In this gripping continuation of his testimony, veteran Victorian solicitor Thomas Flitner reveals what he claims is a 15-year campaign of retaliation, surveillance, and systemic abuse by the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner (VLSB+C). After standing up to government lawyers and successfully challenging disciplinary sanctions in court, Thomas says he became a marked man — targeted not for misconduct, but for daring to expose injustice within the regulatory system. 🎯 What This Video Exposes: 💰 $2 Million in Public Funds Misused Thomas alleges that over $2 million of taxpayer money has been spent persecuting him, despite no findings of wrongdoing. He says this ongoing “lawfare” is built on exaggerated and fabricated charges. 🧾 His Firm Seized and Liquidated His once-thriving practice — serving hundreds of clients — was forcibly shut down. A former employee later boasted online that she had acquired his client base. Office computers were returned damaged over a year later, with confidential files allegedly accessed and misused. 🕵️ Legal Powers Used Against Civilians The VLSB, Thomas claims, tried to pressure his ex-partner — a childcare worker with no legal background — using threats under laws she wasn’t subject to. Estranged family members were also targeted and manipulated into lodging estate-related complaints. ⚖️ Exploiting Family Tragedy After his mother’s death, her original will vanished. Despite a signed commission agreement entitling Thomas to compensation, he was painted as greedy. He ultimately took less than agreed — only to be vilified further. 🧠 Financial & Mental Collapse Thomas describes the personal toll: the destruction of his business, alienation from family, and long-term mental health impacts. He now lives in near-isolation, his only close relationship being with his 9-year-old son, who he sees under restricted conditions. 🔐 Obstruction and Denial Despite evidence of invalid appointments, improper access to legal files, and potential conflicts of interest, the VLSB has refused to acknowledge wrongdoing or investigate complaints against its own auditors. Key documents remain suppressed. 📣 Why This Matters: This is not just Thomas’s story. It’s a warning about what happens when regulators operate without accountability, and when the law becomes a weapon instead of a shield. This video highlights: The systemic failure of legal oversight in Victoria; How public institutions can use disability, family breakdown, and grief as tools of coercion; And how millions in Public Purpose Funds — meant for access to justice — may be quietly redirected to fuel regulatory vendettas. 📌 If you believe in justice, the rule of law, and institutional accountability, share this video. 💬 Comment if you or someone you know has faced abuse of power from legal or government institutions. 📢 Subscribe for more original investigations into corruption, whistleblower cases, and legal injustice in Australia.
00:00You're saying that they've spent close to two million dollars already.
00:04In excess of that, yes.
00:05And this is just the tip of the iceberg because all that has happened up until now is they've made a bunch of allegations against you
00:14and they've been unsuccessful in demonstrating that you lack the character.
00:20I'm not being convicted, I'm not being convicted of having guilty.
00:22Okay, so now, all these years they've tried to go after you and failed.
00:28In different ways.
00:30And failed.
00:32And ultimately, you're determined to hold them to account for that.
00:37So, when you do sue them, they'll have to justify all of that history and spend millions more.
00:47And then, if you succeed, they'll have to make you whole again.
00:53But they can't make you 100% whole because the business has been divided up, sold off.
00:58My wills, probate, which was the largest safe custody box in the Greensboro Westpac, was sold off to a lady who used to work for me.
01:07And on her website, she put in that she'd bought my practice.
01:10And then the official documents to my liquidator, who I appointed in April last year, 2024, and paid for $10,000 to liquidate my business because the debts were running up.
01:21The tax was over $200,000.
01:23He hadn't been paying that off, Nick Curran.
01:25He had also billed me officially $200,000 to date and still had another number of months, three to four months of billing to do to provide to liquidator, which he hasn't provided to date.
01:36So the liquidator has not been able to liquidate.
01:38My computers were returned in November 2024, over a year later, even though I requested...
01:43How many funds did you have on them?
01:46Well, there's about 13 computers, laptops...
01:48I'm joking.
01:49I mean, they're supposed to...
01:51No, they took all my private documents.
01:52They took all those...
01:53They're supposed to return your devices as soon as they're finished.
01:57And I wrote to them.
01:58I even went to the police.
01:59The police said, we're not going to intervene in the legal board.
02:01They have ultimate power.
02:03They even took a hard drive and confiscated that from my computer technician.
02:08Now, I'm not sure what was on that.
02:10Anyway, suffice to say, the computers came back in a corner, were damaged, had, like, laptop bags missing, were thrown in a corner.
02:20The liquidator said, what do you want to do?
02:21Do you want to buy them?
02:22I said, I'm not buying them because they can be tainted.
02:24I saw on the bill a $4,000 bill from an IT specialist who'd gone through.
02:28They didn't want to...
02:29They'd never, to my request, provided me with an itemised breakdown of that IT man's work.
02:38They were going through my emails, which I had confidential and privileged correspondence with Glenn Muhammad with this matter.
02:46And I had correspondence to Nick Curran to say, you are not allowed to utilise that for the board or the Victorian government's benefit.
02:54It was the 6th of October, 23, she had to recuse herself in the court because the judge said, you, you know, you cannot continue.
03:04You have a conflict, yes.
03:05You're in conflict.
03:05And they had to appoint the Victorian government solicitor to continue on with the matter, after they'd been through all the other legal departments, was left to them to take it on.
03:15By the 11th of October, the following week, they had then written a letter and decided to confiscate my business because it looked like they were going to lose in that matter.
03:26It's clearly obvious.
03:27And they wanted access to my files and anything in the office.
03:30So, effectively, they are bringing bogus charges against you because for 15 years, they've tried to find better charges.
03:41For an all-too-right purpose, to get into the practice.
03:43So, they tried for 15 years to find more robust allegations that could stake, but because they can't do that, so they're bringing completely untenable allegations.
04:00Is that what you're saying?
04:02That's correct.
04:02They've even spiked up and written to my former de facto partner who left early 2021, four and a half years ago.
04:10They wrote to her two years ago saying, under the uniform laws, you need to comply.
04:17We have questions for you to answer.
04:19Sorry.
04:20So, they wrote to your spouse, asking them to give evidence against you.
04:28That's correct.
04:29In a private matter.
04:31On what basis?
04:32On my mum's estate matter because she was a signatory to a document my mum signed.
04:37No, but what was the basis upon which they could demand that she could...
04:41They were trying to use the legislation, the Legal Profession Act, which makes lawyers comply to their request.
04:50If they were working for the same practice.
04:52That's right, but she never worked for my practice.
04:54She never was a paralegal.
04:55She was never an employee.
04:56She's actually a childcare worker for the last 40 years.
04:59So, she's not even a lawyer.
05:00No.
05:00And they still tried to threaten her?
05:03That's correct.
05:04With civil penalty...
05:06That's correct.
05:07She didn't comply.
05:07Then also, they decided to contact my half-brothers, younger half-brothers, and spike them up since January 2019 to make allegations against me that I defrauded my mum's estate.
05:22Leading to the middle brother, who received carer's pension, lived there for nine months rent-free.
05:29I let him go with that.
05:30Locked me out after her death.
05:32Her will disappeared in her room, leading me to take even less than a third when I was meant to get two-thirds of the estate because they have their own father.
05:42I've never known my father.
05:44Came with my mum from Germany at four years of age.
05:47They got involved in a family situation.
05:49My only family in Australia, mind you.
05:51So, my only family I have now is my nine-year-old son.
05:54Those are my ex.
05:55Because they have now pushed my brothers away through strategy, leading to my younger brother in March this year writing an affidavit saying that I was entitled to mourn the original will.
06:06But because it disappeared in her house while the middle brother was living there and locked me out, I was still a greedy bastard, even though I'd taken less.
06:16And I had a written document with 5% commission, signed by mum, myself and my ex, de facto.