Does PTI Have Any Justification Left to Be Part of This Parliament? – Salman Akram Raja - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

Does PTI Have Any Justification Left to Be Part of This Parliament? – Salman Akram Raja

Transcript

00:00Then you tell me Salman, please enlighten me.

00:04This is such a fake parliament, it has a small committee and everything.

00:08Why are you sitting in this parliament?

00:10Why are you increasing the salaries?

00:12Your people are also taking salaries, PMLN's are also taking salaries, People's Party.

00:15Everyone is taking salaries.

00:17Murad, everyone is taking.

00:18But where there is a dialogue.

00:20No, then you justify to me today, why are you sitting in this parliament?

00:24Look, we have not given a fake answer to this parliament.

00:29We are saying that listen to our election petitions and decide.

00:34That's a very convenient, I'm sorry Salman, it's a very convenient argument.

00:38It's a very convenient argument.

00:40Wherever you become a suit, you become a parliamentarian.

00:42Where you don't become a suit, you become a fake.

00:44It doesn't work like that.

00:46You can say it like this.

00:48We are saying that the people voted.

00:50The people who were elected by the votes of the people, you kept them out.

00:54Their cases are in front of the courts.

00:56Let them run.

00:58And let this parliament get its rightful identity.

01:02My genuine, my genuine opinion is this.

01:04It is my humble opinion.

01:06That if you had been sitting in that parliament today, in this meeting.

01:09Then perhaps this announcement would have come out.

01:12It would have been something like this.

01:14To engage proactively, to talk.

01:16And you could have given a positive input.

01:19You left the whole field empty.

01:21That okay, according to you, the priest was converted to the converted.

01:26So it's your fault.

01:28You left the empty platform.

01:30Why should we blame them then?

01:32There is nothing like that.

01:34This was not the last marka.

01:36This was not the last room.

01:38This was not the last session.

01:40This conversation will continue.

01:42We will play our role.

01:44We understand that we know what the solution to the issues in this area is.

01:47It is not in the gunfire.

01:49It is not in the beating.

01:51We have mentioned a process.

01:53Which the government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is forming.

01:55We want the loyal government to support it.

01:58We go and talk.

02:00Peace had come during our government.

02:02In this area.

02:04Many matters were to be resolved.

02:06After that, the government changed.

02:08In the same way, he picked up and threw his Afghan immigrants out.

02:10Sent.

02:12He did injustice to them.

02:14These things have an effect in front of us.

02:16We have to talk.

02:18Where someone will point a gun at us, we will also point a gun at them.

02:20But we have to talk only in the press.

02:22We do not have to talk in any formal forum.

02:24We are sitting in the parliament.

02:26There are many committees of the parliament.

02:28This was not the last conversation.

02:30Why do you think it was the last conversation?

02:32There will be a conversation.

02:34The statement that has been made that Pakistan has to become a hard state.

02:38How do you see it?

02:40This is a meaningless statement.

02:42There is a book by Levin called Hard State.

02:44What is a hard state?

02:46If you talk about political science,

02:48it is a state where institutions are strong.

02:50It is a state where institutions are strong.

02:52A hard state is not a state where you

02:54shoot civilians.

02:56A hard state is a state where you

02:58enforce the law.

03:00So that people know

03:02what our rights are.

03:04Then it should be.

03:06Do you agree that Pakistan should become a hard state?

03:08I do not know

03:10how they used this word.

03:12I think it is a state

03:14where you attack institutions.

03:16Where you loot elections.

03:18Where you defeat the judiciary.

03:20It is not a hard state.

03:22I have a little time.

03:24Give me one more answer.

03:26I remember I asked you

03:28when the salaries increased.

03:30Salaries increased.

03:32I asked you.

03:34Yes.

03:36You said that when the salaries increased,

03:38we will decide

03:40what to do.

03:42We have to invest in funds.

03:44We have to invest in people.

03:46That has not been decided yet.

03:48I would request you

03:50for a black and white answer.

03:52Do you have any justification

03:54to be a part of this parliament?

03:56When you do not

03:58believe them.

04:00When you do not believe their platforms.

04:02When you do not believe their platforms.

04:04When you do not believe their platforms.

04:06When you do not believe their platforms.

04:08Our ethical standing

04:10is that people have voted for us.

04:12Our ethical standing is that people have voted for us.

04:14The people who are sitting there

04:16have voted.

04:18We say that you are wrong.

04:20We do not say that we are wrong.

04:22We say to the people who are wrong

04:24that you should leave.

04:26This is not your right.

04:28Let our real representatives come.

04:30We tell the courts to do justice.

04:32Fair enough.

04:34I must concede that is a very smart answer.

04:36I still feel that you should have

04:38been in a meeting.

04:40Salman Akhund Raja, always a pleasure to talk to you.

Does PTI Have Any Justification Left to Be Part of This Parliament? – Salman Akram Raja

Category

Transcript

Recommended