FIR Mein Darj Hai Ke Sher Afzal Aur Barrister Gohar Ne Police Walon Ki. .., Walid Iqbal

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00Mr. Waleed Iqbal, this is basically anything.

00:02Of course, holding a Jalsa and holding a political meeting is the right of any Jamaat.

00:07But for a long time, it was interpreted as,

00:09that it will not be possible to ask for forgiveness until the 9th May incident.

00:13But despite that, you held the Jalsa.

00:15You said that there were numbers as well.

00:17But the speech that was given by Ali Ameen Gandapur,

00:21and especially when he is the minister of a province,

00:23the language that he used with the journalists,

00:25the language that he used with the women,

00:27and the words that he used with regards to the army,

00:31it cannot be differentiated that the political speeches are different,

00:34the public speeches are different.

00:36If the public gets agitated, then who will control them?

00:40Bani is present in your jail.

00:43So, who was the beneficiary in your view of this speech,

00:47if we talk about Ali Ameen Gandapur's speech?

00:50Who benefited from it?

00:53I am surprised that the focus or the focus of attention is on the speech.

01:01Why don't you kindly read the FIRs, Mr. Sati?

01:07The FIRs or the FIRs,

01:09on the basis of which, by speaking up in the Parliament,

01:12today morning or last night,

01:14which were arrested,

01:17Barrister Gauhar,

01:19Shehrafzal...

01:20Mr. Minister, I will come to that.

01:22Alhamdulillah, Mr. Barrister has been released.

01:26That is why I am saying,

01:29my question is, what is written in those FIRs,

01:32that by taking the name of Shehrafzal Marwat,

01:34or by taking the name of Barrister Gauhar,

01:37that he placed a pistol on the policeman's shoulder.

01:41This has happened.

01:44Your crew had gone there.

01:46This has happened.

01:47In any case, this is the level in the FIRs.

01:50So, in a country,

01:52in a civilized country,

01:54in a country where there is such an adherence to morals,

01:57as you said,

01:59when all these things are happening,

02:01and you read the newspapers of the last 2, 4, 5, 6 days,

02:06what people are saying.

02:08Shafqat Mahmood and Shahid Qardar had written an article two days ago,

02:12in the newspaper.

02:14They are not political people.

02:15Shafqat Mahmood has said that he has left politics.

02:17Mr. Qardar is the Governor of the State Bank.

02:19He has written that the government which has no legitimacy,

02:23which has no concept of being elected,

02:28which has been imposed,

02:30what can you expect from it,

02:32when people are saying such things.

02:34They are saying that this is happening here,

02:36look at the root cause.

02:38Look at the root cause,

02:40what is this,

02:42why did the police come to the Parliament,

02:44and they came and…

02:46Ok, my question,

02:48my simple question,

02:50I was ready to talk about it further.

02:52Where is the word root cause being used?

02:54I am ready to go further.

02:56The word root cause is being used,

02:58that look at Balochistan,

03:00what is the root cause there?

03:02Why are there protests there?

03:04Why is BYC putting up such big protests there?

03:06Why is there so much killing going on there?

03:08If you want to look at the root cause,

03:10then look at the root cause.

03:12Mr. Sanyal,

03:14I asked you a simple question,

03:16and basically it was that,

03:18let me be very blunt about it,

03:20this speech of his,

03:22first of all,

03:24I asked you the beneficiary of it,

03:26who was it?

03:28Secondly,

03:30did it benefit the party?

03:32Or did it fulfil the purpose of his speech?

03:34Did it achieve its purpose?

03:36What purpose are you talking about?

03:40I am asking you,

03:42there must be some purpose of his speech.

03:44It is a simple question,

03:46there must be some purpose of his speech,

03:48he mentioned the army,

03:50he criticised the people,

03:52he talked about the establishment,

03:54he talked about ten things,

03:56there must be some purpose.

03:58Obviously, the benefit or benefit of the party

04:00is what a person thinks,

04:02if someone is giving a speech,

04:04then what happened?

04:06No, no one can give a lecture

04:08on benefit and loss to the PTI right now.

04:10For the PTI,

04:12what has been happening for the last two years,

04:14one and a half years,

04:16is in front of everyone.

04:18So, there is no issue of benefit or loss here.

04:20Here, the thing is,

04:22which we need to think about,

04:24the question that arises is,

04:26in this country,

04:28what is the supremacy of the constitution,

04:30or rule of law,

04:32the rule of law,

04:34is it there or not?

04:36The position of the PTI is that,

04:38it is not here,

04:40it is the law of the jungle.

04:42And the law of the jungle means that,

04:44might is right,

04:46it is a primitive,

04:48it is an ancient way of thinking,

04:50the one who has a gun,

04:52the one who has a stick,

04:54the one who has a stick,

04:56the one who has a stick,

04:58the one who has a stick,

05:00the one who has a stick,

05:02the one who has a stick,

05:04the one who has a stick.

Category

Transcript

Recommended