- 7/18/2024
Tito Karnavian and Krishna Murti, along with his subordinates Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto, played pivotal roles in manipulating the CCTV 9 footage related to Jessica Wongso's case. Their actions focused on altering the footage from CCTV 9 footage, particularly in segments where the coffee color needed to be compared. Christopher Hariman Rianto deliberately split the footage into two segments with differing resolutions and frame rates, which had significant implications for forensic analysis. The first segment, which showed the coffee served by Agus Triono, had its frame resolution reduced to 960x576 pixels, while the second segment, showing the coffee after Mirna Salihin drank from it, retained full high-definition resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. This discrepancy was aimed at creating misleading evidence about the presence of cyanide in the coffee.
The manipulation of the CCTV 9 footage resulted in a loss of color detail and clarity in the first segment, making it challenging to accurately compare the coffee colors. This deliberate reduction in resolution and frame rate obscured the subtle variations in hue, saturation, and brightness that are crucial for forensic analysis. By tampering with the visual evidence, the team under Tito Karnavian and Krishna Murti's direction compromised the integrity of the forensic findings. This manipulation not only misled the toxicologists, who based their cyanide analysis on this footage, but also introduced significant doubts about the reliability of the prosecution's evidence.
The inaccurate results from the toxicologists, due to the compromised footage, had far-reaching implications for the trial. The judges relied on flawed forensic evidence to convict Jessica Wongso, which undermines the credibility of the entire judicial process. The deliberate actions of Tito Karnavian, Krishna Murti and his team in manipulating the CCTV 9 footage cast serious doubts on the integrity of the investigation and the fairness of the trial. This case highlights the critical importance of preserving the accuracy and reliability of forensic evidence to ensure justice is served.
The exposure of these manipulations has serious implications for those involved, including Tito Karnavian, Krishna Murti and his subordinates, Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto. The deliberate tampering with evidence not only violates ethical and professional standards in digital forensics but also constitutes a criminal act. If proven guilty, they could face severe legal consequences for their actions. Such manipulations undermine the integrity of the judicial process and erode public trust in law enforcement and forensic practices.
Tito Karnavian and Krishna Murti should face severe punishment for his role in manipulating CCTV footage in the Jessica Wongso case. This includes a lengthy prison sentence, potentially over a decade, due to the gravity of tampering with evidence in a high-profile murder case.
The manipulation of the CCTV 9 footage resulted in a loss of color detail and clarity in the first segment, making it challenging to accurately compare the coffee colors. This deliberate reduction in resolution and frame rate obscured the subtle variations in hue, saturation, and brightness that are crucial for forensic analysis. By tampering with the visual evidence, the team under Tito Karnavian and Krishna Murti's direction compromised the integrity of the forensic findings. This manipulation not only misled the toxicologists, who based their cyanide analysis on this footage, but also introduced significant doubts about the reliability of the prosecution's evidence.
The inaccurate results from the toxicologists, due to the compromised footage, had far-reaching implications for the trial. The judges relied on flawed forensic evidence to convict Jessica Wongso, which undermines the credibility of the entire judicial process. The deliberate actions of Tito Karnavian, Krishna Murti and his team in manipulating the CCTV 9 footage cast serious doubts on the integrity of the investigation and the fairness of the trial. This case highlights the critical importance of preserving the accuracy and reliability of forensic evidence to ensure justice is served.
The exposure of these manipulations has serious implications for those involved, including Tito Karnavian, Krishna Murti and his subordinates, Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto. The deliberate tampering with evidence not only violates ethical and professional standards in digital forensics but also constitutes a criminal act. If proven guilty, they could face severe legal consequences for their actions. Such manipulations undermine the integrity of the judicial process and erode public trust in law enforcement and forensic practices.
Tito Karnavian and Krishna Murti should face severe punishment for his role in manipulating CCTV footage in the Jessica Wongso case. This includes a lengthy prison sentence, potentially over a decade, due to the gravity of tampering with evidence in a high-profile murder case.
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00Mohamed Tito Carnavian, who was born in Palembang, has mixed Javanese and Sumatran heritage.
00:07He was born on October 26, 1964.
00:11Tito Carnavian attended SMA Nedri II Palembang for his high school education, then continued
00:17to the Indonesian Military Academy, a cabaret, in 1987 because it was free and he did not
00:23want to burden his parents with the costs.
00:26In 1993, Tito completed his education at the University of Exeter in England and earned
00:32a master's degree in police studies.
00:34He also graduated from the Indonesian Police Science College, STIK, in Jakarta in 1996
00:40with a bachelor's degree in police studies.
00:44In a telegram from the National Police Chief Gen. Timur Perdopo, Inspector Gen. Tito was
00:49appointed as the Chief of Papua Regional Police on September 3, 2012.
00:54However, he officially started his duties on September 27, 2012.
01:01National Police Chief Gen. Badrudan Haiti reassigned several high-ranking officers of
01:05the National Police who were assuming or leaving leadership positions in various regions.
01:11Based on the Police Chief's telegram letter No. Friday, June 5, 2015, the position of
01:16the new Chief of Metro Jaya Regional Police was assigned to Inspector Gen. Tito Carnavian,
01:22One of the cases that garnered significant public attention during his tenure as the
01:26Chief of Metro Jaya Regional Police was the drama of the murder of a 27-year-old woman
01:31named Weyan Myrna, through cyanide at a coffee shop in a central Jakarta shopping mall, where
01:36the Metro Jaya Regional Police even collaborated with the Australian Federal Police.
01:41On June 15, 2016, President Joko Widodo sent a letter to the Indonesian House of Representatives,
01:48appointing Tito as the sole candidate for National Police Chief to replace Gen. Badrudan
01:53Haiti, who was about to retire.
01:56The Commission III of the DPRRI approved this proposal in their plenary session held in
02:01early July 2016.
02:04Tito was officially inaugurated as National Police Chief by President Jokowi on July 13,
02:102016.
02:11On October 22, 2019, National Police Chief Tito was honorably discharged by President
02:17Jokowi through a letter addressed to the DPRRI and approved in the third plenary session
02:22led by Puan Maharani, the Speaker of the DPRRI for the 2019-2024 period.
02:29He was then inaugurated on October 23, 2019, as the 29th Minister of Home Affairs in the
02:35Indonesia Onward Cabinet during President Jokowi's administration for the 2019-2024
02:41period.
02:42In the Jessica Kamala Wongso case, 2016, the manipulation of CCTV footage at Olivier
02:49Café played a critical role in the investigation.
02:53The chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police at the time, Tito Carnavian, alongside Krishnamoorthy,
02:58the director of General Crimes, held ultimate responsibility for the integrity of the investigation.
03:05Under their leadership, the team handling the case was tasked with uncovering and presenting
03:09evidence related to the incident.
03:12However, it was later revealed that significant tampering had occurred with the digital evidence.
03:17Specifically, digital forensic expert, Rizman Hasihil and Sianapar, uncovered 37 pieces
03:24of scientific evidence indicating that the CCTV footage had been digitally manipulated.
03:30This tampering was carried out by Mohamed Nah Al-Azza and Christopher Harriman Rianto,
03:34who were operating under the direction and supervision of Krishnamoorthy.
03:39As the director of General Crimes, Moorthy was directly responsible for the investigative
03:44processes and the actions of his subordinates, ensuring that all procedures adhered to legal
03:49and ethical standards.
03:51The accountability for this manipulation extended to Tito Carnavian, the chief of the Jakarta
03:56Metropolitan Police, who oversaw the entire police force.
04:01As the highest authority in the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Carnavian was responsible for maintaining
04:06the integrity and professionalism of the investigations conducted under his command.
04:12The revelation of the manipulated CCTV footage raised serious questions about the conduct
04:17and oversight within the police force during this high-profile case.
04:21The involvement of Tito Carnavian, then chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, and Krishnamoorthy,
04:27director of General Crimes, in collaboration with the prosecutors, played a critical role
04:32in the alleged manipulation of digital evidence.
04:36Specifically, this manipulation pertained to the contents of a flash drive held by the
04:40prosecutor, which contained CCTV footage.
04:44Initially, when factual witnesses testified in court, the flash drive contained only 11
04:50CCTV folders.
04:51However, by the time Jessica Kamala Wongso was presented as the defendant, the number
04:56of folders had increased to 13, with the sudden addition of folders CCTV-15 and CCTV-16.
05:04This alteration indicated that the contents of the flash drive had been modified, raising
05:08suspicions of evidence tampering.
05:11The digital forensic analysis highlighted a crucial detail – the modification dates
05:16of the newly added folders, CCTV-15 and CCTV-16, did not match the modification dates of the
05:23other folders.
05:25Most folders had a modification date of January 12, 2016, while folders CCTV-15 and CCTV-16
05:33were modified on July 21, 2016, and July 26, 2016, respectively.
05:41This inconsistency suggested that these folders were added or altered much later, potentially
05:46to manipulate the evidence in favor of the prosecution.
05:49The timing and nature of these modifications pointed to a deliberate effort to undermine
05:53the defense by introducing new evidence at a critical juncture, catching the defense
05:58off guard and limiting their ability to respond effectively.
06:02The manipulation was also made to the contents of folders CCTV-7 and CCTV-9 on the flash
06:08drive in the prosecutor's possession.
06:11Initially, folder CCTV-7 contained four video clips when Agus Trajano testified on July
06:1720, 2016.
06:20By August 10, 2016, when Mohamedna Al-Azza was requested to play the CCTV-7 videos, it
06:27only contained two clips.
06:29Similarly, folder CCTV-9 initially had three clips on July 20, 2016, but only two clips
06:36by August 10, 2016.
06:40These discrepancies indicate that some files were removed or deleted, raising serious concerns
06:45about data integrity and evidence manipulation.
06:49The forensic implications of these changes are profound.
06:53The reduction in the number of video clips in folders CCTV-7 and 9 suggests that the
06:57evidence was tampered with, undermining its authenticity and reliability.
07:03Forensic analysis depends on the integrity of the original data, and any alteration can
07:08significantly impact the credibility of the evidence presented in court.
07:12The inconsistency in modification dates and the unexplained reduction in video clips create
07:17uncertainty about the completeness of the digital evidence, making it difficult for
07:21forensic experts and the court to determine which version of the evidence is accurate.
07:26This casts doubt on the overall reliability of the digital evidence and complicates the
07:31judicial process, potentially leading to unfair or inaccurate judicial decisions.
07:37The actions of Tito Carnabian, Krishnamoorthy, and the prosecutors in this context reflect
07:42a serious breach of ethical and legal standards.
07:46The unexplained changes in the video files raise issues of transparency and trust in
07:50the legal process.
07:52The lack of a clear explanation for these changes can be perceived as an attempt to
07:57manipulate the evidence, eroding public confidence in the fairness and reliability of the legal
08:02proceedings.
08:03Such actions suggest a willingness to bypass ethical guidelines to achieve a particular
08:07outcome, highlighting the need for stringent oversight and accountability in handling and
08:12presenting forensic evidence.
08:14The involvement of high-ranking officials like Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy in such
08:18manipulations underscores the gravity of the situation and the potential for significant
08:23ethical violations within the justice system.
08:26The motive behind Tito Carnabian's involvement in the manipulation of the contents of folders
08:31CCTV-7 and CCTV-9 could be understood as an effort to criminalize Jessica by altering
08:37critical evidence.
08:39These folders were pivotal in the case, serving as key pieces of evidence to support the prosecution's
08:45narrative.
08:46The motive for this manipulation could be to strengthen the case against Jessica by
08:50presenting a curated version of the evidence that would be more likely to lead to her conviction.
08:55By selectively removing certain clips, the prosecution could create a narrative that
08:59portrayed Jessica in a more incriminating light, thus swaying the court's perception
09:03and increasing the chances of a guilty verdict.
09:07This would serve to ensure a conviction in a high-profile case, which was under intense
09:11public scrutiny.
09:13Tito Carnabian, as the chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, along with Krishnamoorthy,
09:18the director of General Crimes, would have had significant influence over the handling
09:22of evidence.
09:24Their collaboration with the prosecutors in this manipulation could indicate a concerted
09:29effort to control the flow of information and manage the outcome of the trial.
09:33The primary motive behind such actions would be to secure a conviction against Jessica
09:37Kamala Wongso by presenting a version of the evidence that supported the prosecution's
09:42claims while concealing any elements that could potentially exonerate her.
09:47This manipulation undermines the integrity of the judicial process and raises serious
09:51ethical and legal concerns about the conduct of those involved.
09:55The motive behind Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy's alteration of the contents of the CCTV3 folder,
10:02as seen in the prosecutor's possession during the Jessica Kamala Wongso case, revolves around
10:07securing a conviction by manipulating crucial evidence.
10:11The CCTV footage from Folder 3 was pivotal, purportedly showing Jessica's actions and
10:16awareness of surveillance at Café Olivier, crucial elements in establishing premeditation.
10:22By altering this evidence, they may have aimed to strengthen the prosecution's narrative,
10:27portraying Jessica in a more incriminating light.
10:30This manipulation serves to align the evidence with the prosecution's theory, potentially
10:35omitting or altering details that could weaken their case.
10:39Such actions suggest a desire to control the narrative presented in court, shaping
10:43it to favor the prosecution and increase the likelihood of a guilty verdict.
10:48This motive underscores a willingness to compromise the integrity of the legal process to achieve
10:53a desired outcome, casting doubt on the fairness and transparency of the trial.
10:58Furthermore, by tampering with the CCTV3 footage, Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy may have
11:03sought to avoid scrutiny or criticism regarding the investigation's thoroughness and the
11:07evidence's reliability.
11:10Presenting a curated version of events could shield the prosecution from challenges that
11:14might arise if the original, unaltered evidence were scrutinized.
11:19This motive reflects a prioritization of securing a conviction over upholding the principles
11:23of justice and integrity in legal proceedings.
11:27The motive behind altering the contents of the CCTV3 folder appears driven by a strategic
11:32effort to strengthen the prosecution's case against Jessica Kamala Wongso.
11:37By manipulating critical evidence, Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy aimed to control the narrative,
11:43potentially at the expense of transparency, fairness, and the accurate representation
11:48of events in court.
11:50Such motives highlight serious ethical lapses and raise significant concerns about the integrity
11:55of the judicial process in this high-profile case.
11:59Under Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy command, Christopher Harriman-Rianto intentionally
12:03divided CCTV7 footage into two segments just before Myrna Salihan arrived at Olivier Cafe
12:09at 1718 local time.
12:12In segment 1, from 1557 to 1717 local time, the footage remained in full high-definition
12:19— 1920x1080px — with a frame rate of 25 frames per second, fps.
12:27In segment 2, from 1717 to 1839 local time, the frame dimensions were reduced to 960x576px,
12:36and the frame rate was lowered to 10 frames per second.
12:39It was during this altered segment that the position of the stirrer became crucial for
12:43analysis, yet it was deliberately blurred by Christopher Harriman-Rianto.
12:48Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy's involvement in the manipulation of the CCTV7 footage in
12:53Jessica Wongso's case aimed to falsely accuse her of placing a stirrer into Myrna Salihan's
12:58coffee and to obscure the movements of Myrna's hand when she picked up the stirrer from the
13:02table.
13:04Under Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy's direction, Mohamedna Al-Azza and Christopher
13:09Harriman-Rianto executed deliberate alterations to the CCTV7 footage from Café Olivier.
13:15This involved reducing the resolution and frame rate of the footage, which blurred crucial
13:20details and distorted the events.
13:22By intentionally blurring these details, the manipulation aimed to create a misleading
13:26narrative that Jessica Wongso had tampered with Myrna's coffee.
13:31This strategic move was designed to cast doubt on Jessica and bolster the prosecution's case,
13:36ultimately compromising the integrity of the trial and raising serious ethical and legal
13:40concerns about the fairness of the proceedings.
13:44Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy, along with his subordinates Mohamedna Al-Azza and Christopher
13:49Harriman-Rianto, played pivotal roles in manipulating the CCTV9 footage related to
13:54Jessica Wongso's case.
13:57Their actions focused on altering the footage from CCTV9 footage, particularly in segments
14:02where the coffee color needed to be compared.
14:05Christopher Harriman-Rianto deliberately split the footage into two segments with differing
14:10resolutions and frame rates, which had significant implications for forensic analysis.
14:16The first segment, which showed the coffee served by Agus Trajano, had its frame resolution
14:21reduced to 960x576 pixels, while the second segment, showing the coffee after Myrna Salihan
14:27drank from it, retained full high-definition resolution of 1920x1080 pixels.
14:34This discrepancy was aimed at creating misleading evidence about the presence of cyanide in
14:39the coffee.
14:40The manipulation of the CCTV9 footage resulted in a loss of color detail and clarity in the
14:46first segment, making it challenging to accurately compare the coffee colors.
14:51This deliberate reduction in resolution and frame rate obscured the subtle variations
14:56in hue, saturation, and brightness that are crucial for forensic analysis.
15:01By tampering with the visual evidence, the team under Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy's
15:06direction compromised the integrity of the forensic findings.
15:10This manipulation not only misled the toxicologists, who based their cyanide analysis on this footage,
15:16but also introduced significant doubts about the reliability of the prosecution's evidence.
15:22The exposure of these manipulations has serious implications for those involved, including
15:27Tito Carnabian, Krishnamoorthy and his subordinates, Mohammed Nah Al-Azza and Christopher Harriman-Rianto.
15:34The deliberate tampering with evidence not only violates ethical and professional standards
15:39in digital forensics, but also constitutes a criminal act.
15:43If proven guilty, they could face severe legal consequences for their actions.
15:49Such manipulations undermine the integrity of the judicial process and erode public trust
15:54in law enforcement and forensic practices.
15:56Tito Carnabian and Krishnamoorthy should face severe punishment for his role in manipulating
16:02CCTV footage in the Jessica Wongso case.
16:06This includes a lengthy prison sentence, potentially over a decade, due to the gravity of tampering
16:11with evidence in a high-profile murder case.
16:14The inaccurate results from the toxicologists, due to the compromised footage, had far-reaching
16:19implications for the trial.
16:22The judges relied on flawed forensic evidence to convict Jessica Wongso, which undermines
16:27the credibility of the entire judicial process.
16:31The deliberate actions of Tito Carnabian, Krishnamoorthy, and his team in manipulating
16:35the CCTV9 footage cast serious doubts on the integrity of the investigation and the
16:40fairness of the trial.
16:43This case highlights the critical importance of preserving the accuracy and reliability
16:47of forensic evidence to ensure justice is served.