🔴 ESCÁNDALO $LIBRA: MARGARITA STOLBIZER PIDE EXPLICACIONES ANTE EL CONGRESO

HighlightNow

👉 La diputada Margarita Stolbizer del bloque Encuentro Federal ha solicitado que el presidente se presente ante el Congreso para responder a acusaciones de uso indebido de información y servicios del Estado para beneficio propio. La diputada sostiene que las acciones del presidente son "imperdonables" y podrían ser pasibles de sanciones.  👉 Seguí en #BuenDíaA24

Transcript

00:00There's also a lot of security and diplomatic cars that are having a meeting at this time,

00:08which is already agreed with an agenda, with people from the United States.

00:12Gabriel Prosper is in Congress, but we also have Margarita Stolviser from the federal meeting block.

00:20Deputy Stolviser, I'm Luis Novaresio. Good day, 24. How are you?

00:24Good day. How are you? How are you?

00:26Your proposal is for the president to come to Congress?

00:31Yes, we came to a permanent meeting of the block online,

00:37and we will continue to be there these days to see how the situation evolves.

00:43We are asking for information, we are going to ask for an interpellation.

00:46We need them to come and give explanations.

00:49Faced with the negative, if this were to happen, let's say,

00:53it is obvious that the situation would be more and more serious,

00:56and then the Congress would enable all the measures and sanctions that could correspond.

01:03Today, we are still waiting for the explanations.

01:06This is the first day, so let's see what they say.

01:11So far, the defenses that some officials have made,

01:14some allies, almost servile officials of the executive power,

01:20are shameful, I would dare to say,

01:23in the same way that many colleagues of yours in the media justify everything

01:29trying to focus on the people who could have done a business.

01:34And the truth is that what worries us is the barbarity and the scandal

01:39starring the president himself in the promotion, let's say,

01:44of an account that has allowed some people, well, to really earn millions,

01:51as it has caused losses to others.

01:54The epitome is extremely serious and is at the limit of the criminal figure, right?

01:59Of course. This was my next question, because I said,

02:01at least it must be analyzed, personally I will not prejudge,

02:05if there is a use of the state for the promotion of a private activity,

02:10which on top of that is a total waste.

02:12There are three statements, the state through the president's Twitter,

02:16that's it, let's finish with this story that when the president speaks on Twitter,

02:20he speaks for himself, not as head of state, this division does not exist.

02:23I say, promoting a private activity, my question is,

02:26is there a collision with the public ethics law?

02:29Yes, I have no doubt that there is,

02:32and in reality it seems to me that it is also in this that some people

02:37try to disfigure the president.

02:39I don't think the problem is the state either.

02:43It seems to me that the problem is the president personally,

02:47and therefore it is the same person who is responsible for all the sanctions

02:52that correspond to the very flagrant violation of public ethics,

02:59especially the obligations that a public official has to fulfill,

03:04such as abstaining from using information acquired

03:08for the fulfillment of his functions,

03:11to carry out activities in his official tasks,

03:14or to allow his use in the benefit of private interests of his own or of others,

03:19and abstaining from using state services for that particular benefit.

03:25Now, who incurs in this very serious lack for public ethics,

03:30in my opinion, for some criminal figure too,

03:33is the president of the nation.

03:35So the problem is that he is involved,

03:38he could be liable for a sanction,

03:40it is him, but he in the exercise of his function, right?

03:44And then there is one more thing that I don't want to miss.

03:49There has not been a mistake here, as some pretend.

03:52There is a very clear premeditation,

03:55and there is a succession of meetings

03:57that the Secretary General of the Presidency has had.

04:00I would say not only that she has to take responsibility

04:03for all the private meetings that Ms. Karina Milley

04:07has had with those responsible for this account,

04:10but that she should start controlling the accounts of the lady herself, right?

04:15With the aggravating fact that being her, being the presidential spokeswoman,

04:19it strikes me that, just like other officials,

04:22they jumped in the air when they made a mistake,

04:25and the president himself has raised the issue

04:28of how to get officials out of trouble when they make mistakes.

04:32Well, that Karina Milley and Adorni are still in charge

04:36is because what they did, they did it in representation of the president,

04:40for the president, right?

04:42Now, Margarita, Lucia Salinas greets you. How are you?

04:45Hi Lucia, how are you?

04:46Good. Is it enough to say that the president was not aware,

04:51he was not advised?

04:53A while ago we heard one of the people in charge of this cryptocurrency

04:57dismissing any kind of responsibility of the president of the nation.

05:02Are these arguments enough?

05:16I am ashamed to say that this can be an argument

05:21to defend the president of the nation.

05:24I insist, he doesn't even make a repost,

05:27he writes himself, spreads, promotes, let's say,

05:31in a personal way, generates profits and losses

05:35with people who had had a direct, personal, even work-related relationship with him

05:41and who have met ten times with his sister in recent months.

05:45The truth is that it is impossible to think that this was part of a mistake,

05:49or a distraction, right?

05:51I think it is an unforgivable situation,

05:54unforgivable in the investiture of a president of the nation

05:57who also knows about economy, he knows about finance.

06:00Margarita, thank you.

06:02No, thank you.

06:03See you later, congresswoman.

06:04Luis, we are trying to go through the whole political arc.

06:07We would also love to speak with the referents of Libertad Avanza

06:10to give their position.

06:12We haven't been able to do it yet,

06:14but we will surely be able to do it.

06:16Tell me more, professor.

06:17Let's see.

06:18Some questions I want to ask in relation to what Margarita Stolbicer said.

06:21In terms of judicial politics,

06:24that is, in terms of investigating and judging the president,

06:28something you mentioned at the beginning of the program,

06:31we have to go to tradition.

06:32There is no interpellation of the president of the nation in Argentine tradition.

06:36Interpelling the president of the nation can only be done

06:39in terms of the opening of a process of political trial.

06:42We haven't had it open either.

06:46No.

06:47It hasn't been frequent.

06:48That is, Alfonso wanted to look for a system,

06:51the parliamentary system,

06:52where the one who exercised the administration

06:54had to account for the...

06:55There is an interpellation of the head of the cabinet...

06:58It is a power intervening over the other.

07:00Sure.

07:01Yes, it can be in the framework of a political trial.

07:03Today there is no number for a political trial.

07:06In my opinion, with all the love you have for him,

07:10Margarita has just included a huge number of prejudices

07:13about issues that still need to be investigated,

07:16that are not within the framework of what has been proven yet.

07:20If you ask me what I think is going to happen in the government,

07:23and at this moment,

07:24what is the government doing politically, Luis?

07:26Looking for a culprit?

07:28The truth is that...

07:29It happens that they are thrown away and they are thrown away again.

07:32The truth is that the Argentines...

07:33Let's see, the one who burns himself with milk comes here and cries.

07:35We have so many years and so many politicians

07:38who got out of where they could and where they wanted to

07:41and so many girls who cried.

07:43The truth is that the first one to jump starts to doubt.

07:45What I say is crazy.

07:47I would say that there is too much at stake

07:49compared to what happened to us in recent years

07:51and people are panicking because there is too much at stake

07:53to make these mistakes.

07:55I think it is interesting what Moomy introduces,

07:58which is political analysis.

Category

Transcript

Recommended