Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/11/2025
During remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday, Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) spoke about the recessions submitted to Congress by President Trump.
Transcript
00:00Last week, President Trump sent to Congress a request to rescind $9.4 billion in fiscal year 2025 and 2024 funds
00:12that a majority of Republicans and Democrats had debated, had voted for, and those appropriations were signed into law by President Trump.
00:24And I want to briefly discuss the impact these rescissions would have because of the consequences for Americans,
00:34for our relationships with other governments, and for millions of people around the world.
00:40Also, I want to speak about what this does to the appropriations power and authority and responsibility of Congress.
00:49We're seeing, from my view, Mr. President, an abdication of Article I authority that belongs under the Constitution to Congress
01:01in delegating that to the chief executive.
01:05It is a violation of our separation of powers, which is a pillar of the checks and balances that is essential to the well-being of our democracy.
01:14First, talking about the rescissions, the White House, as it says, with everything that we do appropriate money for,
01:28the White House claims it's waste, fraud, and abuse, and also claims that it contributes to the ballooning deficit.
01:35There's a contradiction here, because according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office,
01:44the so-called Big Beautiful Bill that the President is determined to pass,
01:52that will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit.
01:57$2.4 trillion, and that is before we add the increased debt service that will be required to pay it.
02:06In this country, taxpayers are now on the verge of paying a trillion dollars annually in interest payments.
02:15And that is dead money.
02:18It doesn't support our military.
02:20It doesn't support our schools.
02:22It doesn't support scientific research.
02:24It's paid to bondholders, many of whom are in China.
02:30Most of the funds that the President is proposing to cancel
02:34were approved two and a half months ago for fiscal year 2025.
02:39And there's been absolutely no showing that any of these funds, not a single dollar,
02:45cannot or should not be used for the purposes for which they were appropriated
02:50by a bipartisan majority in Congress.
02:54There has been absolutely no showing, none, of any waste, fraud, and abuse.
03:01These funds were deemed worthy of funding two months ago, and the President himself agreed.
03:07He signed it.
03:09This is an end around Article I authority of Congress.
03:13We pass a budget, and then the executive rescinds what it is we appropriated our funds for.
03:20Enormous erosion of the responsibility of Congress under Article I.
03:25But let me just mention a few specific examples of the funds that are on the chopping block.
03:33Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
03:35That's in the case of Vermont.
03:38It's called Vermont Public, and it's our public radio station, and it's our public broadcasting.
03:44And every state has the public broadcasting system.
03:48Vermont, and I know we're not unique, it is essential programming that knits together our community,
03:56provided information that was crucial constantly when we had floods in July of 23 and July of 24.
04:03Federal funding is about 10% of our budget, but in many states it's about 40 or 50%.
04:10The administration is proposing to get rid of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting altogether.
04:17I totally and completely oppose that.
04:19It's the equivalent of $1.60 for each American annually,
04:23and it provides a source of local news at a time when we have news deserts all around the country.
04:30And the pressure on our local newspapers, on our local broadcasters, on our local radio stations is enormous.
04:36We need public broadcasting.
04:40I saw it in Vermont, as I mentioned,
04:42when we had the enormous benefit of the information we needed desperately to deal with floods.
04:49My Republican colleagues in North Carolina had a similar experience.
04:54It was local public media markets and outlets that provided life-saving emergency alert information
05:01to ensure that victims knew which roads they could travel,
05:06which food distribution centers were open,
05:10and the elimination of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting puts all of this at risk.
05:15Another program set to be eliminated, PEPFAR.
05:22PEPFAR is a flagship HIV AIDS prevention program.
05:27It was started by President George W. Bush.
05:30It has saved millions of lives.
05:34It has created enormous goodwill for the United States around the entire world.
05:39The chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee has strongly opposed any rescission of PEPFAR funds.
05:46And I agree with Senator Collins and cannot for the life of me understand how anyone would support rescinding those funds
05:53that provide so much to so many for so little.
05:59Some other programs.
06:00Global health.
06:02$500 million would be cut.
06:03These activities on global health protect child and maternal health.
06:09They combat HIV AIDS and infectious diseases.
06:14We'd be rescinding funds that fight malaria, Ebola, polio, HIV and AIDS
06:19and other diseases that have been kept under control
06:23and out of the United States in many cases.
06:26Thanks to these programs, they could easily explode into full-blown epidemics.
06:35$800 million is being cut for refugees, like those who are fleeing genocide in Darfur in Burma.
06:43It also, you know, should we turn our back on the Afghan refugees,
06:47folks who served our men and women in uniform during the course of the Afghan war?
06:53Or another cut is $83 million for programs that have supported democracy
06:59through organizations like the International Republican Institute,
07:03the National Democratic Institute, and Freedom House.
07:07These have all historically received bipartisan support and strong support.
07:14This rescission would put them out of business,
07:17even though we kept them in business on a bipartisan vote just two and a half months ago.
07:21A cut of $1.65 billion for the economic support fund.
07:28It may not necessarily be apparent on its face, but that fund account funds our economics assistance
07:35for Jordan, which has been an incredibly important ally to kind of release pressure in the Middle East,
07:42Egypt, Indonesia, Lebanon,
07:45and for other programs that combat corruption and transnational money laundering
07:51and terrorist financing,
07:54human trafficking and wildlife trafficking.
07:58These programs also, by the way, expand and build markets for U.S. exports,
08:04creating good, high-paying jobs in the United States of America.
08:08A cut of $460 million for assistance for Georgia, Armenia, Macedonia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan,
08:17and other former Soviet republics.
08:21We want them to be our friend.
08:24We are in a contest with Russia.
08:27Russia, walking away from these on-the-edge countries,
08:32fragile countries, would send the message Putin wants,
08:35even while he is seeking to
08:38overtake Ukraine.
08:42A cut of $496 million for international disaster assistance.
08:48And that, by the way, provides life-saving aid for victims of natural
08:51and man-made disasters, from earthquakes and hurricanes to armed conflicts.
08:57You know, this is the United States doing its share as the major power in the world
09:03to help those who have been impacted by these extreme events
09:08that caused immense harm and suffering through no cause of their own.
09:13And also, it would cut $202 million for some specialized agencies,
09:21including UNICEF, that's traditionally been led by an American.
09:26And the Chinese love this, because where we leave,
09:29they've made it no secret, they want to replace us.
09:33These are just a few of the examples of the irreparable harm
09:37these rescissions would cause to programs and organizations
09:40that have had long-standing bipartisan support.
09:45They serve our interest, and they promote U.S. global leadership.
09:50Mr. President, I understand the White House is looking everywhere it can,
09:54except the defense budget, to find revenue.
09:57And they need that revenue to offset the tax breaks
10:01that will go, by and large, to the richest Americans.
10:06But these rescissions are thoughtless and they're reckless.
10:09Leadership of the United States is not solely a function of military power.
10:15Soft power really makes a difference.
10:18And it's a function and a power that we have to use our resources
10:24to act as a force multiplier for democratic principles,
10:28for free markets, and for building alliances.
10:31If these rescissions are approved,
10:36we'll be asked to explain why Congress did an about-face,
10:40literally in a matter of two and a half months,
10:42incited U.S. global engagement influence to China.
10:46None of us want that.
10:48All of us will get that.
10:51You know, the President likes to talk about his historic mandate.
10:56He did win.
10:56It was two million votes out of 152 million cast.
11:02It was a small margin of victory,
11:05the smallest by a Republican presidential candidate since the 1900s.
11:10My point here is not so much the size of the mandate.
11:15Whatever the mandate,
11:17a president should embrace the responsibility
11:21that he or she has to the entire country,
11:25and that includes folks who didn't vote for him.
11:29I do not believe even those who did
11:31were voting to risk the lives and their children's lives
11:37by cutting funds to stop the spread of Ebola,
11:39or measles, or West Nile virus.
11:42This wasn't a mandate to shut down programs
11:44to defend democracy where it's under assault.
11:47This was not a vote to withdraw from UNICEF.
11:52This was not a vote necessarily to turn our back
11:54on the world's refugees,
11:57including, in particular,
11:59Afghan refugees who saved lives of our men and women in uniform.
12:05You know, the talk about wasteful spending,
12:08we're with everybody.
12:10I have yet to meet a member of the United States Senate
12:13who's in favor of waste, fraud, and abuse.
12:15But we've got to identify it and then attack it,
12:20not assert that that's the justification
12:23for ending a program like PEPFAR
12:25that has proven to be efficient and effective
12:29in saving lives at very little cost.
12:33Mr. President,
12:35the final point I think all of us have to consider
12:38is the one I made at the beginning,
12:40and that is about the Article I responsibility of Congress.
12:44Alexander Hamilton warned about
12:48the excessive power
12:53that could reside in any one branch of government,
12:58in that for the well-being of our democracy,
13:02we had to maintain that competition between the branches,
13:06which required them to exercise and assert
13:09the authority that was given to each branch
13:11in the Constitution.
13:13And, of course, Article I gives to the Congress
13:17the power to tax
13:19and the power to spend.
13:22And it is absolutely essential
13:25we do that carefully and wisely
13:27because our constituents are the ones
13:29who are going to pay the bill
13:31through taxes we assess,
13:33and they're the ones who are going to receive
13:34the benefits through appropriations we make.
13:36But to abdicate that power,
13:39which is essentially what rescission
13:41would accommodate for the executive,
13:44is to turn over that power to the president.
13:47And it's not just a matter of it being this president.
13:51It's any president.
13:52In order for us to meet our responsibilities,
13:54we have to adhere to our constitutional responsibility
13:58under Article I.
14:00That we are the ones
14:01who are subject to the will of the people
14:04in the House every two years
14:05and the Senate every six years
14:07to account for how we tax and how we spend.
14:10Let's not dodge
14:11by delegating that power to the executive.
14:15Mr. President, I yield back.

Recommended