then they will not save their lives.

11:09So, we will take a few things.

11:11But, the evidence is not required,

11:15it is sufficient to reach the court legally.

11:19Because I am saying that the court is more important.

11:23I remember that in the past, we were saying that without FI registration,

11:27there is no investigation.

11:29I remember that in April, Justice Aran Kotwal asked the same question.

11:33And you are asking that if you are doing the investigation of murder and gang rape.

11:39We are asking that we are not affidavita.

11:41It is not affidavita.

11:42So, there is no affidavita.

11:43There is no affidavita.

11:45And the court is not affidavita.

11:47If there is no affidavita, then there is going to be hearing.

11:49Now, another important thing I will tell you.

11:53I remember that you all asked a question,

11:56and on a big channel, an editor asked one-to-one a specific question.

12:01He said, leave the rest of the questions.

12:03He went to high court.

12:05After March 2025, he went to high court.

12:08You only answer the question,

12:11that you don't know the country.

12:13What do you answer?

12:15I will not answer the question.

12:17Second question.

12:19He said, why did I not answer?

12:23He said, I will answer the question.

12:25Second question.

12:26Where was your location?

12:28He said, you are in court, I will not answer.

12:32And after three months after the court,

12:36they come to high court,

12:38the affidavit on the 14th June,

12:40they wrote one word that you don't know the country.

12:44My mobile tower location was not.

12:46And we have given evidence,

12:48that the Narcotics Bureau's report

12:50that there was a mobile tower location.

12:52He didn't deny it.

12:54After that, the Narcotics Bureau

12:56kept their phone surveillance.

12:58What did they get?

13:00That Aditya Thakre, Dino Moria, Ria Chakre,

13:03and all drugs are doing business.

13:05All of these have been received.

13:06So there is no answer.

13:07There is no answer.

13:08So the law of Supreme Court is very clear.

13:10You also know.

13:11You are saying in the court that you will give a video,

13:13you will listen to the next one.

13:15We will not ask about the video,

13:17but will it be against the Aditya Thakre?

13:19Or will it be against the Aditya Thakre?

13:21The Aditya Thakre and all other accused.

13:22It will be against the court.

13:23We will also give it against the CBI report.

13:24So what do you want to show the video?

13:25After the video,

13:26what do you want to show the video?

13:27And when you start with the CBI and the Aditya Thakre?

13:28What is the other thing?

13:30I will say,

13:31then I will give it back to the court.

13:32We will give it to the CBI report.

13:34And then I will give it to the court.

13:35What do you want to show the video?

13:37After the CBI,

13:38what do you want to show the CBI?

13:40Where is the Aditya Thakre?

13:41What do you want to show the other thing?

13:42A simple thing is that

13:43our component is to treat it

13:45the other case.

13:46The Supreme Court has done this,

13:48we don't want to do anything.

13:50We don't need to argue 2 minutes,

13:52but we don't need to be part of the argument

13:54and we are part of the part.

13:55The second part is that the CBI investigation is in the supervision of the court.

14:01There is a scene reconstruction.

14:03When you make the body of this body,

14:05and you shake it from the 14th floor,

14:07that it falls down here, and it falls down here,

14:09and it falls down here, and it falls down here.

14:11It will be very bad.

14:13After that, there is another thing that we have told

14:15that this is the point of investigation.

14:17That is an investigation.

14:19And if you take care of yourself,

14:21there will be 4 sheets in 7 days.

14:23Do you think that the police report and affidavits are baseless?

14:29Yes, it is.

14:30There is no legal value of it,

14:32but it is a limit.

14:35I mean, I am not telling you a little bit,

14:38that those people will adjust to it.

14:41What are we going to do in the court?

14:43Yesterday, we came to the court.

14:46We thought we had to take custody,

14:48but he didn't come to the court.

14:50They asked him to do that.

14:52Then we will come to the court.

14:54After that,

14:55we will come to court.

14:58After signing the patent,

15:00his court will have to come.

15:02After that,

15:04we will come to court and record.

15:05One last question, you are saying that Aditya Thakere and others will be posted in the court.

15:12There is also a video and there is also an audio.

15:14What is related to Aditya's death?

15:18Or what is related to the death of the government?

15:22Tell us a little bit about it.

15:24I will tell you.

15:25So, they will have a danger.

15:27But overall, I will tell you.

15:29In this case, there is a murder and gang rape.

15:32And the ROP, Aditya Thakere and others will be posted in the cover-up.

15:36This is a proof of material.

Category

Transcript

Recommended