Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 7/10/2025
Jillian Segal has recommended stripping funding where possible from broadcasters, universities and arts institutions who fail to fight anti-semitism.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00Gillian Siegel, the anti-Semitism envoy, has described this report as not a symbolic document,
00:07but an action plan. She clearly sees this as laying out specific recommendations, specific
00:13steps that can be taken by governments, federal, state, local and other cultural institutions
00:19and other bodies to tackle the issue of anti-Semitism in Australia. And she clearly would like to
00:24see many of these acted upon. I'll take you through just some of the recommendations that
00:29have been made. She sets out 13 of what she calls strategic focus areas with a set of
00:33recommendations under each. They go to things like defining anti-Semitism, having that definition
00:39being broadly adopted. She wants to see the International Holocaust Remembrance Association's
00:44specific definition of anti-Semitism adopted, which is partly that anti-Semitism is a certain
00:51perception of Jews, which may be expressed as a hatred towards Jews. She wants stronger
00:55anti-vilification laws put in place as well. This echoes calls from other Jewish lobby groups,
01:01as well as people like independent MP Allegra Spender, who've seen, who've argued that there
01:05is a loophole in place in current anti-vilification laws, that they're just not quite strong enough.
01:11Others are quite contentious. They would certainly spark significant public debate. Things like
01:16withholding public funding from universities if they're seen to be failing to act upon the issue
01:21of anti-Semitism within their campuses. Advocating for the government to screen visa applicants for
01:28anti-Semitic views or affiliations. Building anti-Semitism into the education curriculum as
01:33well in a stronger way. Not just teaching the Holocaust, but teaching other issues of Jewish
01:38culture and identity too, as something she clearly wants to see acted upon, within both primary and
01:44secondary schools as well. So clearly, a mixture of recommendations here. Some would be relatively simple
01:49to adopt, are uncontentious. Others would be much more difficult, much more complex and clearly quite
01:55contentious. The plan today builds on a foundation of actions. It brings structure though, priorities
02:02and accountability to our national response. And it's not a symbolic document, it's an action plan.
02:07And it addresses anti-Semitism in many places. In our laws, classrooms, universities, media, workplaces,
02:17online spaces and public institutions. And it calls on government and societal leaders to support the
02:24initiatives. Tom, Gillian Siegel was quite careful to refer to this as a plan rather than recommendations
02:32or a report. She was obviously standing alongside the Prime Minister. How much of this plan will be
02:39adopted by the Prime Minister? Look, that remains to be seen. The Prime Minister was quite careful to say
02:44that this is a significant, a substantial document that he clearly supports the intent and the ambition
02:50of, though he was careful not to immediately adopt any of these suggestions from Gillian Siegel,
02:55saying they do require careful consideration. Some, he pointed out, are relatively simple.
03:00Others would be challenging. And not just issues for the federal government, he made the point,
03:04but for state governments, local governments and other bodies as well. He made clear that this
03:10also isn't a situation where you can simply pass a piece of legislation and be done with it.
03:14Anti-Semitism is a more complex problem, he says, than that. This is something that will have to be
03:19worked upon, not just by the federal government, but by others as well, for a significant period of
03:25time. He did tackle questions around how this would sit alongside legitimate public criticism
03:31of the government of Israel, particularly its approach to the conflict in Gaza and elsewhere in the
03:36Middle East. Can these recommendations be adopted? And can that legitimate criticism,
03:41that public commentary around Israel continue? And he said, absolutely, yes. That is something that
03:46he's done in the past. He's been quite critical of Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu,
03:51and his administration and its approach to the war at various occasions over the past 12 months,
03:56two years or so, alongside other world leaders too. That commentary can happen,
04:00that criticism can take place without being anti-Semitic. Here's a bit of what he had to say
04:04on that specific issue. Regarding legitimate criticism of Israel, as you'd be aware, I have
04:12released statements with other leaders that have been critical of the actions of the Netanyahu
04:19government. I will continue to put forward a position that is consistent with the position that
04:30we have taken on the Middle East. But you can put forward those views respectfully.
04:39He was also asked about protests, and many Australian cities have seen regular demonstrations
04:44around the conflict in Gaza for quite some time now, weekly protests, and whether those had any role
04:50in fuelling anti-Semitism. And Anthony Albanese was very clear that Australians have a right to protest
04:56as a liberal democracy, both on issues domestic and international, and of course, on issues like
05:02the conflict in Gaza. He said that should absolutely continue, but should be done respectfully and
05:07without damaging the cause those protests are seeking to push.
05:10Julie athlete Tippmann and University of Minnesota.
05:14Okay, now we're on the way, where do you see a lot of workers?
05:18Good for me.
05:22I've been the first one for the war for the war and a half are the low importance of
05:25and that it is.
05:29I think that is so important
05:34because this has made me know who the Smile reports

Recommended