" Aap Ne Kisi Ko Extension Deni Hai Chahay Is Ke liye. .. ." Zartaj Gul Ki Hukoomat Par Tanqeed

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00He has beautifully said that two-thirds is the majority and the other third is consensus.

00:05Consensus these days is that you pick up Sadula Baloch's wife.

00:09Consensus is that you pick up Fayyaz Hussain Chajra's son, torture him and make his mother hear his screams.

00:15This is how you are going to build consensus.

00:17You have been given the right to vote because you want to make Aurangzeb Khichri disappear.

00:21What kind of consensus are you going to build that you are going to kidnap people from the parliament?

00:26The people who are hiding, they are saying that they should not come out.

00:31They are saying that we should not be kidnapped.

00:33As a parliamentary leader, I go somewhere and people ask me if my people are safe.

00:37The elected representatives who have come with 1.5 lakh votes on 8th February,

00:42you are saying that they should not come to their homes.

00:46They should not come to your talk show because they will be vulnerable.

00:50Because they will be picked up for their consensus.

00:53Because they will be kidnapped.

00:55The rest are saying that there are 6-8 number of shots, we will pick them up and finish them.

00:59So what is your objection?

01:01So this is the thing.

01:02You have to meme like this person specific.

01:07You have to give extension to someone.

01:09Even if you kidnap his mother, sister and son.

01:12There is no difference for them.

01:14This is the last part.

01:16I have to prove this story.

01:18The story has been proven.

01:20Their videos have been released.

01:21This is the last part.

01:22They were missing and then these videos have been released.

01:24Saadullah Blok's videos have been released.

01:26This is the last part.

01:27I don't know the name of the other person.

01:29There are many people.

01:31Just one last thing.

01:33You have asked a beautiful question to Mr. Hasna.

01:38What do you think?

01:40If you create a parallel Supreme Court today,

01:47Do you think that PMLN will make a joke that

01:51On one hand, there is the Punjab government,

01:55Which is through the Punjab Assembly.

01:57On the other hand, you will take a vote from Hamza Shahbaz in Iqbal.

02:00Do you think that the assembly will run like this?

02:03Do you mean that you will make parallel things and say that the country will run?

02:08There are two such institutions.

02:09The Supreme Court has explained.

02:14And your election commission is saying that we have not understood yet.

02:18I am talking about the special sessions for my party.

02:21But if you look at the role of the election commission,

02:23It is very clear in the last two years.

02:25Their role is to find a way according to the order.

02:29They find a way and where there is no way, they take time.

02:32I was just saying that even if the institutions do not agree with each other,

02:37If tomorrow there is a murderer and he has committed 10 murders,

02:41And the court punishes him and the murder is proven,

02:43The police say that they will not hang him.

02:45They say that they will not hang him because it is right in our eyes.

02:48So I am just saying that the women who are going to play now,

02:53They will not get this chair.

02:55They can't give a balance to the chair because the power of the people comes from the chair.

02:58You have come to know that when you were 10 years old, you were not 10 years old.

03:01Let me say one thing.

03:03Whether it is happening or not, people will listen to this decision and do it.

03:07The country can never run by destroying the institutions.

03:10If you want to run this country, you have to have a strong foundation and a strong institution.

03:16In which there is no politics.

03:18When do institutions get destroyed?

03:20When institutions try to play outside their domain, their boundaries.

03:25This PTI is crying as much as it is crying.

03:27These are beneficiaries of those court decisions where the constitution was rewritten.

03:33The only purpose of bringing 63A was to bring down the Punjab government.

03:38The constitution is very clear.

03:39The constitution is very clear that if you have put a vote, it should be counted.

03:43And then you should be punished.

03:45Now you say that this is the constitution.

03:48After rewriting the constitution, a Punjab government was targeted.

03:51They got the government.

03:52These are beneficiaries.

03:54Similarly, if you talk about the reserve seats.

03:57Article 51,106 is clear that if an independent has to join a party in three days.

04:03And if he does, then it is irreversible.

04:06Have you read the decision?

04:07No, what is the decision?

04:08He says that if a political party is not considered a political party.

04:15How do you declare its representatives independent?

04:18This is not out of the ordinary.

04:20He has written this decision by breaking it down in great detail.

04:23Read it.

04:24But what I am telling you is right.

04:26They were beneficiaries of a lot of political decisions.

04:29Whether they are coming against your party or coming in favor of their party.

04:34I remember at that time, I also thought that this decision was wrong.

04:37Because the vote is to be counted.

04:38But then this is happening in our system.

04:41That you also got a lot of decisions.

04:42They took the bullet mark.

04:44Level playing field.

04:45We kept watching with our own eyes.

04:47People are snatching people's ballot papers and running.

04:51Not letting anyone reach.

04:52It was visible.

04:53But you were a beneficiary of it.

04:55Proposal and secondary were being kidnapped from Haru's office.

04:58And our nomination papers were being rejected.

05:01At the end, they were benefitted.

05:03As far as voters are concerned.

05:05And we were not in the government at that time.

05:08We were also.

05:09Their leaders were punished in the courts at 12 o'clock in the night.

05:12They were punished in such a small case.

05:14Courts have made decisions in favor of everyone.

05:17Sometimes in their favor.

05:18Sometimes in your favor.

05:19The thing is.

05:20What kind of parallel system are we making?

05:23Even today, the same Supreme Court.

05:26In this, it also looks at civil matters.

05:28And also looks at primary matters.

05:29The problem with this argument is.

05:34Don't handpick.

05:37Make such a principle.

05:39What is the problem in India?

05:41You judge 25 or 30 Supreme Court judges.

05:43Top 5 judges.

05:45It will become a constitutional bench.

05:47Whatever matters will come, it will become that bench.

05:49The rest will be civil courts.

05:50But what is happening here?

05:51Here it is happening.

05:52As I told you.

05:53There were 4 attempts.

05:55Let me give them a chance.

05:56There were 4 attempts.

05:57First, we extend.

05:59We do tenure.

06:00Top 5 judges.

06:01Every time there was an attempt.

06:03Stop this.

06:04Or put this.

06:06That's the problem.

06:07It is a matter of intention.

06:08It can be a very interesting discussion.

06:10On this point.

06:11That constitutional court should be like this.

06:13Or how should it be.

06:15How should it work.

06:16There can be a lot of debate in this.

06:18It becomes a self-defeating argument.

06:20When politics is seen in it.

Category

Transcript

Recommended