Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
What is deja vu from a scientific point of view ?
Transcript
00:00He had been here before, or so it felt.
00:03As the tram rolled down the cobbled street in Prague, a faint tremor passed through Elliot's spine.
00:09He leaned against the cold glass window, watching the raindrops trace chaotic paths,
00:13colliding like destinies or memories, fleeting, intersecting, vanishing.
00:17The buildings outside, ochre facades, iron balconies, a beggar with a violin,
00:22all conspired in their silence to whisper,
00:24You've seen this.
00:25He sat upright, heart accelerating, eyes wide with eerie familiarity.
00:31Not just the street.
00:32The tram.
00:33The smell of wet upholstery.
00:35Even the precise moment when a child dropped a red mitten and his mother shouted something in check,
00:39it had already happened.
00:41Not just similar.
00:42Identical.
00:43Déjà vu.
00:44A glitch in memory?
00:46A metaphysical message?
00:47A neurological hiccup?
00:49Elliot was no ordinary traveller.
00:51A professor of cognitive science and part-time poet,
00:54he was in Prague, not for sightseeing, but for silence.
00:58A sabbatical to write his next book on memory, perception,
01:01and the strange ghosts that wander between them.
01:04That red mitten haunted him all the way to his apartment in Malastrana.
01:08He dropped his coat, sat at his desk and opened a new document.
01:12The cursor blinked, impatiently.
01:14He typed,
01:15What is déjà vu from a scientific point of view?
01:18And then paused.
01:20Because if there was one thing Elliot knew, it was this.
01:23Science doesn't always begin with answers.
01:26Sometimes it begins with a red mitten on a rainy afternoon,
01:29and the peculiar feeling that reality is folding over itself.
01:34The first known mention of the phenomenon called déjà vu,
01:37literally already seen in French,
01:39came from Émile Boirac in the late 19th century.
01:42But the experience itself?
01:44As old as awareness.
01:46As old as dreams.
01:47Let us begin not with definitions, but with mysteries.
01:50The year was 1955.
01:52A young man named William, aged 23,
01:55was admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Wales.
01:58He was bright, articulate, and deeply disturbed.
02:01His complaint?
02:02He believed every moment of his life was a repetition.
02:06Every sound, every sight, every encounter had happened before,
02:09exactly as it was happening now.
02:11Unlike typical déjà vu, which lasts mere seconds,
02:14William's experience was chronic.
02:17The doctors called it persistent déjà vu,
02:19a condition so rare that most textbooks never mention it.
02:22Tests showed no brain lesions,
02:24no signs of temporal lobe epilepsy.
02:26And yet, William remained imprisoned in a living loop,
02:29endlessly repeating.
02:31Some dismissed it as a dissociative disorder.
02:34Others saw it as an extreme manifestation of a faulty memory circuit.
02:38But William insisted he wasn't ill.
02:40Reality was.
02:42So what happens in the brain during déjà vu?
02:45Modern neuroscience has a few suspects.
02:47The leading candidate is the medial temporal lobe,
02:50particularly the hippocampus and surrounding structures,
02:53the regions responsible for memory encoding and retrieval.
02:57The hippocampus is like a librarian filing away your experiences.
03:01But sometimes it misfires.
03:04It might tag a current event as already retrieved,
03:07even though it hasn't been stored.
03:09This creates the illusion of familiarity.
03:11Think of it like opening a brand new book,
03:14but feeling as if you've read it before.
03:16Not because you have,
03:17but because your brain has accidentally stamped it as familiar.
03:21This theory, called the dual processing hypothesis,
03:24suggests that there are two pathways in memory.
03:27One for processing a new experience,
03:29and one for recognizing familiar experiences.
03:32If the latter activates prematurely,
03:35or independently,
03:36you get déjà vu.
03:38But this elegant theory has a problem.
03:40It doesn't explain everything.
03:42Take this account from 2007.
03:44A woman named Claudia described an episode
03:46where she entered a bookstore she'd never visited.
03:49She walked to the second floor,
03:50turned left,
03:51and suddenly froze.
03:53I knew what book was on the third shelf,
03:54she said later.
03:56I even knew a passage from it.
03:57The book was there.
03:59The passage matched.
04:00So was this still déjà vu?
04:03Or precognition?
04:05No.
04:05Claudia had visited that same bookstore
04:07ten years prior in childhood.
04:10She didn't remember it consciously,
04:11but her brain had retained fragments.
04:14The layout.
04:15The color of the walls.
04:16The rhythm of the spiral staircase.
04:19This is called cryptomnesia,
04:20when forgotten memories re-emerge,
04:22but are mistaken for entirely new experiences.
04:25It's the ghost of memory dressed as a stranger.
04:27So perhaps déjà vu is not about time-folding.
04:31It's about memory failing,
04:33beautifully, subtly, momentarily.
04:35But what if memory isn't failing?
04:38What if it's remembering something
04:39we were never meant to access?
04:41It was a Thursday evening
04:42when Elliot wandered into the archive
04:44of Charles University.
04:46The librarian,
04:47an elderly man with bushy eyebrows
04:48and the calmness of someone
04:50who has seen many storms come and go,
04:52handed him a folder.
04:53Early work on temporal anomalies,
04:56the man said in Czech-accented English.
04:59Inside were yellowed pages
05:00from forgotten scientists,
05:02including a neurologist
05:03named Dr. Zina Hertzfeld.
05:06In a 1962 paper,
05:07never published but meticulously documented,
05:10Hertzfeld described a curious case,
05:12a patient who experienced déjà vu
05:14during near-death trauma.
05:16While drowning,
05:17the patient reported a cascade
05:18of replayed memories,
05:19but not from her own life.
05:21They weren't mine, she had said.
05:23They were from someone else,
05:24a woman.
05:25I saw her wedding,
05:26her children,
05:27her regrets,
05:28all of it in seconds.
05:31Hertzfeld speculated,
05:32without hard data
05:33but with poetic boldness,
05:35that déjà vu might not be
05:36a memory at all.
05:37Perhaps it was
05:38a momentary resonance
05:39with another consciousness
05:40somewhere in the architecture
05:42of space-time.
05:44Elliot raised an eyebrow.
05:45This wasn't science,
05:46it was metaphysics
05:47dressed as neurology.
05:49And yet,
05:50something tugged at him.
05:51There is a lesser-known theory
05:53in neuroscience
05:53called the hologram hypothesis.
05:56The idea is simple,
05:58profound,
05:58and unsettling.
06:00Memory in the brain
06:00might be stored
06:01not like a library of books,
06:03but like a hologram
06:04distributed across a network.
06:06Carl Prebram,
06:07one of its early proponents,
06:08suggested that each memory
06:09is not stored in a single place,
06:11but spread across regions.
06:13Damage one area,
06:15and you may still recall fragments.
06:16This is similar
06:18to how a holographic plate
06:19can be broken,
06:20yet each piece
06:21still contains the whole image,
06:23blurred,
06:23partial,
06:24but present.
06:25But here's the twist.
06:26If memories are holographic,
06:28then familiarity
06:29can be triggered
06:30by partial matches.
06:32A smell,
06:32a sound,
06:33a curve of a stranger's face
06:35might light up a fragment,
06:36just enough to simulate
06:37a full experience.
06:39Déjà vu, then,
06:40could be the brain
06:41trying to complete a puzzle
06:42it never saw,
06:43using pieces
06:44that almost fit.
06:46This theory explains
06:47the eerie rightness
06:48of Déjà vu,
06:50the way it feels
06:50not just familiar,
06:51but destined.
06:53The brain is trying
06:53to resolve a pattern,
06:55and in doing so,
06:56creates a temporary
06:57illusion of certainty.
06:59But Elliot knew
07:00that even this theory
07:00had gaps.
07:01What about the timing?
07:03The split-second feeling
07:04that fades just as fast.
07:07Why do some people
07:08experience Déjà vu frequently,
07:10while others never do?
07:11Why did he experience it
07:13that day in Prague?
07:15Now we must pause.
07:16Because there is a question
07:17that haunts every scientist,
07:19every philosopher,
07:20every soul
07:21who has stared
07:21into the strange corridor
07:22of Déjà vu.
07:23What if the experience
07:24isn't an error?
07:26What if it's a signal,
07:27a marker,
07:28a breadcrumb?
07:29Elliot's thoughts
07:29turn to quantum theories,
07:31not because he believed
07:32them all,
07:33but because they offered
07:34metaphors for the unknowable.
07:36In quantum mechanics,
07:37there is a phenomenon
07:38called superposition,
07:40where a particle exists
07:41in multiple states
07:42until observed.
07:44Could consciousness, too,
07:46operate in a probabilistic space
07:47where possibilities overlap?
07:50Some fringe physicists
07:51and a few brave psychologists
07:53have speculated
07:54that Déjà vu
07:55might be the mind
07:56brushing against
07:57a neighboring version
07:58of reality,
07:59a parallel track
08:00in the multiverse.
08:02Nonsense?
08:03Perhaps.
08:04But what if Déjà vu
08:05is not just the brain
08:06echoing its own memories,
08:08but synchronizing
08:09for a heartbeat
08:09with the echo
08:10of another life
08:11you might have lived?

Recommended