Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 2 days ago
During a House Natural Resources Committee hearing prior to the congressional recess, Rep. Rob Wittman (R-VA) spoke about "carte blanche" closures issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Transcript
00:00Back, is there further discussion on the bill?
00:02Mr. Whitman, you're recognized.
00:05Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:06I'm the proud sponsor of H.R. 556,
00:10Protecting Access to Hunters and Anglers Act,
00:12and I'm amused.
00:13I'm amused at people that talk about
00:15they're the advocates for science,
00:17yet they wouldn't know science if they tripped over it.
00:20I worked as a scientist for the Virginia Department of Health
00:23for 27 years,
00:25and under the federal statute and state statutes,
00:27I was required to gather data
00:30before I made a decision about whether areas
00:32should be open or closed
00:34for the safe taking of shellfish, crustacea, and others.
00:38So what we're saying now is we have a different standard.
00:40We just carte blanche close areas with no data,
00:43without any direct link to the use of lead,
00:47whether it's fishing, tackle, or ammo,
00:49and closing these areas for access for sportsmen.
00:52It just astounds me that it's okay in one area to use this.
00:55It's okay to claim in one area that you're this advocate for science,
00:59and then you turn around and say,
01:01no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
01:03And people that don't even know what science is.
01:05I worked as 27 years, I have a Ph.D. in science.
01:08And I'm going to be lectured by others that say,
01:10somehow, we don't need to collect data.
01:13This bill is simply about this.
01:14It's about collecting data
01:17before we make decisions that affect sportsmen.
01:20We do it in other areas.
01:21We do that for the taking of shellfish.
01:24We do that for the taking of crustacea
01:25to make sure the public is protected.
01:27And it was a perfect example.
01:28We've seen this in the Charles M. Russell
01:30Wetland Management District in Montana.
01:33Without using any accurate science
01:34to substantiate its policies,
01:36the Fish and Wildlife Service recommended
01:37an outright ban on lead tackle and ammo.
01:41Sounds convenient.
01:42Just close it all down.
01:43We don't care.
01:44We don't need to collect the data.
01:45And they didn't even look at what the impact was on wildlife.
01:50It's just that we think there's a problem here.
01:52Is there an association with lead poisoning and animals?
01:56Yes.
01:57But the key is it's not in every situation.
01:59It's a matter of are they going to ingest lead?
02:01Is it there in a scientifically significant concentration
02:05actually causing impact on wildlife?
02:08Another important part of this bill
02:10is to remember that this is about access
02:12to the people that own this land.
02:15This land doesn't belong to members of Congress.
02:18It belongs to the citizens of the United States.
02:20They paid for this land.
02:22They paid for maintaining this land.
02:23They paid for the staffs
02:24that are on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agencies.
02:26And yet we're saying, nope, nope.
02:28We're going to be high and mighty.
02:29We're going to say, you don't get access to that
02:31because we want to place some arbitrary
02:33and capricious requirement there that says we can close it.
02:38We don't have to use data to close it.
02:40We just close it.
02:43Some of my colleagues are going to close this legislation
02:45and say the bill is a rubber stamp to use lead anywhere.
02:47It is not.
02:48It is anything but that.
02:49This is about developing the data, the science,
02:52that the other side claims they want to have.
02:54But only use science when it supports your argument.
02:57If it doesn't support your argument,
02:58then we look at it and go, no, no, we fly right past it.
03:00Just these carte blanche bans if it suits your means.
03:06If you're going to use science the proper way,
03:07you need to use it in every circumstance.
03:09Not just the circumstance that supports your argument,
03:12but in every circumstance.
03:15This bill does promote site-specific scientific data collection
03:19and decision-making to make sure that we are managing the resources of this country
03:26in the best interest of everyone.
03:29Everyone.
03:30That's the key.
03:31Each refuge, each parcel of land has its own unique ecosystems and biological makeup.
03:38That's the uniqueness of this country and how these ecosystems function.
03:43It's how I had to work in my job.
03:45I had to collect samples at stations literally within sight of each other
03:49to determine the water conditions change here.
03:52They change another 300 yards down the road.
03:54They're different.
03:55It's a dynamic environment.
03:56This is not a static environment.
03:58If anything, we know is that this exists within the real world
04:03and that data should drive science-based decisions.
04:08System-wide and statewide bans are short-sighted and ineffective,
04:12and they create problems in the underpinning decisions that we make on these resources.
04:19I urge my colleagues to vote yes on this common-sense legislation.
04:23Let's make it science-based.
04:25Let's gather the information.
04:26And when the information indicates that on these sites,
04:29I have no problem with saying we shouldn't allow the use of lead tackle or lead ammunition.
04:34But carte blanche bans looking past that saying we don't have any data,
04:38we're just going to go ahead and shut things down
04:40and getting lectured to by people that haven't got a shred of experience
04:45in the realm of science or collecting data or making public policy decisions is frustrating.
04:52With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

Recommended