Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/2/2025
During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing last week, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) spoke about derailment cleanup standards and fines.
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I understand earlier Senator Cruz asked you, Mr.
00:05Jensen, about spectrum, so I wanted to go back to that if I could. Are you aware
00:09that the 2000 Defense Authorization Act required the Secretary of Defense, the
00:14Joint Chiefs, the Secretary of Commerce to all work together, that's what we are
00:17trying to do, certify that spectrum auction includes use by DOD. Are you
00:22aware that no such certification was made by the Trump administration? That
00:25never happened? Nobody worked together? I wasn't aware of that, Senator. I'm very
00:31happy to look into that. Well, I think I think the reason I'm bringing it up
00:35because what happened is then some DOD radar spectrum was auctioned and there
00:41was a lot of confusion and interference and so we obviously think that in the
00:48spectrum world you should have, you know, the test bedding of important issues
00:53before moving DOD spectrum. So are you also aware that I think Senator Cruz
00:59mentioned relocation fund but he claimed that these funds enabled users to
01:03upgrade their capabilities and that's not true. In fact, it only allows federal
01:08users to maintain a comparable. I am suggesting a legislation that we had last
01:16Congress that does give people the ability to upgrade because I really do
01:19think that that is important but I just want to make sure that we have the record
01:25correct that mission-critical systems were turned off and no replacement was
01:30provided and so that's a very important distinction I think in the debate because
01:35I want to make sure that this doesn't happen again. We don't we don't want to be
01:39in this vague area that somehow somebody thinks there the law exists to
01:43protect DOD when in reality during the last Trump administration it didn't and we
01:48had some confusion and we don't want to see it again. Okay, Mr. Mr. Fink, I hear five or so of my
01:54colleagues asked you about mainline derailment issues and you had you were
02:01mentioning that you think there were some other statistics there but we're
02:05talking about FRA, the Federal Railroad Administration numbers which they say that
02:11you had an 850% higher than the other class 2 railroads. Do you dispute the FRA numbers?
02:17Our train accident records were in the middle of the railroads, my peer group
02:24railroad, so I don't know of any 850% higher for that. I do not know that and
02:29that number makes really no sense to me. Okay, well in fact in every year in the
02:33decade before you sold Pan the the railroad the mainline derailment rate was double the average
02:42railroad and the reason why the mainline is so important is because we're talking
02:45about East Palestine, we're talking about areas that we think are critical for safety.
02:54Also, do you think that Norfolk Southern's responsibility was to clean up the mess?
02:58Absolutely. Okay, and your company was criminally convicted and sentenced for trying to cover up
03:0590,000 gallon fuel in Ayer, Massachusetts? It was 900 gallons. 900 gallons. So do you think you should
03:14have done that without the without the court decision? We were cleaning it up. We did not
03:20properly report it and we were fined and found guilty. Yes, we... So what do you think that we should
03:28be doing moving forward to make sure that we have better alignment on product, safety,
03:36clean up, all of these responsibilities? What do you... What is your... In that instance,
03:41we had an employee that didn't follow the procedure that they were supposed to follow.
03:46We were cleaning it up. We did not report it. We cleaned it up. We were found guilty of not reporting
03:51and had a very substantial fine. Okay, do you remember what that fine was? Hundreds of thousands of dollars.
03:58You think that's substantial? Hundreds of thousands of dollars, given what some of these communities,
04:02the lives? We will do more for the record on this, but we... I represent a very big port state and
04:12railroad state. We move a lot of product for the United States and oftentimes it's through very treacherous
04:18areas where the response to this can take a long time. The Columbia River Gorge, for example. So we want
04:25to see someone who's going to be aggressive about the continued evolution about information,
04:33involvement, first responders, plans for communities, and responsibilities, and certainly for
04:40follow-up of the legislation we've moved out of this committee that would have for very, very long
04:46trains, the staffing that is required to keep all of us safe. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
04:52Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.

Recommended