- yesterday
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00If you clicked on this video, don't leave it.
00:03I am sure that you will be presented with content that will not leave you disappointed.
00:11Our starting point is the world's best-selling book, the Bible.
00:15We will read the King James Version of the first verses.
00:19The Bible begins with,
00:22In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth,
00:25and the earth was without form and void,
00:28and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
00:32And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
00:36And God said, Let there be light, and there was light.
00:45And God saw the light, that it was good.
00:48And God divided the light from the darkness.
00:52And God called the light day, and the darkness he called night.
00:55And the evening and the morning were the first day.
00:59Let's imagine that you want to study this subject.
01:04So, on the King James Bible Online website, you look for other available translations.
01:10If you really want to know what is written, in fact, you need to look for a literal translation version.
01:16Then you find in the list, Young's literal translation,
01:25and you will be able to read God in the first verse,
01:28and you will be able to read something very similar to what you were presented with earlier.
01:35Then you will look for other versions, and you will find practically all of them the same.
01:40Then you try the Hebrew, and, of course, it is written in Hebrew.
01:45But if you are like me, who does not understand Hebrew,
01:49you will be left without understanding what is written.
01:53So, we conclude that we will need to look for a version that contains a literal translation.
01:59And in this case, I suggest, if you want to research,
02:02I suggest to you, the version that I installed on my computer, Interlinear Scripture Analyzer.
02:10And in this way, you will see with your own eyes, and with your own research, what I will present here.
02:16Let's read again the first five verses of the Bible, in a literal translation.
02:21In a beginning, Elohim created the heavens and the earth.
02:25As for the earth, it came to be a chaos and vacant,
02:29and darkness was over the surface of the abyss.
02:32And the Spirit of Elohim was vibrating over the surface of the waters.
02:37And Elohim said, Let light come to be, and light came to be.
02:42Elohim saw the light that it was good.
02:44Then Elohim separated the light from the darkness.
02:48And Elohim called the light day, and the darkness he called night.
02:52And evening came to be, and morning came to be, day one.
02:56And then the truth appear.
03:02Easily you will understand that God, in English, is a translation of the Hebrew Elohim.
03:08After all, in all available versions, we understand this.
03:12But a quick search on Google, and a simple definition from Wikipedia,
03:16would be prepared to demonstrate that this is not true.
03:22Elohim, the plural of Elohim, is a Hebrew word meaning, gods or godhood.
03:28Although the word is plural, in the Hebrew Bible,
03:34it most often takes singular, verbal, or pronominal agreement,
03:38and refers to a single deity, particularly the God of Israel.
03:43In other verses, it refers to the singular gods of other nations,
03:47or to deities in the plural.
03:49The word Elohim is a grammatically plural noun for gods, or deities,
03:55or various other words in Biblical Hebrew.
03:59So if I can understand clearly,
04:01this means to say that the term Elohim is plural, and means gods.
04:06However, by virtue of an agreement,
04:09it is understood that Elohim should be understood in the singular,
04:13and it is then the same as God.
04:15I understand, but why then, in the King James Version,
04:20in Genesis 1.26, do we read,
04:23And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.
04:28And in the literal translation version we read,
04:32And Elohim said, Let us make humanity in our image,
04:36and according to our likeness.
04:38Isn't it plural in this case,
04:41Let us in our image?
04:43Isn't it plural?
04:43However, we have the explanation that God would be talking to his angels,
04:49or that this would be the majestic plural for God.
04:53But the sands of time have revealed a different subject.
04:57The discovery of the library of Nineveh brought us the Mesopotamian tablets.
05:02At that time, the interest of the great institutions was precisely to prove the biblical narratives
05:09through new discovered documents.
05:11What happened was the opposite.
05:14What was proven, in fact, is precisely the opposite.
05:18The documents found showed direct dependence.
05:20If the Hebrew Bible reveals a narrative,
05:23the tablets reveal more complete and broader narratives,
05:27with a depth and richness of details much greater.
05:31In the story of the flood, for example,
05:34if it is possible to read God or Yahweh in a conventional translation,
05:38the literal translation reveals that some actions are practiced by Elohim,
05:43the plural term, and others by Yahweh,
05:46the singular term that reveals the name of the God of Israel.
05:50But this is very strange.
05:52What sense does it make to write a text using different names for the same thing,
05:57being that this thing is God?
05:59Some at this point in the video could already accuse me of blasphemy
06:04or say that I do not have enough theological knowledge
06:07to know that Yahweh and Elohim are just different names for the same God.
06:14But the truth is just the opposite.
06:17We are not used to reading the Bible as it is.
06:20We are used to reading the Bible as it was read and written for us,
06:24as it was told and retold to us through the centuries,
06:27and the conventions that were made.
06:31In the context of Christianity, the story becomes even more confusing.
06:37And I will demonstrate this to you.
06:40Jesus, when referring to the Father,
06:42uses different nomenclatures in the original Greek.
06:46In Luke 23, 34, he refers to God as Father,
06:50from the Greek term, pater.
06:52In John 10, 30, when saying that he and the Father are one,
06:57the same term pater is clear.
07:00Jesus, in various passages, claims to be doing the will of the Father.
07:05And clearly the Jews do not accept him saying this.
07:09The Jews do not recognize him as the son of the same Father.
07:13They claim that Jesus is blaspheming.
07:15In some passages, Jesus is pointed out as Theo, son of God,
07:23and refers to God as Theos.
07:26In this sense, in a quick analysis,
07:29we have so far the following words that are translated as God in our Bibles,
07:33that we have in our homes.
07:35From Hebrew, Elohim, Yahweh.
07:38From Greek, pater, Theos, Theon.
07:41So I ask you, can we understand all these terms as God?
07:46For the Jews, obviously not.
07:49The Hebrews accused Jesus of blasphemy,
07:51as they did not identify him as the son of Yahweh.
07:55And in fact, I just summarized the little that I showed you.
07:59If we look even deeper,
08:00we would find other words that involving the name of God such as
08:04El, El Elyon, El Shaddai, Adonai, Yah, Kyrios, Despotes, Pneumatheos, Logos.
08:13Actually, it is necessary to highlight here a great confusion.
08:18Is Jesus the Messiah or not?
08:20Is Jesus' Father Yahweh or not?
08:24We can have different interpretations and different readings,
08:28as well as different theological explanations for this.
08:30But invariably, the truth is only one,
08:34even though we may not be able to fully grasp it.
08:37It either is, or it isn't.
08:40There is no way this answer can be doubly correct or partially correct.
08:45The fact that we do not have access to the truth,
08:48from my point of view,
08:49obliges us all to be calm and patient with people who think differently from us.
08:54And more than that, respect, utmost respect.
08:58No one has the truth.
08:59We are all learners.
09:00All of this was already sufficiently complicated,
09:05but later, when we learn about the Anunnaki,
09:08the complexity is accentuated.
09:11The Anunnaki subject reveals a truth that bothers many people.
09:16Many attack this channel and other channels.
09:19And from my point of view,
09:20they are extremely simplistic in their analysis.
09:23They say, the Anunnaki are fallen angels.
09:26But, no, the Anunnaki are not fallen angels.
09:30The Anunnaki are the Elohim,
09:32and they are duly identified in creation.
09:36In texts such as the Atrahasis epic,
09:39Enuma Elish, among others,
09:41it is very well explained that they are the creators of humanity and,
09:45therefore, identify with the plural term, Elohim.
09:49In addition, the Anunnaki also identify with the creation of the universe in the Enuma Elish.
09:56Just as Elohim identifies itself at the beginning of the Bible in Genesis 1.
10:02The fallen angels are the sons of God,
10:05or the sons of the gods,
10:06who in the Hebrew Bible are called Benai Elohim.
10:09These must then be the children of the main Anunnaki, perhaps.
10:14In the case of Genesis 6,
10:16and in a joint analysis with the book of Enoch,
10:19we have the Benai Elohim,
10:21who descend from the heavens,
10:23and these are the fallen angels.
10:26And the fallen angels have children with earthly women.
10:30These are the Nephilim.
10:33Nephilim are interpreted as beings of great stature,
10:36but in reality they are of great stature.
10:39Not literally in terms of their height,
10:42but in terms of their deeds,
10:43their scope,
10:44their power.
10:47Nephilim, from the term Naphol,
10:49means the one who fell,
10:51and not necessarily giants.
10:53Probably these are the demigods like Gilgamesh and Hercules.
10:57Perhaps the Goliath that David defeated.
11:02Zechariah Sitchin, when writing the work,
11:04the twelfth planet referred to the Anunnaki as Nephilim.
11:08But later, he corrected this term,
11:11due to the understanding that the Anunnaki are in fact the Elohim.
11:15There are interviews here on YouTube where he makes this very clear.
11:20In addition,
11:21Sitchin explains that the term El Elyon
11:23refers to God with a capital G,
11:26that is,
11:27the true God above the Anunnaki.
11:29And I must make it clear,
11:31this is Zechariah Sitchin's view.
11:33When we study the Sumerian texts,
11:36or using the correct term,
11:37the Mesopotamian texts,
11:39which precede the Bible by centuries and millennia,
11:42we find a narrative that observes
11:44from the creation of the universe and the worlds,
11:47to the time when only the gods walked on earth.
11:51Later we observe the creation of humans,
11:54the flood,
11:55the beginning of civilization,
11:56and the first contacts of gods,
11:59in the plural,
12:00with humans.
12:02The Mesopotamian texts make it very clear
12:05that among the different gods,
12:07different visions imposed themselves.
12:10In the beginning,
12:11only the gods walked on earth.
12:13Among these gods,
12:15there were the great gods,
12:16the Anunnaki,
12:17and the lesser or the junior gods
12:19called the Igigi.
12:20The Igigi,
12:23the lesser gods,
12:24worked and these junior gods
12:26organized a protest,
12:28a mutiny.
12:29And before Enlil,
12:30in the Ekur,
12:31they protested
12:32so that they would no longer work.
12:35Thus,
12:36one of the great gods,
12:37Anki proposed the creation
12:39of a primitive worker.
12:41In some texts like Anki and Ninma,
12:43Anki manipulates instruments
12:45for the creation of humanity.
12:47In other texts,
12:49Anki inspires the phantom,
12:50or breath of life
12:51to animate a human body,
12:53as if endowing it with a soul.
12:56Among these gods,
12:57one of them is the Father of all,
12:59and His name means Most High.
13:01This is on for the Sumerians,
13:03and Anu for the Akkadians.
13:05He is represented by a simple star
13:07and also by the Maltese cross.
13:10His dwelling is in the celestial abode,
13:13and He is the heaven itself,
13:15the sky of Anu.
13:17The representation of His name,
13:20the Most High,
13:21can be equivalent to El Elyon,
13:23the Most High for the Hebrews
13:25in the Hebrew Bible.
13:27And for those who imagine and affirm
13:29that the Anunnaki themselves
13:31believed in the great creator of everything,
13:34it must be said,
13:35this is an interpretation
13:36of Zechariah Sitchin.
13:38In the available Mesopotamian texts
13:42for reading,
13:43in the originals,
13:44I have never read any mention of Galzu
13:46or the creator of everything.
13:48This is, as I said,
13:50an interpretation of Sitchin.
13:52Moreover, for Sitchin,
13:54Yahweh is the manifestation
13:55of the creator of everything Himself.
13:58Yahweh is the very creator of everything.
14:01This is Sitchin's conclusion
14:03in the book Divine Encounters,
14:05A conclusion that I vehemently disagree with,
14:09just as it is an interpretation of Sitchin
14:11that Marduk, Ra, and Amun-Ra
14:13are the same god.
14:15But the fact is,
14:16his interpretation seems very plausible.
14:19And in this sense,
14:20it must be said,
14:21Marduk appears in the Bible
14:23as Baal and Merodach,
14:25according to various interpretations.
14:27And in the Hebrew Bible,
14:30we observe several times
14:32the biblical god Yahweh
14:33claiming to be the only one
14:35and prohibiting worship
14:36of the deity Astarte,
14:38who is known as the Morning Star,
14:40Inanna for the Sumerians,
14:42and Ishtar for the Akkadians,
14:44just as we see the condemnation
14:46of any worship of Baal
14:48and Merodach or Marduk.
14:51Just as we also notice
14:52that Yahweh seems not to accept
14:54the worship of Amun
14:55or any other god
14:56of the Egyptian pantheon.
14:58And in fact,
14:59Yahweh does not accept worship
15:01to anyone else
15:02beyond worship to himself.
15:04When Yahweh presents himself to Moses,
15:07the situation becomes very clear.
15:09He, Yahweh, claims to be the one
15:11who also presented himself
15:13to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
15:15as El Shaddai,
15:16that is, as God Almighty,
15:18but that he did not previously
15:20reveal himself to them as Yahweh.
15:22It seems we have two sides here,
15:26don't we?
15:30Zechariah Sitchin interpreted it
15:32as being the clan of Enki
15:33and the clan of Enlil.
15:36In the Mesopotamian accounts
15:38of the flood,
15:39in the tablets,
15:40we clearly described that
15:42Enki wants to save humanity,
15:44wants to stop the annihilation
15:46of his creatures.
15:47And we have seen this
15:48in the video of the Eridu Genesis.
15:51and we will see something similar
15:53in Tablet 11
15:54of the Epic of Gilgamesh,
15:56as well as in the Epic of Atrahasis.
15:59Enki wants to save humanity
16:01and Enlil.
16:02He himself sends drought,
16:04famine, diseases,
16:05and finally the flood.
16:09For Sitchin,
16:10the cause of the flood
16:11is the passage of Nibiru.
16:14For the traditional myths
16:15that I have read,
16:16it is not Nibiru,
16:17but Enlil himself,
16:19who decides to annihilate humanity
16:21with the flood.
16:23And Enki decides to save humanity.
16:25In the Hebrew Bible,
16:27we read the term Elohim at times,
16:30and at other times Yahweh,
16:32in the functions that are of Enki and Enlil,
16:35which denotes obviously
16:36that these older writings,
16:38in this case,
16:39the Mesopotamian tablets,
16:41not only inspired the writers
16:43of the Bible,
16:44who copied their writings,
16:45but summarized their writings,
16:47and above all,
16:49altered them,
16:50in order to confuse
16:51and make believe
16:52in a single God,
16:53when in fact there was
16:54more than one.
16:56Could it be
16:57that the God of the Old Testament,
16:59Yahweh,
17:00is different from the God
17:02of the New Testament?
17:03Could this be the reason
17:04why Jesus says
17:05he speaks in the name
17:06of the Father,
17:07that whoever saw him
17:09saw the Father,
17:10but that,
17:11in fact,
17:11Jesus' Father
17:12was not the same Yahweh?
17:14perhaps for this reason
17:16he was killed.
17:19This topic
17:20is extremely complex.
17:22It is also necessary
17:23to observe
17:24that some of the terms
17:25to which Jesus referred
17:26to his Father,
17:27Pater,
17:28automatically refer us
17:29to very ancient deities,
17:31such as Diospita,
17:32from the Vedic Pantheon.
17:34Literally translated
17:36as Sky Father,
17:37Diospita is one
17:38of the oldest known deities,
17:40originating from
17:41Proto-Indo-European mythology,
17:43embodying the daytime sky
17:45and serving as the Father
17:47of gods and men.
17:51As we trace the lineage
17:52of Diospita,
17:54we find a direct evolution
17:55in ancient Greece
17:56with Zeuspita,
17:58which also appears
17:59in Rome as Jupiter.
18:01The name Jupiter
18:01is derived from
18:02Zeuspater,
18:04a conjunction of
18:05Diospita and Potter,
18:06translating to
18:07Sky Father.
18:08These names also
18:09bear similarities
18:10with Jovi or Jovis,
18:12which was another name
18:13for the same Jupiter,
18:15and which is incredibly
18:16similar to the name
18:17Yahweh or Jehovah.
18:19So,
18:19would it be the same
18:20Potter?
18:21Would it be Diospita
18:22or Great Father?
18:23Would Jesus be referring
18:24to the same Father
18:25in the sky?
18:27Or would they be different?
18:28On one side
18:29of the clan of Enlil,
18:30on the other,
18:31the clan of Enki.
18:33This would lead us
18:34to the same Father
18:35of all the gods,
18:36the Most High,
18:37An or Anu.
18:38He lives in the
18:40celestial abode,
18:41his name means heavens,
18:42and his pictographic sign
18:44also represents the cross,
18:46through the evolution
18:47of the cuneiform symbol
18:48to the Hebrew letter Tav,
18:51and which consequently
18:52gave rise to the letter T.
18:54Incredibly,
18:55this one,
18:56An or Anu,
18:57which divides into
18:58two clans,
18:59can also be interpreted
19:00as zero,
19:01the beginning,
19:02which is known
19:02through the one,
19:03and which therefore
19:04divides into the binary
19:06of yin and yang.
19:08I believe that as far
19:09as we have come
19:10in this video,
19:11it is enough to verify
19:12how extremely enchanting
19:13and complex
19:14this subject is.
19:16And this one
19:17that serves
19:17as a brief summary
19:18of all this complexity
19:20is the father
19:21of many documentaries.
19:23I think we all
19:24like to hear
19:25these stories involved
19:26in a tone of mystery,
19:28reverence,
19:29doubt,
19:29and admiration.
19:31And for the Sumerians,
19:33Anu for the Assyrians
19:34is the father
19:35of the Anunnaki,
19:37father of Enki
19:38and Enlil.
19:39He is the greatest
19:40of the gods
19:41of the first mythology
19:42in the history
19:43of the world.
19:44Some point to Anu
19:46as equivalent
19:46to Jupiter
19:47for the Romans,
19:48Zeus for the Greeks,
19:50and El
19:50for the Canaanites.
19:52Although in the
19:52Enuma Elish myth
19:54Anu is not the first,
19:56Anu is pointed out
19:57as being at the top
19:58of Sumerian mythology.
20:00George Smith
20:01in the book
20:02The Chaldean Account
20:03of Genesis in 1876
20:05explained that Anu
20:07is pictographically
20:08represented by a star
20:09and that he is
20:11the personification
20:11of the heavens itself,
20:14also represented
20:14by the Maltese cross.
20:17Mauro Biglino
20:18also clarifies
20:19that the Hebrew term
20:20Elyon
20:21refers to the same
20:22high highest term
20:24which also leads
20:25to Anu
20:26in the Mesopotamian
20:27clay tablets.
20:29In addition,
20:29the pictographic symbol
20:31offered to An
20:32is the Dingir symbol
20:33which means God.
20:35His name therefore
20:36is inscribed
20:37in all gods
20:38as the highest
20:39and greatest of all.
20:41And his symbol,
20:42the star,
20:43the cross,
20:44the heavens,
20:45the celestial abode
20:46is the representation
20:47that later,
20:49in history,
20:50became the letter T
20:51and signifies
20:52the heavens itself
20:54and the most high.
20:55But the analysis
20:57of mythology
20:58and ancient texts
21:00very clearly show
21:01that there is
21:02a great confusion
21:03between different
21:04ancient entities
21:05classified as gods.
21:07And no,
21:08we should not
21:09demonize them.
21:10The ancient deities
21:11are our fathers
21:12and our mothers
21:13and their marks
21:15are in our collective
21:16unconscious
21:16and are part of
21:17the archetypes
21:18of our life.
21:19I hope that you,
21:21despite all the doubts
21:22and studies
21:23that surround this subject,
21:24can find the divine
21:26within you.
21:29For my part,
21:30I have no doubts
21:31about the divine
21:32and the existence of God
21:34of a whole
21:34and the sacred.
21:36But I also have
21:37serious doubts
21:38that our religions,
21:39I believe most of them,
21:40position the divine
21:42too far,
21:43too high,
21:44at a height
21:44that we cannot reach.
21:46And besides this,
21:47they blame our humanity
21:48for terrible
21:49and sinful acts.
21:51Thus,
21:52separating the divine
21:53from man,
21:53humanity is sinful
21:55and unworthy,
21:56God is all-powerful
21:58and we should fear Him.
22:00This conception,
22:01which is in almost
22:02all religions,
22:03is the opposite
22:04of my thinking.
22:05To me,
22:06we are divine
22:07and the divine spark
22:08resides in all of us.
22:10My work here
22:11on this channel,
22:12I clearly perceive,
22:14is to bring my knowledge,
22:16research,
22:16and reflections
22:17to help you
22:18awaken your divine.
22:19It is like the myth
22:22of Prometheus
22:23stealing the fire
22:24from the gods.
22:25It is the light
22:26of knowledge
22:27that illuminates
22:28the darkness
22:29of ignorance.
22:30This is my thought,
22:31and you don't have
22:32to agree with it.
22:34Through this video,
22:35I would like to demonstrate
22:36to you
22:37the complexity
22:38of the subject,
22:39and I want you
22:40to also realize
22:41that I am not here
22:42on this channel,
22:43offering empty
22:44and fanciful documentaries.
22:46Many times I bring
22:49and will still bring
22:50Sitchin's vision,
22:51as it must be known.
22:52But beyond this,
22:53it is essential
22:54to bring comparative studies
22:56as I have been doing.
22:58I classified this video
23:00as the most important
23:01so far
23:02because I need
23:03to demonstrate to you
23:04the many different perspectives
23:05regarding all this.
23:08May peace,
23:10the forces of harmony
23:11and love
23:11of the infinite cosmic universe
23:13reach you.
23:14See you in the next video.
Recommended
1:21:06
1:08:52
31:02