"Hosakta Hai Main maulana ko Draft Bana Kardun...." Salman Akram Raja Big Revelations

ARY NEWS

#constitutionalamendment #pti #maulanafazalurehman #fazalurrehman  #breakingnews #mariamemon #sawalyehhai   "Hosakta Hai Main maulana ko Draft Bana Kardun...." Salman Akram Raja Big Revelations

Transcript

00:00We meet Maulana Sahib and you come out and say that a committee has been formed.

00:04What is the purpose of that committee?

00:06Because there is no joint work on Musawwida.

00:08What will happen in that committee?

00:10Look, today I and Kamran Murtaza Sahib had a meeting, a session.

00:16We exchanged views.

00:18And there can be a Musawwida.

00:21I will come and meet him.

00:25So we will continue to discuss this.

00:28There is a Musawwida in my mind.

00:32As far as the Constitutional Court is concerned, what justification is given for that?

00:37Sorry, I want to come to you point by point.

00:40You said that you might make a Musawwida.

00:43So it seems that the PTI has agreed that it will support the government on some constitutional amendments.

00:49If they agree to your conditions.

00:51Is it right to assume that there will be some constitutional amendments?

00:53Our basic position is that this assembly does not have the right to constitutional amendments.

00:58We will continue to repeat that position.

01:01But if we have to make some amendments,

01:04if we have to show flexibility on behalf of Maulana or someone else,

01:10then what amendments should there be?

01:12We are ready to talk about that as well.

01:14This is a principally big position.

01:16Earlier you said that the amendments will not be passed because this is a non-constitutional assembly.

01:21Now you have come to the middle.

01:23You are saying that if the conditions are acceptable, then you are ready to support it.

01:26This is a principal PTI position.

01:28No, we will not support it.

01:29If you are helping Musawwida Banana, then facilitate it.

01:31No, it is a matter of giving a suggestion to Maulana.

01:33We want Maulana to raise these points in the Parliament and in the committee.

01:37These are things for Maulana to see.

01:40If Maulana will consider them worthy enough to take them forward, then we will want them to proceed.

01:46So that whatever has to be done to improve the constitution,

01:50so that the constitution is not made to be against a political party or a political leader.

01:56At this time, it is obvious that the Musawwida who is in front of us is a killer.

02:01There is nothing else.

02:02That is why we want that our basic position is that there is no need for constitutional amendments at this time.

02:08Leave this matter for 4-6 months.

02:10Before that, there are many other matters that have to be decided.

02:14After that, we will see.

02:15Whatever has been there for 77 years, you did not put it in the Constitutional Court.

02:21So, there is no need to put it in today.

02:23We can wait for a few months.

02:25So, this is our position.

02:27But if this comes up, Maulana said, give us some suggestions so that we can think about it.

02:32In this regard, we will definitely give some suggestions.

02:35So, if your suggestions are accepted and included in Musawwida, then what is wrong in voting?

02:40Because if your suggestions are accepted and included in the Constitutional Court,

02:45then if you are consulting, then the vote will also come back.

02:48Look, if the Constitutional Court is formed without our vote, and it is a good Constitution, then it should be formed.

02:55But since we do not agree with the right of the Assembly to make constitutional amendments,

03:02then we may not be included in it.

03:04But there is no harm in giving suggestions in terms of knowledge and improvement.

03:09What we want is that there should be no amendments.

03:11This Assembly should not make amendments.

03:13To make amendments, there should be a very trustworthy Assembly.

03:16This is a rule.

03:17But Ghajji sahab, you are playing both ways.

03:20You do not consider the Assembly trustworthy, but if you give suggestions to Maulana sahab,

03:24he should go and present them, he should pass them.

03:27No, this is how it is.

03:29This is flexibility.

03:30This is politics.

03:31This is not a trivial matter.

03:33We want that there should be no amendments.

03:36But if we are told to give some amendments so that there can be some give and take,

03:41some softening can be created, then we will give those amendments.

03:44It is not that either it is this or that.

03:46This does not happen.

03:47Our principle is that this Assembly has no objections.

03:51But if Maulana comes to India and says, no, give some amendments, then we will give.

03:58Right.

03:59When you met Maulana sahab, did you also have this doubt that he is on board with the government on most things?

04:04Because the journalists who met him, who had a conversation with him,

04:07they are very senior people, they must have understood that he is close to the government,

04:12he is leaning towards the development of the government.

04:14Did you get any impression in this?

04:16No, look, in this regard, if there is a legal court,

04:23and the reason for that is that other cases of madness, military nature, tax,

04:30they become a victim of confusion when these legal cases come in front of the Supreme Court,

04:35and a big bench, 10-13 judges sit and listen to the case,

04:39then the other work is affected.

04:42Now if this is the case of a legal court, and till now no other case has come forward,

04:47this is the only case.

04:48Look, there are many other ways for that.

04:50There are many countries in the world where there is a permanent constitutional bench.

04:54You can increase the number of judges to 24,

05:01and say that 5 judges will be a permanent constitutional bench,

05:06and the remaining 19 or 17 judges will do other work.

05:11In my opinion, this is a very good solution.

05:14You can also do this, that the constitutional bench consisting of 5 judges,

05:19can be increased from 5 to 9,

05:21one judge from each province can be taken,

05:23two judges from each province can be taken in detailed cases,

05:26and it should be a rotation, so that all judges of the Supreme Court get a chance to participate in legal cases.

05:32But Maulana is on board on this, he is in favor of a legal court.

05:35So Maulana, Noon League, People's Party, more or less ANP,

05:39all these parties are talking about a constitutional court.

05:41There are many things to be done, that is why I said that we have started the discussion.

05:45There is a difference between a legal court and a legal bench.

05:48Of course, but the purpose of a legal court is better than a legal bench.

05:53Look, if you make a legal bench,

05:55there is a unity of structure, which is the requirement of our constitution.

05:59There is an apex court.

06:01You can have different judges of the Supreme Court in that bench through rotation.

06:05This is something that happens in the world.

06:07It happens in India and in other countries.

06:09So Maulana is open to this suggestion.

06:11I think that if this suggestion is given to them properly,

06:15as I want to give it,

06:17then the purpose of a legal court is only that

06:20there should be a new court in which a judge of their choice should be appointed

06:24and some results should be taken from those judges of their choice.

06:27What I am saying is that no, don't do this.

06:30The judges of the Supreme Court at the moment,

06:33and some other judges,

06:35the method of appointing judges in the Supreme Court,

06:38while running it, increase the number of judges,

06:41and five judges should become a permanent member of the legal bench.

06:45Maulana, you have shown flexibility in this.

06:47You have to present it now.

06:48Look, as I am telling you now,

06:50I will write it down and give it to you, Inshallah.

06:52And we will also give arguments in favour of it.

06:55I don't see any argument against it.

06:57The requirement of a legal court is only that

07:00a judge of their choice should be appointed,

07:02and through him,

07:04the intention to bring a reference against PTI should be accepted,

07:09PTI should be banned,

07:11Mr. Imran Khan should be taken to a military court,

07:13and if there is an appeal or petition against him,

07:16he should go to this bench and be punished.

07:18Right now, there is no other purpose of a legal court.

Category

Transcript

Recommended