Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 5/24/2024
#ImranKhan #PTI #javedlatif #punjabgovernment #sawalyehhai #mariamemon

"Bani PTI kay Kuch Cases main Punjab Govt Khud Muddai Kiyu Ban Gai? Javed Latif's Statement
Transcript
00:00 Sir, what is happening now, it seems that the situation is going towards a clash.
00:06 Although the political wisdom says that everyone should restrain a little,
00:11 but the situation is getting worse.
00:14 During this time, do you think the Punjab government had to become the subject of discussion?
00:19 In some cases, they wrote a letter to the head of the Judicial Board,
00:23 put allegations on the head of an institution, so the Punjab government became the subject of discussion.
00:27 This is a matter of increasing tensions, there is no indication that the tensions will be reduced.
00:32 Thank you. You have said a sentence that if politics moves forward a little, then it comes back four steps.
00:41 If you take it in such a way that the economy is a little stable, then it is defeated.
00:47 So this is more for the state and the subject of discussion in today's situation will be this.
00:52 You said that the Punjab government does not need to become the subject of discussion.
00:57 You are right. If the state was getting justice, then the Punjab government did not need to become the subject of discussion.
01:05 The thing is that today, on the Azkhud notice, the letter of six judges has been made and taken,
01:13 so I will take a little time from you.
01:16 The request is that all the parties, beneficiaries and all the influencers,
01:22 if they are satisfied with this, and especially if a powerful institution is saying that
01:27 from 2014, you should make a Judicial Commission and whatever has happened since then,
01:34 they should make it public and according to that, they should be punished.
01:38 So I think that we used to say that make a commission on 2018 and 2024 and whatever has happened,
01:44 it should be made public. But this is a matter of four steps forward,
01:49 that they are saying what happened in 2014.
01:52 In 2014, the London plan was prepared, in which General Zaheer-ul-Islam,
01:58 in which Tahir-ul-Qadri, in which Imran Khan, in which Pervez Ali and in which some other people,
02:05 if the commission is made or it is taken on notice, then those faces will come forward.
02:12 The thing is, Maria, give me some time, the thing is that this was not just a conspiracy,
02:20 this is called a rebellion. In the sense of rebellion, if someone from within the Adaro
02:26 plays a role to end a government, it is a rebellion.
02:31 And who all are involved in that rebellion?
02:34 A Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is also involved.
02:38 Those who have the audio, they say that Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz Sharif should be arrested
02:45 and Imran Khan should be brought. Now we are talking, so Justice Jazool Ahsan,
02:52 a monitoring judge, also sits on it.
02:54 So if all these four, six, one second please, if all these people together prepare a London plan
03:02 to end a elected government and to bring someone, then if there is a law of Pakistan,
03:10 if there is a law of Pakistan, if there are traditions of Pakistan, then it should be noticed
03:16 by the people.
03:18 But, see I have heard you.
03:19 Now one more thing, one second.
03:20 No, no, because my question was different. My question was that why is the Punjab government
03:23 becoming a proponent in this case? The answer to that is, what you are saying is a lie.
03:28 I did not get the answer to that question that why is the Punjab government becoming a proponent?
03:33 No, no, I am coming to that. I was coming to that.
03:36 If you give me some time, then I will answer your question.
03:42 I am requesting that one rebellion took place, the second rebellion took place when there was
03:47 a lack of trust and the Deputy Speaker, on the request of Imran Khan, made a cipher out of a
03:54 document and asked to break the assembly.
03:59 Today, it is being said about the cipher that it was a document, a letter, a paper.
04:06 If it was wrong, then why was it made into a cipher and broken the assembly?
04:12 And the rebellion took place at that time. The document was broken at that time.
04:15 The document was broken for the third time. The rebellion took place for the third time.
04:19 It took place on 9th, 10th May. The rebellion took place on 9th, 10th May.
04:24 The head of one assembly should not be appointed and the head of one assembly should be appointed to continue.
04:31 Tell me, who were included in that?
04:34 Despite the three rebellions, if Article 6 cannot be applied on it, then the Punjab government
04:44 is being made a Muddai because of the need to become a Muddai.
04:49 The three incidents that you have told, during those three incidents, it was your government.
04:55 When the assembly was broken, it was the 18th government of the PDM.
04:58 It is still your government. After 2014, it was your government till 2017.
05:03 During this time, if you could make a commission, if you could find a way, and if you are being made a Muddai,
05:10 then the matter is going to the courts from where you have complaints.
05:14 So, please explain to me that if the matter is here, then you have not pursued it.
05:19 Look, Maria, there are two things. If you listen to my request patiently, that is,
05:27 I am not saying that there has been a rebellion. I am telling the incidents.
05:32 I am saying that why was the punishment not given? I take back the words.
05:37 I am saying that if these incidents have happened, then where is the state, where are the state institutions,
05:43 where is the law of the state, where is the constitution of the state, and from the state institutions,
05:48 if you listen to the words of Good to See You, then you will have to say that the law like Article 6 should be abolished.
06:02 This window should remain open. Whenever someone wants, he will bring the massalas together and change the head of the institutions.
06:10 And the government will bring the massalas together, finish it and announce to make its own government.
06:17 So, I have heard you. No, no, I have heard you. Now the problem is that from PMLN, Rana Sinhaullah Sahib, Irfan Siddiqui Sahib,
06:24 they say, sit and talk, sit and do negotiations.
06:27 The people whom you are saying were the facilitators of the rebellion, were the supporters, they should sit and talk to them.
06:32 So, you are saying that first, resolve this matter. Some people in your government are saying to sit and talk.
06:38 So, what is the real policy of PMLN? Should the issue be brought to the end of the month or should it be discussed first?
06:44 No, no, there are two things. All the political forces, from the workers to the leadership,
06:52 if someone says that the law should not be followed, then I am ready to say whatever you say.
07:01 Yes, whether someone follows the law or not, that is a different matter.
07:05 But everyone says that we are working for the enforcement of the law.
07:10 Now my question is that if there is something called the law in Pakistan,
07:16 then you tell me whether it is Justice Saqib Nisar or Bandeyal Sahib, or General Zaheer-ul-Islam,
07:24 or General Bajwa Sahib, or Imran Khan Sahib, or if I have any punishment left,
07:31 then give me that punishment. But if you do not give punishment for the crimes committed,
07:37 then tell me what is the fault of the other prisoners.
07:40 So, Bihar's Javed Lassi Sahib, it is a very simple question. Do you think that the PTI,
07:46 whom you consider to be responsible for 9th May, should be discussed with them?
07:50 I am very clear, Maria, I am very clear. You will have to talk to every political force,
07:57 but you cannot talk to the one who attacks the state.
08:01 And if you can talk to the one who attacks the state, you are setting an example today,
08:08 then remember, God forbid, in the next 9-10th May, there will be a lot of incidents in Pakistan.
08:13 Sir, this means that you are talking about justice.
08:15 Why are you forgetting this?
08:16 Should there be a dialogue with justice or not?
08:20 I am not talking about justice. You are asking whether Imran Khan or his thought approach should be discussed or not.
08:30 Tell me, are the people of Tehreek-e-Insaf, who were moving forward with Imran Khan's thought approach,
08:38 and plan, and on 9th-10th May, what they did, are they deceitful?
08:45 That one day they are seen, and the next moment they disappear.
08:48 And if they are living inside Pakistan, then the state is weak.
08:52 The state is weak or the institutions are weak, that they cannot be found, they cannot be caught.
08:58 Then I am right to say that they are being facilitated.
09:02 Then I am right to say that after 6 years, you started giving me justice,
09:09 and after 6 years, I was told this, and you all kept saying,
09:14 that sir, look, they are getting justice so quickly, although everyone should get justice quickly.
09:20 But in justice also, you said, they are pampered.
09:23 So today, after 6 months, those who are getting leave...
09:28 But Mr. Mian Javed, I understand what you are saying, but I am not understanding what Mr. Rana Sinhaullah is saying.
09:32 He is saying, you just give us a sign, we will come and talk.
09:35 We will come and talk wherever you say.
09:38 You are saying one thing, he is saying another.
09:40 So what is the right policy of PMLN? This is your individual position.
09:44 No, I am saying, whatever Mr. Rana has said, ask him.
09:49 I am talking about the compliance of the law.

Recommended