Why was no action taken against the cabinet of that time in the Al-Qadir case? Rana Sanaullah

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00Okay, tell me, the decision of Al-Qaeda Trust on Friday is becoming a big issue.

00:08It was a cabinet decision.

00:10If it was such a wrong decision, let's leave the Imran Khan issue for now,

00:14why didn't your cabinet nullify that decision later?

00:19If you think that the money was collected in the wrong place,

00:23then why didn't the cabinet give the order that the cabinet should decide

00:27to withdraw the money from the Supreme Court's account and adjust it within this limit?

00:33The decision of the cabinet can nullify the decision of another cabinet.

00:39No, Mr. Malik, these things cannot be done in this way.

00:47In this way, people cannot be confused.

00:55This is a two-sided issue.

00:59The money collected from a property was a corrupt money.

01:05It was illegal money or it was not justified there.

01:10It was the money of the state of Pakistan.

01:13The state of Pakistan had to come.

01:15The state of Pakistan, along with it, adjusted the money again in its account

01:23and collected 10 billion rupees in its own account.

01:30No, no, I am saying something else.

01:33I am saying something else.

01:35If you think it was a wrong decision, then you can file a case against it.

01:39But the money that you think was in the wrong account,

01:43why didn't the cabinet nullify that wrong decision by rejecting it?

01:51No, they could not do that.

01:53It was a closed transaction.

01:56It was a crime and it had already happened.

01:59The prosecution can only be a trial.

02:03It can only be an investigation.

02:05The reason for that is that it was not that the money was stopped from being stolen.

02:15It had already happened.

02:17The statement was given in London.

02:21The money was collected.

02:23It was a closed transaction.

02:26If you think the crime has been committed,

02:30then some people in the cabinet objected to it.

02:33They were on the side.

02:35The people who accepted it, why didn't they take any action against them?

02:40Why didn't you put them on the list that they were participating in the crime?

02:45Why didn't you put them on the list that they were participating in the crime?

02:48No, the cabinet has not made a decision.

02:51The cabinet has made a decision.

02:53You are saying that it was done in a wrong way.

02:55It was done in a closed transaction.

02:57But there was an approval.

02:59It is in the record.

03:01No, it was done by Shahzad Akbar.

03:04And the Prime Minister at that time managed it.

03:12There is a proper procedure in the cabinet.

03:17But the cabinet has approved it in minutes.

03:21Mr. Rana, the cabinet has approved it in minutes.

03:24No, that was wrong.

03:26If something is written in minutes in a wrong way,

03:31will it become a part of the minutes?

03:36That matter was in accordance with the rules and law.

03:42It was not presented in the cabinet.

03:48Okay, let's talk about this for a long time.

03:51Tell me, there is another news that is making a lot of noise.

03:54No, Mr. Malik, tell me a long story.

03:57Is there any doubt in this?

03:59That the property was returned to him on the basis of 8 billion rupees.

04:13Today, Imran Khan has also made a claim.

04:17He said that the decision of the cabinet

04:21was only about keeping the NCA and Malik Riaza transaction secret.

04:27There was no mention of the account in which the money would come.

04:31Or the cabinet decided to put it in that account.

04:35It was just that the deal would remain secret.

04:38And as a result of that secret deal, so much money will come to Pakistan.

04:42The cabinet did not talk about accounts.

04:45It was just about keeping it secret.

04:47How will it come to Pakistan?

04:49There was no mention of keeping it secret.

04:52It came in the account of the Supreme Court.

04:56The liability was of Malik Riaz.

05:02It came in his account.

05:06Tell me, what did he have to do with the 7-8 billion rupee property?

05:15In a trust where there is no one other than him.

05:21And he has as much power in that trust as you or me.

05:27As much power as we have in the inheritance of our family.

05:35They say that Al-Qadar was made 1.5 years ago.

05:39So it has nothing to do with it.

05:41But tell me one more thing.

05:43Al-Qadar has nothing to do with the 7-8 billion rupee transaction.

05:53Has he ever done this to anyone else?

05:56I believe that he has done this in the name of the Holy Prophet.

06:06He has to be punished for this.

06:08He will not be forgiven for anything else.

Category

Transcript

Recommended