Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/6/2025
In remarks on the House floor last week, Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY) spoke about a resolution to overturn a California emissions regulation.
Transcript
00:00York is recognized.
00:01Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I appreciate the gentleman from New Jersey yielding.
00:06I rise in opposition to this Congressional Review Act resolution.
00:10The American Lung Association recently issued its annual State of the Air report,
00:14which found that nearly one-half of all Americans are breathing unhealthy air.
00:20Despite all the progress that has been made since the enactment of the Clean Air Act,
00:24air pollution remains a major public health threat.
00:26And this is especially true in California, where over 90 percent of residents live in an area with poor air quality.
00:33Given this tremendous public health threat, California has taken the initiative,
00:38as it is clearly authorized to do in the law, to protect its residents,
00:43including through the Advanced Clean Car 2 program.
00:47We've gone over all of the reasons why the CRA is not applicable to this waiver,
00:52so I would like to focus on the specifics of the underlying rule.
00:56which will rapidly reduce tailpipe pollution from light-duty vehicles
01:01by increasing the percentage of new zero-emission vehicles sold in California to 100 percent in 2035.
01:09I would like to try to dispel some of the myths about this rule.
01:13First, it only applies to new vehicles.
01:16No one is requiring people to give up their existing vehicles.
01:19Second, it does not apply to used vehicles,
01:22so there will continue to be a robust secondary market for internal combustion engines.
01:28Third, I heard several Republican members express their support for hybrid vehicles at the Rules Committee.
01:35Under this standard, plug-in hybrid vehicles can account for a significant portion of sales requirements through 2035.
01:44Now, members also raised a litany of concerns about the performance of electric vehicles,
01:51that they don't have an adequate range,
01:53they don't perform well in cold climates, and they are too expensive.
01:58Well, as they are sharing those concerns,
02:02we have a Trump administration response that I'll talk about.
02:06We hear a lot of talk here today in this debate about executive overreach,
02:12primarily from the previous administration of President Biden.
02:16Well, I find it ironic that these complaints are coming
02:19while the Trump administration is actively working to undermine federal investments
02:25and programs to address these very issues.
02:28The Trump administration is illegally freezing billions of dollars at the Department of Transportation,
02:34intended to build out a network of charging stations which will reduce range anxiety
02:40and improve the convenience of EV ownership.
02:44The Trump administration has made the Department of Energy an unwelcoming place to work,
02:49resulting in 3,500 public servants leaving the agency
02:53responsible for supporting R&D funding to improve battery technology.
02:59Well, talk about overreach by the executive branch.
03:03There it is.
03:04Improvements to batteries will allow for greater range,
03:07improved performance, and lower cost.
03:10It has been very publicly reported that the majority is considering repeal of consumer incentives
03:16that reduce the upfront cost of EVs,
03:19all while giving people a choice, a clear choice of what vehicle to purchase.
03:25Of course, EVs, after the upfront cost,
03:28are proven to save consumers considerably through reduced fuel and maintenance costs.
03:35And even that upfront cost is quickly approaching parity with internal combustion vehicles,
03:41as more and more activity is existing out there with the manufacturers globally.
03:47If members were truly concerned about the cost of vehicles,
03:50they would speak out about President Trump's reckless tariffs,
03:55which are expected to raise the cost of all vehicles,
03:59EVs and internal combustion engines alike.
04:03Finally, Republicans have suggested that the EV transition plays right into China's hands.
04:09The reality is that the market, both in the United States and globally,
04:14is heading down a clean vehicle path.
04:17And at this moment, China has emerged as the global leader.
04:20The gentleman's time has expired.
04:22I yield to the gentleman an additional minute.
04:25Another minute has been yielded.
04:26I thank the gentleman from New Jersey.
04:29At the moment, China has emerged as the global leader,
04:31but its long-term dominance of the global EV market is not guaranteed.
04:37Here's what I know for certain.
04:38If we do not compete,
04:40China benefits and will control those global supply chains.
04:43But if we embrace this transition,
04:45we will give America's automakers and innovators
04:48a great opportunity to win the competition in clean vehicles.
04:52The bottom line is that every turn,
04:54the Trump administration is sabotaging all efforts
04:57to build a domestic EV and battery manufacturing industry.
05:00And the attack on California's right
05:02to put forward more protective standards
05:04is part of that effort.
05:05So I urge members to reject this resolution
05:07to allow California to make the decisions it needs
05:10to protect the health of its residents
05:13and allow our entire country to have a better chance
05:16to create jobs and compete to dominate
05:18for the future of the automotive industry.
05:21With that, Mr. Speaker, I thank you for the time.
05:23And I yield back to the gentleman from New Jersey.
05:26Gentleman yields back.

Recommended