Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/28/2025
Alexander Mercouris analyzes rising anxiety across Western capitals as Ukraineโ€™s battlefield position weakens. German politician Friedrich Merz sparks controversy by backing deep strikes into Russian territory, while calls intensify for more sanctionsโ€”despite signs they're losing impact. With Russia advancing and morale fading, fear of a complete Ukrainian defeat is no longer unthinkable. A critical moment in the conflict, expertly unpacked. ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ“‰

#AlexanderMercouris #UkraineWar #Merz #DeepStrikes #Russia #Sanctions #WesternPanic #Geopolitics #UkraineDefeat #NATO #ProxyWar #RussiaUkraine #EUPolitics #MilitaryCrisis #UkraineFrontlines #UkraineCollapse #WarUpdate #GlobalTensions #WesternStrategy #WorldNews #ConflictAnalysis
Transcript
00:00Good day. Today is Tuesday, 27th May 2025, and I'm going to suggest that we are in
00:07the early moments of the second big panic that we have seen over the course of the conflict
00:15in Ukraine. The first big panic, which gripped the West, came in the immediate aftermath
00:22of the fall of Avdeevka, a fall which the Western governments had not expected it led
00:29to panic statements by President Macron of France about deploying the need to deploy
00:36French and European troops to Ukraine to release Ukrainian troops to staff the front lines.
00:44It led to decisions to start debates about missile strikes deep inside Russia. It led
00:55to a whole series of decisions by Western governments. And it also incidentally led
01:03to a conference that was reported some months ago in the New York Times, a military strategic
01:09conference that apparently took place in Washington in the late spring, early summer of 2024,
01:17in which Ukrainian intelligence, Kirill Abudanov and company, apparently informed the U.S.
01:25that Ukraine was losing the war. If the trajectory continued in the same way as it had been going,
01:35then the war would indeed be lost, and that asymmetric, what were called asymmetric techniques
01:43therefore needed to be applied. And I've suggested in previous programs that over the course of the
01:51next few months, we saw these asymmetric decisions, these asymmetric actions being taken by the
01:59Ukrainians. The offensive in Kursk region, the drone strikes, the increasing intensification
02:08of the drone war against Russia, and the decision to authorize the use of missile strikes against
02:16Russia as well. Well, I'm going to suggest that we are now seeing something similar play out.
02:24And some of the things that have created, caused, attracted attention are perhaps understood best
02:34as manifestations of this panic. For example, the recent film of an apparent altercation between
02:46the Macron couple, which I'm not going to discuss further on this program, that could be one such
02:52manifestation. It is most unusual for a husband and wife power team when one is the president
03:01of France to behave in the way that they did, and it does suggest significant stress.
03:09Another example, and perhaps a more important one, is comments made by the German Chancellor
03:17Friedrich Merz, which have been sort of walked back or contradicted since then by other German
03:24officials. Friedrich Merz made a statement that the Western powers, Britain, France,
03:33the United States, and Germany โ€“ notice the inclusion of the United States โ€“ were lifting
03:41restrictions on use of weapons by Ukraine, specifically range restrictions. He did not
03:50say outright that Germany was delivering Taurus missiles to Ukraine, but clearly that was the
03:57implication. But notice that he was trying to imply that this was a collective decision made
04:04by the Western powers involving the United States as well. Well, within hours, the Vice-Chancellor
04:13of Germany, who's a member of the SPD, the partner party in Germany's Grand Coalition,
04:22said that there'd be no recent decision changing policy on the part of Germany.
04:30And then we had further clarifications from Merz himself, saying that in fact this was a decision
04:36that was made months ago, which could take us back to the time of the Biden administration.
04:45And, well, I'm going to here float my own view. I think Germany has now delivered Taurus missiles
04:52to Ukraine. I think it did so pretty much as soon as Olaf Scholz ceased to be Chancellor.
05:00I think the Taurus missiles have already been delivered to Ukraine, and I think that there
05:05is current pressure underway upon the White House to get them to authorize the launch of
05:15these missiles on targets in Russia. And there are reports that around 150 of these Taurus missiles
05:25are being delivered to Ukraine, and these were obviously taken from German stocks.
05:33The actual operational number of these missiles held by Germany is said to be 250,
05:41so that will leave Germany with 100 of these missiles that are operational, and a larger
05:48stockpile of these missiles that would need to be refurbished in order to make them operational.
05:55And there's some claims that these missiles are going to be laundered, if I can use that expression,
06:00via Britain. Germany's going to sell them to Britain, which is then going to supply them
06:05to Ukraine, a completely pointless operation because, of course, it's German technicians who
06:12would need to operate these missiles if they are indeed going to be used inside Ukraine.
06:20And the United States has already pointed out that Taurus missiles use American-made
06:29components, and that it's American software that would need to be used in order to conduct
06:37strikes inside Russia. So, quite probably, quite plausibly, what Metz was trying to do
06:45is he was trying to put pressure on the Americans by making this announcement to get them to agree
06:51to allow Germany to activate these Taurus missiles and to help the Ukrainians conduct
07:00strikes with them against Russia. I would quickly say that though the Taurus
07:07is a longer-range missile than the Storm Shadows and Scalps that have previously been delivered to
07:13Ukraine, I doubt that it will offer any challenges to the Russian air defence system
07:23that the Russian air defence system cannot cope with. Certainly, it is a stealthy missile.
07:31Certainly, it has long range and high speeds, though it is subsonic. Certainly,
07:36it operates close to the ground. It may be more advanced in some respects than the Storm Shadow.
07:44The Scalp. But the Russians have been working on developing counters to such cruise missiles
07:55since at least the 1970s, and I'd be pretty surprised if by now they haven't developed
08:03a very sophisticated air defence system capable of dealing with missiles of this kind,
08:08especially now that they have had vast experience countering these missiles
08:15in Ukraine itself. The Storm Shadows and the Scalps have not been especially successful.
08:23In fact, they've not been successful at all. The Atakams missiles, which function in a completely
08:30different way, they are more like supersonic ballistic missiles. Even Jake Sullivan himself,
08:42Joe Biden's former national security advisor, all but admitted that the Atakams missiles,
08:50of which it seems around 500 were delivered to Ukraine, turned out to be disappointing.
08:57Anyway, I'm not going to discuss these missiles, these Taurus missiles, further
09:02in this program, but the nature of Maerz's announcement suggests to me panic,
09:12alarm, growing alarm in Germany, growing alarm across Europe, and the sustained push
09:23that is being made to get Donald Trump to agree to further sanctions
09:30points, in my opinion, to the same thing. So, Donald Trump had what he considered to be
09:39a good telephone call with Vladimir Putin about two weeks ago. There was dismay and alarm across
09:47Europe when they learned about this call. The Europeans, however, have now restarted their
09:54agitation for further sanctions. The Americans, the hardliners in the United States, are doing
10:02the same. There's reports and rumors that Lindsey Graham is thinking of presenting his sanctions
10:12bill to the Senate, even without Donald Trump's agreement. This is clearly intended to put pressure
10:22on Donald Trump, and Donald Trump has responded. He was needled by criticism from Zelensky that
10:31the United States has not criticized the Russian missile and drone attacks on Kyiv.
10:39Donald Trump put out his statement. He posted a message on Truth Social, which has been seized
10:48upon by people right across Europe and in the United States as showing criticism and exasperation
10:57towards President Putin. Indeed, President Trump did say some very critical things about Putin.
11:05He said that Putin, he'd known Putin a long time, he'd got on very well with Putin,
11:11that Putin had gone absolutely crazy, however, that he no longer knew what he was doing,
11:16that he was launching strikes on Kyiv that made no sense, that they were killing people,
11:22and that if Putin continued along these lines, it could be the end of Russia.
11:27But what people didn't mention also is that Trump then went on to criticize
11:32President Zelensky in almost equally sharp terms. He said that everything that Zelensky says
11:40is counterproductive, that Zelensky basically needed to shut up, that Zelensky's comments
11:48were most unhelpful. And then, of course, Trump then finished by saying that all that he was
11:54trying to do was end the war, to save lives, and this war wasn't his. He hadn't initiated the war
12:03in any way had he been president from 2021. The war would never have happened, and that it's
12:10Vladimir Putin's war, and Vladimir Zelensky's war, and also Joe Biden's war, but not Donald Trump's
12:19war. Anyway, so it was actually an example of Trump obviously needled by criticism that
12:27he'd not criticized the strike on Kyiv, coming out and making, if you like, equivalent criticisms
12:37of both Putin and Zelensky, but of the media class, the commentariat, the Europeans,
12:45people in the United States, seizing on his words of criticism of Putin himself to restart this
12:53tiresome, recurring narrative that we hear trotted out week after week, month after month, about how
13:04Trump is supposedly finally losing patience with Putin, that he has finally seen through Putin,
13:12that he's going to suddenly become tough on Putin, and that he's going to become tough on
13:19authorizing sanctions on Putin and on Russia in order to force Russia to the negotiating table.
13:27And sure enough, we're now getting leaks in the Wall Street Journal that perhaps in order to
13:34preempt Lindsey Graham, Donald Trump is indeed now considering sanctions. The ridiculous banking
13:41sanctions. Banking sanctions against a country whose entire banking system has been cut off
13:49completely from the Western financial system, that the banking sanctions have been dropped,
13:56but some other sanctions are going to be introduced. Who knows what those sanctions
14:03are going to be, but to repeat again, I get the sense that Donald Trump's heart
14:08isn't really in on this, and apparently there was a meeting between US and European officials
14:15to discuss tougher sanctions enforcement, and that meeting apparently fell apart.
14:23There was no disagreement on what could be done. I suspect that what happened is that over the
14:30course of that meeting, it became clear that tougher sanctions enforcement would ultimately
14:42bring a total stop to world trade, and is really unachievable. Anyway, all of this, in my opinion,
14:54is a manifestation of panic. A sense that things are going seriously, very, very badly wrong
15:01with Ukraine. And why is this happening? Well, I'm going to suggest a number of reasons. Firstly,
15:09I think the penny has now finally dropped right across the collective West in the United States
15:16with Donald Trump, with the Europeans, that this mighty effort we have seen since January
15:25to browbeat, bully, seduce, influence the Russians to agree to a temporary ceasefire
15:33that would freeze the conflict and prevent Ukraine being ground into dust, that that
15:40mighty effort has failed. The Russians have refused to be bullied, bribed, or intimidated
15:48into agreeing to a ceasefire. All of the attempts to sweet-talk Putin into agreeing to a ceasefire
15:55have failed. Putin has consistently said that he is not interested in an unconditional ceasefire
16:03intended to lead to a freezing of the conflict. He wants a final settlement of the conflict.
16:13He set out his terms last year at his speech to the foreign ministry on the 14th of June 2024.
16:23He's not intimidated by the sanctions. In a meeting, which I think took place in the Kremlin,
16:32he actually told officials and participants that they should not let themselves be frightened
16:39by all this talk of sanctions. Sanctions are here to stay. They will always remain in place.
16:45Russia has learned to live with them and to adapt to them, and it will continue to do so,
16:51and its sanctions and talk of sanctions should not affect Russia's decisions.
16:58And I think that finally, as I said, it's been understood in the West that the ceasefire,
17:07that much-desired, longed-for ceasefire โ€“ longed-for ever since Donald Trump became
17:15president, ever since it became clear that Ukraine was going to lose the war โ€“ this
17:20ceasefire, as I said, that they've been working towards, this attempt to freeze
17:24the conflict, they now understand that the Russians are not going to agree,
17:28and it isn't going to happen. And I think there's been a second reason for the panic,
17:35and that second reason goes back to that series of meetings that took place in the spring and
17:42early summer of 2024 โ€“ the time when there was lots of talk about asymmetric means to enable
17:51Ukraine to win the conflict. And as I said, at the time, since then, one of those asymmetric
18:00means was supposed to be the drone war. The idea of launching vast numbers of drones
18:08against targets in Russia, it was assumed that these would indeed start to make real damage,
18:15inflict real damage on the Russians, that they would cause the Russians to disperse their air
18:22defense assets, that this would weaken the Russians overall, and that it might actually
18:28cause significant economic damage in Russia and political crisis in Russia, and might indeed
18:37change the entire pattern of the war. And over the last couple of months,
18:42ever since Ukraine started to crank up its drone production and started to hit targets inside
18:49Russia with large numbers of drones, and ever since Ukraine started to use drones more actively
18:58on the battlefronts, there has been a sustained narrative peddled across the West about how
19:10Ukraine had managed to stabilize the situation, that the drones were giving Ukraine a big advantage
19:19over the Russians, that they'd slowed the Russian offensives, and that they were bringing the war
19:26home to Russia, to Russia itself. And I think that in particular, the role the West has played
19:38in making this drone offensive possible is insufficiently recognized.
19:47Probably, perhaps, many or most of these drones are indeed made in Ukraine itself.
19:55It's possible that some of the drones are being made in Europe, just saying. I don't know whether
20:01that is actually the case, but it would certainly not surprise me. After all, other weapons that are
20:07being supplied to Ukraine are made in the West. So, the drones, perhaps some of them are made in
20:15the West too, but the components obviously mostly come from the West. The guidance, I suspect,
20:25is provided by the West. Western inputs from satellites and other intelligence
20:35probably are necessary to guide the drones, the drone swarms to their targets.
20:42And, well, I would not be surprised if Western personnel are not directly involved in
20:51the guidance of these drones against targets in Russia, except that this Ukrainian drone offensive,
21:03involving hundreds of drones, hundreds of drones every night sent towards Russia,
21:10is failing. The drones are simply not getting through. Every so often, an individual drone
21:19does manage to hit or strike a target, but they are relatively small. They do limited damage.
21:28The Russians appear to have been preparing for this drone offensive for some time. One gets the
21:34sense that the targets, the potential targets of this drone offensive, the city of Moscow,
21:41the major military industrial facilities, various other Russian cities, they have,
21:49one way or the other, been hardened and have been prepared for these drones. And I get the
21:54sense that the Russians have also learnt to track the movement of these drones, to identify the
22:02course that these drone swarms are taking, the better to intercept and ultimately destroy them.
22:09So, this drone offensive, in which I suspect high hopes were invested in the spring and summer of
22:182024, a drone offensive into which Western, as well as Ukrainian, resources have been poured into,
22:31a drone offensive which has been endlessly talked about and touted in the media, is failing.
22:40And it is failing at one and the same time as the Russian missile and drone offensive on Ukraine
22:48is now becoming ever more effective. So, obviously, the Russians are able to launch
22:55similar numbers of drones against Ukraine as Ukraine is launching against Russia.
23:01Except that the Russian drones, the Gerand drones, are much more powerful. They operate at much
23:08higher altitudes, far higher than they did when they were first used. They've clearly been perfected.
23:15There are many different types of Gerand drones now. There are drones that fly at high altitudes,
23:21there are drones that conduct diving attacks, like, sort of, dive bombers. There are drones
23:31which actually operate with sirens, which make frightening sounds like Germany's Stuka dive
23:39bombers you did during the Second World War. There are Gerand drones with larger warheads.
23:46The drones have developed abilities to manoeuvre and bypass defences and can apparently now receive
23:56signals from controllers in Russia itself. And some of them may actually use some degree of AI
24:06technology to make them autonomous, though I'm not going to pretend that I know all of the details.
24:12And every night there are hundreds of them, and their numbers are increasing all the time. So,
24:19I read an article somewhere in the media which said that whereas in 2022-2023 the Russians would
24:28launch around 30 drones a night, now they could be launching up to 100 or 200 Gerand drones over
24:39Ukraine every night. And it could be that that production, as production of these drones grows
24:47in Russia. We will be seeing up to 500 of these drones being launched against Ukraine every night,
24:58night after night. And Ukraine's air defences are becoming critically depleted and that they're not
25:08able any longer to shoot down most of these drones as they once could. So, the Economist
25:15is claiming that Ukraine is still able to shoot down 90-95% of the Gerand drones. But I'm now
25:23reading articles also in the Western media that admit that the true proportion of Gerand drones
25:34that Ukraine is currently shooting down is closer to 30% than 90%. In other words, the majority of
25:45the drones are getting through. And of course, it's not just drones because the Russians do have
25:51missiles that they're able to launch against Ukraine and they're able to launch these missiles
25:57also, night after night. And we now have extraordinary varieties of different missiles.
26:04So, we have the Kh-101s that are launched by the strategic bombers. We have the Kalibr missiles
26:12launched by the ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. These are subsonic missiles, similar in
26:20some respects to the Tomahawk missiles and the Taurus missiles and all of that, that they are
26:26becoming more stealthy. They're becoming more difficult to shoot down. Apparently, they've also
26:31developed capabilities to manoeuvre as well. Ukraine can shoot down these missiles. There's
26:40film showing what is said to be a Hawk air defence missile shooting down a Russian Kh-101 missile.
26:48But there are other missiles that Ukraine cannot shoot down. And there are now admissions,
26:55again in the Western media, that to the extent that Ukraine was ever able to shoot down
27:02Iskander ballistic missiles, those capabilities have gone. Russia is able to launch Iskander-M
27:14missile strikes across Ukraine. And the range of these missiles appears to have grown.
27:20Some of them, either way, may be North Korean missiles. It's been debated. It's probably true.
27:27I don't know what proportion of these missiles is Russian, what proportion is North Korean.
27:32If they are North Korean, it's probably the case that the Russians have adapted and improved them.
27:39But anyway, ballistic missiles are now able to hammer Ukraine, again, night after night,
27:47and the Ukrainian air defences are unable to counter them. And of course, there's also the
27:53hypersonic missiles. We've been hearing rather less about these. But of course, they do exist.
27:58The stockpiles are growing all the time, the Kinzhal and the Tsirkon. And lurking in the
28:07background, there is their mighty brother, the Oreshnik. Production of it is probably growing.
28:14We don't know how large the stockpile is or to what size it's going to grow. But there's reports
28:21that it will be ready for mass use in the middle of the summer. And well, we see the effect of this
28:28every day. The Antonov factory in Kiev, a place where Ukraine perhaps produced many of the drones
28:36it's been using to launch attacks against Russia, it has been hammered over several nights.
28:44And we're starting to get people like the rather capable spokesman of Ukraine's air defence system,
28:55Yuri Ignat, gradually admitting that Ukraine's air defence system is now starting to break down.
29:04And that gaps in coverage are increasing. And that there are insufficient numbers of missiles,
29:17interceptor missiles, to deal with all of the Russian missiles and drones that are coming in.
29:25So, we're told that the SAMP missiles supplied by France and Italy have run out. The Krotal missiles
29:34supplied by France have also run out. We're told, I read somewhere, that Italy no longer has any more
29:42interceptor missiles for this system, which it can supply. And France has only small numbers of
29:49these missiles. Production of Patriot missiles has grown, apparently. But again, there is a
29:56shortage, a general shortage of these missiles. The United States, as US Secretary of State Marco
30:05Rubio recently acknowledged, no longer has Patriot missiles to spare. We've been hearing an awful lot
30:14recently about attempts to supply Ukraine with more Patriot missiles supplied by Germany
30:22and Israel, refurbished missiles. But this only plugs holes for about a day,
30:34because the current scale of the Russian missile and drone offensive is simply overwhelming.
30:44The Ukrainian defense is. And bear in mind, there's always this uncertainty as to
30:51the quantities of missiles that Russia is able to produce. But in terms of Gerand drones,
31:04we could be looking at production rates of around 500 a day. And clearly, Ukraine's air defense
31:11system simply cannot cope with numbers like that. And by the way, we hear very little anymore
31:20about the F-16s. They were supposed to be operating in some sort of air defense role.
31:27It looks as if they're being swamped as well. So, if you put all of this together,
31:33you begin to understand why Metz is now panicking and saying, we need to launch
31:40deeper strikes with our Taurus missiles against the Russian hinterland, why there's been this
31:47renewed sanctions push. The Russians are not interested in a freeze. They're not interested
31:55in easing off on their demands. And the West is starting to realize that it's out of options
32:09and that the Russian offensive is simply going to continue.
32:14And even Zelensky today has spoken about the fact that a big Russian offensive is coming.
32:24Now, I'm not going to go through a detailed account, again, of the events on the front lines.
32:34But I've been reading reports by people like the journalist from Bill Zeitung, Julian Rybka,
32:41enthusiastic supporter of Ukraine. And he, contrary to these articles you sometimes read in
32:50some places saying, you know, that the situation is in stalemate, that the Russian advance is slow
32:56and incremental and all of that, and that the Russians aren't really winning the war.
33:01He, on the contrary, is starting to panic. He's talking about a collapse of Ukrainian defenses
33:07around Konstantinovka and around Pokrovsk. He sees the Russians pushing forward in both places.
33:17And he's talking increasingly about the fact that Ukraine, the Ukrainian troops on the battlefronts,
33:24are short of practically everything. Men, armored vehicles, machines. And
33:34that article in the Daily Telegraph, it turned out, about the successful way in which the Russians
33:43are conducting the war, the new battlefield tactics by Russian-like infantry pre-pinning
33:49the Ukrainians down in various positions, then cutting off their supplies using artillery and
33:58drones, and then smashing their defenses using fab bombs. It turns out that that all originates
34:05with a study of Russian tactics that has been conducted by the Royal United Services Institute.
34:14It seems that fab bombs, contrary to David Axe's claims about their loss of effectiveness, are,
34:22in fact, on the contrary, massively effective and incredibly dangerous to the Ukrainians on the
34:29battlefronts. And that Ukrainian defenses are being smashed and chewed up on the front lines
34:39all the time. And I'm going to make my own suggestion here that, in fact, the realities are
34:48that Ukrainian losses are probably now spiking. And I'm going to make a further guess,
34:55and this, to some extent, now goes against the media's own claims. I think Russian losses,
35:02at this point in the war, are starting to fall again, and probably fall significantly.
35:09Now, briefly, we're getting further news on every battlefront, and in every battlefront,
35:16it is a Russian advances. It looks as if the Russians are, indeed, now fighting inside
35:21Unakovka in Sumy region. It looks as if they have captured a whole belt of territory along the
35:28Russian border, north of the Oskol River. There are reports of a logistic crisis
35:37facing the Ukrainians defending Siversk and Liman, that the Russians are close to capturing the
35:45village of Rytlokub โ€“ I always get it wrong โ€“ and that this is going to open up the way for
35:52further Russian attacks on Liman itself. There's also reports that the Russians are now fighting
35:58inside the village of Kolejizy, which is very close to Liman. There is now film evidence which
36:05confirms, apparently, that the Russians have, indeed, captured the village of Verkhokamyansk,
36:12which is located, apparently, just four kilometers west of Siversk, and that the Russians are
36:19gradually gaining territory all around Siversk. And my own view is that, despite denials, the
36:28Russians have, indeed, captured the village of Torskoye, and are, indeed, close to cutting off
36:34supplies to the Siversk group. So, in that area of northern Ukraine, it is one crisis
36:43after another. And I gather that there's been more film โ€“ I haven't seen it โ€“ showing Ukrainian
36:49drone attacks on Russian positions in Volchansk, north of the Volcha River, which again reinforces
36:57my own belief that the Russians are in effective control of the entirety of Volchansk, north of the
37:04Volcha River, and that we could be seeing a Russian offensive to clear the remainder of Volchansk,
37:11south of the Volcha River, fairly soon. But the real big crisis is coming in the
37:19Konstantinovka and Pokrovsk area. And I spoke, I think it was two days ago, about the Russians
37:26establishing a semi-cauldron of the Ukrainian forces south of Konstantinovka, following
37:38their capture of the village of Zarya. Well, apparently, they've now captured Zarya at that
37:46time when I spoke. They'd only captured part of that village, but also the entire village of
37:52Romanovka. It now seems that this cauldron is going to be supplemented by a further capture,
38:02is in the process of being supplemented by a further capture of territory to the north of this
38:08area where this cauldron already is. So, you could be seeing another cauldron inside the cauldron,
38:14in effect. It seems that several battalions of Ukrainian troops are now in very, very serious
38:23risk of being encircled, and the options to retreat to Konstantinovka itself have been lost,
38:32and some kind of disaster is unfolding there. And in the Pokrovsk area, it looks as if the Russians
38:41have successfully completed their fight for the village of Malinovka to the east of Novoekonomichne,
38:52that they've pushed north from Malinovka, that they've captured other villages to the north-east
38:59of Malinovka, and they're in the process not just of encircling, or at least preparing for the attack
39:10the key village of Novoekonomichne, essentially a suburb of Myrnograd and Pokrovsk to the east of
39:20Myrnograd and Pokrovsk, but that they're already actually starting to position themselves
39:28where they could threaten communications and supplies being sent to Pokrovsk
39:33itself. In fact, it looks as if the situation of the Ukrainians in Pokrovsk is now becoming
39:42extremely grim, and we could even find ourselves in a situation that might even
39:49start to resemble Mariupol, where two brigades of the Ukrainian army, in effect, became trapped
40:00and were forced into surrender when Mariupol was entirely encircled by the Russians earlier in the
40:08war, in 2022. Anyway, there's other reports from other places too of Russian advances in southwest
40:17Donbass, of the Russians now making further progress in Zaporozhye towards the town of
40:25Gulyapolye and Orekhov, and well, lots of things going on. And all of this before the two big
40:35reserve armies that the Russians have stationed have so far even been committed, and with all of
40:43the indications being that the Russians have not started the biggest part of their offensive,
40:53which will probably begin in late May, early June. Well, we are already, of course, in May.
41:03Perhaps in June, July, August. Well, we shall see. Anyway, all of this, we can see how it's
41:10coming about. And every so often, whenever there's a quieter period in the war, and there's never
41:18completely quiet periods of the war, and there's never been a time since the failure of Ukraine's
41:24own big offensive in 2023, by the way, when the Russians have not been advancing somewhere.
41:31Anyway, but whenever the pace of the Russian advance appears to slow for a while, because of
41:36climate reasons, because of the need for the Russians to rotate their forces, to build up their
41:42logistics, there's the narrative always resumes that there is a stalemate, and that Ukraine can
41:50keep on fighting indefinitely, and all of these sort of things. And then the Russian offensive
41:59gets going, and then the panic starts. And we are, or so it seems to me now, back at that point
42:09when the panic is again starting to take hold. And I'm going to make a prediction, which is that
42:17over the next week or two, we will see the panic grow. And there will be ever more extreme demands
42:26for things that the West should do, demands that even more sophisticated weapons be sent to Ukraine,
42:34though there is now, I think, a growing crisis in terms of weapons that can be supplied
42:41to Ukraine over the next proximate period, because stockpiles have already been so
42:49depleted. As I said, Italy is without, apparently, air defense missiles.
42:55Britain is without self-propelled howitzers. Germany has run out of weapons and its army,
43:03its military, is less supplied with weapons than it was in 2022. The United States, even the
43:11mighty United States, is finding that it has to devote production to supplement its own inventories
43:22of artillery shelves. There's a general shortage of air defense missiles. But anyway, look forward
43:29over the next few weeks for demands that more advanced fighter jets be supplied to Ukraine,
43:36that Western air forces consider no-fly zones over Ukraine, things of that kind,
43:44even as the situation deteriorates. And mounting pressure on Donald Trump
43:50to try to get him to go for the massive sanctions against Russia. Senator Rand Paul
43:57has already pointed out what a completely disastrous thing for the United States it would be
44:04if Lindsey Graham's bone-crunching sanctions were, in fact, ever imposed, that the party that would
44:14suffer from them would be the United States and the West, less so Russia itself. So, there we are.
44:21That is where we are. Now, of course, just to repeat again, it's a point I make in program
44:26after program, there are always options. Donald Trump, to his credit, has sought to pursue them.
44:36Ever since he became president, he has made a serious effort to try to establish a dialogue
44:41with the Russians and to find a negotiated solution, at least to end the fighting,
44:47if not to end the war. He has faced contrary pressure from Europe every inch of the way.
45:01Whenever he's attempted to speak to the Russians, whenever he's called Putin,
45:06whenever his negotiators have met with Russian negotiators, the cry goes out across Europe
45:13that this is a mighty betrayal of Europe and of Ukraine. And, well, it's wrong that Trump should
45:24be doing this. The only thing he should be seeking is an agreement by the Russians to stop
45:35their advance, with no other concessions made to the Russians at all, and with the implication that
45:43that advance will be rolled back at some point in the future as well. That is the only terms
45:51upon which the Europeans, the Ukrainians, people like Mr Aaron West Mitchell in the United States,
45:59ultimately General Kellogg himself, seem prepared to bring the war to a stop.
46:06And they've run into the fact that the Russians obviously are not going to agree to that. It was
46:12obvious that the Russians would not agree to that. And there are no realistic options
46:23whereby the Russians could be brought round to agree to that. This is something, on the Duran,
46:31we've been trying, hammering away, trying to get people to understand, well, basically ever since
46:38the collapse of the original Istanbul talks back in April 2022. So, we are being brought closer to
46:49that point of crisis. And, well, the point of crisis which is completely foreseeable all the
46:58way back in April 2022, because people insisted that Russia is the gas station, masquerading as
47:07a country, that it has no scientific or industrial base whatsoever, that it's a house of cards, you
47:13only have to blow at, and it will come tumbling down, that the Russian army is made up of
47:21incompetent and corrupt generals, and the soldiers have to fight with shovels and all that kind of
47:30nonsense. We had all of these endless narratives, and they're now leading us to this point where,
47:37and they're now leading us to this point where, as I said, the decision has to be made.
47:46Either we actually do begin serious negotiations, and I suggest that these are serious negotiations
47:55that need to be conducted not by Ukraine, and certainly not by Europe, but by the United States,
48:03to come to some kind of agreement with the Russians, which will have to concede most
48:09Russian terms, probably all Russian terms, the key Russian terms, in terms of the conflict in
48:15Ukraine, but which might, just might, bring us to a point where some kind of general peace in Europe
48:24can be secured, one which secures what is left of Ukraine in return for promises of security
48:35guarantees to the Russians. Difficult to get the Russians to agree to this, but Putin still seems
48:41open to that idea, and perhaps it can be negotiated, and it can be brought about.
48:50Or the alternative is that we wring our hands, talk about ever more reckless ideas,
48:57launching tourist missiles at Russia, imposing bone-crunching sanctions, we gamble, we take more
49:03and more risks, and, well, the outcome this time will be complete defeat for Ukraine.
49:12Those are the only two alternatives that exist, and if people who continue to say
49:21that we can't compromise, we can't negotiate, because that would be appeasing aggression,
49:27and if you appease aggression, that will inspire more aggressors in other places that might,
49:35for example, lead Xi Jinping in Beijing to do something which we would judge bad in Taiwan.
49:45Of course, the Chinese probably wouldn't see it as bad, but anyway, let's skip that.
49:49Well, all I will say is, how much worse will it be if we are faced with an absolute clear-cut defeat
49:58in Ukraine, which is what we are now, in effect, seeing. Now, I'm going to finish this program
50:07with a metaphor that I think it was Major Reisner of the Austrian army first came up with,
50:14that this conflict in Ukraine has been one which pitched a lightweight boxer against a heavyweight
50:21boxer, and initially, because of his influence in the war, he was able to win the war,
50:28because of his nimbleness and skill, the lightweight boxer was able to land some blows,
50:36but the longer the fight continued, the power and weight of the stronger, bigger,
50:45more powerful boxer inevitably would begin to tell, and that is what we are seeing.
50:53We got a precursor of that, a big precursor of that, in the summer of last year, and today,
51:01we can already see that the blows the Russians are landing on Ukraine are getting stronger
51:08and mightier all the time, whilst the Ukrainians, by their own admission, shorter men,
51:15shorter machines, their air defense system breaking down, their economy, as their own
51:22former commander-in-chief, Valery Zaluzhny, admitted, in a catastrophic condition.
51:29They cannot take this indefinitely, or probably even for much longer.
51:37Daniel Davis, Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis, made this very point in a recent article
51:44which appeared in 1945, and he is right. So, either you support negotiations with the Russians,
51:53conducted, as I said, it has to be, by the United States, I cannot see who else can conduct them,
52:01except a peace in Ukraine on Russian terms, or you go down to total defeat,
52:12you go down to total defeat, with all the consequences that will follow.
52:19That is the reality we are confronted with today. Sanctions, Taurus missiles, all of that,
52:28not only cannot change anything, on the contrary, they will only make our own situation worse.
52:35Well, this is where I finish my program today. There will be more from me soon.
52:39Let me remind you again, you can find all our programs on our various platforms,
52:43Locals, Rumble and X. You can support our work via Patreon and Subscribestar,
52:49links under this video. Please remember, if you have liked this video, to tick the like button,
52:53and to check your subscription to this channel. More from me soon. Have a very good day.

Recommended