Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6/2/2025
During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last month, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) spoke about the pilot shortage in the Air Force.
Transcript
00:00Nicely done, and thank you for staying within the time limitation.
00:08We now have standard questions that we ask our civilian nominees and not just need a
00:20verbal yes or no from each of you simultaneously.
00:26Have you adhered to applicable laws and regulations governing conflicts of interest?
00:30Yes.
00:31Yes.
00:32Have you assumed any duties or taken any actions that would appear to presume the outcome of
00:38the confirmation process?
00:40No.
00:41Exercising our legislative and oversight responsibilities makes it important that this committee, its
00:46subcommittees, and other appropriate committees of Congress receive testimony, briefings, reports,
00:51records, and other information from the executive branch on a timely basis.
00:55Do you agree, if confirmed, to appear and testify before this committee when requested?
01:01Yes.
01:02Do you agree to provide records, documents, and electronic communications in a timely manner
01:08when requested by this committee, its subcommittees, or other appropriate committees of Congress,
01:13and to consult with the requester regarding the basis for any good faith delay or denial
01:19in providing such records?
01:20Yes.
01:21Will you ensure that your staff complies with deadlines established by this committee for
01:26the production of reports, records, and other information, including timely responding to
01:31hearing questions for the record?
01:32Yes.
01:33Yes.
01:34Will you cooperate in providing witnesses and briefers in response to congressional requests?
01:38Yes.
01:39Will those witnesses and briefers be protected from reprisal for their testimony and briefings?
01:46Yes.
01:47And that concludes our standard questions, and it's now time for us to begin the five-minute
02:06rounds, and I hope members will be as observant of the five-minute time limit as our distinguished
02:14nominees are.
02:15First of all, a quick yes or no from all of you.
02:23Much of the funding in the Defense Reconciliation Bill is unspecific because of our rules and will
02:28technically be at the discretion of the Department of Defense, though we will write recommendations
02:33for them.
02:34A quick yes or no, do you commit to follow the Congress's spending recommendations in defense
02:40reconciliation unequivocally?
02:41Yes.
02:42Yes.
02:43Yes.
02:44Yes, from all three.
02:46Okay, let me begin with you, Colonel Anderson.
02:50There's an Air Force pilot shortage.
02:56How big of a challenge is that?
02:59What are the reasons for it?
03:02Does that include the fact that civilian pilots for the airlines are getting higher pay, better
03:10more regular schedules and more time at home?
03:15And what can we in the Congress and you in the administration do about this?
03:21Thank you, Senator.
03:22I hung up the uniform a full 16 years ago, and we were talking about pilot shortages then,
03:30as we have been talking about a number of other issues.
03:33And so the Air Force has embarked on attempting to address this in a very vigorous way.
03:40They have implemented, based on my rating, a $50,000 bonus.
03:46But monetary compensation is not the only incentive that keeps our pilots in the cockpit.
03:55It is such things as the quality of their service, to have challenges, to be able to step up and
04:02exercise their leadership skills, to do any number of things.
04:07Well, how can we improve on that, though?
04:08Well, one of the things, Senator, that I just read about in Air and Space Forces magazine,
04:16which I was unfamiliar with, the Air Education and Training Command has just begun a new initiative
04:22this year, where the AETC commander is going to begin a pilot program, no pun intended, to
04:29test out initial pilot training, IPT, which will be done at civilian flying schools, and
04:37then to feed those graduates into traditional undergraduate pilot training.
04:43Based on the reading in that article, it can be done at a wash without requiring additional
04:48financial resources, and they believe that they can generate an additional 1,500 pilots
04:54a year.
04:55Okay.
04:56IPT before UPT.
04:57That is correct.
04:58Well, we could visit the entire five minutes and the entire time of the hearing on that.
05:03Let me turn to you, Dr. Napoli.
05:07Of course, we know where the president is right now.
05:11We know there are discussions about the Iranian nuclear program.
05:18And we're also very aware of the verification challenges under the defunct JCPA.
05:25In your view, what steps should we consider in verifying possible future agreements with
05:33Iran?
05:34And do you think there's any point in even trying that?
05:36Thank you, Senator Ricker.
05:39I appreciate the question.
05:41The complexity and seriousness of the Iranian nuclear issue is obviously very recognized.
05:48At this time, I'm not privy to U.S. government or detailed matters regarding our nation's discussions
05:54with the government of Iran.
05:56However, if confirmed, I will commit to working with the State Department diplomatically, the
06:01Department of Defense, the administration, and the broader Department of Energy to ensure
06:06that the Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation can bring the tools and expertise needed to address
06:11the Iranian nuclear issue.
06:12Okay.
06:13But you know from open sources, from the news media, that verification was difficult under
06:20the JCPA.
06:21Yes, Senator.
06:24I fully support the IAEA's efforts for a comprehensive safeguards agreement and the broader goals of an additional protocol.
06:31Verification is the heart of nonproliferation, and I think we should all strive to meet those
06:36broader nonproliferation norms.
06:38Mr. Till, how are we going to move past some of the burdensome bureaucratic delays that have
06:45frustrated all of us on both sides of the dais?
06:48Thank you, Chairman Wicker, for the question.
06:53The Supreme Court rendered an opinion in 2023 called the Sackett decision.
06:58This decision provided clarity to the question about the regulatory regime related to wetlands
07:05and navigable waterways.
07:08It's my understanding that the Environmental Protection Agency, in coordination with the U.S.
07:12Army Corps of Engineers, is currently working to provide additional clarity about the impacts
07:18of that decision, and the goal would be to provide clarity to stakeholders across the country
07:23so that they understand where the regulatory regime of the federal government stops and
07:27starts.
07:28With regard to the various flood control and navigation projects across the country, the Congress
07:36is of course very interested in these projects and has been very involved in directing the executive
07:40branch to execute them.
07:42It's incumbent upon the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Assistant Secretary of the
07:44Army for Civil Works to provide transparency and clarity to the Congress, to the public,
07:49about the progress of those projects, what may be impeding them.
07:51In some cases, it may be that the project's authorized, but the funds haven't been appropriated.
07:55It may be that a local, non-federal entity has paperwork that it still needs to complete,
08:01or it may be another agency's regime that is a barrier to progress on these projects.
08:07It might very well be, yes.
08:08Thank you, Mr. Till.
08:09Thank you, Senator.

Recommended