Mohammad Malick Breaks Big News Regarding Negotiation Between PTI and Govt

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00I will share the news with you because it is very relevant to the discussion ahead.

00:04According to me, at the highest level of power decisions,

00:08it has been decided that there will be no dialogue with Imran Khan

00:13until the decision on the case of UNKIA in 9th May is made.

00:20And this decision is yet to be made

00:23whether the case should be allowed to go to the civil court or to the military court.

00:27But either way, one thing has been decided

00:30that whether the PTI is right or wrong,

00:33no dialogue will be made until the decision on the case of UNKIA in 9th May is made.

00:40I am talking about Imran Khan only.

00:42I am not talking about the second tier or the first tier.

00:45I am talking about Imran Khan's future.

00:47And after that, the decision on the case of UNKIA in 9th May will be made or not.

00:51And this is why I am coming to you, Mr. Taimoor.

00:54It has been decided that there will be no dialogue with Imran Khan.

00:58And the government is giving excuses to its own people.

01:01You have also agreed to this.

01:03Bilal and others have also agreed to this.

01:05When you say that you will bring the case to the court,

01:07then they will get a solid justification as to how to talk to Imran Khan.

01:10For example, Irfan Siddiqui has also said that

01:13Imran Khan's case is a case of Shikila Faridi.

01:16That person is in prison.

01:18So, these things have started to be linked with him.

01:21But it has been decided that there will be no dialogue with Imran Khan.

01:24And there will be a dialogue later when the decision on 9th May will be made.

01:28So, what will the party do?

01:30We have seen a lot of confusion in the last few days.

01:32I have just told you, Mr. Gandapur,

01:34that the civil disobedience campaign has been announced,

01:36but there is no clarity.

01:38If we get it, we will ask.

01:40Now, we are getting the idea that maybe this will also be postponed.

01:44What options does PTI have now?

01:48Mr. Malik, what you are saying,

01:51if that decision has been made,

01:53then we really have not learned anything from history.

01:56Neither did we learn anything from the 1971 incidents,

01:59nor did we learn anything from the APS.

02:01And frankly, if this decision has been made,

02:07then I think that whoever is making the decision,

02:11they do not know the political dynamics of any country,

02:15certainly not the dynamics of Pakistan.

02:18Because these decisions remain here until the next minute,

02:22until these decisions are changed.

02:26So, we saw this in 1971 too.

02:30Before that, when these decisions were made against specific leaders,

02:35then see.

02:37The Agartala conspiracy case,

02:40was carried out by Ayub Khan against the same Mujeeb-ur-Rehman,

02:43and Ayub Khan withdrew it.

02:46The Hyderabad conspiracy case,

02:49was carried out by Wali Khan and Mufti Mehmood,

02:52maybe they were there or not,

02:54maybe Hafiz knows better,

02:56but almost all the mainstream opposition leadership,

02:59was carried out by the state of Pakistan against them,

03:02and then withdrew it.

03:06The hijacking case,

03:09in which Nawaz Sharif was sentenced to life imprisonment or death,

03:12I don't remember now,

03:14that was carried out and at that time,

03:16it didn't seem like a more serious and black and white decision.

03:20And it was withdrawn,

03:22and see, when the red carpet was laid for Nawaz Sharif,

03:26to come from London as a convict,

03:29that too was a decision of some court.

03:32Today, Sheikh Rasheed Sahib said something,

03:35I want you to listen to it,

03:37I will put all three of you in the comment section,

03:39listen to what Sheikh Rasheed Sahib said,

03:57Do you agree with his assessment?

04:00No, I don't agree,

04:03that we put ourselves in this zero-sum position,

04:08and make such a loose situation a reality,

04:14there is no need for this.

04:16I come back to this,

04:20that if we want to learn,

04:22then you see the events of Bangladesh,

04:27then it could have lasted till the very end.

04:31It just didn't stick to its decision again and again.

04:36The difference here is,

04:38that this country is geographically integrated,

04:42everyone here knows, for example,

04:45I think if someone wants to do a military trial of Imran Khan,

04:50the whole world knows that it is illegal.

04:53But it will not harm Imran Khan,

04:56because Imran Khan is in jail.

04:59If the Supreme Court says it is legal,

05:01then it will be legal.

05:03No, it will be legal,

05:05but with the excuse of the Supreme Court,

05:08which has the status of the 26th amendment,

05:12that is the same thing,

05:14that Bhutto's murder,

05:16or his execution,

05:18was legalized by the Supreme Court,

05:21but 50 years later,

05:23they made it illegal.

05:25Let's talk about this.

05:27I have to take an urgent break.

05:29There are some technical issues.

05:31We will come back to this later.

05:33If there are no negotiations,

05:35then what will happen?

05:37Let's take a break.

Category

Transcript

Recommended