CBI करेगी विमल नेगी मौत मामले की जांच...हाईकोर्ट का आदेश, जानें इस मामले में कब क्या हुआ

ETVBHARAT

विमल नेगी मौत मामले की जांच अब सीबीआई करेगी. हिमाचल हाईकोर्ट ने विमल नेगी के परिवार की याचिका पर ये फैसला सुनाया है.

Transcript

00:00foreign

00:14foreign

00:28and according to the post-sumarten report,

00:57which is the death of five days before he was able to do this.

01:00So, if the death of 10-14 or 13 or 14,

01:04this situation has no investigation.

01:07And the prison government has said that this is the state.

01:12And the possibility of foul play can be ruled out.

01:16So, the SIT, the S.P. Shmala, who worked for this situation,

01:18has no investigation.

01:22Then he said that the corruption angle was made.

01:25He also spoke about the solar project, and he also spoke about the concession.

01:32SIT had done nothing and not investigated the matter.

01:36ACS's report has been proved,

01:38it has been proven that they were the superior officers,

01:43whose name is FIR, their conduct was not fair.

01:47ACS's report has been inducted in their report.

01:51ACS's report has not seen the light of the day,

01:55for the reasons best known to the state.

01:57The state has sent the report to AG,

01:59AG has sent the report to the government,

02:02but until date they were not placing them in the public domain.

02:07ACS's report has been released by the court.

02:13The court has said that ACS's report has not taken into consideration,

02:19and even I.O. SIT has also reported that they did not copy muscle,

02:24and for the reason best known to them,

02:28so that seems that the investigation is not fair.

02:31DGP's affidavit status report has been given,

02:34which they have given their points,

02:37which clearly indicates that the investigation is not fair,

02:42and in case it is allowed to continue in the hands of the present SIT,

02:46there may not be a fair investigation in the matter.

02:50We have also said that despite the fact that from the very beginning,

02:54from the first day,

02:55family is saying that we are not satisfied with the investigation,

02:59even the government is time and again making a statement,

03:02that the government is satisfied with the investigation,

03:06which was wrong, that was incorrect,

03:08and then there was a plea by the family,

03:14that in case the investigation goes on by the present SIT,

03:17the matter will not be fairly investigated.

03:20So, because the matter was fairly independently and transparently investigated,

03:25ultimately the court concurred with us,

03:27and agreed with our submissions,

03:29that it is a good case,

03:31which is to be transferred to the CDI.

03:34Now, court has asked SIT for which way?

03:38Yes, court has asked SIT for the very serious questions,

03:42and the full copy of the judgment will be found,

03:47but the verbally heard the court has asked point-wise,

03:50very precise,

03:52the question has asked that SIT is not investigating in a matter,

03:58in a fair manner,

03:59except that they are conducting investigation on the mental,

04:04comes with medical history.

04:06Medical history.

04:08Sir, court also has said that

04:09that it should not be that the CDI's investigation

04:12for the investigation of the core of the CDI's investigation,

04:15but other things,

04:16what do you think when you see the complete investigation of the project?

04:19I really feel the result,

04:20that this outbreak has become a current scandal,

04:23and the cine's article will be provided to the public,

04:25why the case is immediately in the lawsuit?

04:26and now the matter will be fairly investigated by the CDS.

04:30The pressure of the CDS has also been in front of the CDS.

04:33The pressure of the CDS has also been in front of the CDS.

04:37The face of it, when the government has a report that was not below the rank of the CDS,

04:42the report of the CDS has not been in front of the CDS.

04:46So, they have no reason to hold the CDS in front of the CDS.

04:52There was no reason to withhold it.

04:5483 years old, their brothers, their brothers, our whole family,

04:57our two months, we have no eyes closed.

05:00We have no reason to hold the CDS.

05:03And today, Mania Niyalya has made our decision.

05:07We are very interested in this.

05:09And we also encourage the investigation agency,

05:12where the case has been given,

05:14Kendriya agency.

05:16We have full confidence that we will get the CDS.

05:19What do you think the CDS wanted to save the CDS?

05:23What do you think the CDS wanted to save the CDS?

05:26You can see, the first day, we have tried to save the CDS.

05:29We were not listening to it.

05:31You can see, the pen drive, where did you get the CDS?

05:33And the state forensics lab is also said.

05:36When we were back in the high court,

05:38we didn't know how to get the CDS.

05:40This is the first day,

05:42the CDS, the CDS, the CDS, the CDS, and the CDS.

05:47It's clear that the CDS are getting the CDS with them.

05:51They are saving them.

Category

Transcript

Recommended