🔴 L-GANTE: PIDEN QUE SE REVOQUE LA SENTENCIA A 3 AÑOS

HighlightNow

👉 El abogado Sigal, representante de una de las víctimas, presenta un recurso para revisar la condena en suspenso de tres años por amenazas coactivas y otros delitos. Aunque no se prevé un cambio inmediato en su estado de libertad, una revisión podría alterar su situación.   👉 Seguí en #AndinoYLasNoticias

Transcript

00:00I was correcting a little the lawyer Zigal who represented one of the victims

00:05for which Elegante was sentenced to three years in prison.

00:10Therefore, he was not acquitted, but he was sentenced, but an ex-prison sentence

00:15for which Elegante enjoys a freedom, a freedom somehow tied there with threads

00:22because anyone who is sent goes inside.

00:24Look, this is the document that was presented before the same court.

00:28Elegante was sentenced to three years in prison suspended for coercive threats

00:33qualified for the use of weapons, simple threats and co-author of the crime of harm.

00:37What the lawyer Zigal asks, the lawyer Becerra ...

00:40Excuse me, the intimate ... to whom he considers the intimate enemy, the one who pursues him.

00:45And this would seem like another battle of this war that Elegante and the lawyer have,

00:50but the lawyer Zigal with tools that facilitates the criminal code,

00:56all the judicial instances, presents before the court a resource

01:01for that sentence to be revoked or revoked to three years if it is effectively condemned.

01:07Elegante to eight years in prison for the illegitimate deprivation of freedom.

01:12Judge Raca had considered that the illegitimate deprivation of freedom was not approved,

01:18which is, let's say, of the accusations he had, the most serious,

01:22because they say that this elegant municipal employee was forced into a car

01:26and with a gun pointed at him, he took him to visit parts of General Rodríguez

01:30to free the friends who were kind of trapped by a municipal procedure.

01:35And why do you come back on this?

01:37Now, what Dr. Zigal exposes is that the law was misapplied,

01:41there is a misapplication of the law, a bad consideration,

01:45and that corresponds, because there are all the evidence that Elegante

01:49is effectively condemned for that illegitimate deprivation of freedom.

01:52In the resource that he interposes before the court, he realizes,

01:56second by second, what happened in that early morning in which Elegante

02:00first calls this municipal employee by the last name Torres

02:03to threaten him that he was going to kill his family.

02:05Yes.

02:06And later, that it is proven for Zigal that Elegante had a gun on top of the car

02:10and that he threatens him in all instances so that he does not get off,

02:14that an illegitimate deprivation of freedom would be marked.

02:17The court has to resolve it, but there are more instances,

02:20and it is the instances that would be hunting and even the Supreme Court,

02:23but what they ask is that Elegante, in the short term,

02:27be sentenced for that illegitimate deprivation of freedom

02:30to eight years in prison.

02:32There would be no discharge.

02:33On the other hand, the lawyer of Elegante, Dr. Locatelli,

02:36also presented a resource, but to be completely absorbed,

02:39because today he has a sentence of three years in prison in suspension

02:42that is preventing him, among other things, to get a visa to go to the United States.

02:45There, surely, Álvaro has some data, because he has a lot of activity

02:49in the field of music, especially in the United States,

02:52and for this sentence it would be complicating for him to ask for the visa,

02:56and anyway, as I was saying, any judicial situation

02:59in which Elegante has been involved, these three years in prison in suspension

03:04become effective prison.

03:06That is why Locatelli asks for the absolution to the same court,

03:11the same court 3 of Mercedes.

03:13But the important thing is what the court is asking for,

03:16and the defense of the law.

03:18What is the possibility that it will really advance?

03:20Let's see, in any case, it is the same judge who has to review his sentence.

03:25I believe that the firmest option is, from here to a year,

03:29that the House of Representatives review it,

03:31which is the one that can, in some way, make another consideration of the law

03:35and the application of what it has on the table, which are the files.

03:39Everything has been proven, the late prosecutor Villalba

03:43had done an excellent reconstruction of what had been that early morning

03:46of the year 2023 in the General Rodríguez area,

03:49for which Judge Raca understands that there was no illegitimate deprivation of liberty.

03:54That is why he is sentenced for minor crimes.

03:57The possibility that this judge, this court, reviews,

04:00it seems to me that it does not exist, but it does, the House of Representatives.

04:04From here to the short term, I do not see Elegante arrested,

04:08but a failure review could change the outlook for Elegante in terms of his freedom.

Category

Transcript

Recommended