- 2 days ago
You cannot escape the matrix unless you know you are in it. Join David Icke as he unravels the nature of the reality that we have been taught to believe is truth, through a lifetime of deep programming.You cannot escape the matrix unless you know you are in it. Join David Icke as he unravels the nature of the reality that we have been taught to believe is truth, through a lifetime of deep programming.
Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:00Hello, and welcome. I'm David Icke, and today's subject, the human mind game.
00:16When people think about a few controlling the many, the obvious question is, how would
00:31they do it? How can a few people control billions of people? Well, I've talked in another program
00:40in this series about the web structure, the hierarchical web structure, if you like,
00:47through which it is orchestrated. But its foundation is quite simple. It's programming
00:55the human mind to see the world in a way that suits the agenda of the few pulling the strings
01:03from the shadows. I've talked in another of these programs in the Gaia series about the
01:12big program, how human society is one big program, from cradle to grave, downloading a perception
01:21of reality to keep the population in servitude and in ignorance of what is going on, and
01:29indeed, ignorance of the nature of reality itself. But there are other means, other techniques
01:36of perception control that are used on us all the time, day after day after day. And one
01:46that I've been highlighting for decades is what I call problem-reaction-solution. See, if you've
01:55got an agenda and you want to keep from people the fact that that agenda exists, then you've
02:04got to make it seem that the events that are pushing your agenda on are random and not coordinated
02:13and not planned. So, say you want to change society in a particular way, say you want more
02:20centralization of power, or you want more censorship, more destruction of privacy, etc. If you come
02:28out and just say we're going to do that without any justification, well, you're going to get
02:34a reaction against that. Population's going to be saying, well, what do you mean you're
02:39going to do this? What do you mean you're going to take your privacy away? What do you mean you're
02:42going to take freedom of speech away? What are you talking about? You can't do that. So, what you do is you
02:50provide an excuse to do it, in which you're not actually saying, we want to do this, but saying,
02:57we have to do this in the light of what's happened. And this is where problem-reaction-solution comes in.
03:03So, stage one, you create a problem. It could be a terrorist attack, it could be a government collapse,
03:12it could be a run on a currency, an economic collapse, whatever. Anything that would give
03:19you the excuse to provide a solution to the problem, that would push the agenda on in the
03:26way you want. And what you're looking at, at stage two of problem-reaction-solution,
03:31is the reaction, the reaction from the public, which is basically, do something. You covertly create
03:39the problem, you blame someone else for it, or something else for it. And then, through a
03:45unquestioning, pathetic mainstream media, you tell the public the version of that problem that you want
03:53them to believe, i.e. not seeing who's really created it. And at stage two, you're looking for the reaction,
04:01a reaction of fear, of anger, of outrage. And basically, you want the public to say to you,
04:09do something. What are you going to do about it? And then, at stage three, those who've covertly
04:18created the problem, got that reaction, then offer the solutions to the problems they have
04:23themselves created. I'm just going to give you a quote from someone who played a part in one of
04:32these problem-reaction-solution scenarios. After the Second World War, there was, and people would be,
04:40I'm sure if they're new to this, shocked to hear this, a NATO operation called Operation Gladio. And
04:51NATO, according to the propaganda, is supposed to be there to protect the West from danger, terrorism,
05:03war. Doesn't, but it's supposed to. But what Operation Gladio was, was a campaign of terrorism
05:18to justify more power for government, for security agencies, more destruction of freedom and privacy,
05:31because the problem that the Operation Gladio operatives were providing
05:39were justifying solutions that would not have been justified otherwise. It operated in Italy,
05:47it operated around Europe. And this is a quote from a man called Vincenzo Vinciguera.
05:56And he was a Gladio operative who was involved in a terrorist bomb attack and was jailed. He's still in jail,
06:07the last time I heard. And during his hearings, he said this about Operation Gladio.
06:15You had to attack civilians. The people, women, children, innocent civilians, innocent people. Unknown
06:26people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force
06:34these people, the Italian public in this case, to turn to the state to ask for greater security. Do
06:41something. What are you going to do about it? This is the political logic that lies behind all the
06:49massacres, he said, and the bombings which remain unpunished because the state cannot convict itself
06:57or declare itself responsible for what happened.
07:01So, number one, when something happens in terms of a world event, whatever it may be, a terrorist attack
07:14or someone going crazy with a gun, look at what the solutions to that problem are in terms of what the
07:24authorities say must be done and question whether those solutions are good for human freedom or whether
07:33they benefit those that wish to advance human control. Now, a stable mate with this interconnected relationship
07:48of problem-reaction solution is another technique that I call the totalitarian tiptoe. It's another perceptual
07:57mind manipulation technique. And that works like this.
08:03You are at A and you know that your agenda is going to take the world to Z.
08:11But you know if you go from A to Z in too big a leap, the changes in society are going to be so
08:22fundamental that many people are going to look up from the game show and the sport
08:29and they're going to say, what's going on? Ethel, Ethel, what's going on here? What are they doing?
08:34What are they doing? So you don't go in big leaps. You use the totalitarian tiptoe. You go as fast as you can
08:45but not so fast that people start to see the pattern and realize that it's all connected.
08:51So you'll go from A to B and maybe go to D if you can get away with it and so on. But all the time
08:58you're moving towards this Z goal, which is total human control. And I have this phrase that I use,
09:09know the outcome and you'll see the journey. This is why it's crucial to uncover what the agenda's
09:21outcomes are planned to be. Because once you know that, you can see the stepping stones, the totalitarian
09:29tiptoe to those outcomes. If you don't know what the outcomes are planned to be, then all these events
09:38just appear random. Oh, something else has happened. Oh, that's happened. Oh, now that's happened.
09:44But there's no connection apparently between the two. But if you know what the outcome is planned to be,
09:51know the outcome, and you'll see the journey because you'll see that these events,
09:55through problem, reaction, solution, not least, are using the excuses to push us on to those outcomes.
10:06So what are some of those outcomes? Centralization of power. Anything you can use and create
10:18as an excuse to centralize power is benefiting your agenda. So we've had in the European example,
10:28this incessant movement to centralization of power in Europe. So it's now in the hands of a
10:34a few bureaucrats who've never seen a ballot box in their life. And these incessant stages of
10:42centralization have been justified by endless excuses, not least financial. So in the European
10:53example, what you do in the totalitarian tiptoe, this is what happened with the European Union.
10:58They said, oh, well, we need a free trade zone. Right? Okay, free trade zone. Okay, right. And of
11:07course, you're seeing these free trade zones appearing all over the world. Oh, it's not
11:13central control or anything. It's just good for jobs. Good for jobs. Yeah. Okay. So you start a free trade
11:21area called the European Economic Community, the EEC or the common market. And then you stay like that
11:30for a bit. And then you go, well, you know, it would be actually more efficient, you know, the market,
11:36more efficient if we had more kind of centralization of power to coordinate. And then it goes on and it
11:43goes on and it goes on. And through the decades of the European Union, at different points, there's been
11:50new excuses and new excuses and new excuses to centralize power even more. And now you have a
11:54situation where a few bureaucrats in Brussels are dictating literally the fine detail of people's lives,
12:03including things like the shape of bananas and stuff like that. I mean, fine detail. It's why so many
12:09people in Britain wanted and voted to get out.
12:13And then there's the centralization of money. That's another tiptoe. Because if you look at the
12:22way human society is structured today, what dictates human choice is money overwhelmingly.
12:32And then you think of what is a definition of freedom in the world as it's structured today?
12:42Definition of freedom, indeed in any situation, is basically choice.
12:49The more choices you have, the more freedom you have. The fewer choices you have, the less freedom you have.
13:00And in the way that the world is run and structured today, money overwhelmingly dictates how many choices you have.
13:11Thus, how much freedom you have.
13:14And if you can control money and hoard the money at the center, you are dictating choice.
13:26And as you hoard more money and pull more money to the center, you are sucking choice,
13:34choice, thus freedom, out of human society. And that totalitarian tiptoe is how we've reached a point
13:46where a handful of people, not the 1%, the very much less than 1%, now have equivalent wealth
13:57to the poorest half, half of the world population. And people call it capitalism. It's not.
14:09Not in the way that capitalism is perceived. It's cartelism. It's controlling through monopolies
14:18capitalism. At the center. And capitalism, if you like, is control of money in the way that people perceive it.
14:32And so the more money you can hoard at the center, the more control you have, because you control choice.
14:40And that's where we are now. But there's another, you know, I talked about in this series about the
14:49permanent government, and then the here today gone tomorrow political parties, which people argue
14:54about, but have no power, really, the permanent government has the power. So let's look at an example
15:00of that. People say that the right in politics is into capitalism, that side of economic
15:12structure and the way it's played out. And the left is about socialism. Oh, we've got choice.
15:21Not as many choices we've got of bagels, but we've got a choice. Oh, yeah, well, that's good,
15:26isn't it? But have we? You know, we're seeing in America now, this word socialism used more and more
15:35on the left in politics. We need socialism. But socialism is just another control structure of the same
15:47one percent or less than one percent. They control by hoarding money in the capitalist version of their
15:57control system. And through their socialism, Marxism, power to the people illusion, they control by the
16:11hierarchical structure of society. So if you look at what has happened in so-called communist countries,
16:20whether it's the Soviet Union or China or whatever, you have a structure which is sold as a people's
16:30revolution. But at the end of that revolution, the same elites in control, they may be different
16:38personnel, but the same networks are in control that were before. And if you look at how the control
16:47works in socialism, non-capitalist countries, as he's claimed, it's by structure. The structure of the
16:57society gives power to the few to dictate to everyone else, not least by controlling the military and law
17:04enforcement and imposing the will of the few in the communist example on the rest of the population.
17:11So whether it's that structure controlled by hierarchical society structure, or whether it's
17:17the capitalist structure of control of money, thus controlling choice, they're actually mirrors of each
17:23other. Because the outcome is the same control of the many by the few. And the other centralization
17:36of power that the totalitarian tiptoe and problem reaction solution brings is control of information.
17:44The fundamental control that dictates perception, which is formed from information received.
17:52And where this whole mind game is taking people, and I'm not being wise now, I've been writing this
18:01in my books for decades, is a structure that I call the Hunger Games Society. Obviously, you know,
18:11symbolized by the Hunger Games movie series. And this is how the Hunger Games Society would work.
18:19This Hunger Games Society is designed to be a pyramid, it is pyramid. At the top, you've got the less than one percent
18:31that control the wealth of the world, they control the corporations, they control
18:37the banking system, the pharmaceutical cartel, all the cartels, the oil cartel, all of them.
18:45And therefore, have the power to dictate to human society in general, even though there are tiny few
18:55compared with the population. At the bottom of this Hunger Games Society is supposed to be virtually everyone
19:04in a state of deprivation and dependency, for even survival, upon the decisions of the one percent.
19:20And in this structure of the Hunger Games Society, between the one percent less than one percent and
19:26the rest of the population, is designed to be a merciless police military state. In the end,
19:37the plan is to merge the police with the military. A merciless police military state
19:45to, A, impose the will of the few on the rest of the population, and to stop the population rebelling against the few.
19:57Now, if people just take a step back and look at society from that perspective,
20:10it's unfolding before us like by the minute.
20:16You have the hoarding of money, thus power, in the hands of fewer and fewer people.
20:29You have more and more people getting sucked into deprivation through homelessness and poverty.
20:37And you have the destruction of what people call in America the middle class, a bit different to
20:46the middle class as we describe it in Britain, but not a million miles apart.
20:54And the destruction of the middle class is pulling more and more people into deprivation and dependency.
21:03Now, this is not just happening in the United States. It's happening all over the Western world,
21:07all over the world. And it's the Hunger Games Society unfolding before our eyes.
21:15And unless we start to realize that this structure unfolding is not happening randomly, but by design,
21:27cold-calculated design, unless we start to understand that, it will just go on happening.
21:36But if we understand it's coordinated, we might have a chance of starting to pull back and
21:43pull back, push back, whatever, against this totalitarian tiptoe that is very quickly becoming
21:51becoming a totalitarian sprint. I'll give you an incredibly topical, certainly in recent decades,
22:03example of how this combination of problem reaction solution and the totalitarian tiptoe operate.
22:09You look at all the wars in the Middle East that America has been involved in and Britain has been
22:19involved in, we usually come behind, row, row, row, yes, master, in recent times.
22:27And each one has been given a different excuse. But they've all been A, coordinated and B, long planned.
22:43In the 1990s in the United States, an organization was created called the Project for the New American
22:48Century. It's been well written about and often well condemned by people that understand
22:55what its motivations are. And in September 2000, it produced a document which was demanding a series
23:06of regime changes in the Middle East using American troops. One of its phrases was that we need to fight
23:17multiple theater wars to regime change a series of countries.
23:22countries. Those countries are quite familiar now. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, North Korea,
23:37leading to regime change in China.
23:40This document was published in September 2000. And the people that wrote it and were behind it came
23:55to power either in government or in the background in government with a boy George Bush in January 2001.
24:05And what it said in this document is that if we're going to justify these regime changes and these multiple wars
24:17to the American people, what America needs, and this was the phrase, is a new Pearl Harbor.
24:28And the phrase in the document said, this transformation, all these regime changes they wanted,
24:39basically would be necessarily slow, quote,
24:43absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
24:52One year to the month after that document was published, nine months after the people that wrote it came to power with Bush,
25:06America had what Bush called at the time, the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century.
25:13As a result of that trigger, a series of wars began to unfold in the Middle East, starting with Afghanistan,
25:27and then going through that list in the document ever since, that was started by 9-11,
25:34the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century, and have been justified by different excuses.
25:39Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Saddam Hussein, send the boys in.
25:46Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, he's killing his own people, send the boys in.
25:53So is Assad now in Syria, send the boys in.
25:58All Iran is a threat to the world.
26:02And as I speak, they are desperate to send the boys in.
26:06Now, let's look at this from the political point of view.
26:11You know this thing called political choice?
26:13Remember that?
26:16George Bush was a Republican.
26:19And he was controlled by the neoconservative network.
26:24And so in Britain, we had a poodle called Tony Blair.
26:33And he was the leader, the prime minister, and leader of something called the Labour Party in Britain.
26:39The so-called left party, yeah.
26:42And they invade Iraq on a lie about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
26:49Why did they lie?
26:51Because invading Iraq, regime changing in Iraq was the agenda,
26:57and thus they didn't have a real excuse to do it, so they made one up.
27:01Then, Republican Bush and Labour Party Blair get replaced
27:10by Democrat Barack Obama and Conservative Party Prime Minister in Britain, David Cameron.
27:17They then oversee the invasion of Libya.
27:25So, Iraq, tick off list.
27:29Change regime, now we've gone from those parties to the opposition parties, okay, now tick that off.
27:35And then, in the same period of Obama and Cameron, they started the process of destabilisation in Syria,
27:47which has led to catastrophe there, and sending the boys in.
27:54Problem, reaction, solution.
27:55And then, along comes, after Obama, the maverick Donald Trump.
28:02He's going to drain the swamp.
28:03He's going to drain the swamp.
28:04He's been swimming in all his life.
28:06Oh, yes, I think I'd buy that.
28:09And the Trump regime is now, as I speak, at serious loggerheads with Iran.
28:18And wants a war with it, really, the truth be told.
28:21So, you have this list of countries for regime change, and no matter who comes and goes in politics,
28:29whatever kind of party or colour, the same list, tick, tick, tick.
28:34That's how it works.
28:35Why?
28:36Because the politicians are here today, gone tomorrow.
28:40The permanent government is dictating events.
28:45Why do we have so many wars?
28:47Why do we have so many wars?
28:48Do you know many people in your life that want a war?
28:52I don't meet many people that want a war, but we keep having them.
28:57Through human history, war, war, war, war.
28:58Well, if you want to change society,
29:06nationally or globally,
29:08in a way that is irreversible, it will never be the same again.
29:14Nothing does that more comprehensively than a war.
29:19After a war, that society is never the same again.
29:23And when you have an agenda that's pushing the world in a certain direction,
29:29you have to keep destroying the status quo so you can move the world further in the direction you want it to go.
29:36And nothing destroys status quos more comprehensively than wars.
29:40And it's something I call creative destruction.
29:45You have a status quo.
29:47You have a war.
29:48You destroy the status quo.
29:50The world moves further on down your road.
29:53You have another war.
29:54Take the first world war, second world war as an example.
29:57And you destroy the new status quo.
30:00The world moves on again.
30:01And that's what's happening.
30:03And that's why there's always money for war.
30:09When is the last time you heard any political leader say,
30:13we can't go to war, we can't afford it?
30:16No.
30:17War?
30:17Money, no object.
30:18Homeless people?
30:19Oh, can't afford that.
30:20We can't afford this.
30:21We can't afford that.
30:22War?
30:23How much do you want?
30:25This is why.
30:27And if we're going to get streetwise to this,
30:29we need to keep asking all the time when we're presented with a world event
30:35and an official explanation for it,
30:38who benefits?
30:40Who benefits from me believing this version of events that I'm being given?
30:47And if it is benefiting anyone that wants to take the world
30:52further towards centralization of power, destruction of freedom,
30:55destruction of privacy, destruction of choice,
31:01then red flags should wave and red flashing lights should go off everywhere.
31:08Of course, it's almost certainly a scam.
31:13We need to stop accepting explanations from officialdom,
31:17in whatever form they may take, from whatever political direction,
31:20doesn't matter at all the same, and start to question everything.
31:26And that's the point.
31:26There's a Russian TV station called RT, and it has this motto,
31:31question more, which is better than not questioning at all.
31:36But it's not enough.
31:39We don't need to question more.
31:41We need to question everything.
31:46See you next time.
31:50.
31:52.
31:54.
31:56.
31:58.
32:00.
32:02.
32:04.
32:06.
32:08.
32:10.
32:12.
32:14.
32:16.
Recommended
29:30
|
Up next
29:12
28:46
28:54
32:06
27:20
0:46
2:11