Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 02/06/2025
We’re asking people around Cardiff if they think the expansion of the Senedd to include 96 members from next years election will be a net good for Wales, or if paying an extra 36 politicians wages is a waste of money we don’t have.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00What are you doing?
00:04Our Senedd controls so many parts of our lives, from the NHS to schools and even the fishing and farming industries.
00:10It all falls under the responsibility of our politicians in Cardiff Bay.
00:13And in 12 months' time, 36 more people will hold that responsibility
00:17as the Senedd undertakes one of the biggest overhauls in Welsh political history
00:21since the Senedd first sat over a quarter of a century ago.
00:25The decision to increase the number of members from the current 60 up to 96 has been controversial
00:30and on the face of it, you can't blame people for asking why we need to be paying 36 more politicians' wages.
00:37People in Cardiff seem to see the positive side, though,
00:40and they say that with more people comes more different voices and perspectives
00:44and they're hopeful the new expanded Senedd will be a force for good in Wales.
00:49I think so, and in a way, I think if one party was to suggest all of the ideas,
00:54perhaps more different parties, a wider variety of different parties,
00:58could come towards a better decision for the population
01:01instead of just going with a party with only a specific certain point of view.
01:06So definitely that increase in variety and just having more people to give an opinion on would be great, to be honest.
01:15Because most people are looking to see change as well, so I think expanding it would have more views
01:21that are represented in the Senedd, which I think is a good thing.
01:25Depends on who they're bringing in within the politicians because, in my opinion,
01:30I basically think that the politicians are very biased on one side.
01:33If you bring in people from different parties so that you can have a fair vote, I think that would make sense.
01:39It's important that we have a lot of different types of opinions.
01:42I think the more people you get involved, I think the more opinions are brought to the table,
01:45the more backgrounds are involved in it.
01:47So I know again, 60, 90, in my opinion, it's not too much of a leap.
01:51It's one third of an increase, but I think the more opinions you have on board,
01:55the more, I think, different things to take into account.
01:57So I think, for me personally, I think if they have the passion to do it and they want to do it,
02:01and they think they can better the place, I think, you know,
02:03it's nice to see fresh faces get involved and do their thing, basically, yeah.
02:07Obviously, it's hard to ignore the additional costs of three dozen politicians' wages
02:11and the cost of physically expanding this building of the Senate itself.
02:15But is it worth it?
02:17Not particularly. I didn't vote for devolution.
02:19And as far as the Senate is concerned, I think you're asking the wrong person.
02:24I'm somewhat biased, to put it that way.
02:26I don't particularly see a great benefit from it.
02:31There are certain things I must admit, transport for Wales Metro, things like that.
02:35I don't necessarily think it's like, oh, we employ more politicians
02:39and we're taking away nurses.
02:40I think the people have the skills, they have the skills and they want to go for it.
02:44I think, don't get me wrong, there's obviously problems with NHS funding and cuts
02:47and, you know, there probably does need to be a few more people injected into the vast side of things.
02:51But I don't think it's a sense of, you know, add more here, take away here.
02:55I don't think it works like that personally.
02:57I don't think it works like that personally.
02:58.

Recommended