Reserved Seats Case Hearing In Supreme Court | Meher Bukhari's Analysis - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#reservedseats #supremecourt #sunniittehadcouncil #cjp #qazifaezisa #supremecourt #ecp #khabar #meherbukhari   Reserved Seats Case Hearing In Supreme Court | Meher Bukhari's Analysis

Transcript

00:00The election commission's unknowingness is being questioned.

00:02The second group is involved in suicide.

00:04There is a comment on the political existence of the group as a way of justice.

00:06There are open remarks on the issues related to democracy during the era of dictators.

00:10The case that is being published is reaching its conclusion.

00:14The decision is expected in the next 48 hours.

00:16During today's most important hearing, there was a lot of contradiction in the opinion of the election commission.

00:20During the hearing, the election commission has stated that the decision to give special seats to the father party was illegal.

00:26Justice Ayesha Malik questioned how the father party was given special seats in the last election.

00:31The lawyer of the election commission replied that the decision to give special seats to the father party was not in accordance with the law.

00:36Justice Ayesha Malik asked how the election commission can take two different opinions on one case.

00:41The lawyer said that the current election commission has heard all the opinions and decided.

00:46During the hearing, the justice remarked that a lawyer took some points in one case and something else in the evening.

00:51The problem is that you are a constitutional body

00:55and you seem to be taking different stances as and when you understand the law,

01:01how you choose to understand the law.

01:03There has to be some consistency

01:05and if you are not agreeable with what happened in the last election,

01:08you would then write it somewhere, you would meet on it.

01:12The commission is a commission, but tell us what the situation is.

01:16Mr. Sikandar, you can take it lightly.

01:19One time someone was arguing and in the morning, after a while, the court observed another case.

01:25You are making your arguments very different.

01:29Please, I am listening.

01:30So he said, I am wiser now.

01:33Or you can also say I am more freer now or less freer now than the then election commission or the present election commission.

01:42There was a lot more thought given to this.

01:44During the hearing, Justice Munir Ghaftar also remarked on the occasion of the election commission.

01:49The election commission has adopted different stances.

01:52The election commission says that the decision made in the last election was wrong.

01:56During the hearing, Justice Jamal Mandokhil questioned the lawyer of the election commission, Sikandar Basheer.

02:00Tell us, where and who made the mistake?

02:03This aspect of the hearing of the special sessions was also interesting

02:06that every point was raised by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

02:09where the judge was a criminal.

02:11While Justice Atar Minala, Justice Ayesha and Justice Jamal Mandokhil

02:14most of the marks were on keeping the spirit of democracy safe.

02:18During the hearing, Justice Jamal Mandokhil raised the point that

02:20there were no party elections in 2018 of Tehreek-e-Insaf.

02:23Then how did he get the electoral mark?

02:25The Chief Justice remarked that if we go on this, the election of the Chairman of the Senate will also be open.

02:30The matter of Tehreek-e-Insaf intra-party elections was coming up many years ago.

02:33Tehreek-e-Insaf was asking for time for intra-party elections again and again.

02:36Justice Mansoor Ali Shah said that I wish I had a mind like the Chief Justice.

02:40I would have understood everything as soon as I read it.

02:42But I am a common man.

02:43During the hearing, the election commission came under discussion.

02:46The loser says that the elections were not right.

02:48We do not value the institution.

02:50Justice Mansoor Ali Shah raised the question on the remarks of the Chief Justice

02:52that is the election commission such a powerful institution?

02:57The election commission of Pakistan is not a poor institution.

03:00Neither is it a subordinate institution of yours nor of the Supreme Court.

03:03He is not saying anything.

03:04We will have to show that he has done this unorthodox thing.

03:08Then I will use my power against him.

03:12It is possible that I will disagree with him on many things.

03:15But I will interfere only when I will understand that he has moved away from the law.

03:26Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Issa said that prove that the election commission has done this unorthodox thing.

03:30We will blow it.

03:31We will have to see that the election commission has done this unorthodox thing.

03:34Then we will intervene in it.

03:35Justice Mansoor Ali Shah said that the court wants the right of a political party

03:41to get what it wants.

03:42No one should have more or less seats.

03:43Chief Justice said that what is the right?

03:45The Supreme Court has to look at the constitution.

03:47Interestingly, two days ago,

03:49Justice Sattar Minnalla issued a very important additional note on all four sides

03:54which is a complete denial of the remarks of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Issa

03:57to prove the unorthodox action of the election commission.

03:59Justice Sattar Minnalla wrote in his note that the voters were deprived of their fundamental right

04:03by the decision of the election commission.

04:06Justice Sattar Minnalla wrote in his additional note

04:08that due to the misinterpretation of the court's decision,

04:10a large political party was removed from the election.

04:12The Supreme Court's decision was not to disqualify any party.

04:16The voters were deprived of their fundamental right by the decision of the election commission.

04:19The election commission admitted that a large party was disqualified in the light of the Supreme Court's decision.

04:24The lawyer of the election commission tried to put the decision of giving freedom to the hopefuls of justice

04:28on the ROs.

04:30The lawyer's arguments have raised serious questions on the role of the election commission.

04:35In the additional note, it has been said that the election commission has to confirm

04:38which political party was excluded from the electoral process.

04:42If the election commission fails to confirm,

04:44then serious questions will be raised on its constitutional responsibility.

04:47Justice Sattar Minnalla further wrote that the case of the special seats is not only the case of the seats

04:51but is the case of the fundamental constitutional rights of the stakeholders, i.e. voters.

04:55Justice Sattar Minnalla said that the election commission should confirm

04:58that everyone was given equal opportunity in the general elections

05:01and fulfilled their constitutional responsibility.

05:03The decision of the case of the special seats cannot be taken out of the technical points alone.

05:08The decision of the special seats can be made in the context of the elections on 8 February.

05:12Justice Sattar Minnalla further ordered that the election commission should give a written statement

05:16that was it legal to exclude the judicial process from the electoral process.

05:20The records of the decision of the election commission are present

05:22and it is clear that the Supreme Court judge said in the additional note

05:25that the situation was extraordinary in light of the situation

05:28and the hopefuls of the disqualified political party wanted to maintain their position.

05:32Justice Sattar Minnalla said that the misinterpretation of the election commission

05:35affected the political party, voters and the exclusion of the special seats.

05:39Governance, policies, legislation and the trust of the people depend on the electoral process.

05:44Ladies and gentlemen, in today's hearing,

05:46the Supreme Court has rejected the formula of allotting reserve seats

05:49from the election commission in 2018 and 2024

05:51and the hearing has been postponed until tomorrow.

05:55In the most important hearing,

05:57the party with which the Justice Movement wants to move forward

06:01has supported the arguments of the election commission

06:04to keep the reserve seats of the Justice Movement.

06:09And they have gone against the Justice Movement.

06:11This is a serious situation.

06:13On one hand, it is a matter of reserve seats.

06:15On the other hand, the Justice Movement

06:17is passing resolutions on resolutions

06:19through a core committee.

06:21It is an internal storm that is not stopping.

06:23With your permission.

Reserved Seats Case Hearing In Supreme Court | Meher Bukhari's Analysis

Category

Transcript

Recommended