Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 7/8/2025
During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last month, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) asked Navy leadership about an F-35 crash in 2023.
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Senator Tuberville.
00:05Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:07Just a quick statement, Secretary of Feeling.
00:10Everything we read, obviously, is China's using AI on almost everything that they do.
00:16They can build a bridge, and in three months it takes us three years.
00:19I'm sure she'll build it as part of that.
00:21In your travels, hopefully we're getting into that.
00:25I don't know how far and how impressed you have been with that.
00:30Any thoughts?
00:33So, Senator, thanks for that.
00:36We're slowly adapting and getting there.
00:40I think that there's more that we need to do, and we're focused in the public shipyards trying to get that done.
00:46I saw at Finkateria, actually, they have these 3D goggles where you can actually look at where they're welding
00:53and how it matches up versus the blueprint to make sure that they're not off
00:58because the precision of this manufacturing is incredibly intense.
01:03I mean, these are very complicated things.
01:05So we're getting there, and I think implementing AI, even just basically digital twinning of projects,
01:11there are a number of things we have to do to get in and done that I think will speed up construction, make design faster.
01:20We spend way too much time in requirements and design.
01:24This needs to move much, much quicker.
01:26So streamlining that, I think, will be helpful as well, including that.
01:30Just what I read, it looks like we're just falling farther and farther behind, you know, the Chinese,
01:34and we can't deal with that too much.
01:36General Smith, I'd like just to make a statement here and discuss to you about a constituent matter.
01:43Normally, this would be handled in emails and conversations between our staffs,
01:47and after more than seven months of headquarters Marine Corps being evasive and unresponsive to my questions,
01:54here we are.
01:54A little over two years ago, we had an F-35 crash in Charleston, South Carolina.
02:01The pilot, an Alabama constituent who entered service from my state,
02:05had been selected for a very important command and was in the process of converting from another aircraft
02:10and staying current for his new job.
02:12This mishap got a lot of attention because the pilot ejected the aircraft,
02:17continuing to fly for an extended period of time before it eventually hit the ground.
02:20Of course, there was no way for the pilot to know that this would happen.
02:24If he had, he would have remained in the aircraft.
02:27What the pilot knew at the time was that the weather was bad,
02:30he had no visual reference with the ground,
02:31and his primary and sector instruments had completely failed.
02:35Disoriented by the cascading failures and loaded the ground, he ejected.
02:39The Marine Corps did what it always does.
02:42In these mishap situations, they had three investigations.
02:45One command investigation determined the mishap was in the line of duty,
02:50and the pilot had committed any misconduct.
02:52It found no misconduct.
02:54A field flight performance board that focuses on pilot actions and abilities
02:58and the safety investigation that is meant to determine the truth of the incident
03:02and provide a way forward and lessons learned to prevent future occurrences.
03:07All three investigations were completed February 2024.
03:10You know, this investigation and their summaries were routed to headquarters Marine Corps
03:16where it was determined that the pilot had acted appropriately
03:19and should continue his career.
03:22The pilot and his family were moved across country to Yuma, Arizona,
03:25and he took command in late June 2024, a year ago.
03:30General Smith, that July, you visited the squadron,
03:33and while speaking with the pilot in his office,
03:36you asked him what his future plans were, stating,
03:39we put you here for a reason,
03:41and the Marine Corps isn't done with you after this command.
03:44Then a month later, in August 2024,
03:46a redacted version of the command investigation
03:48was being prepared for public release.
03:51During that process, you apparently became familiar with this mishap
03:54for the first time,
03:55and without reviewing the other two investigations,
03:57directed that the VMX-1CO be relieved.
04:02It is important to emphasize that all information on this mishap
04:07and the investigation had been available to headquarters Marine Corps
04:10for more than eight months by this point,
04:13and it was also available when this family was moved across the country.
04:16During the video call relieving him,
04:19this Marine was told by the deputy commandant for aviation
04:22that you've done nothing wrong.
04:24You're doing a great job,
04:25but that the commandant had decided you could not stay in command.
04:30I wonder what the reasons were for this erratic and hasty decision.
04:35The officer who conducted the command investigation
04:37inappropriately offered his opinion.
04:40That mishap was caused by pilot error.
04:43Of course it was incorrect.
04:44The mishap was caused by a never-before-seen series of failures.
04:48This erroneous opinion is what you justified breaking faith
04:52for this decorated combat vet for more than 33 years of combat service
04:56because you never reviewed, obviously, the other investigation in detail,
05:00maybe at all.
05:01You don't know that you didn't know or tell the different story of things that was said.
05:06Due to this unique circumstance of mishap,
05:08the board believes the pilot was justified in his decision to eject.
05:13Recovery from the previously described flight regime
05:16is not trained in the F-35 syllabus,
05:18and the FFPB believes that the predominance of naval aviators
05:23with similar experience of the F-35B would have made the same decision.
05:27This treatment of this pilot, to me, feels punitive and vindictive.
05:31There was no attempt by the Marine Corps to take care of this Marine or his family
05:35despite his excellent performance as CO
05:37and the abundance of misconduct of any kind.
05:41This family was denied a change-of-command ceremony,
05:44even after the committee's professional staff requested you evaluate this decision.
05:48General Smith, I would like you to get answers to this question.
05:51I've been asking since October.
05:53I prefer it to happen through normal means instead of a hearing,
05:57but I am chairman of the committee's subcommittee on personnel,
06:00and we can arrange that.
06:02But to Trey and Jess Del Pizzo and their family,
06:05thank you for your many years of service and sacrifice to this great nation.
06:09I think you deserve much better here.
06:12There is no excuse to treat a Marine and his family this way,
06:16so I look forward to hearing from you.
06:18General Smith, thank you.

Recommended