Heated Argument  Between Taimur Jhagra and Musadik Malik | Breaking News - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#supremecourt #muhammadmalick #barristeralizafar #qazifaezisa #article63a #MustafainKazmi #pti #breakingnews #imrankhan   Heated Argument  Between Taimur Jhagra and Musadik Malik | Breaking News

Transcript

00:00Let's start with you. Today, the Chief Justice has said that he has no objection to the full court.

00:05His party, people outside say that it has become very controversial.

00:09Four judges are sitting, five judges are running the bench.

00:13Two people are sitting, the entire roster has been decided, everything has been done.

00:17The Chief Justice also says that the full court should sit and resolve it.

00:20This is such a big controversy of constitutional amendments. Why don't you do it?

00:25Why don't you request? Yes, let's have a full court.

00:29I will say it now. I will also say it in your program.

00:32What is this? They have not called us, nor have I presented myself.

00:35I have presented myself to you. You have said that if the Chief Justice is agreeable,

00:40then are we the judges? Those who are agreeable, they want to do it,

00:44you want them to do it, Mr. Jhagda is smiling.

00:47Even in your sentences, the judge comes. You have a lot of hearts.

00:50This is now your contribution towards the Chief Justice.

00:53What can I do in this?

00:56Who is close to whom, you know this better.

00:59I cannot comment on this.

01:02I will only say to you that the thing that is coming in front of you today,

01:06the procedures, the new procedures of the Supreme Court,

01:11on which all these matters were coming, there is a need for change in it.

01:15So what has been proven today?

01:17It has been proven that if you make a team of three,

01:20then one of the judges will say that this is not happening,

01:23then the entire work of the Supreme Court should be stopped.

01:26Until the three judges are not complete, the work of the Supreme Court will be stopped.

01:30So the best way is that one or two judges get up,

01:33and the work of the Supreme Court should be stopped.

01:36No, but there was a good advice of Ali Zafar.

01:38He said, you tell me, exactly the way you said it.

01:41He said, one judge has got up, nor is he accusing, nor is he doing anything,

01:45what should we do?

01:46So he said, it is not better that you first make these rules,

01:49make your own court rules in a day or two,

01:51and then file a case.

01:53But today, what Bilawal Bhutto has said,

01:5525th October, and this is the date on which Qazi Sahib retires.

01:58So it seems that his favourite judge is Justice Mansoor Ali Shah.

02:02Your favourite judge is Qazi Sahib.

02:05Now your key ally is Bilawal Bhutto.

02:07So, legitimate questions arise.

02:10No, I don't have any questions in this.

02:12I know Justice Mansoor Ali Shah very well.

02:17He was in our university college at that time,

02:24and at that time he was a very remarkable man.

02:27And you have seen, at that time he was well-known,

02:30and he is still well-known.

02:32So, the legal disputes that are taking place,

02:35or the disputes between judges,

02:38in which a judge says that judges should not be seen as politicians,

02:44we have not said that.

02:45If you say, I will tell you, it is not appropriate,

02:47but a respected judge,

02:49sitting in a bench, addressing the rest of the bench,

02:52said that judges should not be seen as politicians,

02:56or judges should not form a party.

02:58Politicians in black coats.

02:59Yes, there are many such things.

03:02We have not done this.

03:04None of these things have been done by any politician.

03:07This is what respected judges are addressing each other and saying.

03:12So, at the place where you decide on a method,

03:15and a judge gets up and leaves,

03:17and the Supreme Court gets paralyzed,

03:19at the place where a bench of 10 is formed,

03:21then it becomes of 8, then it becomes of 5,

03:23then it becomes of 3.5,

03:24then they say, let's work with this.

03:26That is, the benches that were being formed at that time were fine.

03:29Today, if someone is saying that three new judges are being completed,

03:33then should we stop the proceedings of the Supreme Court?

03:35This is wrong.

03:36Oh brother, I don't know, half is wrong,

03:38half is right,

03:39half is empty,

03:40half is full,

03:41which is empty,

03:42which is half,

03:43no one knows.

03:45That is, there is a mess.

03:47So, all those things…

03:49There is a mess.

03:50Everybody is…

03:51So, all those things that I am talking about,

03:55what are they pointing out?

03:57That is, one gentleman says…

04:00Pointing out that with such indecent haste,

04:04you want to bring such serious constitutional amendments.

04:08This is a direct issue.

04:09With such haste…

04:10Now, I will not say indecent to any decision,

04:13but…

04:14No, I am saying your haste is indecent.

04:16I am not saying your decision.

04:17You will say it to me,

04:18you have called me.

04:19Ask one question.

04:20No, no, Taimur is my friend.

04:22Don't ask, Taimur, you are my friend.

04:24When PMLN comes,

04:25why are there always issues in the Supreme Court?

04:27Okay, let's tell this.

04:29The Supreme Court had said the same thing about us.

04:32No, this is a little…

04:33No, that is why I am also…

04:34I am returning it to you.

04:36I am returning your question to you.

04:39On the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,

04:43I don't know which Jamaat had written that…

04:47No, no, a Jamaat had not written,

04:49a reference had been sent by the President,

04:51after signing,

04:52that remove this Chief Justice.

04:54They removed him.

04:55They removed him.

04:56Why is this in the case of PMLN?

04:57That reference,

04:58in the Supreme Court,

04:59the Judicial Council,

05:00the decisions of the judges,

05:02the judges were making…

05:03Which judges?

05:04You tell me.

05:05Which judges did you refer to?

05:06Tell the people.

05:07Qazi Faiz Issa.

05:08You referred to Qazi Issa?

05:09Doesn't that mean…

05:10By the way, Mr. Musaddiq,

05:11you referred to the Biography…

05:12By the way, later you are saying

05:13that we didn't do it,

05:14that we did it.

05:15No, no, one second.

05:16Doesn't that mean

05:17that after that,

05:18Faiz Issa should not have a moral authority

05:19if his life is in danger?

05:20What is this, man?

05:21These people are so good.

05:22I mean,

05:23they don't remember Saqib Nisar.

05:25No, now you…

05:26No, I am also remembering him.

05:27One by one.

05:28No, I…

05:29No, not like this.

05:30You didn't answer a question.

05:31I didn't answer your question.

05:32Not like this.

05:33Not like this.

05:34Sir, you didn't answer his question.

05:35Now you are not answering his question.

05:36No, no, not like this.

05:37Let's finish.

05:38Let's finish.

05:39If you speak loudly,

05:40I will be quiet.

05:41If you speak loudly,

05:42I will be quiet.

05:43I will be quiet.

05:44No, your question.

05:45First,

05:46I will answer your question.

05:47Answer the question.

05:48Yes, I am answering.

05:49Sir, we have little time.

05:50We want to focus on few things.

05:51Do you have an answer?

05:52Do you have an answer?

05:53Yes, I have an answer.

05:54If you have an answer,

05:55then why do you ask me questions?

05:56I am asking you

05:57that the day

05:58you sat down

05:59and said Supreme Court…

06:00If you have an answer,

06:01why do you ask me questions?

06:02I am answering your question.

06:03I am not answering my question.

06:04I am answering.

06:05Let him answer.

06:06Let him answer.

06:07So, he will answer

06:08that if 5% has been slighted,

06:09then should they

06:10head the benches or not?

06:11Yes, answer.

06:12I will be quiet.

06:13You are here.

06:14You called me

06:15in his program.

06:16No, no, you say.

06:17You answer.

06:18You are not speaking

06:19in the middle of the program.

06:20You are not hearing me.

06:21You are not hearing me.

06:22No, it's amazing.

06:23I am answering your question.

06:24He wants to be an anchor.

06:25He works,

06:26wants to be a politician.

06:27Anchor.

06:28It's not working like this.

06:29It's not working like this.

06:30so this is not how it will work.

06:32Give us the answer.

06:34The answer is very simple.

06:36The day you sat in the Supreme Court

06:38and started the fight

06:40the day you appointed a judge

06:42to get Nawaz Sharif punished

06:44Supreme Court's judge

06:46Supreme Court's judge.

06:48Let him talk.

06:50Let him talk.

06:52Give us 20 seconds to finish the answer.

06:54The thing is

06:56whatever is happening in Judiciary

06:58means that the Constitution

07:00needs to be revised.

07:02And the law needs to be revised.

07:04There is only one judge.

07:06If you sit on one side

07:08and make a decision

07:10then Mr. Taimur raises his hand.

07:12Either you clap or he raises his hand.

07:14If there is a second decision

07:16then we clap or he raises his hand.

07:18This means that whatever is written

07:20in the Constitution

07:22the way it is being interpreted

07:24through judgments

07:26the same judgment

07:28is being interpreted

07:30by the Chief Justice.

07:32Now let me come here.

Heated Argument Between Taimur Jhagra and Musadik Malik | Breaking News

Category

Transcript

Recommended