Skip to player
Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Search
Connect
Watch fullscreen
Like
Comments
Bookmark
Share
Add to Playlist
Report
The only right answer to all real questions || Acharya Prashant, on Zen (2016)♂️ Want to meet Acharya Prashant? Be a part of the Live Sessions: https://acharyaprashant.org/hi/enquir... ⚡ Want Acharya Prashant’s regular updates? Join WhatsApp Channel
Acharya Prashant
Follow
5/4/2024
♂️ Want to meet Acharya Prashant?
Be a part of the Live Sessions: https://acharyaprashant.org/hi/enquir...
⚡ Want Acharya Prashant’s regular updates?
Join WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va6Z...
Want to read Acharya Prashant's Books?
Get Free Delivery: https://acharyaprashant.org/en/books?...
Want to accelerate Acharya Prashant’s work?
Contribute: https://acharyaprashant.org/en/contri...
Want to work with Acharya Prashant?
Apply to the Foundation here: https://acharyaprashant.org/en/hiring...
➖➖➖➖➖➖
Video Information: 24th Advait Learning Camp, 14.9.16, Mukteshwar, India
Context:
~ What are the right questions?
~ What is the answer?
~ How to Understand Zen Koans?
~ What is the only right answer to all real questions?
Zen Koan:
A monk asked Joshu, “Has the dog Buddha nature?”
Joshu replied, “Moo” .
Music Credits: Milind Date
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Category
📚
Learning
Transcript
Display full video transcript
00:00
A monk asked Joshu, has the dog the gupta nature? Joshu replied, Moo. Moo stands for
00:25
nothing. Everything about the dog and the gupta is different.
00:46
As long as you compare a thing about the dog and the gupta, you will only find differences.
01:07
As long as the dog is something or anything, as long as the buddha is seen as something or
01:19
anything, all you will see is differences. The dog and the buddha are alike only in their nothingness.
01:33
Has dog the buddha nature? Yes, of course. The dog is buddha when the dog is nothing.
01:43
Of course, the dog has buddha nature, but not as long as it is a dog. As long as it is a dog,
01:53
it is just a dog. The dog is a buddha when it has lost its doghood. You are a buddha when you have
02:04
lost your personhood. The buddha is nothing but the one who has lost himself. That great emptiness,
02:17
that great nothingness is the buddha. Has dog buddha nature? Moo. Do I have buddha nature? Moo.
02:29
Do you have buddha nature? Moo. As long as I am myself, as long as I am what I appear to be and
02:38
what I think myself to be, of course, there is no possibility of buddha nature. For buddha nature,
02:44
is that vast emptiness that we all are. That vast emptiness in which even we appears like
02:58
an absurdity for there is no diversity, no difference. So, what to talk of me and we?
03:06
When you are not, then the buddha is. Surely the buddha is even when you are,
03:18
but what to do if you believe yourselves to be non-buddha as long as you are?
03:25
Hence, you are the buddha only when you are gone. Gate gate paragate swaha. When you are gone,
03:38
gone, totally gone and disappeared, that is buddha buddha. When the dog is gone,
03:45
gone, totally gone and disappeared, that is buddha buddha. Do you now see what Jyotish is saying?
03:53
Yes, of course, the dog has buddha nature, but not the dog. The dog and the buddha are one,
04:02
but not as long as the dog insists on being a dog. As long as you insist on being what you
04:12
stand for, what you are attached to, what you are identified with, of course, there is no possibility
04:17
of buddha nature. The buddha nature will remain present but yet appear absent and that is the
04:26
great maya. You know what maya is? That which prevents the present from being seen and that
04:40
which makes you see that which is not. These are the two things that maya does. You start
04:55
looking at yourself as someone who is not and you start forgetting the one that you really are,
05:11
that is maya. Seen a little differently, Yoshu also means that this question itself is a barrier
05:40
against buddhahood. So, when the question is posed, Yoshu presents a nothing to the question,
05:49
drop this question and there lies buddhahood. As long as there is a question, there is a question.
05:56
Who are we? The ones who are full of questions. When the questions are gone, we are gone and
06:03
what remains is the buddha. Drop this question and that's what the buddha also used to do.
06:09
He would not entertain several questions that pertain directly to buddhahood. His
06:19
response would be drop the question and you are home. The answer would keep you
06:28
believing in the validity of the question. So, I will not present any answer. Answer
06:36
will reinforce your belief in the question. You are already distracted. Why should I
06:46
confuse you even more? So, I will not give you an answer. Do you have buddha nature?
07:00
No. Neither yes nor no. If you say yes, then you mean that you as you are,
07:07
you as you think you are, have buddha nature. No way. The way we have built ourselves up,
07:20
the way we have conceptualized ourselves, there is no possibility of buddha nature.
07:25
It is only the force of habit, conditioning, biology and evolution. All of them are something.
07:35
None of them is nothing. All of them are space time. None of them are beyond the mind. So,
07:52
yes would not be proper. When I asked, do you have buddha nature? Saying yes would not be proper.
07:59
This question is the same as saying, are you brahman? Are you atman? Saying yes would not be
08:04
proper. Asking do you have buddha nature is the same as asking are you the atman? Saying yes would
08:12
not be proper. Saying no would also not be proper. If you don't have buddha nature, if you are not
08:22
the atman, then you must be something other than the atman. Which means something other than the
08:29
atman exists. Which means there is multiplicity of truths. Because the atman, the buddha nature
08:38
is the sole truth. By saying that you exist and are yet not the atman, you are saying something
08:49
besides the atman exists. And thereby you are raising parallel gods, parallel truths. And if
09:03
truths are parallel, they are just false. The truth by definition is the one that has no end,
09:13
no substitute, no parallel. So, neither can you say yes nor can you say no. All you can say is
09:23
Moo. This Moo is such a beautiful word. Language does not normally have it. But
09:33
spirituality stretches language. It forces language to do things which language normally
09:39
cannot do. That's what saints do. That's what seers do. That's what Zen does. Moo is a classical
09:48
subject. So, that is the reason why you will find me admonishing you when you say aham brahmasmi.
10:04
I will say what rubbish are you talking? Are you Brahm? And you will find me equally irate when
10:20
you say naham brahmasmi. I will say if you are not Brahm, what else are you? And this may confuse
10:28
you. You may feel yesterday he kept on saying I am that. Today when I am saying I am that,
10:38
he is saying are you that? Look at your face. Because your yes is as dangerous as your no.
10:48
The answer is Moo. You see now why yesterday I kept insisting you are that, you are that and
10:57
today when you want to dance, I am that, I say. You see this? Saying anything regarding your Brahm
11:14
nature or Buddha nature is a disgrace. So, don't say anything. When you don't say anything,
11:20
then you are that. But who says by saying anything you will be displaced from being that? But try
11:28
saying and let's see what happens. That's the absurdity of Zen. That's the beauty of Zen.
11:37
That's the truth of Zen. It's everywhere but it's not in the beginning, not in the end,
11:50
neither in the beginning. Yet nothing apart from it exists. But go and find it in all your latest
11:59
grams. Nothing apart from it exists. But try finding it, you will fail. Could you find it?
12:11
Saying yes is arrogance. Saying no is blindness. So, the answer is Moo. Moo is the only defeating
12:31
answer to all real questions. All real questions. Do you love me? If I say yes, I'm accepting that
12:44
you and I exist and if you and I exist and we are separate, there is a question of love. If I say no,
12:50
then I am saying that I too exist and I have nothing for you. In either case I am damned. So,
13:01
the right answer is Moo. Do you exist? Were you born? Would you die?
13:32
Should I hit you hard? Continue.
13:36
Yes, yes, yes.
13:45
Zen does not hesitate. In? Are you getting it? Clear?
Recommended
0:15
|
Up next
Divine Serenity: Lord Ganesha Worshipping Shiva Lingam by the Riverbank
Sanatan Family
6/4/2025
4:58
Sex Child Sexual Abuse in Family -
Home Art and Craft
3/12/2016
8:59
Planting Trees, Veganism, and Protests Aren’t Enough! || AP Neem Candies
Acharya Prashant
today
36:56
Poor Billionaires, Loveless Weddings || Acharya Prashant (2025)
Acharya Prashant
yesterday
12:24
Abortion Rights: Who Decides — Country, Religion or Society? || Acharya Prashant, IIT-Delhi (2025)
Acharya Prashant
yesterday
0:31
The Desire To Be Loved || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
1:17
Shri Krishna: The Eternal Virgin! || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
0:54
The Greatest Joy || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
0:45
Temple of Love! || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
1:01
Do We Love Our Cows? || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
0:32
Whom to Call a Guru? || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
0:58
Lessons from Cricket || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
1:04
Your IQ Doesn’t Make You Superior || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
0:55
Happy Lives Of Tribal People || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
11:59
Facing My Fear: Journey to Trust and Connection || Acharya Prashant (2024)
Acharya Prashant
2 days ago
1:14
Peter's Real Passion (from Fountainhead) || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
0:49
Learn to Question Yourself || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
1:02
The Valour of Sikh Gurus! || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
0:45
Beyond the Body || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
0:46
Two Events that Impacted My Life! || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
1:04
Is Spirituality for Everyone? || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
1:03
Lord Mahavir was a Warrior || Acharya Prashant
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
7:55
Why was Buddha Silent About Atma? || Acharya Prashant (2020)
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
12:22
Do We Really Need Spirituality in an AI-Driven World? || Acharya Prashant, at IIT-Guwahati (2023)
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago
40:52
Planning a getaway? How about going within? || Acharya Prashant (2025)
Acharya Prashant
3 days ago