📢 CASO LOAN: EL EXCOMISARIO WALTER MACIEL PROCESADO COMO "PARTÍCIPE" NECESARIO

HighlightNow

👉 Se dictó prisión preventiva para Antonio Benítez, Laudelina Peña, Mónica Millapi, Daniel "fierrito" Ramírez, Carlos Pérez, María Victoria Caillava y otros implicados en el caso del robo del OAN. El comisario Maciel ha sido procesado como partícipe necesario de la sustracción. Además, se le atribuyen cargos por amenazas. La jueza Cristina Pozzer Penzo asigna coautoría a todos los implicados y el caso se dirige ahora a la Cámara Federal para revisión.  👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7

Transcript

00:00...processed with preventive prison, logically the ones you already know, Benítez, Benítez,

00:09Laudelina, Millapi, Ramírez, Carlos Pérez, María Victoria Caillaba, the ex-minister,

00:17the ex-secretary of planning on July 9th, and Maciel, with a surprise, two surprises

00:23rather, one that has to do with Commissioner Maciel, there you have it, at the top right,

00:29the Commissioner Maciel, who in addition to being accused of cover-up by Judge Cristina

00:34Pózar-Penso, also processed as a necessary participant in the subtraction of the OAN,

00:42of the theft of the OAN, that is, if it had not been Maciel, it would not have been possible

00:49the subtraction, the theft of the OAN, that means, roughly, the necessary participation,

00:55and the second novelty, to Millapi they made him a price, in some way.

00:59Yes, but there is another part, there is another part that I do not understand, and there, Hanson

01:03can evacuate me the consultation, why do you threaten, what do they refer to?

01:13To Caillaba and Maciel.

01:14To Caillaba and Maciel, what is the threat based on?

01:17Well, I think that, look, the file came out for us today at 7 in the morning, they notified us,

01:26and we began to read it, obviously, we focused on the part of Ramírez and Millapi, and also

01:34on the rest, in what is substantial, but well, in short, there is a version there regarding

01:44that situation, which varied, it is true, because before it was for the cover of Maciel,

01:49now the threats are added, and I understand that it is all related to the issue of the boot.

01:55The issue of the boot.

01:58Yes.

02:00As he would have threatened who?

02:05Well, that's what, the resolution itself is not clear in any aspect, neither regarding the role

02:11that each one fulfilled, I have succinctly read to try to find the reason why he assigns

02:21one or another role, but the judge preferred to deny everyone authority, that is, co-authority,

02:27and to everyone he throws the same crime and adds, the one for Caillaba and Maciel, the one of threats.

02:35And now what?

02:37In short, they are all co-authors of the subtraction and concealment of Loban, which is very difficult

02:46to understand, because no matter how much one reads and rereads the resolution, what one must find

02:52in those resolutions is how each one executed the part that he assigns, or they were all together,

02:59taking him from here to there, that is, it is not described in a functional way how that co-authority would be.

03:08Now, Marcelo, real, what weight does the doctor's resolution have in front of the federal chamber?

03:19What weight does it have?

03:22No, the chamber is independent, the judges will sentence according to their conviction or not,

03:31of what they can read, and of the abuses we present. Obviously, the issues that are not a matter of complaint,

03:38that are not abuses, they will not touch them.

03:41Okay, but for people, so that people can understand, what is the function of the chamber judge?

03:49The chamber judge does not investigate.

03:51No, he reviews the decision.

03:53What does he do?

03:55He reviews the decision of the inferior, that is, of the instruction judge, if according to the elements

04:04that he analyzed, the merit resolution is well dictated, which can be, in this case, a process that we are going to appeal,

04:11but it can also be that the prosecution appeals the lack of merit, there are two lacks of merit there.

04:18I would believe that no, because of the situation and what they asked for,

04:22but it could be the case that the chamber has to analyze a lack of merit and review it,

04:27understanding that the process corresponds.

04:29What are the lacks of merit? Those of your defendants, those of Ramírez and Millapi?

04:33Of all, because of all those who were accused, what happens is that in the case of the first three,

04:39Benítez, Millapi and Ramírez, were accused of abandonment of person,

04:43a qualification that is dictated by the lack of merit.

04:47Then there is the indictment for all the first six, Laudelina did not enter.

04:53Hanson, wait, give me a second.

Category

Transcript

Recommended