Anatomía de un asesinato: El informe de la autopsia (James Stewart HD Clip)

Página12

Ver Anatomía de un asesinato: El informe de la autopsia (James Stewart HD Clip) - Página12 en Dailymotion

Transcript

00:00El cuerpo de Quill tenía cinco golpeados de golpeado.

00:04Uno de los bolos había pasado en el corazón.

00:07La muerte, en mi opinión, fue casi instantáneos

00:11y fue directamente causado por este golpe.

00:13Dr. Rashid, ¿puedo tener tu reporte?

00:16Sí, sí.

00:17Puedo que este reporte sea marcado People's Exhibit 1,

00:20para identificar.

00:21Así es, y marcó.

00:23El people handen la defensa a copy de la reporte.

00:26El counsel may cross-examine.

00:29Dr. Rashid, ¿your primary purpose was to ascertain the cause of death, was it not?

00:34Yes.

00:35And yet I read in your report here that you checked to determine

00:39whether spermatogenesis was occurring in the body of the deceased at the time of death.

00:43Objection, Your Honor.

00:45The people called this witness only to show the cause of death.

00:48Your Honor, the entire report was offered as evidence

00:51and the report contains this information about spermatogenesis.

00:54Overall, Mr. Ludwig, the witness may answer.

00:57Yes, I made that examination on the deceased.

01:01Now, would you tell the court your findings?

01:04Spermatogenesis was occurring at the time of death.

01:07In other words, the deceased in life was not sterile.

01:10He could produce children.

01:12That is correct.

01:13Now, Doctor, if a woman says that she has had intercourse with a certain man

01:18and the man is proved fertile even though no evidence is found in the woman's body,

01:22could a lawyer say, a prosecuting attorney,

01:25could he use this as evidence that the woman is lying?

01:28Your Honor, I object to this line of questioning.

01:33We are not concerned here with whether or not there have been relations between a man and a woman?

01:38Your Honor, as long as an examination for spermatogenesis has been made,

01:41at least we are entitled to know why.

01:43Overruled.

01:44You may answer.

01:45Yes, prosecution could use that, though it certainly would not be conclusive that she was lying.

01:51Why not?

01:52There could be several reasons why the test on her was negative.

01:56The use of a contraceptive or possibly there was no completion on the part of the man.

02:03Now, in this post-mortem, were you also asked to determine whether or not the deceased had reached a sexual climax shortly before his death?

02:10No, sir.

02:11Could you have made such a determination?

02:13Oh, yes.

02:14So, you were only asked to make such examination that might be useful to the prosecution, none that might help the defense.

02:20I object, Your Honor. The question is argumentative.

02:24Counsel for the defense is trying to impugn the intent of the representatives of the people.

02:29Mr. Bigler, you must be aware that the question is improper.

02:32I withdraw the question, Your Honor, and apologize.

02:35The question and answer will be stricken, and the jury will disregard both the question and the answer.

02:42That's all the questions I have.

02:44No redirect.

02:45The people now call Lloyd Burke.

02:48Will the witness step forward, please?

02:54How can a jury disregard what it's already heard?

02:58They can.

02:59You do solemnly swear with the testimony you shall give in this guy...

03:02They can.

03:03...

03:18...

03:22...

03:23...

Categoría

Transcripción

Recomendada