Steny Hoyer Has Impassionated Conversation With IRS Commissioner About Audit & Enforcement Rates

  • 4 months ago
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) questioned Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Danny Werfel about audit and enforcement rates.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 time. Now I would refer to Ranking Member Hoyer.
00:04 First of all, Mr. Commissioner, you were appointed by Donald Trump. Is that accurate?
00:19 No. No, I was not appointed by Donald Trump. I was appointed by President Biden.
00:25 Okay, excuse me. I got some misinformation. In any event, I'm going to make my point anyway.
00:33 Mr. Reddick, one of your predecessors, and you essentially have represented a nonpartisan,
00:41 bipartisan view of the revenue flow of the IRS and the impact on its ability to do the job that
00:50 has been given to it by the Congress of the United States. Would that be an accurate statement?
00:54 Yeah. My predecessor, Commissioner Reddick, was a significant champion for the IRS workforce and
01:01 for the dollars that we needed to get the job done. Now, unfortunately, Mr. Edwards left because I
01:12 wanted to refer to his chart. You went up and looked at it? Yeah, I couldn't see it from here.
01:17 What was the time period for that chart? Did anybody recognize it? Did you see anybody?
01:23 It talked about the start, the close of audits in 2023, if I recall. The reality is that because
01:33 of the... Some audits take months, but many audits, especially conflicts, take years. The
01:37 closeout date is very different than the inception date. Yeah. My point is, I like that chart.
01:47 That chart reflects the reality that under $400,000, if you have an audit, essentially,
01:55 on average, it's a one-to-one. You spend $5 and you save $5. You find $5 in fraud or underpayment.
02:08 If you audit a millionaire, you get 12 times the expense. You have a 12-to-one.
02:16 Now, it is interesting that in the years, in the last 10 years, we have audited many, many,
02:24 many more people under $400,000. Why? It's easy. You can conduct audits. You don't get much money
02:35 because the payments are relatively small. Because probably 90% of those, I'm just taking
02:46 that off the top of my head, don't have a thing, have every week, every bi-week, every month,
02:53 we collect their taxes. It's the corporations, it's the pass-throughs, it's the partnerships,
03:00 et cetera, et cetera, that you don't do that with, which are much larger,
03:05 which is why you have four, five, six, 12-to-one return on the audit. I want to see his,
03:15 because he makes our point. To the extent you underfund enforcement, and enforcement has been
03:23 reduced 22% from 2010 to 2019. Hopefully, we have more relevant, more recent statistics than that,
03:34 but has been reduced 22%. Returns are up 7%. That's a 39% difference there, or 29%, excuse me.
03:45 So it is not surprising that we have that $687 billion under payment. Why? Not just because,
03:53 just the cheats, or strike that, people who don't pay what they're supposed to pay,
03:59 but it is also because those who know that they're $687 billion owed, they may not ever be caught.
04:13 So not only our tax system, one of the great things about it is, it is a largely voluntary
04:18 system, one of the most voluntary in the world. I think we're now at 87% or something like that.
04:24 80, yeah.
04:25 Is that correct?
04:25 Just north of 85%.
04:26 85% in that ballpark. But frankly, to the extent we reduce enforcement, with all due respect
04:35 to all of us, if we think, well, maybe it's due, and maybe it's not, I'm not going to pay it,
04:43 and if they catch me, they catch me, and I pay it.
04:45 That's why this enforcement system is so critically important.
04:50 It's also not unusual that those who make the most are audited the less, the least.
05:02 My, my, my, isn't it nice that we don't, for all those people who give us all these big
05:08 contributions and all that sort of stuff, we won't look at you so much.
05:11 We're going to look at the little guy a lot, which is what that chart shows.
05:17 Now, I hadn't seen that chart before, and I don't know the basis, so I have to analyze it.
05:21 But the EITC, I was glad to hear you say, they don't make anything hardly.
05:30 They're scraping by, they have it tough.
05:32 And we want to really look at them. Is there fraud in the EITC? There absolutely is. Why
05:41 is there fraud in the EITC? Because human beings are participating in it.
05:45 And human beings want to try to pay as little as they, me included. But some people cheat.
05:57 And they claim they are. You don't collect much from them because they don't have much.
06:00 But that's why so much time was spent, because we want to see that little old lady who's driving
06:07 the Cadillac, coming and doing the food stamps at the grocery store.
06:10 So, Mr. Chairman, it concerns me that when people who are making a lot of money,
06:20 and very frankly, I don't know the statistics on Miss Delora's corporations,
06:25 but if 41 corporations are paying no taxes, my presumption is they're probably doing that legally.
06:30 And we make the rules, but we complain about it. But if we make the rules,
06:36 and they're following the rules, then they'll pay taxes. God bless them.
06:39 They got smart accountants, smart lawyers. God bless. I hear that. My colleagues say that all
06:46 the time. They say, okay, did they go to jail? No. Well, then they're abeying the law, our law.
06:53 And if you don't like the fact they're not paying any, don't let them have the deductions or the
06:57 look backs or whatever that they're taking. I know I've taken longer time,
07:01 but this is a critical issue for defense, for national security.
07:06 Because that's how we pay for national security, for domestic security, because that's how we pay
07:14 for it. That's how we pay for the administration of all the government through Mr. Werfel's and
07:20 his colleagues' efforts. And we need to come to grips with establishing a system where we don't
07:30 have, forget about what the figure is, let's say it's only 400 billion. Let's say we're over
07:36 extrapolating it by $250 billion. If we have a deficit, we need to be collecting everything
07:46 that is owing, not a nickel more. And on the 400,000 people on the taxes, on the property tax,
07:56 very frankly, and I come from a high property tax state, Maryland's a rich state.
08:03 But very frankly, on property taxes, you buy a $2 million home and somebody down the road
08:11 can't afford a $50,000 home, you want them to subsidize your real estate. Now, that wouldn't
08:18 be popular in my district, Mr. Chairman, I know that. It's not popular, but I take that position.
08:23 Because they want the federal government to subsidize what Ms. Torres said they voted for,
08:29 for their schools and whatever, God bless them. But don't then look around at the Maryland taxpayer
08:37 or the Kansas or Iowa taxpayer, or even the Ohio taxpayer, to subsidize what they decided
08:46 to spend money on through their property taxes. That won't be popular in my district,
08:50 but that's the way it is. Mr. Werfel, thank you very much. You got a tough job. We're going to
08:57 have a markup and I'm going to work very hard to get the money that we need as Americans, not you,
09:02 not the IRS employee. We need as Americans to fund a tax system that is fair, which means that
09:10 everybody pays their fair share. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Recommended