'Too risky'? Ukraine says West should permit long-range attacks in Russia

FRANCE 24 English

Visit our website: http://www.france24.com  Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English  Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/France24_en

Transcript

00:00We can now bring in Patrick Burry, Senior Lecturer in Security at the University of Bath and former

00:05British Army Captain and NATO Analyst. Good afternoon. Thank you very much for joining us

00:10on the program today. Just yesterday, the US President Joe Biden was asked about a Ukrainian

00:15request to lift restrictions on long range weaponry. Biden responded, I made it clear what

00:21we prefer, what we would support and what we don't. What do you think, in your opinion, would

00:26be permissible for Washington? Good afternoon. I think if it's going to stay the same and the

00:32reason that that permission to use Western weapons essentially on Russian airbases inside Russia,

00:39the reason that hasn't been granted, I would be very surprised if it is.

00:43I personally can see the reasons why Russia have found a sweet spot, a strategic sweet spot where

00:49they can use their air forces at a standoff distance and use cheap glide bombs, which are,

00:55you know, it doesn't make sense to be intercepting them with a very expensive Patriot missiles, etc.

01:01to bombard and destroy Ukrainian energy infrastructure, water infrastructure,

01:05and even the front lines, too, because they've got dynamic targeting. So they found this spot.

01:11And of course, Ukraine, as we all know, are asking, you've got to let us shoot the archer,

01:16not the arrow. So hit the airbases. But Ukraine can't do that on its own at the moment.

01:22It doesn't have those weapons systems. And so they're reliant on the West and the UK,

01:28the US, France to give them clearance to strike Russian airbases inside Russia with Western

01:35weapons. And the problem here is that there is no precedent for this between two nuclear powered

01:42forces fighting what has become a proxy war. There's no precedent. And that's why I think

01:49the US better minds and myself with better intelligence have come to the conclusion that

01:54this is too risky. It's too risky because we have in the past over two years seen those repeated

02:02red lines being crossed by NATO allies. You're saying this is this is not going to happen.

02:09That's my hunch. I think I think given the reticence that that the US has shown here

02:17about granting this, it would have been granted if it happens. I could be wrong.

02:21But I think the other red lines, listen, Russia, and this is what plays into a lot of analysis,

02:26people saying, oh, well, you know, Russia said this, and it was a red line. And they have done

02:30a great job of using the nuclear threat as to scare off in particular, you know,

02:36well, certain European nations to scare them off over certain things. And the aid that has gone in

02:41to into Ukraine is from the West has been salami sliced too little too late. And it's had horrific

02:47consequences for the Ukrainians. You know, a lot of that could have gone in much sooner.

02:52There is a rules of the game here. It's happened in larger conflicts previously between two

02:57nuclear arm stations. And that is if one power invades another ally with its full conventional

03:04forces, that ally can respond with full conventional force inside that country.

03:08So that could have been the rule of the game back in when the invasion happens,

03:12that basically Ukraine could have been given everything it needed immediately to stop Russia

03:18inside Russia. But when it escalates onto a nuclear power sovereign territory,

03:24that is what nuclear deterrence is actually for. It's about protecting your sovereign territory.

03:29So that's why I think the calculation in the US is this would actually be quite risky.

03:34Secondly, if you look that actually there's been increases, been a reported sabotage

03:39operation on a Norwegian airbase, threats of sabotage, etc., against German air force bases,

03:45too. This is Russia bringing out its deterrence now and saying, in my view, anyway, look,

03:50we're serious about this. This will happen. You need to read the signals.

03:54Because I want to ask you about the Kursk incursion, which started just

03:57in August, not so long ago. But in that same month, Russia has advanced some 477 square kilometres

04:05into Ukrainian territory. This is Moscow's biggest increase. This is, of course,

04:10according to data supplied by the Institute for the Study of War. So has this bet

04:18on this Kursk incursion been too risky for Vladimir Zelensky?

04:23It's a really good question. When it first happened, people are watching it very closely,

04:27said, what are they doing? This is too risky. You're putting in crack units,

04:30which are needed in defence, essentially, and as a reserve into Kursk. And then given the amount

04:37of time it took the Russians to move forces around, I thought actually the Ukrainian bet had

04:42been a pretty good one. But I think the central tenet of this bet was that it would draw forces

04:49from what you're talking about, the Pokrovsk-Chasov Yar axis, which is where they're really advancing

04:55now. And it would draw forces off. And of course, what Putin has calculated is, is I am not taking

05:01forces away from my main effort. So he stripped forces out of other parts of the line. Yes,

05:06the Ukrainians were right about that assessment, the Russians are stretched, but he stripped forces

05:11from other parts of the line to deal with this, which is essentially just captured a few villages

05:15in Kursk. Whereas the real risk now, unfortunately, is Pokrovsk is a major logistical hub

05:22for them, like half of the front, essentially, down there. So that's the worry. He's managed to

05:28be able to not strip forces off the Pokrovsk axis. And what happens if Ukraine does lose Pokrovsk?

05:36It's, it's not good. It's not good. It's not good. I mean, it's an axis. I mean,

05:42they'll find other ways, but it depends. I actually think personally, I think that the

05:46advance on Pokrovsk may well slow down as it starts to move into the urban fight rather than

05:52the more rural fight where the Russians are advancing now. Because Patrick, we're also

05:56going to, we have winter that's around the corner. I mean, it is September, but in that part of the

06:00world, it gets cold a lot sooner. And then it's difficult to send in weaponry and get things

06:07moving, isn't it? Well, yeah, maybe in about six weeks, it gets wet first. And then, and things

06:15slow down and then it gets cold. So, you know, we'll see. Yes, it slows combat down. Of course,

06:22it does. But they need to stabilize the front down near Pokrovsk really soon because it's

06:28getting quite worrying, unfortunately. And hopefully they can. And the incursion into

06:34Kursk, one thought in the early days was for Ukraine to have an upper hand in any potential

06:41peaceful settlement, a dialogue to bring this war to an end. But now you're saying that

06:47that Kiev could be on the back foot? I don't, in the Kursk salient, essentially, there's still a

06:54bit of tit for tat going on. The Russians have pushed the Ukrainians out of some villages and

06:58Ukrainians are still attacking in other places. The big question is, look, you widened your line,

07:04you widened your front line and now you have to sustain that for Ukraine. And you put in

07:08really good units. Personally, I think that it probably made the most sense in terms of

07:14the main aim would have been to have take or one of the supporting and take the Kursk nuclear power

07:20plant on day one or day two and then trade for Zaporizhia coming up to winter, which the Russians

07:24hold would have made a lot of sense. But again, in these operations, you know, surprise operations,

07:31it's so difficult to know where you're going to get to on day one or day two.

07:34Patrick Burry, a fascinating conversation. Thank you very much for joining us on the program today.

Category

Transcript

Recommended