Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/13/2025
During remarks on the Senate floor Tuesday, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) blocked a bill that would require the Senate Legal Counsel to file a lawsuit to enforce the Emoluments Clause as President Trump appears poised to accept a $400 million gifted 747 plane from the Qatari Royal Family.
Transcript
00:00Senator from Connecticut. Mr. President, a lot of Americans are watching this spectacle,
00:08a $400 million gift from Qatar, which President Trump has called a palace in the sky.
00:20It would be for his personal use now and then afterward when he is a private citizen.
00:30And they're wondering, isn't there a law that prevents it?
00:36Isn't there some statute that stops this corruption, a gift to the president from a foreign power that makes him beholden for his personal benefit and use?
00:52And the answer to the American people is, yes, there is a law. In fact, it's in the Constitution.
00:57It's a specific clause. It's called the Foreign Emoluments Clause that states, quote,
01:05no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of Congress,
01:12accept of any present emolument office or title of any kind whatsoever from any king, prince, or foreign state.
01:21And the reason for this clause, which was written by the founders centuries ago, is so powerfully shown today.
01:36At the beginning of our nation, we were a small country, potentially influenced by big foreign powers, England, France.
01:46Founders were concerned that our presidents or other officials could be bought, could be influenced, could be pressured by those foreign powers.
01:58So they specifically wrote into the statutes a measure that protected our small nation then.
02:06It applies equally now.
02:09In fact, now, it's even more a protection of our national security.
02:17This plane is emblematic of a core metastasizing corruption,
02:26an economic cancer that has infected the White House.
02:30But it is also emblematic of a national security threat from nations who would buy our president.
02:40Maybe not signed, sealed, and delivered, but exert undue influence.
02:48And in fact, the national security threat is even greater from this plane,
02:52which would have to be taken apart at huge expense to American taxpayers,
02:57literally taken apart down to its shell.
03:01As a member of the Armed Services Committee,
03:04I can tell you, Mr. President,
03:06that there are foreign powers all over the world
03:09who would like nothing better than a Qatar plane
03:12to be carrying the president of the United States,
03:15potentially bugged, infiltrated,
03:18by systems that could be hacked by them,
03:23not just by Qatar or other Mideast nations.
03:27It is a threat to our national security
03:30to have the president of the United States riding in this plane
03:34unless it is, in effect, taken apart
03:37and put back together
03:39with the systems and the safeguards
03:42that are included on Air Force One.
03:47This blatantly corrupt act shows that the president is just in it for himself.
03:58In fact, that kind of equipping of the plane
04:01will take billions of dollars of taxpayer money
04:04and years of work
04:06to bring this aircraft up to the requirements,
04:10the minimal requirements,
04:11of Air Force One,
04:14ready in time for the president to use it
04:17after he leaves office.
04:20And President Trump won't even pay the transfer fees.
04:23The reports that the United States Air Force
04:27will pay all the costs related to retrofitting
04:31and transferring this plane to the United States,
04:34even to the presidential library,
04:36show the blatant corruption here.
04:41Accepting the plane is bad enough.
04:42But foisting on taxpayers
04:46the expense of retrofitting it
04:49and updating it
04:51and then transferring it to his foundation
04:54is an insult to every American.
04:58And my colleagues on the other side of the aisle
05:02would like to say it is only Democrats
05:06who are objecting,
05:08but in fact,
05:10MAGA media personalities strongly agree.
05:13One described the planned gift
05:15of this plane as a quote-unquote bribe.
05:19Pretty right on.
05:21Another called it indefensible.
05:24Also right.
05:26Even Laura Loomer opposes this gift.
05:29She described this incident
05:31as a stain on the Trump administration.
05:35I never thought I would say
05:38that she's right, too.
05:42But it is a stain
05:43not on the Trump administration alone.
05:47It's a stain on America.
05:49It's a stain on our national honor.
05:52It's a stain on the integrity
05:55of the greatest country
05:56in the history of the world.
05:59Foreign governments have figured out
06:00how to get to Donald Trump.
06:02It's through his wallet.
06:04his vanity
06:05and his bank account.
06:10Not just this palace in the sky.
06:14The Qatari government
06:15has signed a $5.5 billion deal
06:20with the Trump organization
06:21to build a luxury golf resort in Qatar
06:26complete with Trump-branded
06:28beachside villas
06:29and an 18-hole golf course.
06:32And it's not just Qatar.
06:36President Trump has also pursued
06:38new business deals
06:38with the UAE, Saudi Arabia,
06:40and others,
06:42including Serbia.
06:44On May 1,
06:46Trump's cryptocurrency firm
06:48announced
06:49that an investment fund
06:51backed by the United Arab Emirates
06:55would be using
06:56President Trump's digital coins
06:58to complete a $2 billion
07:00transaction.
07:03Through this deal,
07:05President Trump and his family
07:06stand to gain
07:07hundreds of millions of dollars
07:09from a foreign state.
07:12And their cryptocurrency empire,
07:15if I can use that term loosely,
07:19which includes
07:19World Liberty Financial,
07:21as well as their
07:23meme coin Trump,
07:26is making hundreds of billions,
07:29millions of dollars.
07:31Literally hundreds of millions of dollars,
07:33for example,
07:33through the transfer fee
07:34involved in fight, fight, fight.
07:37That's the reason that
07:40the permanent subcommittee
07:42on investigation
07:43minority staff
07:45that I
07:45head
07:46has written
07:47asking for more facts
07:48from fight, fight, fight
07:50and World Liberty Financial.
07:53But this crypto corruption
07:55is, again,
07:57just one more
07:58of the ongoing
08:00corrupt
08:02con games
08:04that
08:05President Trump
08:06has helmed.
08:08Live Golf,
08:09backed by the Saudi government,
08:10will host a tournament
08:11at Trump
08:12National Dural Resort
08:14later this year.
08:15And the Trump organization
08:16has announced
08:17new real estate developments
08:18on government-owned land
08:20in Serbia
08:21and
08:22elsewhere.
08:24Now, Mr. President,
08:25there's
08:25a kind of fundamental principle here.
08:28And it goes back
08:29to the founders.
08:32The American president
08:33is supposed to work
08:33for the American people,
08:35not for his own enrichment.
08:38In foreign policy
08:40and on the international stage,
08:42he's supposed to represent
08:43the United States of America,
08:46not his own business interests
08:48or any foreign state
08:50or any business
08:51privately.
08:54And
08:54that's what
08:56the Emoluments Clause
08:58is meant
08:59to guarantee.
09:00It protects
09:01our national security
09:03as well as
09:04the integrity
09:05of our
09:07political system.
09:09When
09:10President Trump
09:10brazenly
09:12and
09:12shamefully
09:13flouts
09:14the constitutional
09:16protections
09:17implemented by the founders
09:18to avoid
09:19to avoid
09:20improper
09:21influence,
09:23he
09:24violates
09:25one of the
09:26core
09:26principles
09:27of our
09:28Constitution.
09:31He's never
09:32come to Congress
09:33asking for any
09:34permission
09:35for any of these
09:36deals,
09:36that's for sure.
09:38His willingness
09:39to use the privileges
09:40of his office
09:41to enrich himself
09:42and his family
09:43seems to know
09:44no bounds.
09:45Congress
09:46simply
09:48cannot
09:49stand aside
09:50because Congress
09:51is the one
09:52who has to
09:53enforce
09:54the Emoluments Clause.
09:55I know.
09:56I went to court
09:58during the first
09:59Trump term.
10:01I
10:02organized
10:03many of my
10:05colleagues
10:06in both the House
10:07and the Senate
10:07to ask the courts
10:09to enforce
10:10the Emoluments Clause
10:12and we won
10:12in the District
10:13Court.
10:14Our case
10:15failed in the
10:16Court of Appeals
10:17because of
10:17lack of
10:18standing.
10:20That is to say
10:21we lacked
10:23authorization,
10:24specific
10:25permission
10:26from
10:28the House
10:29or the Senate
10:30to go forward.
10:33There were
10:33214
10:34other members
10:35of Congress
10:35who joined
10:36in my lawsuit
10:37to enforce
10:38this clause.
10:39there is
10:41no other
10:42party
10:43that is
10:44an enforcer
10:46for this clause
10:47and if the
10:49President refuses
10:50to seek our
10:51approval
10:51for acceptance
10:53of these
10:53foreign benefits
10:54we have no
10:55choice but to
10:55go to court
10:56again.
10:58I
10:59am hopeful
11:00that my
11:02Republican
11:03colleagues
11:03will join me
11:04in saying
11:05well we may be
11:07wrong about
11:08all this
11:08corruption
11:09about
11:10what Blumenthal
11:12is saying
11:13about the
11:13violation of
11:13the Foreign
11:14Emoluments
11:14Clause
11:14but let's
11:15let a
11:16court decide.
11:18Let's bring
11:19it to
11:20a judge
11:22on the
11:23federal court
11:24because in
11:25my view
11:26this
11:27violation
11:27of law
11:28is so
11:29abjectly
11:30and obviously
11:31clear
11:31it demands
11:34an answer
11:34from the
11:35courts.
11:36accordingly
11:38in a moment
11:40I'll ask
11:40for unanimous
11:41consent
11:42to pass
11:44a resolution
11:44that would
11:45direct
11:45Senate
11:48Legal
11:48Council
11:49to file
11:50a lawsuit
11:50on behalf
11:51of the
11:51United States
11:52Senate
11:52to enforce
11:53the
11:53Emoluments
11:54Clause
11:54and I
11:55will just
11:56close by
11:56saying to
11:57my
11:57Republican
11:58colleagues
11:58I
11:58challenge
11:59you
11:59I
12:00challenge
12:01you
12:01to
12:01prove
12:01that
12:02you're
12:02more
12:03than
12:03just
12:03lackeys
12:04to
12:04President
12:05Trump
12:05that
12:05you're
12:06just
12:06more
12:07than
12:08automatic
12:10approvers
12:11of whatever
12:11he does
12:12his
12:12self
12:13enrichment
12:13schemes
12:14and show
12:16that the
12:16Senate
12:17still has
12:17spying
12:18still has
12:18self
12:19respect
12:19and
12:21still
12:21has
12:22respect
12:23for the
12:23founders
12:23who said
12:25that
12:26no one
12:27is above
12:28the law
12:29no one
12:30can
12:31brazenly
12:32and shamefully
12:33commit corruption
12:34that endangers
12:35the national
12:36security
12:37of the United
12:37States of
12:37America
12:38and makes
12:40our nation
12:41vulnerable
12:43to this
12:43kind of
12:44interference
12:44from foreign
12:46powers
12:46whether they
12:46are in the
12:47Middle East
12:47or Russia
12:48or anywhere
12:49around the
12:50globe
12:50and so
12:52as if in
12:53legislative
12:53session
12:54I ask
12:54unanimous
12:55consent
12:55the Senate
12:56proceed to the
12:57consideration of
12:58Senate Resolution
12:59219
12:59submitted earlier
13:01today and that
13:02the resolution be
13:02agreed to
13:03the preamble be
13:04agreed to
13:05and the motions
13:05to reconsider
13:06be made and
13:07laid upon the
13:08table with no
13:09intervening action
13:10or debate
13:11is there an
13:12objection
13:12Mr. President
13:13the senator from
13:14Alabama
13:15reserving the
13:15right to object
13:16you know I've
13:17been around here
13:18five years now
13:19and I'm used to
13:21attacks on a
13:22lot of people
13:23but for the
13:25most successful
13:26president in the
13:27first four months
13:28I've never seen
13:29like the attacks
13:30from my
13:31Democratic
13:31colleagues
13:32I don't
13:32understand it
13:33and really it's
13:33not an attack
13:34on President
13:34Trump
13:35it's an attack
13:35on American
13:36people
13:36because this
13:37body itself
13:38years ago
13:39before I got
13:40here passed
13:41the ability to
13:42build two of
13:43these new
13:43planes
13:44for the
13:46President of
13:47the United
13:47States to
13:48use
13:48by the way
13:50the $2.5
13:51billion
13:52each
13:54that's pretty
13:56dang expensive
13:56I think if you
13:58asked the
13:58American people
13:59they would take
14:00out a swap
14:00for a $400
14:01million airplane
14:02instead of $2.1
14:03billion
14:03maybe add some
14:05changes to it
14:06obviously
14:08as I said
14:09earlier
14:09I don't know
14:10whether President
14:10Trump will ever
14:12fly on this
14:12plane
14:13maybe in the
14:14future
14:14and the next
14:14President
14:15because it's
14:15going to take
14:16a while
14:16for security
14:17purposes
14:17but we just
14:20need to be
14:20really careful
14:21here and make
14:22sure we
14:22understand
14:22the American
14:24people have
14:25the decision
14:25here
14:26not politicians
14:27and I guarantee
14:28if you ask
14:29the people
14:30that pay the
14:30tax in this
14:31country
14:31they would
14:31take the
14:33alternative
14:33to spending
14:34$2.5
14:35billion
14:36on an
14:37airplane
14:38when you
14:39could get
14:40one for $400
14:40million
14:41and possibly
14:42add a few
14:44million to it
14:44to upgrade
14:45it
14:46so
14:46it's
14:48just another
14:49attack on
14:50the best
14:52and the greatest
14:52president in my
14:53lifetime
14:54who fights for the
14:56American people
14:56who does things
14:57for the American
14:58people
14:58who does things
14:59to save money
15:00for the American
15:00people
15:01and hope to God
15:02he continues to do
15:03that the next
15:04three and a half
15:04years he's in
15:05office
15:05so for those
15:06reasons Mr.
15:07President
15:07I object
15:09The objection
15:10is heard
15:10Mr. President
15:12The Senator
15:13from Connecticut
15:14if President
15:15Trump is
15:16everything
15:16that my
15:17colleague
15:17has just
15:17said
15:17he never
15:18would have
15:18suggested
15:19this $400
15:21million
15:22boondoggle
15:23he never
15:24would have
15:25thought
15:27that the
15:28American people
15:28should pay
15:29billions of dollars
15:29to retrofit
15:30the plane
15:31he never
15:32would have
15:32risked
15:33the American
15:34security
15:35in the
15:38threat
15:39that is
15:40posed
15:40by foreign
15:41powers
15:42bugging
15:43or hacking
15:44the security
15:45devices
15:45or disabling
15:46the
15:47mechanisms
15:48of this
15:49plane
15:49and
15:51if this
15:52president
15:53never flies
15:54on this
15:55plane
15:55it will
15:56only be
15:57because
15:58of the
16:00vocal
16:02and vehement
16:03protests
16:04that we
16:04are seeing
16:05not only
16:06on the floor
16:07of the United
16:07States Senate
16:07but across
16:08the country
16:08from
16:09mega
16:10personalities
16:11and commentators
16:12to
16:13everyday Americans
16:15who are
16:15aghast
16:16that
16:17hundreds of
16:19millions
16:19in fact
16:20billions
16:21of dollars
16:21will be spent
16:22on this
16:23boondoggle
16:23that puts
16:24at risk
16:25American
16:26security
16:27if
16:29president
16:29Trump
16:30never takes
16:31possession
16:31of this
16:31plane
16:32it will
16:32only be
16:33because
16:34he has
16:34been
16:34embarrassed
16:35and shamed
16:36by our
16:39vehement
16:39and vocal
16:40protests
16:40against doing
16:41it
16:41and the
16:42reaction
16:43of everyday
16:43Americans
16:44has been
16:45one of
16:46vehement
16:47objection
16:48but
16:48this plane
16:50is only
16:51the most
16:51visible
16:52and tangible
16:53evidence
16:54of a
16:55corrupt
16:56administration
16:57and particularly
16:57the
16:58crypto
16:59corruption
17:00where
17:01hundreds of
17:02millions of
17:03dollars are
17:03literally
17:04flowing into
17:05the bank
17:05accounts and
17:05pockets
17:06of president
17:07Trump and
17:08his family
17:08and
17:09everyday
17:10Americans
17:11are suffering
17:11losses
17:12because of
17:13it
17:13the investors
17:14in his
17:15meme coin
17:16tens of
17:17thousands of
17:18them
17:18are losers
17:19they've lost
17:21money
17:21and
17:23many other
17:24Americans
17:24are likely
17:25to suffer
17:26losses as
17:27well
17:27so the
17:27tangible
17:28impact
17:28of that
17:29crypto
17:30corruption
17:30is real
17:31and present
17:32and ongoing
17:32and so
17:34I think
17:34enforcement
17:35of the
17:36emoluments
17:36clause
17:36through a
17:37lawsuit
17:37brought by
17:38the
17:38Senate
17:39of the
17:39United
17:39States
17:40authorized
17:40through
17:41this
17:41resolution
17:42is
17:43absolutely
17:44necessary
17:45and appropriate
17:46now
17:46thank you
17:47Mr. President
17:48I yield the
17:49floor
17:49to
17:52me
17:53to
17:53the
17:54one
17:54I yield the
17:55day
17:55to
17:56a
18:00wall
18:01if I
18:02do
18:03I yield the
18:04end
18:05to
18:05a
18:05wall
18:06I yield the
18:08I yield the
18:08in
18:08and I yield the
18:10милли
18:10to
18:12my
18:12I yield the
18:14to
18:14the
18:14old
18:15the
18:15one
18:16I yield the
18:17to

Recommended