Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • yesterday
Read The Russia Collusion Memos President Trump Declassified And Kash Patel Gave To Congress

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/read-declassified-russia-collusion-documents-turned-over

FBI Director Kash Patel turned the hundreds of pages of documents over turned to Congress following President Trump's order declassifying the materials

Nearly 700 pages of declassified records from the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation into now-discredited claims of the 2016 Trump campaign's collusion with Russia were turned over to Congress by the FBI this week and obtained Thursday exclusively by Just the News.

You can read the declassified documents below, reorganized by subject for easy access and listed alphabetically.
.
#News #Politics #Trump 47 #Juan O Savin #Nino #Jennifer Mac #Michael Jaco #Education #Republican #USAID #Documentary #

Category

πŸ—ž
News
Transcript
00:00Some big breaking news. You're going to get it here first because you're Real America's Voice
00:04fans and you watch just the news. Earlier today, the FBI under Kash Patel turned over to Congress
00:11700 pages of Crossfire Hurricane documents, unredacted and declassified. These are the
00:17documents President Trump intended to be released in January 2021, but the FBI scooped them up,
00:23kept them from going to public release. We sued, tried to fight for them. Donald Trump came back
00:28into office and he released them a second time. And today they got to Congress and then they ended
00:32up in the hands of just the news. And in just an hour, you're going to see our first story. I'm
00:37going to give you a time table, 7 p.m. Our first story is going to come out on just the news.com
00:41at 8 p.m. We're going to give all the documents one by one and post them onto the website. So you
00:47have a sort of Wikipedia, Wikimedia wiki to go look through the documents yourself. You find some good
00:52stories, let us know at just the news and we'll go pursue them. We're going to tell you about one
00:57right now. Perhaps the most important thing in the documents that we found early on, one of the
01:02two informants that were used by the FBI to spy or to snitch on Donald Trump in his campaign was
01:09named Stefan Halper. He's not the most famous. Christopher Steele, the guy that wrote the
01:12dossier, he's the most famous. But Stefan Halper was used quite a bit by the FBI. In fact, he was used
01:18for three decades by the FBI. And it turns out snitching is a pretty lucrative profession. He got paid
01:23nearly $1.2 million by the FBI to be a confidential human source from the early 1990s to 2017. The last
01:33of those payments, $70,000 for his work snitching on the Trump campaign and the crossfire hurricane
01:39early investigation. Now, why? What are we going to tell you about it? It turns out that he got that
01:44money and he kept being used by the FBI and he kept being validated as reliable, even though the FBI
01:50detected he had given them an inaccurate, false or disprovable story. What is it? He's the guy
01:55that told the FBI that Mike Flynn, soon to be Donald Trump's national security advisor in the fall of
02:012016, back in 2014, had left a conference, an overseas conference while he was a three-star general and the
02:08head of the Defense Intelligence Agency alone with a Russian woman. Now, the FBI determined that was
02:14implausible and inaccurate. In fact, President Mike Flynn's own security detail would never have left
02:20him alone. He was a three-star general and the head of the Intelligence Agency. He was always guarded by
02:26people. They determined it was unreliable, not true, inaccurate, not plausible, but guess what? They kept
02:33using him to keep digging further and further into people like George Papadopoulos and Carter Page and others. We're going to get
02:39all this up for you to read. We want your own eyes on it. You look at it, you see it at justinnews.com, 7 p.m.
02:45Once we get off the show, the first story will be up. There'll be all the documents listed in
02:49chronological order or by titles. You can go do your own sleuthing tonight. We give you a homework assignment. All right, Mr. Chairman,
02:55the evolution of this story has been incredible and we are now finally getting to the place. Thanks to folks like you and
03:00John Solomon, we're finally getting to the place where people realize what went haywire, what was true and not true.
03:06The Democrats on your committee, as you guys are examining these documents and seeking out
03:11subpoenaing documents, are you finding that they are as willing as you are to take a good look and
03:18maybe have a little bit of come to Jesus moments where they say, man, we didn't realize this?
03:24We have not seen that yet. You can always hope that's the case. But I always like to start with,
03:32remember the basics here. You had a presidential campaign, the Clinton campaign,
03:38who had hired a law firm. The law firm then went and hired Fusion GPS, a public relations firm,
03:45who then went and hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele, who then went out and put together a false
03:53document, who then the FBI, Jim Comey, used the false document as a basis to get warrants to go
03:59spy on President Trump's campaign. That, to my knowledge, has never happened in American history,
04:04but it did. And it was all driven by money from the other campaign and lies to run the opposing campaign,
04:14you know, to run a spy operation on the opposing campaign. And now what we have in this release is we
04:20have some of the 302s. We have the 1023s. The 302s are where the Mueller FBI, though,
04:25during the Mueller investigation, the special counsel interviewed Christopher Steele. So we
04:29can look exactly what was said there. Even though we've gotten a lot of that information in the
04:33Mueller report and everything else, you actually have the 302. And then you have the 1023s where
04:37Steele's handler was talking with Steele and reporting that information, which we know was garbage,
04:44but you actually have those documents. So we think that's something new that we've gotten
04:49here in this release from from from Director Patel.
04:53Sir, you're working on a continuing pattern of this. So in the 16, a Democratic campaign,
04:5860 FBI and their opponent, Donald Trump in 2021. It's the White House, the Joe Biden's White House,
05:04his general counsel's office that's sticking the FBI and even grabbing President Trump's old phone
05:09and turning it over with executive privilege claims and others notwithstanding to the FBI to
05:15stick it on him again. It seems like the cycle just kept going.
05:18Yeah, it did. I mean, this is lawfare. This is this is politics jumping into our justice system,
05:24which is not supposed to happen. I mean, and of course, that could sort of culminate then the
05:28raid on his home. And then the four what for at least from the two indictments from Jack Smith.
05:34And I think you almost have to lump in the even though their state cases, the Alvin Bragg and
05:39Fannie Willis, it's all part of this effort. We know Nathan Wade was coming here and talking with
05:43people in Washington related to the investigation there in Fulton County, Georgia. So, yeah, it's all
05:51part of this lawfare using using the law to go against your political opponents. But the sort of
05:58start of it was exactly what you uncovered way back when was when the Clinton campaign,
06:03Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, then Christopher Steele putting together the dossier.
06:10Yeah, it's so important. And, you know, Peter and the great team at JAA, they really found the
06:15first original story. Democrats, they say they're all against Russia, Russia, Russia. But in 2009,
06:20they were the Russia lovers. They were resetting. They were taking $500,000 speech fees. They had
06:27John Podesta's company getting Russian backing. Everybody was making out great with Russia until
06:32it invaded Ukraine. If it weren't for GAI and Peter Schweitzer, we probably wouldn't have known
06:37that part of the story. We wouldn't know that part of the story. We wouldn't know the words like
06:42Skolkovo, which is basically Russia's effort to create their own Silicon Valley, which, as you noted,
06:48paid companies that brought on John Podesta. And so, ultimately, what happened is this reporting
06:54was so far-reaching. And, you know, I traveled to Haiti as part of the research team for Clinton
07:00Cash and talked about how Hillary's brother made money off of a Haitian gold mine. I mean,
07:04the Clintons were so shameless, John. Just, I mean, making money in Haiti and in Russia,
07:08only the Clintons have that far-reaching tentacles of, like, basically a global ATM. But they realized,
07:15hey, we have a real problem. And so, what they did is they fabricated, they used their campaign
07:20attorney, Mark Elias, who is his own walking scandal machine. And, you know, they hired Fusion GPS and
07:26they fabricate this whole Russian narrative. And then that Russian narrative was used to attempt
07:32to deny Donald Trump the 2016 election. And then, of course, successfully was used to deny him the 2020
07:38election because, as we now know, thanks to the reporting about an FBI gag order, you know, they said,
07:43oh, this is Russian disinformation. So, this Russian story has stuck with Trump campaign,
07:48but because of your work and the work that we've done here at the Government Accountability Institute,
07:51we now know is totally fabricated.
07:52Erika, I want to ask you, we're talking at the top of the show about Stefan Halper and his role as
07:58a confidential human source and what certainly appears to be either being egregiously wrong or lying
08:05about General Flynn. What motivation would the FBI have to keep someone like that on the payroll,
08:12to continue using them to glean information, to glean sourcing from investigations? Why would
08:19they keep someone like that?
08:21Yeah, I think three letters, TDS, and it's Trump derangement syndrome. Clearly,
08:26it doesn't matter if the information is correct. I mean, what is the ultimate story and the lesson
08:30from the Russiagate fiasco? It doesn't matter if the information is true, if we like the meaning that
08:36it imparts and we like the impact it has politically. So, the fact that this guy is making 1.8 million
08:42dollars, even though he's clearly not telling the truth, I mean, look at some of the information we
08:46now know because of the work that's been done in the Hunter Biden investigation. They overlooked
08:50whistleblowers and testimony. People are saying, look, I was on the phone with Hunter Biden and
08:55Ukrainian executives who said Joe Biden wanted to be bribed and that information was overlooked.
09:00Meanwhile, people like this are straight taking cash from U.S. intelligence officials,
09:06despite a track record of dishonesty or inaccuracy at best. It just speaks to how deep-seated the
09:13deep-state effort to block a Trump presidency and candidacy was.
09:16Yeah, such a great point. And it also shows how lucrative that snitching for the government,
09:20being a confidential human source or informant, as we call them, can be. 1.2 million dollars going
09:25back to 1991. 70 or 80 grand just to do some conversations for the FBI in 2016 and 17 related
09:33to Russia collusion. You get this sense that they know there was a problem with Stefan Halpert's
09:39story allegation. You might have been wrong, might not have been. But normally that becomes a
09:43reliability issue. Normally there's a process called the validation process that goes back and
09:48decides, should we keep using a guy like this? That requires the input that you know that he didn't
09:53tell an accurate story. But when you go through the validation reports that have been released
09:57here, Eric, there's no mention of the fact that he had a problem with the story and they just keep
10:01passing him down the line for more informing. Seems like confidential human sources are still a weak
10:07spot for the FBI. Yeah, I guess the information is only as good as the accuracy of the people that are
10:14relaying it. No, you're absolutely right. This is a big problem for the FBI. It's one of the reasons
10:18why I think your book with Seamus was so important. And I think that, look, we've now seen subsequent
10:24emails come out and say you have FBI officials, as you well know, say, look, we'll do anything to
10:29essentially stop Donald Trump. We excuse behavior as long as we deem the political impact to be
10:35correct. Remember, just going back to Clinton Cash for a second, the reporting we had on Hillary
10:40Clinton's relationship with Russia wasn't just stuff that was in that book. That information was given to
10:45the New York Times, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, ABC News. Those are legitimate mainstream outlets,
10:52and they all built upon it and independently reported on it. And then only after Donald
10:57Trump was elected, partly because of the information in Clinton Cash, did all of those mainstream news
11:02outlets essentially do a public mea culpa, a gnashing of teeth, a wearing of sackcloth and said,
11:08I can't believe we were used by this duplicitous government accountability institute,
11:13even though the information that we reported was absolutely correct, unlike the information of
11:17these confidential informants. But because the net effect of the information was undesirable
11:23politically, we were shunned. Meanwhile, fraudulent FBI informants are elevated. Just speaks to how
11:30broken the economy from an information and political standpoint is in our intelligence agencies.
11:35So, let's do a lot of studies.

Recommended