00:00Sure, I think you could, I'd say go out, the IC should be able to help you answer that question.
00:06They look at a variety, as the Secretary has alluded to, we look at a variety of things.
00:10I don't do that. They do all different sources of intel, which I'd refer you to them to get clarity on the instance.
00:20So again, I go back to the IC, whether it's Director Radcliffe or Odi and I, Gabbard, I read the statements at the beginning.
00:25They're the ones aggregating the intelligence, and they're saying nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over a number of years.
00:32Facilities were destroyed. What do we got right here?
00:37Sir, you cited a body of credible intelligence to suggest the damage at Fort O and other places.
00:45What is that referring to, and when can we say that?
00:46I was reading from the CIA Director's Statement, which came out last night.
00:50CIA, again, they do the BDA, they do the assessment.
00:55CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates, it also goes on to say,
00:59new intelligence from historically reliable and accurate sources and methods.
01:04Now, you can imagine, you can imagine the CIA Director's going to be very careful about how he articulates things of that sensitivity.
01:12Classified, secret, top secret, compartmentalized.
01:14He's going to know things that you're not going to know, that the press isn't going to know,
01:18and he's reflecting that the sources he's seeing are highly credible.
01:23They've given credible intelligence.
01:26They or those processes have given credible intelligence in the past, and that's what he's basing it on.
